test : Set Up Automated Unit and Integration Test Suite (closes #1334)

[Pratikshya32]

Summary

• Add integration tests verifying controller logic and thresholds
• Set up validation checks for configuration schemas

Closes #1334

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[vercel]

@Pratikshya32 is attempting to deploy a commit to the magic-peach1's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[Pratikshya32]

Hello! I have created a pull request resolving this issue: #1345.

[github-actions]

⚠️ PR Format Issues — @Pratikshya32

Please fix the following before your PR can be reviewed:

• ⚠️ Use a conventional PR title. Examples:
  • feat: add dark mode support
  • fix: resolve aria label missing on slider
  • docs: add deployment guide to README

Push new commits after fixing — this comment will update automatically.

📖 CONTRIBUTING.md

[github-actions]

👋 Thanks for your PR, @Pratikshya32!

Welcome to Reframe — a browser-based video editor built for everyone 🎬

What happens next

1. 🤖 Automated checks — build & TypeScript typecheck will run automatically
2. ✅ Vercel preview — a preview deployment will be created (requires maintainer authorization for fork PRs)
3. 👀 Code review — a maintainer will review your changes
4. 🚀 Merge — once approved, your PR will be merged!

Quick checklist

• PR title follows Conventional Commits (e.g. feat: add dark mode)
• Linked the issue this PR closes (e.g. Closes #123)
• Tested the changes locally (bun run dev)
• Build passes (bun run build)

Useful links

• 📖 CONTRIBUTING.md
• 🐛 Open Issues
• ⭐ Star the repo to support the project!

Happy coding! 🎉

[magic-peach]

Thanks for the contribution! Another open PR (#1760: test: Set up automated integration tests for useVideoEditor core controller #1334) tackles the same issue and is a bit further along (cleaner CI / no merge conflicts), so I'm consolidating there to keep review focused in one place. Closing this one — no reflection on the work itself, just avoiding split review across duplicates. Feel free to bring anything over to #1760 if it adds something that one doesn't have yet!