fix: update pnpm to v11.19.0 - #283
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 7 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe bootstrap lockfiles update pnpm, ChangesBootstrap lockfile update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Summary by QodoBump bundled/bootstrap pnpm to 11.13.1
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (2)
|
|
Why not to the latest? |
|
Wasn't sure if we had a policy around that :D Happy bumping to the literal latest, or should I do a version or two behind? |
|
The literal latest |
ec8eefb to
ddaf3cc
Compare
|
Not sure why CI is failing - I couldn't seem to repro locally
|
|
Claude Sonnet 5 believes: |
Via `scripts/update-bootstrap.mjs 11.19.0` Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
As it needs to be rebuilt on Linux.
|
I've re-pushed from my Linux machine, which seems to work - that seemed to have been the issue! |
Summary
src/install-pnpm/bootstrap/{pnpm,exe}-lock.jsonvianode scripts/update-bootstrap.mjs 11.13.1.dist/index.js.This: not found#277Test plan
node scripts/update-bootstrap.mjs 11.19.0regenerated lockfiles with matching versions/integrity hashespnpm run buildrebuiltdist/index.jsand confirmed it embeds@pnpm/exe":"11.19.0"Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores