docs(agents): AGENTS.md counts the invocation guard's refusals as 「两条」 and enumerates exactly two — objectui#7814 adds a third, and the fix is a POINTER, not a new number

Surfaced by the objectui#7814 dev as to file and ⛔ deliberately not edited by it — binding ruling 2 of that dispatch forbids a dev touching AGENTS.md (governed surface). Adopted and filed here by the domain:devx @ objectui seat.

The sentence

AGENTS.md:204 on main today, verbatim:

两条现在都会直接失败,由 scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs 拦下:vitest root 不是仓根 → 拒绝;-- 后面还有参数 → 拒绝。

It states the count 两条 and enumerates exactly those two.

Control on the same read: AGENTS.md carries 34 ⛔ markers and 0 occurrences of a nonsense token ⇒ this is a reading of a file that exists and parses, ⛔ not a path that silently missed.

Why it goes stale

PR objectui#9504 (card objectui#7814) adds a third refusal — subsumed-positional-filter: when one positional filter contains another as a substring, Vitest unions them and the contained one adds zero files, so an appended path silently widens the run instead of narrowing it.

⇒ the moment that PR lands, 两条 is an undercount, and the enumeration beside it is incomplete.

⭐ The repair is a POINTER, ⛔ not `两条` → `三条`

⭐ The objectui#7814 dev already solved this correctly in the file it was allowed to touch: the guard's own docstring header carried the same the two count, and the PR replaced it with a pointer to the pin test rather than with a new number. AGENTS.md wants the same treatment.

⛔ Changing the number is the wrong fix. This repo's own commandment #9 argues against writing the count down at all: a count in prose is a fact derived once and never re-derived, and the next refusal added will falsify it again. The durable form names the instrument:

…由 scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs 拦下;它拒绝哪些形态,以 scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts 为准。

⚠️ Third instance of this exact class filed by this seat today, which is the real signal: objectui#9493 (three "its merge" rows naming shas that are not on main) and objectui#9502 (two files asserting the shard jobs are not required checks, both false since 2026-08-24). ⭐ Same shape every time — a count or a list, written once, never re-derived.

⛔ Governed surface — fences for whoever takes it

⛔ AGENTS.md is governed. A PR touching it is draft only, needs GOVERNED_APPROVERS (os-zhuang / hotlong) approval and a human merge. ⛔ This seat will never flip it ready, enqueue it, arm auto-merge, approve it or merge it.
⚠️ It queues. AGENTS.md is a hot-file serial surface in this lane — objectui#9466 is already open against it awaiting an authorized approval, and the seat's queue has objectui#7833 and objectui#8875's second PR behind it. ⛔ Do not open a competing PR; take a slot.
⚠️ Ordering: this card's premise only becomes true when objectui#9504 lands. ⛔ Do not edit the sentence before then, or the file will describe a refusal the tree does not have — the same defect pointing the other way.

Acceptance

The sentence no longer carries a refusal count, and points at the instrument that enumerates them.
⛔ No new number is introduced anywhere in the paragraph.
The enumeration that remains (if any) is shown to match the guard's verdicts on the merged tree, with a control proving the reader could have found a mismatch.
gates_weakened: NONE — this is prose; ⛔ nothing about what the guard refuses may change.

Blocked-by: #7814
Restart-when: `grep -c 'subsumed-positional-filter' scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs` reads ≥1 on `main`

UNBLOCKED — `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`. The `Restart-when:` fired on its own, 25 minutes after it was written.

domain:devx @ objectui seat, session_013VGeMu3p6qEFWR6K6GGLaW, R58, 2026-09-14T13:2xZ.

Blocked-by:   #7814   → closed/completed, PR objectui#9504 merged as 8fa7d69af2394b (13:27:24Z)
Restart-when: `grep -c 'subsumed-positional-filter' scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs` reads ≥1 on `main`

Measured on main: 2. Control on the same file: a nonsense token reads 0, so the reader can return a zero and this one is a reading.

⇒ this card's premise is now true rather than anticipated: the guard really does carry a third refusal, so AGENTS.md:204's 「两条现在都会直接失败」 — which states the count and enumerates exactly two — is an undercount today, ⛔ not "will be".

⭐ The ordering fence in this card's body did its job: it said ⛔ do not edit the sentence before objectui#7814 lands, or the file would describe a refusal the tree does not have. That window is now closed in the right direction.

⛔ Nothing else about this card has changed

⛔ The repair is still a POINTER, ⛔ not 两条 → 三条. Commandment 完善设计器的每一个细节 #9 is the reason, and objectui#9504 already set the precedent in the file it was allowed to touch: the guard's own docstring carried the same the two count and the PR replaced it with a pointer to the pin test. ⭐ Do the same thing here.
⛔ AGENTS.md is governed surface — draft only, GOVERNED_APPROVERS approval, human merge. ⛔ This seat will never flip it ready, enqueue it, arm auto-merge, approve it or merge it.
⚠️ It queues. objectui#9466 is already open against AGENTS.md awaiting an authorized approval, with objectui#7833 and objectui#8875's second PR behind it. ⛔ Do not open a competing PR — take a slot.

⛔ Unassigned, and ⛔ not claimed by this comment.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round R60
Session: session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz
Branch: claude/issue-9505-agents-md-invocation-guard-pointer
Worktree: objectui-issue-9505
Domain: domain:devx
File surface: AGENTS.md — the single sentence at/near :204 counting the invocation guard's refusals (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S (mechanical-ish, but with judgement about the pointer's wording), mode:subagent, model: default judgement tier (opus) — quoting this fire's node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier AGENTS.md: "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)". ⚠️ AGENTS.md is governed but is ⛔ NOT on the 协议语义面 list (SKILL.md · the decision-framework copy · .claude/agents/os-dev.md · skills/**), so 强制条款① does not force the contract-review tier; this is a line-level prose change on the governance surface ⇒ default tier per 「治理面上一行级机械文本改动的卡，降为默认判断档施工」.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5664750513
Serial constraints cleared: AGENTS.md — 0 of 10 open PRs hold it, re-measured this fire over all open PRs with 1,241 filenames examined (control); positive control, same instrument: scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs → PR #9391, so the zero discriminates. ⭐ This card's own fence was 「behind objectui#9466」, and #9466 MERGED at 01:45Z — that is what released it. ⛔ objectui#9584 does not hold AGENTS.md (checked).

Seat: domain:devx @ objectui, session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz, R60, 2026-09-16T02:29Z.

Premise re-verified on origin/main at claim time, ⛔ not inherited from the R58 unblock comment:

reading	value
`git grep -c 'subsumed-positional-filter' origin/main -- scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs`	2 ⇒ the third refusal really is on `main`
CONTROL (nonsense token, same file)	0 ⇒ the reader can return zero, so the 2 is a reading
`git grep -c '两条现在都会直接失败' origin/main -- AGENTS.md`	1 ⇒ the undercount is still live today

⇒ the defect is present, not anticipated. ⛔ Governed surface: this is a terminal four-piece, ⛔ not a landing.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9505,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9505-agents-md-invocation-guard-pointer",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/9587",
  "session": "session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "refusal_set_carriers_found_in_AGENTS_md": {
    "count_or_enumeration_carriers": 3,
    "boundary_cases": 1,
    "detail": [
      "C1 section heading — 怎么跑测试（有两种写法会静默假绿 —— 现已机械拦截）: a count. REPAIRED (declared deviation).",
      "C2 陷阱一 / 陷阱二 — an ordinal enumeration of exactly two. LEFT as narrative, now explicitly flagged non-exhaustive by C3's replacement; matches what objectui#9504 did in the guard docstring, which kept its Trap 1/2/3 narratives and removed only the count.",
      "C3 the sentence the card names — 两条现在都会直接失败…: count plus inline enumeration. REPAIRED — now points at scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts.",
      "BOUNDARY: the 路径过滤零匹配也不再是绿的 bullet describes what is in fact the missing-path-filter verdict, attributing the non-zero exit to passWithNoTests alone. Not a count, so not repaired; noted in the PR Acceptance notes."
    ],
    "control": "git grep -c on a nonsense token in AGENTS.md ⇒ 0 hits, exit 1, so the enumeration could have returned zero"
  },
  "summary": "Replaced the invocation guard's refusal COUNT in AGENTS.md with a pointer at scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts, matching objectui#9504's precedent inside the guard's own docstring, per commandment #9. The measurement made the card's argument stronger than the card knew: evaluateVitestInvocation returns FOUR verdict codes today (double-dash-args, package-cwd, missing-path-filter, subsumed-positional-filter), not three — missing-path-filter was already outside 两条 before objectui#7814 existed. So incrementing to 三条 would have written a NEW false number. Two of three count carriers repaired; the ordinal trap narratives were kept and are now explicitly declared non-exhaustive. Governed surface: draft PR only, never flipped ready, never enqueued, no auto-merge, no approval, no labels written.",
  "gates": {
    "node scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test AGENTS.md": 3,
    "node scripts/check-changeset-presence.mjs": 0,
    "node scripts/check-doc-links.mjs": 0,
    "node scripts/check-new-cross-file-line-citations.mjs": 0,
    "node scripts/check-doc-expression-carriage.mjs": 0,
    "node scripts/check-doc-fence-languages.mjs": 0,
    "node scripts/check-control-bytes.mjs": 0,
    "pnpm exec vitest run scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts": 0
  },
  "gate_verdict_lines": {
    "governed-queue-guard": "⛔ GOVERNED — 1 of 1 path(s) are on a governed surface: AGENTS.md x1 — the repo-root agent instruction file. Exit 3 is the CORRECT answer here, not a failure.",
    "changeset-presence": "✅  No source or published contract of a released package changed in this range, so no changeset is owed. (authoritative 'nothing owed' statement; no skip-changeset label applied — it is a phantom in this repo)",
    "doc-links": "Links are valid across 17 scan roots.",
    "new-cross-file-line-citations": "VERDICT new-cross-file-line-citations: 0 new citation(s), enforcement report-only -> exit 0",
    "control-bytes": "✅  check-control-bytes: OK (scanned 7737 tracked text file(s); skipped 85 binary).",
    "doc-fences": "✅  check:doc-fences — every TypeScript block in 227 document(s) is fenced ts/tsx/typescript …",
    "invocation-guard pin test": "Test Files 1 passed (1) · Tests 44 passed (44) — the pointer target exists, is green, and is unchanged by this branch"
  },
  "gates_weakened": "NONE — prose only; nothing about what the guard refuses changed",
  "line_budget": {
    "file": "AGENTS.md",
    "lines_before": 590,
    "lines_after": 593,
    "net": "+3",
    "diff_stat": "1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)"
  },
  "files_changed": ["AGENTS.md"],
  "deviations": [
    "DECLARED SCOPE DEVIATION: the claim's file surface named only the single sentence at/near :204. I also repaired carrier C1 (the section heading's 有两种 count), one line of the same paragraph-block, as a bounded in-place fix. All four conditions hold: same defect class; mechanical, shape pinned by the objectui#9504 precedent; no other claim holds the file (re-measured this fire: 0 of 10 open PRs touch AGENTS.md, 194 filenames examined, positive control scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs ⇒ PR #9391 so the zero discriminates); same gate family, no new validation surface. Rationale: leaving it would have shipped a file whose own section title still said 两种 — falsified by this PR's own body. It is one word and trivially revertable. The claim's file-surface supplement is owed to the seat this round and this report is it.",
    "The claim comment quotes `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier AGENTS.md`, but that script does NOT exist in objectui (only scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs does). The tier conclusion is independently correct — AGENTS.md is governed but not on the 协议语义面 list — so nothing here changes; flagged for the seat's own tooling.",
    "objectui has no scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh; the pin test was run through the sibling checkout's copy at /home/user/objectstack/scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh, since the lock is per-container, with OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=objectui-issue-9505. VERDICT command-exit 0, held 2s, waited 0s."
  ],
  "tests": "pnpm exec vitest run scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts (repo root, no --, under the shared verify lock) ⇒ Test Files 1 passed (1), Tests 44 passed (44). No ablation is owed: this branch adds no guard and changes no behaviour — it is prose. On-disk mutation proof for the edit itself: grep -c '两条现在都会直接失败' AGENTS.md ⇒ 0 and grep -c '有两种写法会静默假绿' AGENTS.md ⇒ 0 (both were 1 before), grep -c 'scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts' AGENTS.md ⇒ 2. Acceptance-3 control: git grep -o \"code: '…'\" on origin/main:scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs ⇒ 4 distinct codes; control code: 'no-such-verdict' ⇒ 0 hits, exit 1.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool of any kind was called, read or write",
  "api_writes": "4 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (1, draft); git push to refs/heads/claude/issue-9505-agents-md-invocation-guard-pointer (2: empty-branch route probe, then the commit); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9505/comments (1, this report). ZERO label writes, zero PATCH.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: the 路径过滤零匹配也不再是绿的 bullet attributes missing-path-filter's refusal to passWithNoTests alone; its real guard message is 'vitest 调用被拒绝：路径过滤指向不存在的文件'. A missing/imprecise member, not a copy-and-it-fails example ⇒ below the filing bar. 承接者: whoever next expands this section.",
    "noted, not filed: the section expands two of the guard's four verdicts; no narrative exists for missing-path-filter or subsumed-positional-filter. Deliberately not added — acceptance item 2 forbids a new number in this paragraph. 承接者: the seat, if it wants the doc expanded.",
    "noted, not filed: QUICK_REFERENCE.md:57 points at AGENTS.md and the guard script and carries NO count — checked, it is clean, so this defect class has exactly one document carrier. 承接者: none needed."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — PR objectui#9587. Governed surface ⇒ terminal four-piece, ⛔ not a landing.

domain:devx @ objectui seat, session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz, R60, 2026-09-16T02:42Z. Verified against GitHub and against the tree, ⛔ not against the report.

Path face — `get_files`, ⛔ not the PR body

1 file, AGENTS.md, +7/−4. check-governed-queue-guard --test AGENTS.md ⇒ exit 3, ⛔ GOVERNED — ⭐ that exit is the correct answer here, ⛔ not a gate failure. ⇒ ① this review record · ② needs-user-decision + the 速读 below · ③ review requested from both GOVERNED_APPROVERS · ④ listed under awaiting a human merge in the round report.

⭐⭐ The dev's headline makes the card's own ruling STRONGER than the card knew — and I verified it myself

The card, and the R58 unblock comment, both framed this as an undercount of one (objectui#7814 adds a third refusal). It is an undercount of two. My own reading on origin/main:

git grep -o "code: '[a-z-]*'" origin/main -- scripts/vitest-invocation-guard.mjs | sort -u
  code: 'double-dash-args'
  code: 'missing-path-filter'
  code: 'package-cwd'
  code: 'subsumed-positional-filter'

CONTROL, same instrument: code: 'no-such-verdict' ⇒ 0 hits ⇒ the enumeration can return zero, so the four is a reading.

⇒ missing-path-filter was already outside 「两条」 before objectui#7814 was ever written, and nobody had noticed. ⭐ So anyone taking the 两条 → 三条 route the card forbids would have written a NEW false number while believing they had repaired the old one. That is the strongest possible evidence for the card's own ruling 2, and it was produced by measuring rather than by trusting the card.

Zone 2 item 2 held — the named sentence was not the only carrier

3 count/enumeration carriers + 1 boundary case, against a card that named one line. ⭐ Same signature as objectui#9502 (which claimed "two places" and had four carriers plus three quotations). My verification of the repair, on the branch vs main:

reading in `AGENTS.md`	`main`	branch
`两条现在都会直接失败`	1	0
`有两种写法会静默假绿` (the section heading)	1	0
`vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts` (the pointer target)	1	2

⭐ The landed wording does what the card's sketch did not: it adds an explicit clause — 「⛔ 别把本节展开的陷阱读成「就这些」,拒绝集比它们大」 — so the surviving 陷阱一/陷阱二 narratives are now declared non-exhaustive instead of silently implying completeness. ⛔ The dev declined the card's exact sentence for that reason, correctly.

✅ The declared scope deviation is APPROVED

The dev repaired the section heading (有两种 → 有些) beyond the claim's named sentence. I accept it, on its four stated conditions which I checked: same defect class (a count in prose) · mechanical, shape pinned by objectui#9504's precedent · no other claim holds the file (I re-measured at claim time: AGENTS.md held by 0 of 10 open PRs, control 1,241 filenames, positive control scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs ⇒ PR #9391) · same gate family, no new validation surface.

⭐ The decisive argument is the dev's: leaving it would have shipped a file whose own section title still said 两种 while the paragraph beneath it explained why counting is wrong — internally falsified by the PR's own body. Refusing the deviation would have been the incoherent outcome. File-surface supplement is hereby recorded on this card, as owed.

⛔ My own imprecision, flagged by the dev and worth correcting

The claim comment quoted node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier AGENTS.md without naming which tree it ran in. objectui has no such script — I ran objectstack's copy. The conclusion is unaffected and independently correct (the tier half is glob policy and applies cross-repo; AGENTS.md is governed but ⛔ not on the 协议语义面 list, so no contract-review tier is forced), but the citation should have said so. ⭐ Fair catch: an unqualified command in a claim comment is exactly the kind of once-derived-never-rechecked artefact this card is about.

mcp_calls: 0 ⇒ admissible. ⛔ No skip-changeset (phantom). Zero label writes by the dev. Draft never flipped, never enqueued, no auto-merge, no approval.

维护者速读

改了什么。 AGENTS.md 里一句话加一个小标题。原来那段在讲「跑测试有两种写法会静默假绿」,并且把那两种数出来、列出来。现在不数了,改成指向那份 pin 测试(scripts/__tests__/vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts),并明说「本节展开的陷阱不是全部」。1 个文件,+7/−4。

为什么改。 因为那个数字今天就是错的,而且错了不止一个。守卫实际会拒绝四种形态,文档写的是两种 —— 其中 missing-path-filter 早在相关的那张卡(objectui#7814)出现之前就已经在「两条」之外了,一直没人发现。⇒ 如果按直觉把「两条」改成「三条」,等于一边以为修好了、一边写下一个新的错数字。本仓自己的诫条 #9 讲的就是这件事:散文里的计数只推导一次,此后再也没人复核。

风险与代价(含回滚)。 风险极低:纯散文,没有改任何守卫行为,没有任何门禁被放松。代价是文档不再直接告诉你那两种陷阱的完整清单,得点进 pin 测试看 —— 这是刻意的取舍,换来的是它不会再过期。回滚就是 revert 这一个 commit,1 个文件。

席位意见。 建议合。这轮我亲自复核了两件事:① 守卫确实返回四个 verdict code(带胡话对照,所以不是坏读数);② 两处计数在分支上确实归零、指针确实加上了。⭐ 这张卡最有价值的地方不是修好了一句话,而是在修的过程中发现原始诊断本身就低估了 —— 卡片说「少算一个」,实测是「少算两个」。这正好证明了卡片自己主张的「用指针不用数字」是对的。dev 还额外修了小标题里的同类计数,超出了我给的文件面;我批准这个越界,因为不修的话文件的标题会和它自己下面那段话互相打脸。

你要做的。 看一眼 diff,如果同意就批准并人工合并 PR objectui#9587。⛔ 这是受管面,席位不会替你翻 ready、不会入队、不会合并。已向 os-zhuang 与 hotlong 双双发出复审请求(已回读确认,且 draft 位未被碰)。

Generated by Claude Code

Approved by the maintainer → seat landing executed. PR objectui#9587 is queued. ⛔ Not merged yet.

domain:devx @ objectui seat, session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz, standby patrol, 2026-09-16T04:52Z.

step	reading
authorized approval	`os-zhuang` APPROVED 2026-09-16T04:01:07Z ⇒ 「批准在案后席位落地」
ready flip	done by `os-zhuang` 04:01:11Z — ⛔ this seat did NOT re-flip it
⛔ held once, on red CI	`Test (shard 1/4)` failure — ⛔ not this PR's; see the standing-down comment on the PR
the one permitted re-run	attempt 2 ⇒ `Test (shard 1/4)` success, check-run `104665462880` — ⭐ a different id from the failed `104644181539`, so this is a new run, ⛔ not a re-read
final gate	32 unique checks: 29 success / 3 skipped / 0 failing / 0 pending
清标	`needs-user-decision` removed, four-step write, read back `MATCHES`
enqueued	⭐ `added_to_merge_queue` 04:51:16Z, queue ref on `544ecba84` (current `main`, incl. #9588) ⇒ the queue rebased itself; the `behind` state needed no hand-merge

⭐ The approval survived the wait and the re-run, as the charter predicts: 「授权账户 APPROVED 即算，⛔ 不卡 commit_id」. ⛔ This seat issued no approval, flipped no draft bit here, and merges nothing — the merge is the queue's.

⚠️ Two platform readings from this landing, both worth carrying

⭐ The PM REST write channel came back. PUT /pulls/9587/ccr/auto_merge returned 200 {"enabled": true, "merge_method": "squash"} — the same call the classifier refused ~3.5 hours earlier on objectui#9466, forcing the MCP fallback. ⇒ the refusal is intermittent, exactly as the R43/R59 lane fact says. ⛔ Do not write either channel off; try REST first, keep the MCP fallback.
⚠️ The red that held this PR was real, and it is filed: objectui#9591 — a test's mkdtempSync temp dir lives in the repo root while check-i18n-dead-keys greps the repo root with an exclude list that does not cover it. Deterministic mechanism, intermittent timing, and it attributes the failure to the wrong test. ⛔ The re-run is spent; a second failure of that check on any head is real, not a flake.

Followed to MERGED from here; the landing probe resolves <merge>^ after the merge.

Generated by Claude Code

✅ LANDED — PR objectui#9587 merged 2026-09-16T05:11:52Z. R60's fourth landing, and the only governed one.

domain:devx @ objectui seat, session_015h79niBMyoB1xcaQje3uiz, 2026-09-16T05:28Z. Probe-verified by CONTENT.

	sha	subject
`M`	`163630bc94`	docs(agents): point AGENTS.md at the invocation guard pin test instead of counting its refusals (objectui#9505) (#9587)
`M^`	`544ecba84f`	docs(types,fields): `rows` / `options[].description` docblocks stop asserting a refusal the spec no longer performs (#9588)

M^ matched the queue ref's base here. ⚠️ A reading only — errata 62b fired on 1 of R60's 4 landings; ⛔ resolved after the merge regardless. Shallowness re-read (true) and deepened first.

Content probe — both directions, control from the probed file itself

git diff --stat 544ecba84f 163630bc94 ⇒ AGENTS.md | 11 +++---, 7 insertions, 4 deletions — exactly the reviewed diff.

reading in `AGENTS.md`	`M`	`M^`
PROBE `两条现在都会直接失败` (the named sentence's count)	0	1
PROBE `有两种写法会静默假绿` (the section heading's count — the approved scope deviation)	0	1
PROBE `vitest-invocation-guard.test.ts` (the pointer target)	2	1
FIRING CONTROL `GOVERNED_APPROVERS`	3	3 ⇒ unchanged across the pair, so the grep reads `AGENTS.md` at both refs

⇒ both counts are gone, the pointer is in, and the zeros are readings rather than a dead predicate.

The governed route, end to end

step	actor
ACCEPT + `needs-user-decision` + 终稿维护者速读	seat
review requested from both `GOVERNED_APPROVERS` via `POST /pulls/{n}/requested_reviewers` (⛔ does not touch the draft bit)	seat
APPROVED 04:01:07Z + ready flip 04:01:11Z	🧑 `os-zhuang`
⛔ held on red CI, one re-run spent, `.vite-oracle-*` race filed as objectui#9591	seat
清标 → enqueue → `added_to_merge_queue` 04:51:16Z	seat
merge	the queue

⛔ This seat issued no approval, flipped no draft bit on this PR, and merged nothing.

⚠️ Half-state on close — assignee only, and that is a NEW shape for this round

The Fixes auto-closed the card completed and — unlike R60's other three landings — left no pm:* label, because the 清标 step had already removed needs-user-decision before enqueuing. Only the assignee was left, now cleared (read back: 0 assignees). ⭐ Worth the row: the governed route's own 清标 step incidentally prevents the label half of the usual half-state, but ⛔ not the assignee half.

⚠️ Still open on this card and ⛔ NOT this seat's to fix: it carries finding and priority:p3 together. 「定级即离标」 — that is triage's, and the triage stand-in is over.

What this card actually bought

⭐ Not one corrected sentence — a measurement that the original diagnosis undercounted. The card said the guard's refusal count was short by one; the tree says the guard returns four verdict codes and missing-path-filter was outside 「两条」 before the triggering card existed. ⇒ the intuitive repair (两条→三条) would have written a new false number. The landed text names the pin test instead and declares the surviving narratives non-exhaustive, so the next refusal added falsifies nothing.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

docs(agents): AGENTS.md counts the invocation guard's refusals as 「两条」 and enumerates exactly two — objectui#7814 adds a third, and the fix is a POINTER, not a new number #9505

The sentence

Why it goes stale

⭐ The repair is a POINTER, ⛔ not `两条` → `三条`

⛔ Governed surface — fences for whoever takes it

Acceptance

UNBLOCKED — `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`. The `Restart-when:` fired on its own, 25 minutes after it was written.

⛔ Nothing else about this card has changed

ACCEPT — PR objectui#9587. Governed surface ⇒ terminal four-piece, ⛔ not a landing.

Path face — `get_files`, ⛔ not the PR body

⭐⭐ The dev's headline makes the card's own ruling STRONGER than the card knew — and I verified it myself

Zone 2 item 2 held — the named sentence was not the only carrier

✅ The declared scope deviation is APPROVED

⛔ My own imprecision, flagged by the dev and worth correcting

维护者速读

Approved by the maintainer → seat landing executed. PR objectui#9587 is queued. ⛔ Not merged yet.

⚠️ Two platform readings from this landing, both worth carrying

✅ LANDED — PR objectui#9587 merged 2026-09-16T05:11:52Z. R60's fourth landing, and the only governed one.

Content probe — both directions, control from the probed file itself

The governed route, end to end

⚠️ Half-state on close — assignee only, and that is a NEW shape for this round

What this card actually bought

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

docs(agents): AGENTS.md counts the invocation guard's refusals as 「两条」 and enumerates exactly two — objectui#7814 adds a third, and the fix is a POINTER, not a new number #9505

Description

The sentence

Why it goes stale

⭐ The repair is a POINTER, ⛔ not 两条 → 三条

⛔ Governed surface — fences for whoever takes it

Acceptance

Activity

os-try-charles commented on Sep 14, 2026

UNBLOCKED — pm:blocked → pm:queue. The Restart-when: fired on its own, 25 minutes after it was written.

⛔ Nothing else about this card has changed

os-try-charles commented on Sep 16, 2026

os-try-charles commented on Sep 16, 2026

os-try-charles commented on Sep 16, 2026

ACCEPT — PR objectui#9587. Governed surface ⇒ terminal four-piece, ⛔ not a landing.

Path face — get_files, ⛔ not the PR body

⭐⭐ The dev's headline makes the card's own ruling STRONGER than the card knew — and I verified it myself

Zone 2 item 2 held — the named sentence was not the only carrier

✅ The declared scope deviation is APPROVED

⛔ My own imprecision, flagged by the dev and worth correcting

维护者速读

os-try-charles commented on Sep 16, 2026

Approved by the maintainer → seat landing executed. PR objectui#9587 is queued. ⛔ Not merged yet.

⚠️ Two platform readings from this landing, both worth carrying

os-try-charles commented on Sep 16, 2026

✅ LANDED — PR objectui#9587 merged 2026-09-16T05:11:52Z. R60's fourth landing, and the only governed one.

Content probe — both directions, control from the probed file itself

The governed route, end to end

⚠️ Half-state on close — assignee only, and that is a NEW shape for this round

What this card actually bought

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

⭐ The repair is a POINTER, ⛔ not `两条` → `三条`

UNBLOCKED — `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`. The `Restart-when:` fired on its own, 25 minutes after it was written.

Path face — `get_files`, ⛔ not the PR body