Skip to content

CLDSRV-911: promisify removeAllVersions versioning test utility#6183

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-911-incomplete-sdk-migration
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

CLDSRV-911: promisify removeAllVersions versioning test utility#6183
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-911-incomplete-sdk-migration

Conversation

@tcarmet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Jun 2, 2026

A versioning functional-test cleanup helper was left mid-migration to the new AWS SDK: it used Promise-based SDK calls inside a callback-style control flow (async.waterfall) that never returned a Promise. Callers that awaited it resolved immediately while version and delete-marker deletion continued in the background, so bucket teardown raced ahead and failed against a consensus-based metadata backend (BucketNotEmpty, leftover buckets polluting shared metadata). This migrates the helper and its internal delete helper to async/await while keeping a callback trampoline, so awaiting it now waits for cleanup to complete and existing callback and promisify-based callers are unaffected.

Migrate removeAllVersions and its _deleteVersionList helper from
async.waterfall/callbacks to async/await, keeping a callback trampoline
so existing callback and promisify callers keep working.

The waterfall never returned a Promise, so callers doing
`await removeAllVersions(...)` resolved immediately and version cleanup
ran fire-and-forget in the background. Under a RAFT-based metadata
backend the consensus latency exposes the race: bucket teardown runs
before cleanup finishes, leaving versioned objects behind and failing
DeleteBucket with BucketNotEmpty.
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 2, 2026

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 2, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-911 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.8

  • 9.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-911, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team June 2, 2026 22:17
@claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown

claude Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 2, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team June 2, 2026 23:29
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 3, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-911 contains:

  • 9.3.8

  • 9.4.0

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.9

  • 9.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-911, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@tcarmet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tcarmet commented Jun 3, 2026

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 3, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

function enableVersioningThenPutObject(bucket, object, callback) {
enableVersioning(bucket, err => {
if (err) {
callback(err);
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing double-callback: when enableVersioning fails, callback(err) fires but execution falls through to s3Client.send(...), which eventually calls callback a second time.

```suggestion
return callback(err);

@claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown

claude Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

  • enableVersioningThenPutObject: missing return before callback(err) causes double-callback when enableVersioning fails (pre-existing, but in scope since this PR touches the function).
    - Add return before callback(err) on line 90.

    The removeAllVersions and _deleteVersionList async/await migration looks correct. The callback trampoline preserves backward compatibility for both callback and promisify callers.

    Review by Claude Code

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.53%. Comparing base (25b783d) to head (ef09df8).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.3.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6183      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            84.58%   84.53%   -0.06%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13360    13360              
===================================================
- Hits                 11301    11294       -7     
- Misses                2059     2066       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 68.34% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 28.30% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 69.55% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 69.54% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 36.80% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 35.84% <ø> (-0.83%) ⬇️
sur-tests-inflights 37.68% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unit 70.50% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 3, 2026

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-911-incomplete-sdk-migration

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 4, 2026

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

This pull request does not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
will be left untouched:

  • hotfix/6.4.7
  • hotfix/7.10.49
  • hotfix/7.10.8
  • hotfix/7.70.11
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/9.0.32
  • hotfix/7.10.27
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.10.15
  • hotfix/7.4.6
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.70.51
  • hotfix/9.0.7
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/9.2.24
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/7.70.73
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/7.70.45
  • hotfix/8.8.45
  • hotfix/7.4.7
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.70.21
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.10.28
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/7.10.4
  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.10.30

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 4, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-911.

Goodbye tcarmet.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit ceec022 into development/9.3 Jun 4, 2026
36 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/CLDSRV-911-incomplete-sdk-migration branch June 4, 2026 04:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants