pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve type or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A)

Filing gate ③, the remainder of a maintainer-directed task. On objectstack-ai/hotcrm#2178 the maintainer ruled 「A」 (recorded by the repo:hotcrm seat in comment 6265194393, matching the director's delta 6264888052; the director's ledger 6265393657 on #12708 carries it as batch #371 item 3): the single-lane repo:hotcrm seat grades its cards at first touch. The 口径 scoped the first text PR to lanes/hotcrm.md:8 and :33 and 「⛔ nothing else in that PR」; that PR landed as #24521 (2667e2402). The lines below are the same ruling's leftovers, recorded on #24517 and in the at-tier audit record on PR #24521 (comment 6279602320, ③ items 7–8). Filed by the domain:skills seat 1 (os-justin, session session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85). ⛔ Not a claim.

Reader who acts: the domain:skills lane seat, in one line-neutral text PR under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/ (governed, Tier S: at-tier review, then the seat lands it).

Dedupe: MCP semantic search on this repository, closed included, "single-lane repo seat grades type first touch triage only producer rule 4 carve-out hotcrm charter line 51 cross-repo-coordination": 40 hits, 0 open on point. Nearest: #24517 (closed, the parent), #9131 (closed, the 2026-08 three-repo triage unification that never covered hotcrm), #23733 (closed, 例外二 self-labelled cards). Dedupe words: single-lane type first touch; rule 4 carve-out; hotcrm charter line 51.

What is wrong (objectstack `origin/main` `3a931fca1`, `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/`)

The single-lane rule is cross-repo-coordination.md:9-10: 「单车道仓 repo:* 席自理机械三务,⛔ 不产 domain:*」 and 「机械三务 = 自扫 sweep、自打 type、自做 finding 首触定级」. After PR #24521, lanes/hotcrm.md:8 points at it. Three lines still say the opposite with no single-lane qualifier:

lanes/hotcrm.md:51 — 「- domain:* 与 type 留给分诊;催办不代裁。」 Line 8 of the same file now delegates 机械三务, which includes 自打 type, so the file disagrees with itself on type.
cross-repo-coordination.md:37 (rule 4) — 「- 分诊座位唯一生产:定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/duplicate_of;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」 Lines 7–10 of the same file scope central triage to the multi-lane repos and give the single-lane repo:* seat first-touch grading and type; line 37 is unscoped.
filing-gate.md:26 — 「- 缺件卡由分诊首触补齐能从卡与一次检索推导的三件,写进定级评论并定级。」 First touch of a single-lane repo's card is that repo's seat, not triage; the line names only 分诊.

Today the specific clause governs a hotcrm card, so no seat has acted wrongly; the cost is that a reader of any one of the three lines alone is told the pre-ruling rule.

What to change

One text PR, line-neutral in each file (lanes/hotcrm.md 53/53, cross-repo-coordination.md 51/51, filing-gate.md 64/64 against their ceilings), every line within the 120-byte line cap.
:51 — type follows 机械三务 (the seat applies it); domain:* stays triage's.
:37 — a multi-lane-repo qualifier, or a pointer to lines 9–10 as the single-lane exception.
:26 — the first-touch actor is 分诊 for multi-lane repos and the repo:* seat for single-lane repos.
filing-gate.md:27 is the subject of the open decision card [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 and stays out of this PR; if [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 is ruled first, fold its one line into the same PR.

Acceptance

Each of the three lines names the single-lane exception or defers to cross-repo-coordination.md:9-10; grep -n "type 留给分诊" .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md answers nothing (control: grep -c "机械三务" on the same file answers at least 1).
The line ratchet and id-lint guards pass; no changeset (.claude/** publishes nothing).
The PR body quotes the ruling (hotcrm#2178 → A, 6265194393) and names the audit record 6279602320 that raised the leftovers.

Claim: PM loop round 2 · domain:skills seat 1 · 2026-10-19T23:34Z
Session: session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85
Account: os-justin (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers
Worktree: objectstack-issue-24686
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1 (seat post #7623)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md line 51, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md line 37, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md line 26 — one line each, line-neutral (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the three paths at 92ce3af40: "no path-derived mandate … floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable"; a references/**-only text card is built at the default tier; the compensating control is an isolated CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review before the Tier S landing)
Clause-②: no
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③, the remainder of hotcrm#2178 → A)
Thread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared: the three files are FREE (lanes/hotcrm.md since PR #24521 2667e2402; filing-gate.md since PR #24602 c03b17d78; cross-repo-coordination.md untouched since f151ef2c9); the in-flight sibling #24585 / PR #24685 touches dispatch-runbook.md only; no open PR touches .claude/** or skills/** at the R2 read; filing-gate.md:27 is the subject of decision card #24610 and stays out of this PR — fold its one line in only if #24610 is ruled before this PR lands.

Filed by this seat under 例外二 (self-applied lane, state and grade with the three filing-gate answers in the body); triage spot-checks after.
Premise read on origin/main 92ce3af40: the three lines read as the card quotes; the files are at their ceilings (53/53, 51/51, 64/64); line bytes without newline: hotcrm.md:51 53, cross-repo-coordination.md:37 114, filing-gate.md:26 102; MAX_LINE_BYTES 120.
Landing: Tier S, by the seat after the at-tier review PASS and every check green.

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 24686,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/24691",
  "session": "session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 (subagent: the parent PM session's id, the same id the relay read from the container)",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Changed one line in each of three files under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/, at head 90efe550a on base 92ce3af40. No file gained or lost a line. lanes/hotcrm.md:51 now reads 「- 平台仓卡的 `domain:*` 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (103 bytes). cross-repo-coordination.md:37 now reads 「- 多车道仓:分诊唯一生产定级/路由/type/查重/shadow/`duplicate_of`;执行席永不定级或路由裸卡。」 (120 bytes); the 多车道仓 topic scopes both clauses. filing-gate.md:26 now reads 「- 缺件卡由分诊(单车道仓 `repo:*` 席)首触补齐卡与一次检索可推三件,写进定级评论并定级。」 (120 bytes). The premise held for all three lines as quoted, with one refinement on :51. Git history shows that line 51 was split off the platform-gap-card sentence at line 50. At cdc7eff78 the text was one sentence: 「…立卡在平台仓、无 assignee、普通卡待分诊,`domain:*`/type 留给分诊;催办不代裁。」. The rules-only rewrite abe980c5c split it, and the bullet lost its subject. So the new line keeps platform-repo cards' domain and type with central triage (cross-repo-coordination.md:7) and gives type on the seat's own cards to 机械三务. The card's literal wording, placed after line 50, would have the seat self-type the platform card it just filed. filing-gate.md:27 is untouched: #24610 has no Ruling: line in its body or its one comment, read twice, the second time right before pr_create. Draft PR #24691: assignee os-justin, labels skip-changeset, size/xs and documentation, body read back byte-identical (9695 bytes).",
  "tests": "No package code was touched, so there is no package test, typecheck or ablation (docs or protocol text only). Acceptance greps on the head tree: `grep -n \"type 留给分诊\" .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md` printed nothing, EXIT=1. Control `grep -c \"机械三务\"` on the same file answered 2, EXIT=0. Control-byte self-scan `grep -naP` over the three files found nothing, EXIT=1. wc -l before and after: 53/51/64, equal to the ceilings 53/51/64. Changed-line bytes, measured with python over UTF-8: 103, 120 and 120, all within MAX_LINE_BYTES 120. The PM's family grep `git grep -n \"留给分诊\\|唯一生产\\|由分诊首触\" origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/` gave 5 hits: cross-repo-coordination.md:7 and :37, filing-gate.md:26, lanes/hotcrm.md:51, and lanes/ui.md:8. The ui.md:8 hit is not in the family (objectui is multi-lane).",
  "gates": "dispatch-gates --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, derived from merge base 92ce3af40 at head 90efe550a, named 17 families. Each ran locally with output redirected and the exit captured before any pipe; all 17 answered exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity, the same with --self-test, check-comment-mask-corpus (9599 files, 0 disagree), check-harness-current --self-test, lint check:doc-formula-expressions, check:agent-test-spelling, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes (no raw ASCII control bytes), check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-skill-id-lint (87 files clean), check:pm-skill-ratchet (all three files at ceiling, headroom 0), check:refd-timer-probe, check:skill-frame-sync and check:watch-hint-literal. doc-formula-expressions first answered exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET because formula and lint were unbuilt. `turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under os-verify-lock gave VERDICT command-exit 0, and the gate then gave 0. One extra gate also ran: pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster, exit 0. The derivation flags its roster because it lives under .claude. --ran reconciliation (exit 0): 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, a derived zero with all 17 exit codes recorded. CI on head 90efe550a when this report was written: 36 check-runs, 10 success, 12 skipped, 14 in_progress, 0 failure. The successes include Test Core, Check Changeset, Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate and the three claim guards. Lint, Type Check and Governed Surface Queue Guard were in_progress. NOT MEASURED locally, declared to CI: test:repo and the type-check lanes. check:skill-frame-freshness and check:dev-prereqs did not run: the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the SKILL.md decision frame.",
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "2 relay strokes, each a POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches executed as objectstack-fleet[bot]. Stroke 1 was pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24691/assignees and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24691/labels. Stroke 2 is this report: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24686/comments. There were also 2 git pushes, which are not REST writes: the empty-branch probe and the head 90efe550a. Every other call was a REST GET.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "lanes/hotcrm.md:51: keep the scoped wording, or take the card's literal one-clause wording?",
      "options": [
        "A: 「- 平台仓卡的 `domain:*` 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (as landed, 103 bytes)",
        "B: 「- `domain:*` 留给分诊,`type` 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (the card's literal wording, 73 bytes)"
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. B sits right after line 50 (platform-gap cards filed on the platform repo, 普通卡待分诊), so it would read as the hotcrm seat applying type to an objectstack or objectui card, which contradicts cross-repo-coordination.md:7. A restores the subject the rules-only rewrite abe980c5c split off (cdc7eff78 has the original sentence) and still gives the seat type on its own repo's cards, as ruling A orders."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed (not a defect class) · lanes/ui.md:8 「⛔ 不产 `domain:*`、type 与定级,中央分诊唯一生产」 matches the family grep, but it is correct as written: the domain:ui seat works in objectui, a multi-lane repo (cross-repo-coordination.md:7) · carrier: none, 承接者:无",
    "noted, not filed (not a defect class) · SKILL.md:113 (tooling) and SKILL.md:118 (area:*) say 「分诊首触打」 without a repo-class scope. Neither label is one of 机械三务 (cross-repo-coordination.md:10), so neither contradicts ruling A · carrier: none, 承接者:无 · dedupe words: single-lane tooling area first touch"
  ],
  "line_budget": "lanes/hotcrm.md 53 to 53 (ceiling 53); cross-repo-coordination.md 51 to 51 (ceiling 51); filing-gate.md 64 to 64 (ceiling 64). Changed lines in bytes without the newline: hotcrm.md:51 went from 53 to 103, cross-repo-coordination.md:37 from 114 to 120, filing-gate.md:26 from 102 to 120. MAX_LINE_BYTES is 120. Line 37 was paid for by dropping 座位 and the colon after 唯一生产, keeping 永不. Line 26 was paid for by 「能从卡与一次检索推导的三件」 becoming 「卡与一次检索可推三件」, keeping the tail. Nothing was re-wrapped.",
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "The :51 wording refines the card's 〈What to change〉, which the ruling section carries word for word. The refinement keeps the ruling's intent (the seat types its own cards) and does not extend it to platform-repo cards. Evidence: cdc7eff78 and abe980c5c. The seat decides in review (open_questions).",
    "PM mechanism assumption 2 is partly falsified: the family grep also hits lanes/ui.md:8. It is not the same family and was left untouched. Assumption 1 held (53/53, 51/51, 64/64; 53, 114 and 102 bytes; MAX_LINE_BYTES 120). Assumption 3 held (no Ruling: line on #24610 either time it was read). Assumption 4 holds only for cross-repo-coordination.md, because filing-gate.md:3 writes file names bare. It does not matter here: none of the three new lines names a file.",
    "The harness attribution reminder asked for a Co-Authored-By trailer with a model name and a robot-emoji PR footer. AGENTS.md overrides it, so commit 90efe550a carries the model-free pair (Claude-Session plus Co-authored-by: Claude) and the PR body ends in the session-URL footer block.",
    "The checkout is shallow. The history of :51 was read through the REST commits and contents endpoints, not by deepening the shared .git.",
    "The worktree was removed before this comment was posted: no --force, tree clean, remote head 90efe550a. The relay for this comment ran from the shared checkout's scripts at 92ce3af40. That checkout's scripts are unchanged by this diff, and nothing was edited there."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Fold note (chain head) · domain:skills seat 1 · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T00:04Z

#24610 was ruled B by the maintainer at 2026-10-19T23:47Z (record 6279873026) before this PR landed, so this card's pre-declared fold applies: #24610 rides PR #24691 on this branch as a second Fixes line and its own commit (its claim: 6280072316). Contract review PASS 6280036469 covered head 90efe550a; the record is re-rendered on the moved head before landing. Landing waits for the patch round.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 24686,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/24691",
  "session": "session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 (subagent: the parent PM session's id, the same id the relay read from the container)",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Patch round 1. #24610 was ruled B, and that ruling is folded into PR #24691. The branch was continued from origin at 90efe550a. origin/main was merged once (merge commit 96ead27a0, new merge base 5018fc303); nothing under .claude/** or scripts/pm/** came in. One separate commit, dc6cadff3, changes filing-gate.md:27 from 「- 补不齐(四类皆非,或 `finding` 无 `reach:`)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」 (113 bytes) to 「- 补不齐(四类皆非)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」 (86 bytes). This is exactly ruling B item 2 (comment 6279873026). Line 26, the other lines and triage-duties.md L50 are unchanged; ruling B item 1 keeps L50. No history was rewritten. Both pushes were fast-forward and the head is dc6cadff3. The #24610 claim 6280072316 names this branch. I did NOT write the PR body (step 4 of the patch order), because os-dev.md forbids a dev-side PATCH of the PR body: the dev writes it once, at pr_create, and the seat writes any later change. The revised body is ready for the seat at /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/78f91428-0fb8-57a2-a50a-21d53253a5dd/scratchpad/issue-24686/pr-body-r1.md (12354 bytes, no angle brackets, no blockquote markers, closing keywords only on lines 1-2). It adds a second `Fixes` line for card 24610 as line 2, a 'Folded member' section quoting ruling B items 1-2 word for word and naming #24589, the L27 before/after bytes, a #24610 acceptance bullet, the gate rerun at head dc6cadff3, and #24589 plus this ruling in 维护者速读. Until the seat writes it, the stored body closes only #24686, so merging as-is would leave #24610 open.",
  "tests": "No package code was touched, so there is no test, typecheck or ablation (protocol text only). On the head tree, measured before the commit and checked with `git show HEAD:...`: `grep -c '或 `finding` 无 `reach:`' filing-gate.md` answered 0, and `grep -c '补不齐(四类皆非)者'` answered 1. The control-byte self-scan `grep -naP` found nothing (exit 1). Line counts after the fold: hotcrm.md 53, cross-repo-coordination.md 51, filing-gate.md 64. L26 is 120 bytes and L27 is 86. Sibling sweep `git grep -n \"首触即关\\|无 `reach:`\\|无 reach\" -- .claude/ AGENTS.md`: besides L27, it hit triage-duties.md:61 and :63, which close cards with no definition item and report-only instrument cards (a different population), and SKILL.md:113 (tooling label). None closes a reach-less finding at first touch.",
  "gates": "Re-derived on head dc6cadff3 (merge base 5018fc303): the same 17 families as the first round (cmds diff empty). All 17 ran locally with output redirected and the exit captured before any pipe; all 17 answered exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity, the same with --self-test, check-comment-mask-corpus, check-harness-current --self-test, lint check:doc-formula-expressions (after `turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under os-verify-lock, VERDICT command-exit 0), check:agent-test-spelling, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes (12433 files, no raw ASCII control bytes), check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-skill-id-lint (87 files clean), check:pm-skill-ratchet (filing-gate.md 64 lines, ceiling 64, headroom 0; hotcrm.md 53/53; cross-repo-coordination.md 51/51), check:refd-timer-probe, check:skill-frame-sync and check:watch-hint-literal. One extra gate also ran: pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster, exit 0. --ran reconciliation (exit 0): 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, a derived zero with all 17 exit codes recorded. CI on head dc6cadff3, read once: 34 check-runs, 25 success, 9 skipped, 0 failure, 0 in_progress. The successes include the five required contexts: Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core, Governed Surface Queue Guard, plus the Type Check lanes, Lint lanes, claim guards, Check PR Size and Dogfood Regression Gate. Build Core and Check Changeset are among the skipped. NOT MEASURED locally, declared to CI: test:repo. check:skill-frame-freshness and check:dev-prereqs did not run: the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the SKILL.md frame.",
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "This round: 1 relay stroke, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, executing POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24686/comments (this patch-round report), plus 1 git push (90efe550a to dc6cadff3, fast-forward, not a REST write). No PR body PATCH, no label, assignee or ready write. Across both rounds: 3 relay strokes (pr_create with its assignee and label legs, round-1 report, round-2 report) and 3 git pushes. Every other call was a REST GET.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "The patch order's step 4 (edit the PR body) conflicts with os-dev.md, which forbids a dev-side PATCH of the PR body: the dev writes it once at pr_create, and the seat writes later changes. Who writes it?",
      "options": [
        "A: the seat writes the prepared body /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/78f91428-0fb8-57a2-a50a-21d53253a5dd/scratchpad/issue-24686/pr-body-r1.md in one body write, then reads it back to its end",
        "B: re-dispatch with an explicit os-dev.md exception for this PR's body"
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. The text is ready and linted, and os-dev.md routes exactly this case to the seat. Per platform-readings, an edit-side write sends no footer; the prepared file ends in the session-URL footer block, so strip the last three lines (blank, rule, footer) before a PATCH, or the platform keeps one footer and appends another."
    },
    {
      "question": "lanes/hotcrm.md:51 (carried over from round 1): keep the scoped wording, or take the card's literal one-clause wording?",
      "options": [
        "A: 「- 平台仓卡的 `domain:*` 与 type 归分诊;本仓卡 type 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (as landed)",
        "B: 「- `domain:*` 留给分诊,`type` 随机械三务自打;催办不代裁。」 (card literal)"
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. The reason is in the round-1 report (cdc7eff78 and abe980c5c), unchanged this round."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed (not a defect class) · lanes/ui.md:8 matches the family grep but is correct as written: objectui is multi-lane · carrier: none, 承接者:无",
    "noted, not filed (not a defect class) · SKILL.md:113 and SKILL.md:118 say 「分诊首触打」 for the tooling and area:* labels without a repo-class scope; neither label is one of 机械三务 · carrier: none, 承接者:无 · dedupe words: single-lane tooling area first touch"
  ],
  "line_budget": "lanes/hotcrm.md 53 to 53 (ceiling 53); cross-repo-coordination.md 51 to 51 (ceiling 51); filing-gate.md 64 to 64 (ceiling 64). Changed lines in bytes without the newline: hotcrm.md:51 went from 53 to 103, cross-repo-coordination.md:37 from 114 to 120, filing-gate.md:26 from 102 to 120, filing-gate.md:27 from 113 to 86. MAX_LINE_BYTES is 120. Nothing was re-wrapped; L27 only deletes the ruled clause.",
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md (lines 26 and 27)"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "Step 4 of the patch order was not executed. The PR body was not edited, because os-dev.md says the dev writes the PR body only once, at pr_create, never with a PATCH, and the seat writes later changes; the conflict is stated here rather than resolved silently. The prepared body is at /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/78f91428-0fb8-57a2-a50a-21d53253a5dd/scratchpad/issue-24686/pr-body-r1.md. The edits it makes: line 2 a second `Fixes` line for card 24610; 'What changed' renamed to four lines and the head and base updated; the L27 before/after added (113 and 86 bytes); the 'filing-gate.md:27 is untouched' bullet replaced; a new section, 'Folded member: ruling B on decision card #24610', quoting items 1-2 of 6279873026 and naming #24589; a #24610 acceptance bullet; verification moved to head dc6cadff3; 维护者速读 names #24589 and this ruling.",
    "Step 1: the local branch name still existed, so the worktree was added on it, and it was checked to equal origin's head 90efe550a before origin/main was merged. The merge commit 96ead27a0 carries the model-free trailer pair. No os-regen deferral was pending.",
    "During the round, a mistyped relative output path wrote pr2.json into the worktree. It was this session's own read-back file, so I deleted it, and git worktree remove then succeeded without --force. The tree was clean and the remote head was dc6cadff3.",
    "The report comment was posted through the relay with the shared checkout's scripts, after the worktree was removed; nothing was edited in the shared checkout."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT → PR #24691 comment 6280398880 · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T00:28Z

Contract review PASS on the folded head dc6cadff3 (record 6280366991, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; the first record 6280036469 covered 90efe550a); CI 33 success / 15 roster skips / 0 failed; readied and armed by the seat's relay strokes (run 39347767498). Tier S: lands by the queue with its chain partner #24610; the landing comment follows the merge.

Generated by Claude Code

Landing · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T00:53Z

Reading	Value
PR #24691 merged	yes, by the queue at 2026-10-20T00:52Z, merge commit `8e14ce057`
`8e14ce057` is an ancestor of `origin/main` (`8e14ce057`)	yes
queue branch `gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24691-…` still present	0
remote branch `claude/issue-24686-single-lane-grading-leftovers` still present	0

State change: the card closed completed by the PR's Fixes (folded pair #24686 + #24610, one PR, two content commits); pm:dispatched removed.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve `type` or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A) #24686

What is wrong (objectstack `origin/main` `3a931fca1`, `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/`)

What to change

Acceptance

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve type or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A) #24686

Description

What is wrong (objectstack origin/main 3a931fca1, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/)

What to change

Acceptance

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve `type` or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A) #24686

What is wrong (objectstack `origin/main` `3a931fca1`, `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/`)