Skip to content

docs(D-DTM-1): distributed thought-delta reasoning interchange capstone and PR map - #1777

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/d-dtm-1-reasoning-interchange-20261025
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

AdaWorldAPI merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/d-dtm-1-reasoning-interchange-20261025

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Scope: S0 docs-only, no implementation authorization

Maps the operator's exchange references → exchange computational understanding architecture into separately approvable, falsifiable slices. Mathematical methods and provenance travel independently of values and sealed DR focus; Kafka and Arrow Flight are alternative physical transports, never mathematical authorities.

Changed files (exactly 4)

  • .claude/plans/d-dtm-1-distributed-thought-delta-reasoning-interchange-v1.md — conceptual contract, component ownership table, Kafka/Flight/TiKV/Raft/time distinctions, P1–P8 stages, 15 kill/refusal tests, upstream/GitHub/Linear references
  • .claude/prompts/d-dtm-1-reasoning-interchange-claude-code.md — review-only CC handoff, no implied implementation authorization
  • .claude/board/STATUS_BOARD.md — D-DTM S0/P1–P8 marked docs/proposed/not-run/blocked
  • .claude/board/INTEGRATION_PLANS.md — crosslinked single index row

Reuses existing owners, no drift

PR DAG (not opened yet)

P1 independent two-node oracle → P2 map/value demand; P3 existing method artifact reuse; P4 Kafka binary replay and P5 Flight DoExchange (independent labs); P6 temporal/cross-partition source closure (requires ID owners); P7 optional MeTTa/MORK/ONNX/TFLite intake; P8 system-level exactness and economic falsifier. Each stage has explicit stop conditions.

Acceptance gates for this docs PR

  • Review correctness of owner/status/source citations and proposal vs shipped qualifiers.
  • Review PR independence, no duplicate executor/ABI/graph/store.
  • Inspect whether F01–F15 are sufficiently falsifiable and P1 is smallest useful baseline.
  • CI remains required; no local test/benchmark was run from this session. No generated entries index changed because no entry file was added.
  • No merge permission inferred, all future stages require separate operator approval.

Coordination: EXO-50. Related: EXO-127, EXO-148, EXO-151, EXO-79, EXO-84, EXO-89, EXO-143, EXO-150.

Request: Thought-Git, DRF/DRAV, Quack/R2IL, Math Foundry and transport owners please comment on precise contradictions/ownership gaps rather than opening implementation work.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 6b9f01f0-09c7-4c93-9a85-e02b67fef9fe
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2026 17:03
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T17:04:50.385549Z 11b5cbc Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant