Skip to content

feat!: update to use brick/math 1.x - #63

Open
owenvoke wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/brick-math-1.0
Open

owenvoke wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/brick-math-1.0

Conversation

@owenvoke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@owenvoke
owenvoke requested a review from alberthaff October 28, 2026 10:13
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: QUIET
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: 4ac9ccd1-ab6b-4cde-a04d-84129d836cc9
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 992355b and 560129f.

Files selected for processing: 3
  • composer.json
  • src/Casts/NumberFromDecimal.php
  • src/Number.php

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 3 included reviews remain after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 5 reviews per hour.

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified the documented requirements for decimal values and expanded parameter descriptions.
  • Release Impact
    • No changes to application behavior or public interfaces are included.

The Composer requirement for brick/math changes to ^1.0. PHPDoc annotations for Number and NumberFromDecimal describe parameter types and non-negative constraints. No runtime behavior or public signatures change.

Changes: Numeric API updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Dependency constraint
composer.json
The brick/math requirement changes from ^0.14.4 to ^1.0.
Numeric parameter documentation
src/Number.php, src/Casts/NumberFromDecimal.php
PHPDoc annotations document parameter types and non-negative constraints. Declarations and defaults remain unchanged.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested labels: dependencies

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 56012

No actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4 · Inconclusive 1

Failed Failed checks: 1 inconclusive

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so the description cannot be evaluated for relevance. Add a brief description that states the project now requires brick/math 1.x and notes any breaking-change impact.
Passed Passed checks: 4 passed
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly identifies the primary change: updating the project to use brick/math 1.x. It also marks the change as breaking.
Docstring Coverage Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 2 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant