Repository navigation
Turn the template into a cruft template - #15
Conversation
Projects are created with `cruft create` and pull later template changes with
`cruft update`. The project moves under {{cookiecutter.project_name}}/, the rename
script gives way to prompted names, and CI creates a project and runs its tests and
pre-commit. The template ships no pixi.lock: each project locks on its first install.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 88ea222999
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
- Name the distribution with hyphens, as pyproject-fmt normalises it. - Keep biome off .cruft.json, which cruft rewrites in its own format. - Re-include figures/.gitkeep, which the figures/ rule hid from a fresh repo. - Refuse prompt answers with quotes or backslashes; they break the TOML. - Skip README.md on update: each project writes its own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2b75da1bb4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 participant
Projects are now created with
uvx cruft create https://github.com/quadbio/analysis_templateand pull later template changes, such as the vendoredREVIEW_GUIDE.md,.gitignorerules and.claude/settings.json, withuvx cruft update.{{cookiecutter.project_name}}/, andcookiecutter.jsonprompts for the repo name, package name, description and author.scripts/rename_package.pyand therenametask are gone.[tool.cruft] skipin the project'spyproject.tomlmarksREADME.md,analysis/,data/,src/andtests/as project-owned, so updates leave them alone.pixi.lockin the template. It can't be kept in sync with a templated manifest, and its updates would never apply to a project's own lock. Each project locks on its firstpixi install.git inithook.cruft updatediffs two fresh renders, and a hook-made.git/would end up in that diff. The README's create steps rungit initbeforepixi install, which hatch-vcs needs.*.rejfiles left by a conflicting update. biome skips.cruft.json, which cruft rewrites in its own format.pixi run testand pre-commit.cruft linkfor existing repos, and template development. The project README loses its rename and first-commit steps.Checked locally:
cruft createfrom a scratch clone, then a template commit andcruft update -y: the template-owned file updated, the skippedsrc/didn't, and a project edit survived.🤖 Generated with Claude Code