[AdaWorldAPI]

Summary

D-SAG-6 (#1760) lists the entry points for its D-SAG-6-1 capability audit in its §7. Since #1760 merged, #1813–#1831 and the private crai-rs CR-H0/CR-H1 docs have added material that audit must read, and some of that material now carries stale status. This PR adds .claude/plans/d-sag-6-1-audit-reference-ledger-v1.md, which records both. It is documentation only. It is not the audit, changes nothing in D-SAG-6's design, and authorizes no code.

What the ledger adds

• References missing from docs(D-SAG-6): Rust Codegraph → Mathematics → Logic → Tracert, prompt and board #1760 §7:
  • ruff ruff_spo_triplet (ir.rs, expand.rs, reassemble.rs, role.rs), plus ruff's behavioural-ore plan, R2IL oracle spec and polyglot AST RFC;
  • OGAR ogar-from-ruff;
  • the merged CFA docs from docs(D-CFA-0): counterfactual flow analysis capstone + thought dependency scratchpad #1813, docs(D-CFA-1): source-harvested ON/WHEN/DO incidence and refusal gates #1814 and docs(D-CFA-5): counterfactual compiler analysis and guarded equivalence #1818;
  • D-DR256-WHERE: capstone, DR64³ inventory, P2 Quack-path lab, evidence reconciliation, D-NFR-1 ownership correction #1792 (escaped-Keep refusal) and docs(DT64-0): versioned DTO predicate adapter capstone, staged PR board and EXO-50 gates #1799 (DT64);
  • three contract-side files: spog_tenants.rs, epistemic_state5.rs and lance-graph-cypher-quack;
  • D-DTM-1, and the board entry that records the mcp.exo.red workbench;
  • the ndarray mask and popcount primitives for D-SAG-6's first fixture;
  • crai-rs CR-H0/CR-H1, whose falsifier sets overlap F01–F15.
• Two required rows for the audit's capability map:
  • "Ruff Rust frontend: MISSING". ruff f2cb523 has SPO frontends for C++, C#, Python, Ruby, MeTTa and SQLAlchemy, but none for Rust.
  • "ProposedMethod type: PROPOSED only". It appears in plans but has zero definitions under crates/.
• One required comparison of the smallest read-only adapter against ogar-from-ruff.

Stale status corrected

• crai-rs CR-H0 lists docs(D-CFA-0): counterfactual flow analysis capstone + thought dependency scratchpad #1813–docs(EAW-10): minimal legal-rule AST and conditional deciding-question gate #1830 as open docs proposals. All eighteen have since merged, as docs.
• docs(D-DT64-6): DR64 routing, DT64 bind store, per-cell WHEN×ON×DO, OGIT reference predicates #1831 calls crai-rs CR-H0/CR-H1 "the successor to docs(D-SAG-6): Rust Codegraph → Mathematics → Logic → Tracert, prompt and board #1760". In fact crai-rs keeps D-SAG-6 as the motor, forbids a new Codegraph owner, and its CR-H2 waits on the D-SAG-6-1 audit. That makes it a sidecar that consumes D-SAG-6, and D-SAG-6-1 itself is still unstarted.
• docs(D-SAG-6): Rust Codegraph → Mathematics → Logic → Tracert, prompt and board #1760's Ruff cross-check ("Ruff may independently corroborate supported source structure") has no Rust input today, because ruff has no Rust frontend.

Board changes

• New entry entries/2026-10-28-d-sag-6-1-audit-reference-ledger.md.
• INTEGRATION_PLANS.md gets a prepended row; entries/README.md is regenerated.
• The supersession index regenerates with no change.

#1831 and #1832 also prepend to INTEGRATION_PLANS.md, so whichever of these merges later needs a rebase there.

Validation

• Run locally against origin/main eeaaafb:
  • plan_dids.py passes (1 added plan, D-id present);
  • append_only_gate.py passes (11 files checked);
  • citation_decay.py --since origin/main reports no new decay;
  • entries_index.py --check passes.
• Every reference in the ledger was read or located on the stated main. The two measured claims, the ruff frontend list and the zero ProposedMethod hits under crates/, give the command used.
• Not run: code and tests, because this PR adds none.

Related: #1760, #1831, #1832.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 969e8e2a-6573-4674-9763-133ee4b35230

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T03:17:32.055756Z	98dd0a8	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.