CompletePipeline: the icon legend of the workflow tree in HTML only

[pytooling-claude]

Documentation

• CompletePipeline, topic Workflow Hierarchy: the icon legend of the workflow tree (📄 workflow, 🧩 composite
  action, 🔗 third-party action, 🐳 container image) is shown in HTML only (.. only:: html).
  • The PDF has no tree icons (Hierarchies in the documentation drawn by the 'tree' directive #298, Known Issues), so the legend explains nothing there.
  • Libertinus Serif has no 📄 (U+1F4C4) and 🧩 (U+1F9E9). LaTeX warns Missing character, and latexmk ends with
    "Latex reported missing or unavailable character(s)" and exit code 1 - although myPackage.pdf (290 pages) is
    written. So _Checking_JobTemplates' job PDFDocumentation failed on dev since Hierarchies in the documentation drawn by the 'tree' directive #298.

Tests

• Local LaTeX build: no emoji left in myPackage.tex (was: one each of 📄, 🧩, 🔗, 🐳, all in the legend). The HTML
  page still shows the legend.

---

Related Issues and Pull-Requests

• Follow-up of Hierarchies in the documentation drawn by the 'tree' directive #298 (trees). Blocks v9.0.0 (v9.0.0 #299): _Checking_JobTemplates fails on dev until this is merged.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (c13a6e3)	41	38	92.68%
Head commit (f8ac0ec)	41 (+0)	38 (+0)	92.68% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#301)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.36%. Comparing base (c13a6e3) to head (f8ac0ec).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #301   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.36%   85.36%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          41       41           
  Branches        7        7           
=======================================
  Hits           35       35           
  Misses          3        3           
  Partials        3        3           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Paebbels]

We fixed MiKTeX, to it works in LaTeX too.