[AdaWorldAPI]

D-NAM-1 — static normalized method crosswalk and admission schema

Status: DRAFT / engineered specification and OFFLINE manifest validator only. Native Rust runtime integration and actual external semantic conformance are not implemented. No merges, no authorized ABI change.

Files:

• .claude/plans/d-nam-1-native-method-crosswalk-spec-v1.md: canonical method identity, source ownership and versioned semantic admission/refusal gates.
• .claude/specs/d-nam-method-crosswalk-v1.json: 4 existing native method anchors × 4 dialect readings; candidates are explicitly unadmitted.
• tools/d_nam_validate_crosswalk.py: fail-closed static shape checker. Intended review command: python3 tools/d_nam_validate_crosswalk.py. This checks schema, not ONNX/TFLite/MLIR operator parity. Tool has not been exercised in repository CI by this handoff.

Dependencies: D-NAM capstone #1778; EXO-152, EXO-50. Preserve D-RA-2 #1644, D-NFC #1753, ONNX leaf #1754/#1758, EXO-86/102/115/127.

Next implementation gate: locate actual method identity owner; pin ONNX/TFLite/MLIR versions, add independent oracle + negative tests for i32 Greater, i32 Where/Select, masked Sum and f32 Tanh. Refuse unproven equivalence, no new AST/interpreter or per-call DTO dispatch. Draft only; operator review before code promotion.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: ad701bf1-cc19-472f-bf34-1c78f4a8e501

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-25T17:30:49.392435Z	3bb5977	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.