-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.5k
gh-138633: indicate SSL backend requirements for SSL functions #138656
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 4 commits
6df1740
5f351d2
dca32b5
df4f93b
c1ae0f6
7c60b75
0db99b9
b092f31
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -65,6 +65,13 @@ Notes on availability | |
| *Availability: Linux >= 3.17 with glibc >= 2.27* requires both Linux 3.17 or | ||
| newer and glibc 2.27 or newer. | ||
|
|
||
| * "Availability" notes may also be used to indicate requirements on how Python | ||
| was built. For instance, "Availability: OpenSSL >= 3.5" note means that the | ||
| feature is available if Python has been built with OpenSSL 3.5 or later, | ||
| while "Availability: not AWS-LC" note means that the feature is not available | ||
| if Python has been built with AWS-LC instead of OpenSSL. | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we imply a default of OpenSSL here?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd say "it depends". For now, we only have OpenSSL and AWS-LC that are "supported" and tested. We don't test LibreSSL or BoringSSL. In the future "not AWS-LC" may mean "everything that is libssl-like except AWS-LC". But this may be a bit annoying to actually say that "libssl-like" means. So, I don't have a preference. I think we should always assume that it should work with OpenSSL (maybe not with all its versions). |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| .. _wasm-availability: | ||
|
|
||
| WebAssembly platforms | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.