Repository navigation
CBMC: Use a second solver for 149/215 proofs - #1423
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-44, REDUCE-RAM)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-44)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-65)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-87)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-65, REDUCE-RAM)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
Contributor
CBMC Results (ML-DSA-87, REDUCE-RAM)
Full Results (375 configurations)
|
hanno-becker
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mkannwischer Thanks a lot. It's great to make progress towards the desired proof redundancy.
Can you rebase and get it ready for review?
mkannwischer
force-pushed
the
mjk/cbmc-lp64-two-solvers
branch
from
October 24, 2026 13:04
70b5ce9 to
191da3c
Compare
A soundness bug in a single SMT solver would silently invalidate every proof discharged by it. To mitigate this risk, we aim to have each proof discharged by at least two solvers. 149 of 215 proofs gain a second solver: 98 bitwuzla, 25 cvc5_arrays_exp, and 26 Z3 profiles alongside a bitwuzla or cvc5 default. The other 66 do not, mostly because bitwuzla timed out or cvc5 returned unknown, either under a local 300s per-proof cap or in CI. Signed-off-by: Matthias J. Kannwischer <matthias@zerorisc.com>
mkannwischer
force-pushed
the
mjk/cbmc-lp64-two-solvers
branch
from
October 24, 2026 14:11
191da3c to
15fe7d6
Compare
mkannwischer
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 24, 2026 15:01
hanno-becker
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2026
hanno-becker
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot @mkannwischer, it's great to make progress towards the proof-redundancy goal!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.