Repository navigation
feat(seo): admit /vs/skills-sh to the index - #551
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Harlan asked for the comparison to be indexable. It fails the measured volume bar, and the competitor brand rule would exclude it, so the admission records it as an owner-approved exception with the evidence and a review at the 2026-11-11 gate.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔗 Linked issue
None. Harlan asked for
/vs/skills-shto be indexed after #516 rebuilt it.❓ Type of change
📚 Description
/vs/skills-shrenderednoindex,followand stayed out of the pages sitemap, because the freeze audit had no admission for it. The homepage hero and the new Why band both link it as the skills.sh alternative.It does not clear the admission bar on evidence. The keyword provider holds no data for skills.sh queries, and Search Console shows five queries naming skills.sh at about one impression each over three months, none with "alternative". The audit's competitor brand rule would also exclude it. The entry records it as an owner-approved exception with that evidence, like
/vs/context7, and puts it up for review at the 2026-11-11 gate.