[AdaWorldAPI]

#1635 merged one commit too early: its head (cb9906d9) carries a round-2 board entry whose id duplicates the round-1 entry (D-RMAP-DIR-1). The entries-index check (regenerate-and-diff) fails on that, so main now fails it too.

This PR is the follow-up commit that missed the merge:

• The round-2 entry, and its row in the entries index, are now D-RMAP-DIR-1-R2. The index keeps an existing row's id, so the row had to be renamed as well as the heading. entries_index.py --check passes, and the supersession index is unchanged.
• Plan §9.4 gains the 65,000-user W5 figures, which show the same pattern as at 8,000 users:
  • 64 focus groups: F is 3.3× faster than B+;
  • 256 focus groups (8,160 conjunctions, 255 KiB of masks): F's mask form is 2.1× slower than B+, and the slot-bit form 1.2× faster;
  • composite membership: F is 1.8–2.8× faster.

Docs and board only; no code.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 5cf34a82-bc60-48ae-b742-023631671436

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-20T22:34:53.839824Z	45c8a4d	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.