Repository navigation
Console wording, no browser agent tools, and a roadmap that matches the app - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…he app - The console asked every researcher to keep the second copy of the key file in their Teams channel files. It now asks for a secure place the study has approved. - Removed lib/board-tools.ts, which registered tools on document.modelContext so that an AI agent in the participant's browser could read the cards and piles and move cards. Nothing else used it. - ROADMAP listed three workflows, contribution review and Sites hosting as working, and a DOI as still to do. It now describes this release.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three small things from the code review.
Wording. The console asked every researcher to keep the second copy of the key file in their "Teams channel files", and publishing waited on a checkbox saying so. That came from the first study. It now asks for "a secure place our study has approved for its files". The key file's own notice changes in
@malverdesoftware/session-client0.1.4 (MalverdeSoftware/malverdesoftware#10); this app picks that up when it moves to that version.Browser agent tools removed.
lib/board-tools.tsregistered two tools ondocument.modelContext, so an AI agent running in a participant's browser could read the cards and piles and move cards. Nothing else used it, and a participant's sort shouldn't be offered to other software on the page. The approved spec still lists the file under "kept and reused"; I left the spec as the record of that round.Roadmap. It listed three workflows, contribution review and Sites hosting as working, and a DOI as still to do. It now describes this release, and moves the other activities to Next.
Checked.
npm run verify, and on a local server with synthetic data:npm run test:consoleandnpm run test:browser.