[objectstack-fleet]

Fixes #24686
Fixes #24610

Clause-②: no

Filing gate ③: the remainder of the maintainer's ruling on objectstack-ai/hotcrm#2178 → 「A」. The single-lane repo:hotcrm seat grades its own cards at first touch. The seat recorded the ruling in comment 6265194393, matching the director's delta 6264888052; the director's ledger comment 6265393657 carries it as batch 371, item 3. The at-tier contract review of PR #24521, comment 6279602320, section ③ items 7 and 8, raised these three lines as leftovers. A fourth line, filing-gate.md:27, is folded in from decision card #24610 (ruling B, below), in its own commit.

What changed: four lines in three files, no net lines

Opened on base 92ce3af40; origin/main was merged once (96ead27a0, merge base now 5018fc303, nothing under .claude/** or scripts/pm/** came in). Head dc6cadff3: commit 90efe550a carries the three single-lane lines, commit dc6cadff3 carries line 27. Byte counts leave out the newline. The cap is MAX_LINE_BYTES = 120. Every file keeps its line count at its ceiling: lanes/hotcrm.md 53 → 53 (ceiling 53), cross-repo-coordination.md 51 → 51 (51), filing-gate.md 64 → 64 (64).

• references/lanes/hotcrm.md:51
  • before (53 bytes): 「- domain:* 与 type 留给分诊;催办不代裁。」
  • after (103 bytes): 「- 平台仓卡的 domain:* 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」
• references/cross-repo-coordination.md:37 (rule 4)
  • before (114 bytes): 「- 分诊座位唯一生产:定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/duplicate_of;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」
  • after (120 bytes): 「- 多车道仓:分诊唯一生产定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/duplicate_of;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」
• references/filing-gate.md:26
  • before (102 bytes): 「- 缺件卡由分诊首触补齐能从卡与一次检索推导的三件,写进定级评论并定级。」
  • after (120 bytes): 「- 缺件卡由分诊(单车道仓 repo:* 席)首触补齐卡与一次检索可推三件,写进定级评论并定级。」
• references/filing-gate.md:27 (ruling B on [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610, commit dc6cadff3)
  • before (113 bytes): 「- 补不齐(四类皆非,或 finding 无 reach:)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」
  • after (86 bytes): 「- 补不齐(四类皆非)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」

Why each wording

• :51: the line gets back its subject. Commit cdc7eff78 registered the lane, and there the text was one sentence: 「- 平台缺口卡是本席最常见的联动产出 —— 立卡在平台仓、无 assignee、普通卡待分诊,domain:*/type 留给分诊;催办不代裁。」 (quoted here as one line; the original wraps it across two). The rules-only rewrite abe980c5c split that sentence into lines 50 and 51, and line 51 lost its subject: the cards the seat files on the platform repo. On those cards central triage is still the only producer of domain:* and type (cross-repo-coordination.md:7, multi-lane repos). So the new line names both cases. Platform-repo cards keep domain:* and type with triage. The seat's own repo cards take type through 机械三务 (line 8 of the same file defers to cross-repo-coordination.md:9-10).
  • This refines the card's wording on purpose. The card's 〈What to change〉 reads "type follows 机械三务 (the seat applies it); domain:* stays triage's". Taken alone and placed right after line 50, that wording would tell the seat to apply type itself to the platform card it just filed, which contradicts cross-repo-coordination.md:7.
  • The literal alternative, if the review prefers it: 「- domain:* 留给分诊,type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (73 bytes).
• :37: 「多车道仓:」 is a topic placed in front of the whole line. That scopes both clauses to multi-lane repos: triage being the only producer, and the ban on execution seats. The single-lane repo:* seat is itself an execution seat (lanes/hotcrm.md:7) and it grades at first touch, so an unscoped second clause would keep the contradiction. Two cuts pay the bytes: 「座位」 is dropped, so the line says 分诊 as line 7 does, and so is the colon after 唯一生产. 「永不」 stays word for word. 114 → 120 bytes.
• :26: the single-lane first-touch actor is named beside triage, as 「由分诊(单车道仓 repo:* 席)首触」. One cut pays the bytes: 「能从卡与一次检索推导的三件」 becomes 「卡与一次检索可推三件」, which keeps the same bound (the card plus one search). The tail 「写进定级评论并定级」 is unchanged. 102 → 120 bytes.
• filing-gate.md:27: the clause 「或 finding 无 reach:」 leaves the line, exactly as ruling B item 2 orders (next section). Nothing else on the line moves; triage-duties.md line 50 is untouched because ruling B item 1 keeps it.

Folded member: ruling B on decision card #24610

The card body of #24686 pre-declared the fold (「if #24610 is ruled first, fold its one line into the same PR」). The maintainer ruled 「24610 B」 (2026-10-19T23:47Z), recorded by the director seat in comment 6279873026; the card body carries the Ruled: line, and the seat's claim 6280072316 names this branch. Items 1 and 2 of that record, verbatim:

• Item 1: 「1. triage-duties.md L50 stands as written: a non-exception finding with no reach: is graded priority:p3 and folded into its collector or sweep card, ⛔ not dispatched alone, ⛔ not closed for that reason.」
• Item 2: 「2. filing-gate.md L27 narrows to 「四类皆非」: the first-touch close for missing items applies only to a card that is none of the four categories; the clause 「或 finding 无 reach:」 leaves the line. Line-neutral at the file's ceiling (64/64).」

This re-rules the earlier 「B」 on #24589 to exactly that extent (the record's item 3); #24589 itself is not reopened by this PR. A sweep of .claude/ and AGENTS.md for 首触即关 and 无 reach: finds no other line that closes a reach-less finding at first touch: triage-duties.md:61 and :63 close cards with no definition item and report-only instrument cards, a different population.

Family sweep

git grep -n "留给分诊\|唯一生产\|由分诊首触" origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/ at 92ce3af40 gives 5 hits:

• cross-repo-coordination.md:7 is already scoped to multi-lane repos. Untouched.
• cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 and lanes/hotcrm.md:51 are the three lines in this PR.
• lanes/ui.md:8 (「⛔ 不产 domain:*、type 与定级,中央分诊唯一生产;…」) is a hit the dispatch did not expect. It is not the same family. The domain:ui seat works in objectui, a multi-lane repo (cross-repo-coordination.md:7), where central triage is the only producer, so the line is correct as written. Untouched.

A wider sweep found no other line that reserves single-lane type or first-touch grading for triage. It searched for 首触, 分诊首触, 首触定级 and type 留 across .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/, .claude/agents/ and AGENTS.md. See Acceptance notes.

Card acceptance

• grep -n "type 留给分诊" .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md prints nothing and exits 1. The control, grep -c "机械三务" on the same file, answers 2 (lines 8 and 51) and exits 0.
• The line ratchet and the id-lint pass (results below). There is no changeset because .claude/** publishes nothing; skip-changeset is set when this PR is created.
• Each of the three lines now either names the single-lane exception or is scoped to multi-lane repos.
• For [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610: grep -c of 「或 finding 无 reach:」 on filing-gate.md answers 0; 「补不齐(四类皆非)者」 answers 1; the file stays 64/64.

Verification at head dc6cadf

These are the 17 families that node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derives for this change set (the same 17 before and after the fold). Each ran locally on head dc6cadff3, and each exit code was captured before any pipe:

• node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs: exit 0
• node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test: exit 0
• node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs: exit 0
• node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test: exit 0
• pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions: exit 0, after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint under the verify lock (on the first head the gate answered exit 3, PREREQUISITE NOT MET, until that build ran).
• pnpm check:agent-test-spelling: exit 0
• pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs: exit 0
• pnpm check:doc-authoring: exit 0
• pnpm check:driver-memory-census: exit 0
• pnpm check:gitlink-declared: exit 0
• pnpm check:nul-bytes: exit 0
• pnpm check:pm-governed-merges: exit 0
• pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint: exit 0. Its verdict line: 「87 file(s) clean」.
• pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet: exit 0. It reports all three files at their ceilings with headroom 0, filing-gate.md at 64 of 64.
• pnpm check:refd-timer-probe: exit 0
• pnpm check:skill-frame-sync: exit 0
• pnpm check:watch-hint-literal: exit 0

One more gate ran: pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster, exit 0. The derivation flagged its roster because it lives under .claude. dispatch-gates --ran answers: 「17 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 17 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)」.

Left to CI and not run locally: test:repo, the type-check lanes and the artifact-roster families. check:skill-frame-freshness and check:dev-prereqs did not run, because the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the decision frame in SKILL.md. There is no ablation: this is a text change to governed protocol files and changes no tested behaviour.

Acceptance notes

• SKILL.md:113 (tooling) and SKILL.md:118 (area:*) say 「分诊首触打」 without scoping it to a repo class. Neither label is one of 机械三务, which cross-repo-coordination.md:10 defines as sweep, type and finding first-touch grading. So these lines do not contradict the single-lane ruling, and this PR leaves them alone. 承接者:无.
• The wording of lanes/hotcrm.md:51 differs from the card's literal 〈What to change〉, for the reasons above. The seat's review decides.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:PM 协议的三份参考文件共改四行，行数不增：hotcrm 车道说明第 51 行、多仓协调第 37 行(规则 4)、立卡门第 26 行，这三行原来都把 type、定级或首触写成「只归分诊」，没有区分多车道仓和单车道仓;另把立卡门第 27 行的「或 finding 无 reach:」删掉，首触即关只剩「四类皆非」的卡。

为什么改:您在 hotcrm#2178 裁了 A:单车道仓(hotcrm 等)的卡由本仓席位自己首触定级、自己打 type。上一张 PR 只改了 hotcrm 说明的第 8 和第 33 行。复核记录指出，还有这三行与裁决相反，读者只看其中一行会拿到裁决前的旧规则。第 27 行来自您对 #24610 的「B」:缺 reach 的 finding 照旧定 p3 并入收口卡(triage-duties 第 50 行不动),首触即关只用于四类都不是的卡;这一裁决把您早先在 #24589 的「B」收窄到这个范围(裁决记录评论 6279873026)。

风险与代价(含回滚):只改文字，不涉及代码和发布;三份文件的行数和上限都不变，每行不超过 120 字节。第 51 行比卡上的写法多一层限定:hotcrm 席在平台仓(objectstack、objectui)立的卡,domain 和 type 仍归中央分诊，只有 hotcrm 仓自己的卡由本席自己打 type。这是该行最初版本的本意，免得被读成「hotcrm 席去给平台卡打 type」。回滚就是 revert 本 PR;两件事各占一个 commit,也可单独回滚第 27 行。

席位意见:

你要做的:不需要操作。席位达档复核通过后，由席位落地。如果您希望第 51 行按卡上原文写、不带平台仓限定，请在复核前说一声。

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review — PR #24691 (card #24686), isolated reviewer · 2026-10-20T00:00Z

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 90efe550a757cf3e70f6c927ee4eb71dd5a2180e
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/ui.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md

Inputs read: card #24686 (body and both comments), PR #24691 (body, file list, net diff against main), the check-runs on the head, and the three files at origin/main (92ce3af40) and at the branch head; nothing from the dispatch order or the dispatching seat's own conclusions. The three hunks were judged against the ruling the card records (hotcrm#2178 → 「A」: the single-lane repo:hotcrm seat grades its own cards at first touch) and against the single-lane rule text, cross-repo-coordination.md:7-10, quoted verbatim:

• line 7: 「多车道仓 objectstack、objectui:中央分诊是 domain:*/type/定级的唯一生产者。」
• line 9: 「单车道仓 repo:* 席自理机械三务,⛔ 不产 domain:*;决策卡入本仓收件箱,不落 objectstack。」
• line 10: 「机械三务 = 自扫 sweep、自打 type、自做 finding 首触定级。」

① Derived judgments

1. Published accept set and public surface: none touched. The diff is three lines under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/; no packages/**, no schema, no export, no skills/** (the published catalog). Right. The review is owed by the governed-rules face alone (Tier S, .claude/**).
2. lanes/hotcrm.md:51 — right. New line: 「- 平台仓卡的 domain:* 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 Clause one restates line 7 for the cards the seat files in objectstack or objectui (line 50's subject); clause two gives the seat type on hotcrm's own cards by the name of 机械三务 (line 10), which is exactly ruling A's reach and no further. The file no longer disagrees with its own line 8. The card's acceptance greps hold on the branch content: grep -n "type 留给分诊" prints nothing (exit 1); the control grep -c "机械三务" answers 2 (lines 8 and 51).
3. cross-repo-coordination.md:37 — right. New line: 「- 多车道仓:分诊唯一生产定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/duplicate_of;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」 The leading topic 多车道仓: governs both clauses after the colon, so the producer monopoly and the ban on execution seats grading or routing are both confined to the repos line 7 names. That is the correct boundary: in a single-lane repo the repo:* seat is an execution seat (lanes/hotcrm.md:7) that grades finding cards at first touch (line 10) and routes decision cards into its own inbox (line 9), so an unscoped second clause would have kept the contradiction. The bytes paid (座位, and the colon after 唯一生产) change no meaning; bare 分诊 is how line 7 names the actor.
4. filing-gate.md:26 — right. New line: 「- 缺件卡由分诊(单车道仓 repo:* 席)首触补齐卡与一次检索可推三件,写进定级评论并定级。」 The parenthetical names the single-lane first-touch actor beside 分诊, in the register line 25 uses (三件 is line 25's three answers); 「卡与一次检索可推三件」 keeps the same bound as 「能从卡与一次检索推导的三件」. Line 27 is untouched, as the card orders.
5. Line budget — right. Line counts 53/51/64 unchanged and equal to the ratchet's ceilings for the three files (scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs: 53, 51, 64). Changed-line bytes measured over the branch content without the newline: 103, 120, 120; the ratchet judges a line by its byte count being at most MAX_LINE_BYTES, which is 120, so a line at exactly 120 is inside the budget. The only line over 120 bytes in filing-gate.md is line 7, the blockquoted maintainer ruling, which the ratchet exempts structurally. No ASCII control bytes and no angle brackets in the three files. Id-lint: none of the three new lines carries a # followed by three or more digits.
6. Family sweep, my own, over the branch tree (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/, .claude/agents/, AGENTS.md; terms 留给分诊, 唯一生产, 由分诊首触, 首触定级, 分诊首触): beyond the three lines and the rule itself (lines 7 and 10), the hits are lanes/ui.md:8 and :15, lanes/spec.md:30, lanes/skills.md:21, triage-duties.md:19 and :69, execution-duties.md:44, dispatch-runbook.md:24, SKILL.md:113 and :118. None reserves a single-lane repo's type or first-touch grading for triage: the ui and spec lanes work the multi-lane repos (line 7), the triage-duties and runbook lines describe triage's own work, execution-duties.md:44 is about 定域, lanes/skills.md:21 is that seat's own first touch, and SKILL.md:113/118 are label semantics outside 机械三务 (③ item 4). No fourth leftover.
7. The PR body meets the card's last acceptance item: it quotes the ruling (hotcrm#2178 → 「A」, 6265194393, with 6264888052 and 6265393657) and names the audit record 6279602320, ③ items 7–8.

② Semver level

Right. .claude/** publishes nothing from any released package; the diff adds no .changeset/*; the PR carries skip-changeset, and the Check Changeset run on the head concluded success. The PR body carries Clause-②: no at the start of a line with no (narrowing) arm, matching a diff that changes no accept set.

③ Boundary flags

1. open_questions — lanes/hotcrm.md:51: the scoped wording (A, as landed) or the card's literal one-clause wording (B, 「- domain:* 留给分诊,type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」). Answered: A, on my own reading of line 50. Line 50 「平台缺口卡是本席最常见的联动产出:立卡在平台仓、无 assignee、普通卡待分诊。」 sets the subject of the bullets that follow: the cards this seat files in the platform repos, left for triage. Line 51 on main has no subject of its own, so in context it continued line 50 — it was correct about platform cards and silent about hotcrm's own, and the defect was that, read alone, it became a general reservation of type. B inherits line 50's subject the same way, so in place it would read as the hotcrm seat applying type to the platform card it has just filed — an objectstack or objectui card, where line 7 makes central triage the only producer. B would trade the old ambiguity for a new contradiction. A names both subjects, and each clause agrees with the line that governs it (7 for platform-repo cards, 10 for hotcrm's own). Ruling A, as the card records it, reaches the seat's own cards and no further, so the card's 〈What to change〉 for :51 is correctly read as scoped to those cards; the landed line is that reading, not a departure from the ruling. One observation, not required: 催办不代裁 now trails the 本仓卡 clause rather than the platform clause it qualifies; harmless, since on its own cards the seat is the one ruling, so the clause is vacuous there.
2. Deviation (the :51 wording refines the card's 〈What to change〉): accepted, for the reason in item 1.
3. Deviation (the family grep also hits lanes/ui.md:8): agreed, correct as written — 「⛔ 不产 domain:*、type 与定级,中央分诊唯一生产」 is line 7 applied to the domain:ui seat, which works objectui, a multi-lane repo. Leaving it untouched is right.
4. Out-of-scope finding (SKILL.md:113 tooling and :118 area:* say 「分诊首触打」 with no repo-class scope): agreed, 承接者:无. Neither label is one of 机械三务 (line 10), so neither line contradicts ruling A; what remains is an absence (no named producer of tooling or area:* on a single-lane repo's cards), and filing-gate.md:51 holds that an absent sentence is not what a card is for.
5. Deviation (attribution): verified on the head commit — its message ends with the session-URL trailer line and the model-free co-author trailer line, and the PR body ends with the session-URL footer; both are the forms AGENTS.md prescribes.
6. Deviations (history read through REST on a shallow checkout; worktree removed before the report; the relay run from the shared checkout's unchanged scripts): process notes, no effect on the landing.
7. filing-gate.md:27 and decision card [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610: untouched, as the card orders. [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 is outside this review's inputs and was not re-read here; the dev reports no Ruling: line on two reads. Escalated to the landing seat as a check immediately before landing: if [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 carries a Ruling: line by then, the card's instruction (fold its one line into the same PR) applies, the head moves, and this record no longer names it.
8. Check-runs on the head at the time of this record: 38, of which 26 success, 12 skipped, 0 failure, 0 pending. Lint · repo & tooling gates (the job that runs check:pm-skill-ratchet and check:pm-skill-id-lint), Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Governed Surface Queue Guard and Check Changeset all concluded success.
9. Adjacent, outside this ruling's family and not a card (filing-gate.md:20): cross-repo-coordination.md:38 「执行座位信任标签,只在本车道认领;误标 ⛔ 不自行改,挂 pm:retriage + 异议评论同笔。」 stays unscoped; for a single-lane seat that applied its own type, there is no triage to retriage to. It reserves neither type nor first touch for triage, so it is outside the card. 承接者:无; a seat-post note at most.
10. The PR is a draft. The Tier S landing (ready, then the queue) is the owning seat's act after this record and with every check green (Prime Directive 14); nothing here changes that.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers
Reviewed-by: session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85

VERDICT: PASS

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review — PR #24691 (card #24686; folded decision card #24610), isolated reviewer, re-rendered on the moved head · 2026-10-20T00:24Z

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: dc6cadff3f0b638ab988c81397883ec4cd7acabb
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md + .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/ui.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs, .github/workflows/pr-automation.yml, .github/workflows/ci.yml

Inputs read: card #24686 (body and all four comments), card #24610 (body and all three comments, the ruling record 6279873026 among them), PR #24691 (body, file list, net diff against main), the check-runs on the head, and the cited files at origin/main and at the branch head. Nothing from the dispatch order or the dispatching seat's own conclusions. The first record on this PR, 6280036469, covered head 90efe550a; the head has since moved by one merge of origin/main (96ead27a0) and one commit on filing-gate.md:27, so every judgment below stands on the new head, with the first record cited where this one agrees with it.

Rulings and governing text judged against:

• hotcrm#2178 → 「A」 (recorded in the card body with its ids: seat record 6265194393, director delta 6264888052, ledger 6265393657): the single-lane repo:hotcrm seat grades its own cards at first touch. The rule text is cross-repo-coordination.md:7-10, verbatim: 「多车道仓 objectstack、objectui:中央分诊是 domain:*/type/定级的唯一生产者。」 / 「单车道仓 repo:* 席自理机械三务,⛔ 不产 domain:*;决策卡入本仓收件箱,不落 objectstack。」 / 「机械三务 = 自扫 sweep、自打 type、自做 finding 首触定级。」
• [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 → letter B, the maintainer's 「24610 B」, record 6279873026, items 1–2 binding: triage-duties.md L50 stands as written; filing-gate.md L27 narrows to 「四类皆非」 and the clause 「或 finding 无 reach:」 leaves the line, line-neutral at 64/64. Item 4: who closes a reach-less finding is unchanged (the maintainer). Not taken: A.

① Derived judgments

1. Published accept set and public surface: none touched — right. GitHub's net diff against main is three files, +4/−4, all under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/; the local three-dot stat against origin/main agrees (3 files, 4 lines), so the merge of origin/main brought nothing under .claude/** or scripts/pm/** into the diff. No packages/**, no schema, no export, no skills/**. The review is owed by the governed-rules face alone (Tier S, .claude/**).
2. lanes/hotcrm.md:51 — right; the first record's item 2, re-read on this head. 「- 平台仓卡的 domain:* 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 Clause one is line 7 applied to the cards line 50 is about (filed in objectstack or objectui); clause two gives the seat type on hotcrm's own cards under the name 机械三务 (line 10), which is ruling A's reach and no further. domain:* on the seat's own cards is governed by line 8 of the same file and by line 9 (⛔ 不产), which the new line neither restates nor contradicts. Acceptance greps on the branch content: grep -n "type 留给分诊" prints nothing (exit 1); the control grep -c "机械三务" answers 2 (lines 8 and 51).
3. cross-repo-coordination.md:37 — right; the first record's item 3, re-read. 「- 多车道仓:分诊唯一生产定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/duplicate_of;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」 The leading topic scopes both clauses to the repos line 7 names, which is the boundary the single-lane rule needs: a repo:* seat is an execution seat (lanes/hotcrm.md:7) that grades at first touch. One question the scoping raises, answered: it leaves no single-lane producer unnamed for 查重/shadow/duplicate_of, because triage-duties.md:69 makes dedupe an act of first-touch grading (「首触定级即并:证据搬先卡,后卡关 duplicate_of」) and first-touch grading is the single-lane seat's by line 10. The bytes paid (座位 and the colon after 唯一生产) change no meaning; bare 分诊 is how line 7 names the actor.
4. filing-gate.md:26 — right; the first record's item 4, re-read. 「- 缺件卡由分诊(单车道仓 repo:* 席)首触补齐卡与一次检索可推三件,写进定级评论并定级。」 The parenthetical names the single-lane first-touch actor beside 分诊 in the register this file already uses; 「卡与一次检索可推三件」 keeps line 25's three answers and the same bound (the card plus one search).
5. filing-gate.md:27 — right; the new line on this head. 「- 补不齐(四类皆非)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」 Against ruling B item 2: the clause 「或 finding 无 reach:」 is gone and nothing else on the line moved (113 → 86 bytes); the line now closes at first touch only a card that is none of the four categories. Against item 1: triage-duties.md:50 on the branch reads 「- 缺 reach: 且非例外 ⇒ 定 priority:p3,并入收口卡或清扫卡,⛔ 不单独派发、不因此关卡。」, byte-identical to origin/main, and the ruling's two populations are now apart in the text: an incomplete card is completed and graded (L26), a reach-less finding is parked at p3 (L50), only an out-of-category card is closed (L27). The reading that holds the three lines together, stated so no later reader re-opens it: filing-gate.md:11 makes reach: a requirement on a category-① finding, so a finding without it is an incomplete ① card, not a 四类皆非 card — reach: is measured, not derived, so L26 cannot complete it and L50 parks it; that is the ruling's own reading (「the maintainer keeps the two populations apart」). Against item 4: no line left in .claude/ or AGENTS.md closes a reach-less finding at first touch — my own sweep for 首触即关, 无 reach: and 不因此关卡 over the branch tree hits L27, L50, triage-duties.md:61 (无则关: a card with no definition item), :63 (report-only instrument cards) and SKILL.md:113 (the tooling label's named readers); the two triage-duties lines close different populations, as the PR body says.
6. Line budget — right, measured on the branch content: 53/51/64 lines, equal to the ceilings scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs declares for the three files (53, 51, 64); the changed lines are 103, 120, 120 and 86 bytes without the newline; MAX_LINE_BYTES is 120 and the comparator is at-most (a line whose byte count does not exceed the cap passes), so the two 120-byte lines are inside the budget. The only over-budget line in the three files is filing-gate.md:7, the blockquoted maintainer ruling, exempt under the ratchet's blockquote class. triage-duties.md is 120/120, untouched. None of the four lines carries # followed by three or more digits (check-skill-id-lint.mjs), an angle bracket or an ASCII control byte; the three files' only angle brackets are pre-existing and untouched (cross-repo-coordination.md:29 and the blockquote markers at filing-gate.md:7-8).
7. Family sweep, my own over the branch tree (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/, .claude/agents/, AGENTS.md; terms 留给分诊, 唯一生产, 由分诊首触, 首触定级, 分诊首触): beyond the three lines and the rule itself (lines 7 and 10), the hits are lanes/ui.md:8 and :15, lanes/spec.md:30, lanes/skills.md:21, triage-duties.md:19 and :69, execution-duties.md:44, dispatch-runbook.md:24, SKILL.md:113 and :118 — the same set the first record's item 6 found, and none reserves a single-lane repo's type or first touch for triage. No fifth leftover.
8. The PR body meets both cards' acceptance: it quotes ruling A with its three ids and names audit record 6279602320 ③ items 7–8 (card pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve type or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A) #24686); it carries Fixes #24610 as its second line, quotes items 1 and 2 of 6279873026 word for word (compared against the ruling comment), and its 维护者速读 names pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 and the ruling record, as the ruling's execution section orders. The stored body has no angle brackets and its closing keywords sit on lines 1–2 only.
9. Commit shape — right: 90efe550a carries the three single-lane lines; 96ead27a0 is the merge (parents 90efe550a and 5018fc303); dc6cadff3 changes filing-gate.md alone (1 file, +1/−1), so the folded member is independently revertable, as the body says. All three commits end with the model-free trailer pair AGENTS.md prescribes.

② Semver level

Right. .claude/** publishes nothing from any released package; the diff adds no .changeset/*; the PR carries skip-changeset. On this head both Check Changeset runs concluded skipped, which is the gate's exemption verdict — pr-automation.yml's job-level if: skips the job when that label is present — not an absent verdict. The PR body carries Clause-②: no at the start of a line with no (narrowing) arm, matching a diff that changes no accept set; the Clause-②: line reads no.

③ Boundary flags

1. open_questions (round 1, carried into round 2) — lanes/hotcrm.md:51: the scoped wording A as landed, or the card's literal B 「- domain:* 留给分诊,type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」. Answered: A, on my own reading of line 50's context, agreeing with the first record's item 1. Line 50 「- 平台缺口卡是本席最常见的联动产出:立卡在平台仓、无 assignee、普通卡待分诊。」 is about the cards this seat files in the platform repos. The old line 51 named no subject: read after line 50 it was about those cards and correct; read alone it became a blanket reservation of type, which is the defect the card names. B names no subject either, so in place it inherits line 50's and tells the hotcrm seat to self-type a card it has just filed in objectstack or objectui, which line 7 forbids — a new contradiction bought for the old ambiguity. A names both subjects, and each clause agrees with the line that governs it (7 for platform-repo cards, 9–10 for hotcrm's own). The card's 〈What to change〉 for :51 — type follows 机械三务 — is an instruction about the seat applying type, and 机械三务 reaches the seat's own repo only, so A is that instruction placed under its subject, not a departure from ruling A. The dev's history claim (cdc7eff78, abe980c5c) is not reachable from this shallow checkout and was not needed: the answer stands on lines 7–10 and 50 alone.
2. open_questions (round 2) — who writes the PR body after the fold, the seat (A) or a re-dispatch (B). Resolved by the state of the PR: the stored body carries the second Fixes line, the 「Folded member」 section and the gate rerun at this head, so the seat has written it, as os-dev.md routes it; no re-dispatch. One consequence for the owning seat, not a FAIL item: the stored body now ends after its 「你要做的」 paragraph with no attribution block, where the first record read a session-URL footer on the old head. AGENTS.md makes the per-channel, per-action readings the authority on what a body write does to the footer and places durable attribution in body prose or a comment; the session is on both claims, both dev reports and this record. If the seat writes the body again before landing, it sends the session-URL footer and reads the body back.
3. Deviation (:51 refines the card's wording): accepted, item 1.
4. Deviation (the family grep also hits lanes/ui.md:8): agreed, correct as written — 「⛔ 不产 domain:*、type 与定级,中央分诊唯一生产」 is line 7 applied to the domain:ui seat, which works objectui, a multi-lane repo. Leaving it untouched is right.
5. Out-of-scope finding (SKILL.md:113 tooling and :118 area:* say 「分诊首触打」 with no repo-class scope): agreed, 承接者:无 — neither label is one of 机械三务, so neither line contradicts ruling A; what remains is an absent sentence, which filing-gate.md:51 says a card is not for.
6. Fold gates (claim 6280072316 on [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610): same file, adjacent lines (L26/L27); both members ruled; each independently checkable (① 5 beside ① 2–4) and in its own commit (① 9); the exclusion held — triage-duties.md:50 untouched. [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 carries the Ruled: line in its body and the claim naming this branch; the claim guards on this head (The card this PR closes must claim this branch, No other open PR may claim the same issue, Part-of PR must not also close its card) concluded success on both runs. Ruling B item 3 — the re-ruling recorded on pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 by pointer — is a seat act on pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589, not something this diff can carry; pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 is outside this review's inputs and was not read. Escalated to the owning seat as a check before landing: confirm the pointer is on pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589, or post it.
7. Deviations (the worktree re-added on the surviving local branch; a stray read-back file deleted before worktree remove; the relay run from the shared checkout's unchanged scripts; history read through REST): process notes, no effect on the landing.
8. Check-runs on the head at the time of this record: 41, of which 29 success, 12 skipped, 0 failure, 0 pending. Of the five required contexts, Lint & Repo Gates (whose Lint · repo & tooling gates job runs check:pm-skill-ratchet and check:pm-skill-id-lint), TypeScript Type Check, Test Core and Governed Surface Queue Guard concluded success; Build Core concluded skipped by ci.yml's paths filter (needs.filter.outputs.core; the filter job itself success) on a diff that touches no core path — the workflow's designed skip, not a red. Every gate-carrying job that ran is green.
9. The PR is a draft. The Tier S landing (ready, then the queue) is the owning seat's act after this record and with every check green (Prime Directive 14); this record is the newest naming head dc6cadff3f0b638ab988c81397883ec4cd7acabb, and the first record 6280036469 names only the old head.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers
Reviewed-by: session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85

VERDICT: PASS

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

维护者速读(终稿)· PR #24691 · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T00:27Z

• 改了什么: 三个协议文件共四行。三行把「定级/type 只归分诊」补上单车道仓的例外:hotcrm 岗位说明第 51 行(平台仓卡的 domain:* 与 type 归分诊,本仓卡的 type 随机械三务自打)、多仓协调第 37 行(规则 4 限定为多车道仓)、立卡门第 26 行(缺件卡首触者:分诊,单车道仓为 repo:* 席)。第四行是您在 [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 裁的 B:立卡门第 27 行收窄为只关「四类皆非」的卡,「或 finding 无 reach:」那半句删掉(pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 的 B 按此补裁,分诊职责第 50 行的 p3 并入收口卡照旧)。三文件行数不变。
• 为什么改: 您在 hotcrm#2178 裁了 A(hotcrm 席首触自定级),第一张 PR 按口径只改了第 8、33 行;复审记录指出这三行仍写着裁决前的旧规则,单看任一行都会被误导。[Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 在本 PR 落地前被您裁了 B(「24610 B」,23:47Z),卡上预先写明「若先裁则并入同一 PR」,相邻两行同 PR 落地也省一次合并冲突。
• 风险与代价(含回滚): 纯文本,不发布。三行都压到 120 字节上限内,第 37、26 行恰 120 字节。回滚 = revert 两个提交(第 27 行单独一个)。
• 席位意见: 接受,含 dev 提出的第 51 行措辞之问:取 A(带主语的分域写法),不取卡上字面 B。理由:第 51 行紧接第 50 行「平台缺口卡立在平台仓、待分诊」,字面 B 放在那里会读成 hotcrm 席给 objectstack 卡自打 type,与多仓协调第 7 行冲突;A 保住裁决本意(本仓卡自打),git 历史也证实这行原本就是第 50 行句子的后半截。
• 你要做的: 无。Tier S,席位在达档复核 PASS 后入队。

席位核对

• 形态: draft、base main、首两行 Fixes #24686 / Fixes #24610(折叠成员各一行)、行首 Clause-②: no、assignee os-justin、skip-changeset 随创建同笔;3 文件 +4/−4,两个提交;正文无尖括号;闭合关键词只有那两行(另引 pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589、docs(pm-dispatch): hotcrm lane charter grades at first touch per the single-lane rule #24521、hotcrm#2178 旁无动词)。
• 前提实测(席位,分支 tip 90efe550a): 三行逐字如报告;字节 103/120/120(不含换行);行数 53/51/64 = 上限;第 27 行按裁决 B 第 2 项逐字收窄(原 113 字节,新行更短);[Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 的 Ruled: 行与裁决记录 6279873026 在案,折叠认领 6280072316,链首折叠注记 6280086652。本席派发令的机制假设 2(同族只此三行)被部分证伪:lanes/ui.md:8 同词命中但 objectui 为多车道仓,照旧正确,不动 —— 接受。
• 门禁 check-runs(head dc6cadff3,折叠后): 2026-10-20T00:16Z 40 条,26 success、11 skipped、0 failed、3 in_progress;check-expected-skips --pr 24691:OK,全在名单;check-governed-merges --pr 24691:GOVERNED,Tier S,8 行。dev 两轮本地 17 条派生门禁全 0,--ran 17/17。PR 正文由本席按 os-dev 的分工写入(dev 备好的 r1 文,改侧不送页脚)。
• 接受的偏差: 第 51 行取 dev 的分域写法 A(dev open_questions 由本席在此答复,属不升级类:无产品可见行为变化);第 37 行删「座位」与冒号、第 26 行压缩「能从卡与一次检索推导」为「卡与一次检索可推」以付字节;doc-formula-expressions 首跑 exit 3 为前置未建,补建后 0;分支历史经 REST 读取(浅检出)。
• 复核记录的两项席位核查: ① 裁决 B 第 3 项的补裁指针已由总监席落在 pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589(6279974385),本席核对在案,未重复发;② 改侧写入正文后平台没有追加裸页脚(与 platform-readings.md 改侧 +58 的读数相反),本席按「只送页脚不送横线」再写一次正文(12,350 字节,读回两次一致,页脚 1 条,无 U+FFFD);改侧首写后两次 API 读到 +6 字节/3 个 U+FFFD 的瞬态版本,随后稳定为与送出完全一致 —— 平台事实记座位贴。
• 范围外去向: lanes/ui.md:8、SKILL.md:113/118(tooling/area:* 首触由分诊打,二者不在机械三务内)—— dev 判与裁决 A 不冲突,本席同意,不立卡,记座位贴。
• 落地条款: Tier S;首个 head 90efe550a 的达档复核 PASS 6280036469 在案,折叠后的 head 另有同形记录(6280366991)在案后,由本席 pr_ready + automerge_enable 入队。

ACCEPT

---

Generated by Claude Code