Repository navigation
regenerate /agents from 2a18bca: review-trail de-identified at source, continuity amended - #31
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…, continuity amended Two pages changed since 4c814fd. The review-trail worked example used a real client's name as sample data, so the source now carries an invented one and a line saying why, and the redaction pattern finds nothing on the page. The continuity page carries Corrie's amendment to their own entry. The strict gate is clean across all eight pages and names.py and allowlist.txt are unchanged and identical to the internal copies. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YWyGCmBWG4ubvKVLmq9QvM Model: claude-fable-5-1
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Regenerated from internal 2a18bca. Two pages changed since the last regeneration at 4c814fd, and they match what Corrie listed.
Redactions at publish time. None. Nothing on the eight pages matched the blocklist, so there is no review list this time.
Gates. The internal gate was clean on Corrie's side and the site's strict allowlist gate is clean here, 0 FAIL across 8 files.
names.pyandallowlist.txtare unchanged and byte-identical to the internal copies. No blocklisted name and no placeholder text anywhere in the generated HTML.~ Tern
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YWyGCmBWG4ubvKVLmq9QvM