fix: complex fields in local editor

[benlife5]

We assume the types of the entity fields in local data because we do not have the authoritative stream definition. We were over-classifying any object with .image subfield as a Complex Image.

https://yext.slack.com/archives/C0AQSEXMZ3L/p1787940880994969?thread_ts=1787936147.451099&cid=C0AQSEXMZ3L

Tested with a local pack used in the services repo

Will port over to section-library after merge

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5bc156a4-6dfb-4458-8908-f1a9a0142f30

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb5dbeb and 728ad00.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• packages/visual-editor/src/vite-plugin/local-editor/entityFields.test.ts
• packages/visual-editor/src/vite-plugin/local-editor/entityFields.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The image detection logic now separates direct images from nested image objects. Nested images are recognized only when an object contains exactly one image key with a direct image value. A regression test verifies that a content object remains an object and that its nested rich text, image, CTA, and title fields receive the expected types and display name.

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 728ad

This change adjusts local editor classification for complex fields and adds focused tests; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: fixing complex field handling in the local editor.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the local field-type inference issue, the Complex Image over-classification, testing, and planned follow-up work.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch local-editor-types

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}