Repository navigation
[Docs] Make saved environments optional in source-control setup - #3593
Open
roomote-roomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
roomote-roomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
roomote-roomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
No issues found. Reviewed the source-control documentation changes against the first-task guide, task-launch schema and handler, source-control tool implementation, and applicable repository guidance. Current-head docs validation, lint, typecheck, and test checks passed; Docker build and JavaScript/TypeScript CodeQL were still running when checked. See session Reviewed 01d3e1b |
roomote-roomote
Bot
requested review from
brunobergher,
daniel-lxs and
mrubens
as code owners
October 26, 2026 14:22
5 of 8 tasks
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related issue
Weekly public documentation health review; no separate issue.
Why this PR exists
What changed
Correct the Source control overview's saved-environment prerequisite. Explain that a connected repository can run a task directly with a sandbox provider, link the existing first-task walkthrough, and make the verification checklist and PR-management introduction consistent with that path.
Why this change was made
The first-task guide already documents repository-only execution, and
taskLaunchRequestSchemaaccepts a repository with an optional environment ID. Requiring a saved environment in the source-control setup checklist sends readers through unnecessary setup. Current open PRs and issues were checked; the pending corrections in #3468, #3514, #3515, and #3466 are not duplicated.Impact
Documentation-only change to
apps/docs/source-control.mdx(+8/-3). Readers can connect repositories and verify a task without first creating an environment. No runtime, navigation, redirect, configuration, generated-index, or icon changes.How it was tested
mise exec -- pnpm --filter @roomote/docs build: passed repository-defined Mintlify build validation (not a static export).mise exec -- pnpm --filter @roomote/docs check: passed full Mintlify validation and broken-link check on baseline and final text.mise exec -- pnpm --filter @roomote/docs check-cookbook-index: passed, seven recipes; generation produced no changes.git diff --checkand all normal pre-push gates passed: oxlint, residual web/worker ESLint, 27 package typechecks, and Knip. Commit-time Judgement returned incomplete for two prose criteria (evidence/judgment collection failed); it allowed the commit, and those criteria were manually reviewed. It is not a successful automated judgment.pnpm lint/pnpm check-typesfor this prose-only change.Checklist
[Fix],[Feat],[Improve],[Refactor],[Docs], or[Chore]followed by a user-facing descriptionpnpm lintandpnpm check-typespass locallypnpm changesetNo changeset is needed for this documentation-only correction.
Screenshots
Genuine local Mintlify rendering with no mocks or simulated state. These demonstrate documentation appearance, not live task execution or provider authorization. Missing provider logos and weak selected-link contrast are disclosed above.