Skip to content

OCPBUGS-87377: Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#2172

Open
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-agent-installer-orchestrator
Open

OCPBUGS-87377: Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#2172
openshift-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-agent-installer-orchestrator

Conversation

@openshift-bot

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-agent-installer-orchestrator.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-5.0-ose-agent-installer-orchestrator branch from b848c1a to b04a287 Compare June 6, 2026 19:13
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the build and runtime infrastructure from OpenShift 4.21 with Go 1.25 to OpenShift 5.0 with Go 1.26. The CI operator configuration and Dockerfile base images are aligned with this version bump.

Changes

Build Environment and Base Image Upgrade

Layer / File(s) Summary
OpenShift and Go version upgrades
.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp
CI configuration build_root_image.tag and Dockerfile builder stage and final runtime stage base images are updated from OpenShift 4.21/Go 1.25 to OpenShift 5.0/Go 1.26 consistently.

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR only modifies CI config (.ci-operator.yaml) and Dockerfile, not Ginkgo test files. Check is not applicable as no test name changes are present.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The test quality check is not applicable. This PR only modifies .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp—no test files or Ginkgo test code is being changed.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added in this PR. Changes are limited to CI configuration (.ci-operator.yaml) and Dockerfile base image updates. The MicroShift test compatibility check does not apply.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR. Changes are limited to CI configuration and Dockerfile base image updates, not test code.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates CI build image tags and Dockerfile base references; no scheduling constraints, affinity rules, or deployment manifests that could impact topology compatibility.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR contains only configuration and Dockerfile changes, no Go code. OTE Stdout Contract check applies to code-level violations and is not applicable here.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR. Changes are limited to .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp (infrastructure configuration only). The check is not applicable.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed No weak crypto (MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, ECB), custom implementations, or non-constant-time comparisons found. Only secure crypto/tls and crypto/x509 standard library imports used.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR introduces no new privilege escalation; changes only affect build images in .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile base images, not container/K8s privilege configurations.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The PR modifies only CI configuration and Dockerfile with no logging statements. Changes are image version updates containing no passwords, tokens, keys, PII, or sensitive data in logs.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating container images for OpenShift 5.0 consistency with ART configuration, which aligns with the specific base image and Golang version updates in both .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 OCPBUGS-87377: Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87377, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-agent-installer-orchestrator.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from javipolo and rccrdpccl June 6, 2026 19:13
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the downstream-change-needed Requires updating downstream image label Jun 6, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rccrdpccl for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87377, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Updating ose-agent-installer-orchestrator-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ose-agent-installer-orchestrator.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
  • Updated build infrastructure to use newer versions of the runtime environment and build toolchain, including updates to containerization base images for improved compatibility and support.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp (2)

6-6: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Avoid copying the entire build context.

Line 6 copies everything, which violates policy and increases risk of unintentionally including sensitive or unnecessary files.

Proposed hardening diff
-COPY . .
+COPY go.mod go.sum ./
+COPY vendor/ ./vendor/
+COPY cmd/ ./cmd/
+COPY src/ ./src/
+COPY Makefile ./

As per coding guidelines, "COPY specific files, not entire context".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp` at line 6, The Dockerfile currently uses a
broad COPY . . which pulls the entire build context; replace this by copying
only the required artifacts (e.g., COPY package.json package-lock.json ./ and
COPY dist/ ./ or COPY src/ ./ as appropriate) and add/update a .dockerignore to
exclude secrets and dev files; locate the COPY . . instruction in the Dockerfile
and change it to explicit COPY statements for the exact files/directories your
build/runtime needs and ensure a .dockerignore excludes everything else.

Source: Coding guidelines


10-18: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Harden the runtime stage with non-root user and healthcheck.

The final image does not set a non-root USER and does not define a HEALTHCHECK, both required by policy.

Proposed hardening diff
 FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9
@@
 COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/build/installer /usr/bin/installer
 COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/deploy/assisted-installer-controller /assisted-installer-controller/deploy

+USER 1001
+HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=20s --retries=3 \
+  CMD ["/usr/bin/installer", "--help"] || exit 1
+
 ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/installer"]

As per coding guidelines, "USER non-root; never run as root" and "HEALTHCHECK defined".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp` around lines 10 - 18, The final stage runs
as root and lacks a HEALTHCHECK; modify the Dockerfile to create/use a non-root
user and add a healthcheck: add a dedicated user/group (or use an existing
unprivileged user), chown the installed artifacts referenced by COPY (e.g.,
/usr/bin/installer and /assisted-installer-controller/deploy) to that user, add
USER <non-root> before ENTRYPOINT, and add a HEALTHCHECK instruction that
verifies the installer process (or an appropriate readiness endpoint) so the
container reports health.

Source: Coding guidelines

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp`:
- Line 1: The Dockerfile's builder stage uses an unapproved base image (FROM
registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/...), so replace that FROM line in the builder
stage with an approved UBI minimal or distroless image from catalog.redhat.com
(e.g., the appropriate UBI minimal or distroless golang-builder image) to comply
with the container hardening policy; update the builder stage reference
(builder) and any related image tags to match the chosen catalog.redhat.com
image and ensure any required toolchain or Go version compatibility is
preserved.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp`:
- Line 6: The Dockerfile currently uses a broad COPY . . which pulls the entire
build context; replace this by copying only the required artifacts (e.g., COPY
package.json package-lock.json ./ and COPY dist/ ./ or COPY src/ ./ as
appropriate) and add/update a .dockerignore to exclude secrets and dev files;
locate the COPY . . instruction in the Dockerfile and change it to explicit COPY
statements for the exact files/directories your build/runtime needs and ensure a
.dockerignore excludes everything else.
- Around line 10-18: The final stage runs as root and lacks a HEALTHCHECK;
modify the Dockerfile to create/use a non-root user and add a healthcheck: add a
dedicated user/group (or use an existing unprivileged user), chown the installed
artifacts referenced by COPY (e.g., /usr/bin/installer and
/assisted-installer-controller/deploy) to that user, add USER <non-root> before
ENTRYPOINT, and add a HEALTHCHECK instruction that verifies the installer
process (or an appropriate readiness endpoint) so the container reports health.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 601c5b90-c476-4129-8c07-9ff47ed24170

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c400e8 and b04a287.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .ci-operator.yaml
  • Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.25-openshift-4.21 AS builder
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0 AS builder

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Use an approved base image source for the builder stage.

Line 1 uses registry.ci.openshift.org/... instead of an approved UBI minimal/distroless image from catalog.redhat.com, which breaks the container hardening policy.

As per coding guidelines, "Base image: UBI minimal or distroless from catalog.redhat.com".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile.assisted-installer.ocp` at line 1, The Dockerfile's builder stage
uses an unapproved base image (FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/...), so
replace that FROM line in the builder stage with an approved UBI minimal or
distroless image from catalog.redhat.com (e.g., the appropriate UBI minimal or
distroless golang-builder image) to comply with the container hardening policy;
update the builder stage reference (builder) and any related image tags to match
the chosen catalog.redhat.com image and ensure any required toolchain or Go
version compatibility is preserved.

Source: Coding guidelines

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.82%. Comparing base (7c400e8) to head (b04a287).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2172   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.82%   48.82%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        4397     4397           
=======================================
  Hits         2147     2147           
  Misses       2026     2026           
  Partials      224      224           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ART wants to connect issue OCPBUGS-87663 to this PR, but found it is currently hooked up to ['OCPBUGS-87377']. Please consult with #forum-ocp-art if it is not clear what there is to do.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jun 10, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

downstream-change-needed Requires updating downstream image jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants