[AdaWorldAPI]

Board and docs only. No code.

What changes

• PR_ARC_INVENTORY.md: compact entries for lab(drmc): certificate keeps egglog's ProofStore + ProofId, not its rendering; L1 board records #1742–lance-graph-onnx: Tanh and Exp as ULP-bounded aliases (onnx::bounded) #1758. None of these PRs had one. Each entry is recorded from its merge commit and changed-file list, and claims nothing beyond what the PR's own board entry records.

• LATEST_STATE.md: new "main after lance-graph-onnx: Tanh and Exp as ULP-bounded aliases (onnx::bounded) #1758" section covering the new crates (lance-graph-onnx, math-polyfill-probe, soa-view-probe), the ProofStore certificate, and the doc-only ONNX/DR plans.

• STATUS_BOARD.md: five rows still read "In PR", "draft PR" or "this branch" after their PRs merged:

  • D-ONNX-NATIVE-0 → D-ONNX-NATIVE-0: lance-graph-onnx, ONNX names over existing native functions #1754
  • D-DRF-1 → docs(D-DRF-1): immutable DR64 focus leases, foreign-cache amortization and sparse writeback #1756
  • D-NFR-6 → lab(D-NFR-6): native operations over the SoaEnvelope borrow — no Table, no frame guard #1755
  • D-MPF-1 → lab(mpf): D-MPF-1 — the Stage 1 math polyfill already exists; one expression, oracle, refusals, cost split #1752
  • D-ONNX-0 → D-ONNX-RELALG-CAP S0: ONNX as an import membrane over the existing substrate; board closeout #1726–#1741 #1744

  Only the status column changed.

• INTEGRATION_PLANS.md: one index row for six plans that merged without one (docs(onnx) S0: convergence amendment (HOLD, competing capstones #1744/#1750) #1745–docs(onnx) S4–S5: reuse BGZ/Helix/ndarray with identity-safe ONNX binding #1749, docs(onnx) O0–O4: Optimum offline compiler frontend → BGZ/Palette256 sidecar #1751).

• .claude/plans/d-onnx-relalg-cap-v1.md (the S0 plan from D-ONNX-RELALG-CAP S0: ONNX as an import membrane over the existing substrate; board closeout #1726–#1741 #1744): owner supersession note adopting D-NFC §1/§2 by reference, as d-native-first-dependency-correction-v1.md §6 step 1 asks of each S0 owner. OP-ONNX-1 is marked answered by D-NFC §4 plus lance-graph-onnx. The rest of the plan is unchanged.

Still open, and not decided here

• Which of the three S0 drafts (D-ONNX-RELALG-CAP S0: ONNX as an import membrane over the existing substrate; board closeout #1726–#1741 #1744 / docs(onnx) S0: convergence amendment (HOLD, competing capstones #1744/#1750) #1745 / docs(board): D-ONNX-RELALG-CAP S0 — ONNX intake onto existing surfaces + board reconciliation #1750) documents the conformance-adapter layer. That is D-NFC §6 step 3, and the three owners decide it on EXO-50.

Gates

• append_only_gate.py origin/main: OK
• citation_decay.py --since origin/main: no new decay
• entries_index.py --check: current
• fruits_index.py --check: current
• SUPERSESSION-INDEX.md: regenerated with no diff

---

Generated by Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 9269d035-1f5c-4e5c-9b47-d16bf0df1b82

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-24T18:58:12.743125Z	32cbf2f	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.