Repository navigation
contrib → main: Organization Science Stage 1 reviewed package and irreducibility-pipeline - #865
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ions (#849) * berthon_ethics_paper: open the arm — source copies, all cards, indexes, scripts Byte-identical copies of the eight versions of the Berthon ethics paper and their supporting notes (sources/), all cards from berthon_ethics_course and algorithmacy_design_ethics, the dxd_foundation and algorithmacy_scaffolding cards matched to DXD Part 2's citations, and DXD Part 2's literature directory. Generated: CARD_INDEX.md (421 cards), DUPLICATES.md (26 clusters), NO_CARD.md (83 of 134 Part 2 keys with no card), references.bib (809 entries), PROVENANCE.md (492 copies, all identical). Scripts are stdlib, deterministic, with --check. The ledger and consolidation follow in later commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EpbgtHxT6wTjFn1VJCmURK * berthon_ethics_paper: concept ledger, conflicts and consolidation Hand-written from a reading of all eight versions and their notes: CONCEPT_LEDGER.md (113 concepts with provenance per version, the author's wording quoted with line numbers, cards and audit flags), CONFLICTS.md (X01-X13, including every v3 change marked AUTHOR by ledger row), and CONSOLIDATION.md (the ideas in one themed account; no thesis chosen, by the author's ruling). HEADINGS.md maps all 187 headings to ledger rows; coverage_check.py fails on any unmapped heading, uncited ledger row, missing card or uncited audit item, and passes. NO_CARD matching now also uses title and year. Registers the arm in submissions/README.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EpbgtHxT6wTjFn1VJCmURK --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…856) * protocol: scaffolder names probe_<slug>.py and creates results/ and literature/; portable run commands new_question.py left the probe stub as probe_template.py while writing probe_<slug> into the FINDINGS.md reproduce line and the probe docstring, so the CI entry a newcomer copied did not resolve. It now renames the stub, creates results/ and literature/, and prints the real module. RESEARCH_PROTOCOL.md, the template, and question_pipeline.js ran under the owner's laptop venv path and named a branch that no longer exists; they now run `python -m …` from the repo root, name the shared infrastructure with its package prefixes, and state the current house style. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * probes: run commands use the project venv, not the owner's laptop path Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * catalog and open-questions registry: place a question before scaffolding it tools/build_catalog.py generates catalog.json, one row per question, probe, study, foundations experiment, and open thread, with the one-line finding, the registered reproduce commands, and a runtime class; --find prints the rows nearest to a newcomer's question. OPEN_QUESTIONS.md is the registry of open threads with a status column and what each needs; MAP.md counts its open rows and lists the generator. The update-directory job regenerates catalog.json and catalog-current gates it. ci/precommit_audit.py reports, for a commit range, whether hypotheses.md landed before FINDINGS.md and results/ in each question directory. The manifest registers probes #7 (the first probe START_HERE runs), #57 and #116 (slow). q43 gains a literature/ note explaining the missing Stage 2 artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * docs: the forker's path — fast first probe, placement step, fork recipe, one style rule START_HERE runs probe_control (two seconds) instead of the nine-minute conjunctive law, adds Phase 3.5 (place the question against the catalog: answered, adjacent, or open), routes the data-minded to DATA_SOURCES.md and the handoff packets, and sends 'find something new' to OPEN_QUESTIONS.md. GETTING_STARTED gains the placement step and the fork remote recipe. AGENTS confirms the instrument with classifier.validate rather than the full manifest, lists the fourth generator, and adds the fork note. AGENTS, CONTRIBUTING, PUBLISHING carry one style sentence pointing at CLAUDE.md's current rules. OVERVIEW, org_frontier/README, and protocol/README drop the drifted counts and the stale 'not yet run' and 'rest pending' lines. NOW.md is refreshed to 27 October. README's setup block warns about Python 3.10 and validates; llms.txt lists START_HERE and OPEN_QUESTIONS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * harness: exact probe-check matching, Windows-safe --find, add-only audit, fork recipe - build_catalog: match a probe's checks on the exact module after `-m` instead of a substring, so #67 probe_voting no longer takes probe_voting_robustness's reproduce command; regenerate catalog.json. - build_catalog: guard the SIGPIPE handler with hasattr (absent on Windows). - precommit_audit: list only added files (--diff-filter=A), as the docstring says, and count `results/` directories at any depth. - GETTING_STARTED §8: `gh repo fork --clone` already adds `upstream`; drop the redundant remote add and cd into the clone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7XkmoHkqsYk7uTDpv8hp8 --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* submissions: open Exetasis AI and Sovereignty project Scaffold for the Exetasis CFP (300-500-word abstract, due 2026-12-20): README, CFP digest (journal page authoritative, PhilEvents secondary), the pasted starting-point abstract with known defects, the concept inventory for seven research streams, and an empty verification table and bib. Adds index rows to submissions/README.md, CALENDAR.md and NOW.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: deep research, hand verification, angle memo Seven research streams (genealogies, subjectivation, infrastructure, authority, rent/formal, collisions, venue) with the synthesized report; 35 sources checked by hand against Crossref, Open Library and source texts in VERIFICATION.md; IDEAS.md sets out angles A-D for the author's ruling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: verify five sources from supplied PDFs Stark & Vanden Broeck: 'interested third party' is not their phrase (Mismatch); triangular structure p. 14. Lazar quotes on p. 163. Verhulst & G. Otero and Pisani read in full. Ingham & Lovett 2019 added: noncooperative model, does not pre-empt the bloc result. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: literacy-to-sovereignty search; record angle ruling Roger's ruling: argue the chapter's thesis with recent literature, fitted to the call. Search log, source map and theme mapping in research/LITERACY_SEARCH.md; ten new verification rows. Son (2022) is the closest collision and is unread. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: read nine supplied sources for the abstract Son 2022 read in full: a partial collision (same literacy premise), but with a dyadic 'technology literacy' remedy, so it serves as the foil. Goody & Watt: literacy necessary, 'educated democracy' unrealized (pp. 332-333). Burrell, Coeckelbergh, Oeldorf-Hirsch & Neubaum, Gagrcin et al., Calzada, Mohlmann et al. verified; Lynn's review of Bateman has no literacy-test content. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: draft abstract (494 words) and bio Thesis per Roger's ruling: literacy necessary, never sufficient; algorithmacy necessary under triadic, opaque, co-optive coordination. All quotations checked against VERIFICATION.md. Shapley left out. Marked DRAFTED; bio facts marked CONFIRM; awaiting read-aloud. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: record ruling not to cite Roger's own work Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: abstract v2 from Roger's pasted rewrite and reviews 496 words, APA 7, no em-dashes. Kept accurate review suggestions; corrected the Verhulst characterisation and the Goody & Watt gloss attribution against the sources. New quotes verified: Goody & Watt p. 332, Stark & Vanden Broeck p. 14 (ratings), Verhulst pp. 1, 4. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: abstract v3, rebuilt against Muldoon & Raekstad (2023) Sentence-by-sentence rebuild: model abstract+introduction transcribed (48 entries), outline of 22, ledger with verdicts for 23 sentences; four pronoun/claim defects rewritten. 494 words. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: v4, Roger's rewrite plus a CFP-framing opening Opening paragraph (marked DRAFTED) answers Theme 2, 'algorithmic governance and democratic accountability'. Roger's text verbatim. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * exetasis_sovereignty: abstract v5, merged with Antonio Scala's plan; model run Merge Roger's v4 abstract with Antonio Scala's 25 Oct revision: keep the verified literacy argument and quotations, add the network mechanism, the simulation and the coordinative-sovereignty definition. File Antonio's plan verbatim, archive v4, add Pending verification rows for his sources, and reimplement his threshold-contagion model to check the claim the abstract reports (competence compensates for thin bridges only at bridge positions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKWotXgMiqF92CbWh2BVBk * exetasis_sovereignty: define coordinative sovereignty as the condition for sovereignty Roger's ruling of 26 Oct: coordinative sovereignty is the condition for sovereignty, voice within the coordinative environment, and no individual sovereignty remains. Paragraph 4 rewritten; the note records the ruling and its effect on Antonio's plan and the IGI chapter. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKWotXgMiqF92CbWh2BVBk * exetasis_sovereignty: trim abstract v5 back inside the 500-word limit Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKWotXgMiqF92CbWh2BVBk * exetasis_sovereignty: abstract v5 at 497 words Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKWotXgMiqF92CbWh2BVBk * exetasis_sovereignty: v5.2, keep Antonio where he advances the thesis, drop what misreads it Roger's ruling of 26 Oct. Kept: the intermediary shapes the relations through which voice forms (Santos; Centola & Macy), the bridge-width result, the two poles of the debate. Dropped: sovereignty as a population's capacity, constituent power and the collective subject, a surviving individual sovereignty, relational algorithmacy, the bridge-placement result. Two tables in ABSTRACT.md record the sorting for Antonio. Body 493 words. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKWotXgMiqF92CbWh2BVBk --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Ludwitt <rhunt@bentley.edu>
* berthon_ethics_paper: open the arm — source copies, all cards, indexes, scripts Byte-identical copies of the eight versions of the Berthon ethics paper and their supporting notes (sources/), all cards from berthon_ethics_course and algorithmacy_design_ethics, the dxd_foundation and algorithmacy_scaffolding cards matched to DXD Part 2's citations, and DXD Part 2's literature directory. Generated: CARD_INDEX.md (421 cards), DUPLICATES.md (26 clusters), NO_CARD.md (83 of 134 Part 2 keys with no card), references.bib (809 entries), PROVENANCE.md (492 copies, all identical). Scripts are stdlib, deterministic, with --check. The ledger and consolidation follow in later commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EpbgtHxT6wTjFn1VJCmURK * berthon_ethics_paper: concept ledger, conflicts and consolidation Hand-written from a reading of all eight versions and their notes: CONCEPT_LEDGER.md (113 concepts with provenance per version, the author's wording quoted with line numbers, cards and audit flags), CONFLICTS.md (X01-X13, including every v3 change marked AUTHOR by ledger row), and CONSOLIDATION.md (the ideas in one themed account; no thesis chosen, by the author's ruling). HEADINGS.md maps all 187 headings to ledger rows; coverage_check.py fails on any unmapped heading, uncited ledger row, missing card or uncited audit item, and passes. NO_CARD matching now also uses title and year. Registers the arm in submissions/README.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EpbgtHxT6wTjFn1VJCmURK * berthon_ethics_paper: set up the Nadella workstream The ethics the Spaces in the Stream paper bracketed, read through Nadella's X article "Models as Insider Risks in the Super Intelligence Era" (10 Oct 2026). nadella/ holds the author's instructions verbatim, a corpus index (P1-P21 paragraph map; full texts kept local because the repo is public), the rulings made under the author's delegation, and a research plan pairing each of the post's moves with a failure of growing literacy. collect.py copies the lab's earlier work on the post and on the scribal and print transitions (49 files) and the 219 cards behind it; build_provenance.py now checks those copies too. CONFLICTS X01 records the delegated ruling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EpbgtHxT6wTjFn1VJCmURK * berthon_ethics_paper: make the stated card counts match the indexes Totals now match CARD_INDEX.md (583 cards), DUPLICATES.md (32 clusters) and COVERAGE.md (291 uncited). nadella/collect.py counted bib-key matches (219) as cards; it now counts distinct cards (204). Facets G and V1 hold 62. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7XkmoHkqsYk7uTDpv8hp8 --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add the v6 prospectus and technical addendum, the 10-slide deck, and a folder README under submissions/proposals/orgsci_ai_2026/, and index the 1 November 2026 deadline. Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: Roger Hunt <rogerSuperBuilderAlpha@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* classifier: portable run commands and a current status note The README, validate.py, and classifier.py docstrings ran the instrument under the owner's laptop venv path and pointed at files in the private dissertation repository a forker cannot see. They now run `python -m …` from the repo root, name the oracle by its package path, and describe the classifier as the instrument in use rather than a scaffold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * classifier: run.py and forms.py docstrings follow suit Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * classifier: methods.md and concepts.md point at public files Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmpzs9ewHjVmrjPYwYV * classifier: fix stale forms.py library note and proxy_audit module path Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7XkmoHkqsYk7uTDpv8hp8 --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sync main into contrib
* orgsci: review the Stage 1 package and fold the irreducibility prototype into the lab STAGE1_REVIEW.md audits the Google Doc against the CFP, the prototype and the lab: CFP compliance, narrative, every repository reference and number re-derived from the scripts, every citation checked against a database record, and the attribution of each claim about the literature. Eleven items block submission; the first is that irreducibility-pipeline (tag v0.1-stage1) had no git remote. The prototype now lives at irreducibility-pipeline/ with its layout intact, so one fork of the lab carries both artifacts. From the lab root `python irreducibility-pipeline/reproduce.py` passes 17/17 and `pytest` 19/19; the lab check irreducibility-pipeline-reproduce (slow) registers the pass line. The README's programs list names it. Found on the way and not changed: wageman-ti-verdict fails on this branch (manifest expects rho(W,Phi)=0.883, script prints 0.867). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H7Xkmog7WCpaqLVPe22mKa (cherry picked from commit f2ef5de) * docs: land the reviewed Org Sci Stage 1 text and the QR deck Replace the prospectus with the v7 export (review items 0.1–0.11, F.1–F.19, F.23–F.24), add Do Platforms Reduce to Pairs, and set the workshop date to 27–28 February 2027 (tentative). Co-authored-by: Roger Hunt <rogerSuperBuilderAlpha@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: let pytest collect the irreducibility package from the lab root Declare pytest options so irreducibility-pipeline is the rootdir, and put that directory on pythonpath. pytest -q irreducibility-pipeline/tests then imports the package. Co-authored-by: Roger Hunt <rogerSuperBuilderAlpha@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: Roger Hunt <rogerSuperBuilderAlpha@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Promotes
contribtomain, including the reviewed Organization Science Stage 1 package (submissions/proposals/orgsci_ai_2026/,irreducibility-pipeline/,STAGE1_REVIEW.md, updatedgdoc_1fhM_v6_story_plus_addendum.md, andDo-Platforms-Reduce-to-Pairs-IIT-PyPhi.pptx, PRs #858 and #864) along with recentcontribmerges (#849, #850, #851, #856, #857, #863).