Repository navigation
fix: min_soc_bat_mode #4116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
LKuemmel
merged 1 commit into
openWB:master
from
seaspotter:fix-bat-min-soc-discharge-not-allowed
Oct 16, 2026
Merged
fix: min_soc_bat_mode #4116
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Das heißt, oberhalb des Max-SoCs gibt es kein eindeutigen Fahrzeug oder Speicher-Vorrang mehr, sondern first come first served?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ja, richtig beobachtet - aber keine neue Eigenschaft von diesem PR. Im Band (
hysteresis_discharge=True) gab es noch nie eine feste Priorität zwischen Fahrzeug und Speicher;charging_power_leftspiegelt einfach, was der Speicher gerade tut. Vor #3986 war das ja schon= base_powerund mit #3986 hatte ich das in diesem Zweig versehentlich auf 0 gesetzt, wodurch auch die berechtigte Ladereservierung für den Speicher verloren ging. Dieser PR stellt nur das Vorzeichen-Verhalten wieder her, ändert aber nichts an der fehlenden festen Priorität selbst.Ob der Speicher im Band einen festen Vorrang bekommen soll, symmetrisch zu #3986 beim Aufstieg, ist strukturell identisch mit #3985 (der ist ja noch offen) und dort schon mit @ndrsnhs offen diskutiert, ohne Entscheidung. Ich würde #4116 unabhängig davon als Bugfix mergen - die Vorrang-Frage weiter auf #3985/#3980 klären.