[Copilot]

Summary

Fixes the failing labeler / label (pull_request) Actions job by switching the workflow to pull_request_target so label writes succeed on fork-originated PRs. The change is limited to workflow trigger/context alignment.

Motivation

The labeler job failed with Resource not accessible by integration because actions/labeler attempted to write labels with insufficient token permissions under pull_request for fork PRs.

Implementation notes

• Workflow event context
  • Switched trigger from pull_request to pull_request_target in .github/workflows/labeler.yml.
• Job guard alignment
  • Updated the job-level if from pull_request to pull_request_target to keep event gating consistent.
• Behavioral impact
  • No application/runtime code changes; only CI labeling behavior changes.

on:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]

jobs:
  label:
    if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'

Questions for the reviewer

These questions must be answered before your PR will be reviewed.
Replace each … with your actual answer. Unanswered questions block merge.

Q1 — What existing tests cover the code you changed?
A: No repository test suite covers this change directly; it is a GitHub Actions workflow-only fix.

Q2 — What new tests did you add, and what cases do they cover?
A: None (workflow configuration change only).

Q3 — Does this change affect any authenticated or unauthenticated API paths? If yes, how?
A: No API path changes.

Q4 — Did you run golangci-lint run locally and get 0 issues?
A: No (not applicable to this workflow-only change).

Q5 — Is this the only open PR you have against development?
A: Yes.

Checklist

• go test -race -count=1 -timeout=120s ./... passes locally
• golangci-lint run --timeout=5m reports 0 issues
• gofmt -s -l . reports no unformatted files
• All five questions above are answered (not left as …)
• No secrets or credentials in code / config
• New dependencies reviewed and justified
• Related issue linked in "Closes #" above

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: stjosephsplacements/AetherCode-Execution-Engine/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: b18e8539-b913-4c46-ada8-0e126b3536ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}