Repository navigation
lab(drf-tlb): gather cost against distinct pages touched - #1774
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
|
…laim The skewed generator's within-page offsets shrank with P (8 -> 1), so the 512->1024 step was a cache-set artifact; it vanishes with balanced offsets. The rise past ~2048 pages survives. The original 1024 vs 65536 row gap also changed the distinct-line count (~1005 vs ~3970), so the earlier 'same footprint' statement is corrected and the TLB entry no longer claims to close that OPEN point. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
…led arm Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
…#1802 - PR_ARC_INVENTORY: compact entries for #1772, #1774–#1787, #1794–#1803, recorded from merge commits, changed files and each PR's own Status line. #1773 and #1793 are board-hygiene-only and get none. - INTEGRATION_PLANS: one index row for thirteen plans merged without one (D-NAM-1..5 + PZL, DT64-1..5 + QB pointer, D-ONNX-INTAKE-0). - LATEST_STATE: "main after #1803" section. - d-onnx-relalg-cap-v1: OP-ONNX-2 status cell names #1802's Burn onnx-ir vs Tract proposal; still OPEN. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VncKoyG6JkpsoqhqTGTv3f
Lab diagnostic (draft): how the focus gather build cost depends on distinct 4 KiB pages touched, at constant slots (4096) and constant distinct cache lines (4096 for P >= 512).
Result (reported, not gated)
x86-64-v3run agree.Not done: 2 MiB-page control, hardware counters (perf is unusable here), randomized visit order, decomposing the original gap into lines vs pages. "TLB" is the best-fitting reading, not a measured cause.
Files:
examples/tlb_probe.rs(both generators),entries/2026-10-25-drf-tlb-probe.md, correction onentries/2026-10-24-drf-p2-breakeven.md, STATUS_BOARD DRF-P2 row.Stays a draft diagnostic until the huge-page control is run or the claim is dropped.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg