Skip to content

Add label attribute for ACL entry - #2320

Closed
shri-khare wants to merge 1 commit into
opencomputeproject:masterfrom
shri-khare:acl-entry-label
Closed

Add label attribute for ACL entry#2320
shri-khare wants to merge 1 commit into
opencomputeproject:masterfrom
shri-khare:acl-entry-label

Conversation

@shri-khare

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:

This is similar to #1158, #1407, $1430.

Those PRs added label attribute for LAG/virtual router, counter, ACL Counter. This PR adds similar label attribute for ACL entries.

ACL entries have PRIORITY attribute, but since multiple ACL entries can be configured with same priority, PRIRORITY attribute cannot be used to uniquely identlfy an ACL entry within a given ACL Table.

Adding a label attribute that can be used to uniquely identify ACL entry object during warmboot. This attribute is consider as user data attached to the object.

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

Summary:

This is similar to opencomputeproject#1158, opencomputeproject#1407, $1430.

Those PRs added label attribute for LAG/virtual router, counter, ACL
Counter. This PR adds similar label attribute for ACL entries.

ACL entries have PRIORITY attribute, but since multiple ACL entries can
be configured with same priority, PRIORITY attribute cannot be used to
uniquely identlfy an ACL entry within a given ACL Table.

Adding a label attribute that can be used to uniquely identify ACL entry
object during warmboot. This attribute is consider as user data attached
to the object.

Signed-off-by: Shrikrishna (Shri) Khare <skhare@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Jasmeet Bagga <jasmeetbagga@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Ron He <zecheng@meta.com>
@shri-khare

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Discarding in favor of #2322

@shri-khare shri-khare closed this Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant