Repository navigation
plans: D-LFA-1/2 GKAT amendment and D-GKAT-0 probe (docs only) - #1673
Conversation
Operator-approved amendment after #1670: - D-LFA-1: a structured Rubicon reference flow and an optimized variant are GKAT-equivalent (same actions, declared guards and projections), plus a separate trace check that RequestCommit never occurs without a valid revision and MUL authorization. RequestCommit is an intent, not a Lance write. Three disable runs; GoTo/GoBack refused; WaitForInput is an observation at resume; the snapshot/codebook generation gate stays independent. - Guard projection: WHERE {T} vs CHECK {T,U} declared per guard, never interchanged; commit authorization never inherits CHECK semantics. - D-LFA-2: integration with graph-flow, thought-git verbs, Kanban transitions and authorized proposals against the from-scratch oracle; no second scheduler, evaluator, state store or commit owner. - D-GKAT-0: independent, unclaimed fixture probe (G1, G2, G5); no runtime, dependency or executor. D-RFT-2 unchanged; D-RFT-4 keeps thought binding/frontier. Co-research map: D-GKAT-0 and P-GKAT-RUBICON probe rows. STATUS_BOARD: D-RFT-0 shipped (#1668); D-LFA-1/2 and D-GKAT-0 rows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configuration
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Docs and probe definitions only. Nothing is implemented, no owner is claimed, and nothing should merge automatically. This is the operator-approved follow-up to the GKAT excerpt in #1670 and the co-research map in #1668.
Changes
d-lfa-lance-graph-flow-rubicon-assimilation-v1.mdgets a new section, Amendment 2026-10-21: guarded-control verification (GKAT). Where it differs from the existing D-LFA-1 and D-LFA-2 text, the amendment replaces it.Guard projection. A K3 predicate becomes a GKAT test only through a declared projection:
{T});{T,U}).The two are never interchanged. Commit authorization never inherits CHECK semantics.
D-LFA-1. One structured Rubicon reference flow and one optimized variant.
RequestCommitwithout a valid revision and MUL authorization.RequestCommitis an intent, not a Lance write.RequestCommitahead of its guard;GoToandGoBackare refused, not translated.WaitForInputis modelled as an observation of external state at resume.D-LFA-2. Integration with what already exists:
Replay results and receipts are compared against the from-scratch oracle. No second scheduler, evaluator, state store or commit owner.
D-GKAT-0. An independent, unclaimed fixture probe:
No production runtime, dependency or executor.
Unchanged. D-RFT-2. D-RFT-4 keeps versioned thought binding and frontier behaviour; guarded workflow verification is not part of it.
Board.
STATUS_BOARD:--checkpasses; the supersession index is unchanged.Generated by Claude Code