Skip to content

Update module github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5 to v7#280

Open
red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
konflux/mintmaker/main/github.com-cenkalti-backoff-v5-7.x
Open

Update module github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5 to v7#280
red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
konflux/mintmaker/main/github.com-cenkalti-backoff-v5-7.x

Conversation

@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02

@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5 v5.0.3v7.0.0 age confidence

Release Notes

cenkalti/backoff (github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5)

v7.0.0

Compare Source

v6.0.1

Compare Source

v6.0.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "on monday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.


Documentation

Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.

@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02

red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: go.sum
Command failed: go get -t ./...
go: github.com/openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-api/pkg/api imports
	github.com/openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-api/pkg/api/openapi: cannot find module providing package github.com/openshift-hyperfleet/hyperfleet-api/pkg/api/openapi

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from ciaranRoche and crizzo71 July 6, 2026 08:06
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kuudori for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift-hyperfleet member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

go.mod replaces the indirect requirement github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5 v5.0.3 with github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v7 v7.0.0. This is a major module path/version change. No go.sum update is shown in this diff, so checksum verification data is not present here. Supply-chain review applies (CWE-1357, CWE-829).

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Related issues: None referenced.

Related PRs: None referenced.

Suggested labels: dependencies, supply-chain

Suggested reviewers: API, Sentinel, Adapter, Broker module owners

Poem: No poem.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Sec-02: Secrets In Log Output ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed; no Go source/log statements were modified, so no CWE-532 secret-in-log issue is present.
No Hardcoded Secrets ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed (backoff/v5→v7); no API keys, tokens, passwords, private keys, embedded creds, or long base64 literals in touched lines (CWE-798/CWE-259).
No Weak Cryptography ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed, bumping an indirect backoff dependency; no banned crypto, ECB, or secret-comparison code was added (CWE-327).
No Injection Vectors ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed; no SQL concatenation, exec.Command, template.HTML, or yaml.Unmarshal paths were introduced.
No Privileged Containers ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed; no Kubernetes/OpenShift manifests, Helm templates, or Dockerfiles were modified to add privileged settings. No new CWE-250/CWE-266 exposure.
No Pii Or Sensitive Data In Logs ✅ Passed Only go.mod changed; no logging code or log fields were added/modified, so no CWE-532 PII/sensitive-data exposure is introduced.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately states the dependency version bump from backoff v5 to v7.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly documents the same Go module update shown in the changeset.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch konflux/mintmaker/main/github.com-cenkalti-backoff-v5-7.x
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch konflux/mintmaker/main/github.com-cenkalti-backoff-v5-7.x

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Signed-off-by: red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 <190377777+red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02 Bot force-pushed the konflux/mintmaker/main/github.com-cenkalti-backoff-v5-7.x branch from 4aa1d90 to c3d1913 Compare July 6, 2026 16:04
@rafabene

rafabene commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing — Go 1.26 bump merged (HYPERFLEET-1310). Renovate will recreate with proper go.sum on next run.

@rafabene rafabene closed this Jul 6, 2026
@rafabene rafabene reopened this Jul 6, 2026
@rafabene

rafabene commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ok-to-test

@hyperfleet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Risk Score: 0 — risk/low

Signal Detail Points
PR size 2 lines +0
Sensitive paths none +0

Computed by hyperfleet-risk-scorer

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh02[bot]: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/presubmits-integration c3d1913 link true /test presubmits-integration
ci/prow/unit c3d1913 link true /test unit
ci/prow/lint c3d1913 link true /test lint

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant