[AdaWorldAPI]

Documentation changed

• New D-DRAV-1 plan: separately reusable sealed DR map vs derived support, source/physical locators and optional values; MAP/BORROW/GATHER/COMPILED/STORAGE as unadmitted physical candidates; dirty-value vs value-derived-topology invalidation; ONNX/TFLite value-demand frontier; AV1–AV12 falsifiers.
• Required board registration: .claude/board/INTEGRATION_PLANS.md prepended with D-DRAV-1; new .claude/board/entries/2026-10-25-d-drav-1-address-first-value-demand.md; .claude/board/STATUS_BOARD.md contains D-DRAV-1 + AV1–AV12 (all falsifiers Queued / NOT RUN); regenerated .claude/board/entries/README.md index to 473 without loss of 113 curated findings.
• Two ownership crosslinks: existing D-DRF-1 and D-RMAP-1A docs.
• Corrected GitHub-rendered math using a fenced math block.
• Updated #1774 evidence: /proc/self/smaps confirms row-buffer 4 KiB backing; seeded shuffled-order arm retains the qualitative rise. 2 MiB huge-page arm, hardware counters and original-gap attribution remain unmeasured. No NVMe or map-only runtime claim.

Boundary: documentation only; no Rust, ABI, executor, CE64, new semantic map owner or storage backend. D-RMAP-1A, D-DRF-1, native-first D-NFC/D-NFR, existing Quack/BIND semantics and H14c/H14d admission remain authoritative. A1/A3 are NOT RUN, so the foreign-cache exception has not lapsed.

Checks and review request

• Rechecked A1–A3 definitions, ownership and local relative document links.
• Structural check: 12 AV rows and matching new board entry; index retained 113 curated finding cells. Documentation-only; no runtime/benchmark claims.
• CI should validate supersession, D-id, entries index and citation decay after the latest push. Do not merge solely on an earlier green commit.
• Please review independent map/value leases, invalidation of value-derived support, source/index/scope witnesses, and whether MAP/BORROW/GATHER/COMPILED/STORAGE fit existing capability boundaries. AV1/AV2 are proposed as the first separately approved lab.

Draft for architecture review, not authorization to implement.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 2e65863f-4400-4c74-b5e9-a2586b56a1b5

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-25T17:04:29.069524Z	0c28c47	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.