Repository navigation
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This was referenced Oct 28, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Latest head
aaef7949mergesmainat89607b48; the incoming change is documentation-only (CONTRIBUTING.md). Application, test, and workflow trees are unchanged. CI on this head is queued; the passing results below cover the preceding head.Saved-view creation could return 201 before Elasticsearch exposed the new view to list queries. Navigating to the new view then rendered a 404, even though a later list request found it. Creation now uses native immediate consistency before returning, matching predefined-view writes. This isolates the inherited blocker observed in #2630 from its authentication changes.
Validation: deterministic HTTP regression failed before the fix and passed afterward; all 130 saved-view endpoint tests passed. The affected browser scenario passed three consecutive runs with retries disabled; the final build passed with zero warnings/errors. Full CI passed on
5a1609c4, including all backend shards, frontend validation/tests, image builds, and 124 browser scenarios with zero retries. No API response or schema changes.Verification and implementation details
The regression initializes predefined views, disables automatic refresh only for the fixture's saved-view index, creates a view, and immediately queries both organization and event-view lists. It uses no sleep, polling, or intervening refresh, and restores the refresh interval in
finally.Production change: add
ImmediateConsistency()to the existing create operation. No frontend delay, retry, or cache policy changes.Local integration verification used a disposable Elasticsearch container with tmpfs storage. Temporary fixture and AppHost changes are excluded from this PR.