Change small PR to well scoped#3037
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 24 minutes and 23 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| the end-user getting your improvement faster. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Make your PRs as small as possible.** | ||
| 1. **Make sure your PRs are well-scoped.** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it's that unclear. We talk about size and scope below. And we say "as small as possible". A config flow PR is as small as possible if the user can complete the user flow and errors and abort cases are handled.
Proposed change
Change small PR to well scoped as I think that small PR can be interpret as small in lines of code, while with a PR where you for example add a config flow, it will be inherently big, but if that is the only change you're making, that's fine as its well-scoped. So by using the word well-scoped instead we make it clearer what we expect.
Type of change
Checklist
Additional information