Skip to content

cran-extrachecks: clarify rules on exported generic functions #63

Description

@CoryMcCartan

Have been trying out the CRAN submission skill and it has done great; much better than my earlier attempt to do something similar.

The one issue I've run into is that it flags exported S3 generics, e.g. print.class_name, as needing @return and @examples, even if there is no Roxygen documentation except #' @export.
Seems like it might be good to edit the skill to explain this exception to the CRAN rules (no .Rd is actually created here)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions