Skip to content

feat: begin snapshot-bound verification planning - #2

Open
GTrunSec wants to merge 64 commits into
mainfrom
agent/software-engineering-mainline
Open

GTrunSec wants to merge 64 commits into
mainfrom
agent/software-engineering-mainline

Conversation

@GTrunSec

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add POO-native verification policy, request, and planning-result values over the existing Phase 2 invalidation receipt.
  • Select only obligations bound to the supplied snapshot; record capability requirements, impact witnesses, and separate conflicted, unresolved, stale, and unavailable blockers.
  • Keep verifier execution, release authority, and runtime execution false; update the Phase 3 roadmap status to active without claiming phase closure.

Local verification

  • just check passed on Darwin arm64 using an isolated, pinned Gerbil package workspace. This includes Scheme semantic and integration tests, Lean, C ABI, Python, and wheel build.
  • git diff --check passed.

Still open in Phase 3

Replacement-obligation derivation, dependency ordering, verifier-choice receipts, and composition obligations remain separate work. This PR does not invoke verifiers or authorize effects.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-23T03:04:16.345999Z 2e69ec3 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2e69ec370a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread modules/assurance/funs.ss Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant