Skip to content

fix: listing copy names the model it serves and links only to pages that exist - #5

Merged
danstotts-ops merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/listing-copy
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

danstotts-ops merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/listing-copy

Conversation

@danstotts-ops

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Holo4 is listed on the Hub as of launch-20261008-2. Its copy still describes a different launch.

Where Was Now
hub.json title Holo4 (Holo4-27B-GGUF, Holo4-35B-A3B-GGUF) Holo4-35B-A3B
hub.json description GGUF, llama.cpp and Ollama claims, plus internal market framing Serve Holo4-35B-A3B (H Company) on Runpod Serverless with vLLM.
README heading and intro GGUF names Holo4-35B-A3B
README recipe, Image row runpod/worker-v1-vllm:v2.27.0 this repo's Dockerfile, on vllm/vllm-openai:v0.29.0
README env table no MAX_NUM_SEQS MAX_NUM_SEQS = 32 (#4)
README measurements unattributed attributed to Launch Builder's run on runpod/worker-v1-vllm:v2.27.0
README Deploy private template yye0eu6dtk (opens for Runpod's account only) the Hub listing, with the same utm tags
README Model page / Docs both return 404 removed
README "Before merging this bundle" / "Fast path while this is in review" present removed

This copies the pattern of runpod-workers/astabrief. The worker code, Dockerfile and tests.json are unchanged. The Hub reads hub.json per release, so the listing copy updates on the next release after this merges.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…hat exist

The listing title and description said "Holo4-27B-GGUF, Holo4-35B-A3B-GGUF" and
promised GGUF, llama.cpp and Ollama deploys. The worker serves
Hcompany/Holo4-35B-A3B at fp8 on vLLM. The description also carried internal
market framing.

The README's Deploy link opened a private serverless template. Its model page
and docs links return 404. The recipe table named worker-v1-vllm while this
repo's Dockerfile runs vLLM v0.29.0. The env table lacked MAX_NUM_SEQS, and
reviewer-only sections were left in. Now Deploy is the Hub listing, the
measurements say which image produced them, and the review sections are gone,
matching runpod-workers/astabrief.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@kenlim-mops kenlim-mops left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved.

@danstotts-ops
danstotts-ops merged commit f489ba7 into main Oct 9, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants