Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Gateway and Companion Store credentials currently live behind native workflows that ordinary repository writers can invoke. Workflow files alone do not enforce release-manager approval, and the existing release ledger writers push directly to main.
Outcome
openclaw/releasesthe single Store submission owner, with a fixedgateway/companionrequest contract and separate protected environments.16590423(@openclaw/release-managers-openclaw), exact-main deployment, and no administrator bypass. Prepare a source/run/attempt/artifact/package/hash approval summary, then re-resolve and compare those facts before credential use.Coordinated PRs and rollout
Coordinate these cutovers with verified team access, active review/CI rules, the two central environments, scoped existing GitHub App grants/key, product variables, and exclusive Entra federation migration. Drain old/native runs and outstanding tokens; deleting workflow files is not cloud revocation. No new PAT or persistent Microsoft Store secret is inherently required.
Validation
Candidate head:
d8517174532eeea622b4be05b9cb0fdc4d5f2352.git diff --checkpass.Risk and remaining proof
This PR does not apply live settings or grant cloud authority. Administrators must review/apply/read back the documented GitHub and Entra cutover; current credentials/federations and actual blocked/approved publication behavior remain unverified. No merge, release dispatch, Store submission, runtime deployment, or tenant/secret mutation was performed. Hosted CI and review are pending; this is non-draft, not claimed merge-ready.
Coordinated Store approval rollout
Land evidence-writer compatibility before enforcing PR-only main. Coordinate the central/native/caller cutovers with the documented administrator setup: team grants, active review/CI rules, exact-main release-manager environments without bypass, scoped existing App grants/key, product variables, and exclusive Entra federation migration. These PRs do not apply those live settings, merge themselves, or authorize a Store submission.