Auto-expand worker context budget - #219
Merged
Merged
Conversation
pmbstyle
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 23, 2026 22:42
…dget # Conflicts: # tests/test_agent_worker_contracts.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Worker startup could fail before inference when required system context grew slightly beyond the fixed 6,000-unit compiler budget. This surfaced infrastructure prompt bookkeeping to the agent and encouraged ineffective template-level workarounds.
Impact
Required worker instructions remain lossless, and normal prompt growth no longer requires an agent or operator to edit worker templates. The reported
6461 > 6000case now compiles automatically with an effective budget of 8,461.Validation
git diff --check