[AdaWorldAPI]

Board and docs only. No code changes.

What changes

• PR_ARC_INVENTORY.md: compact entries for lab(drf-churn): measure MRU against LRU under focus churn #1772, lab(drf-tlb): gather cost against distinct pages touched #1774–docs(quack): audit DuckDB vector techniques against DR landing zones #1787 and docs(DT64-1): 64 typed predicate mappings for IAM Odoo SAP #1794–probes(D-TFLP 6.5): compact softmax data files, drop the run record #1803. Each entry is recorded from the merge commit, the changed files and the PR's own Status line. board: D-DRF lab arc #1760–#1771 #1773 and board: post-merge records for #1788–#1792 #1793 change only the board, so per the termination clause they get no entry.
• INTEGRATION_PLANS.md: one index row for 13 plans that were merged without one: D-NAM-1..5 and PZL, DT64-1..5, the QB pointer, and D-ONNX-INTAKE-0.
• LATEST_STATE.md: new "main after probes(D-TFLP 6.5): compact softmax data files, drop the run record #1803" section. It states that no production source changed since board: catch-up #1742–#1758; #1744 S0 adopts D-NFC; stale In-PR rows marked shipped #1759. The only code is the drf-focus-probe lab crate and the D-NFR-1 falsifier tests from D-DR256-WHERE: capstone, DR64³ inventory, P2 Quack-path lab, evidence reconciliation, D-NFR-1 ownership correction #1792. It also records the one registered FAIL, D-DQM P1 (probe(D-DQM P1): chunk-touched predictor vs H14c/H14d Lance bytes — FAIL #1789), and the cross-cutting EXO-148 blocker.
• d-onnx-relalg-cap-v1.md: the OP-ONNX-2 status cell now names docs(D-ONNX-INTAKE-0): Burn onnx-ir vs Tract cold frontend capstone, DT64/D-NAM gates #1802's proposal (Burn onnx-ir vs Tract). The item stays OPEN.

How it was gathered

Four Haiku substrate-mapper runs copied every Status / FAIL / NOT RUN / proof / Thought-Git line verbatim out of the plans and entries of #1760–#1801. I checked 21 sampled lines against the source files. 19 matched byte for byte. The other 2 differed only by quote characters normalised (curly to straight).

Gates

• append_only_gate.py origin/main: OK
• citation_decay.py --since origin/main: no new decay
• entries_index.py --check: current
• fruits_index.py --check: current
• SUPERSESSION-INDEX.md: regenerated, no diff

---

Generated by Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 6915a391-5066-43b8-92f0-5fa7a5c36003

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-26T21:14:40.481747Z	f4dd287	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.