[objectstack-fleet]

domain:skills#1 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J

Requested by Irene · project thread

os-dev · domain:skills#1 dispatch · session_01J8VVAm7suYn3TrFHkbu4N3

Fixes #29386

Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none

维护者速读

• 改了什么：总监章程写明，录裁时裁决、正文 Ruled: 行和给车道席的 Notify: ruling 敲门是同一笔，漏敲是录裁者欠的半状态；半状态巡查新增 H73 行，列出正文已有 Ruled: 却仍挂 needs-user-decision 超过 6 小时的卡，附裁决 id、已过时长和欠退箱的 domain:* 车道席。
• 为什么改：11 月 2 日录裁的 12 张卡，录裁时一次敲门都没有，11 小时后仍全部挂在决策箱里；巡查没有一行读这种情况。
• 风险与回滚：只读巡查，不写任何标签或评论；章程只改一条录裁规则，新增一行由合并 职责一 里两行同义条款付账，仍为 86 行上限。回滚即 revert 本 PR。
• 先看：scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs 的 h73RuledCardStillInBox（围栏剥离、取最新时间戳、Prior rulings on this card: 重入例外），再看 lanes/director.md 第 13 行与第 39 行。
• 两分钟验证：node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs --self-test，预期结尾的 battery 列表里有 H73 ruled card in the decision box 28/25，且全部通过。
• 需要你做的：本 PR 触及 .claude/**（Tier S），由 skills 席复核落地，你无需动作。

What changes

• .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md (86 → 86 lines, ceiling unchanged)
  • New line under the Ruled: recording line: the Notify: ruling knock to the card's lane seat lands in the same act, its shape is the one ../project-forms.md spells, and a ruling recorded without its knock is a half state the recorder owes. The existing ⛔ 不新增标签与状态 stays, so the director still writes no label on the card.
  • Paid in the same file: the two 职责一 lines 「处理三分支之一,收尾 PASS 且工已完 ⇒ 跟到合并为止」 and 「到合并 = 推进到就绪并点名等待,⛔ 不代维护者合并」 say one thing, and are merged into one line with the same terms. No ceiling raise.
• scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs: new report-only row H73, the body-record half of the runbook's declared 「旗一」.
  • Population: open issues carrying needs-user-decision, read on the unscoped open listing beside H62. needs-user-decision is not a label page, so this is where those cards are first visible. It is one label read and one body read on rows the sweep already holds, so no new request.
  • Record: a line-leading Ruled: (the shared directive reader, so bullet/bold/backtick decoration reads) whose value opens with a numeric comment id. Fenced blocks are stripped first (stripMarkdownCode, inline spans kept). A mid-sentence mention and a line-leading Ruled: followed by prose are not records.
  • Age: from the newest readable UTC stamp on the card's Ruled: lines. A record with no readable stamp reports with its age unreadable, never as fresh. Threshold RULED_IN_BOX_STALE_HOURS = 6, one standing patrol cycle (PATROL_CADENCE_HOURS).
  • Re-entry: a card whose governing ruling id is named on its Prior rulings on this card: line (or the list under it) has lawfully re-entered the box with a new question and is clean.
  • Row text: the ruling comment id, the age against the threshold, the owing domain:* lane seat (or "no lane yet, the triage seat routes it"), the one-act rule and the bell shape's printout. No angle brackets, no tracker number.
  • Band stall, registered in HALF_STATE_FAMILY_BAND with its reasons.
  • Self-test battery H73 ruled card in the decision box on the frozen roster (28 cases, pin 25).

Why

Card #29386, letter A. The director records a ruling as a Ruling: comment plus a Ruled: body line and writes no label; the exit out of needs-user-decision is the lane seat's, and the lane learns of the ruling from a Notify: ruling bell. Measured on 2026-11-02, twelve cards ruled 01:14Z–10:06Z drew zero bells and all twelve still carried the label at 12:08Z, the oldest 10 h 54 min after its ruling. No patrol row read a Ruled: line against the label.

Verification

At 4bf6e86 in objectstack-ai/objectstack:

Self-test and ablations

• node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs --self-test: exit 0, 5213 cases pass; battery H73 ruled card in the decision box 28/25, every other battery at or above its pin.
• The controls, each beside its positive twin: the same body without the label is clean; a Ruled: line inside a backtick fence and inside a tilde fence is clean, and the identical line unfenced fires; a mid-sentence mention and a table cell are clean; a line-leading Ruled: followed by prose (the H55 fixture's body) is clean; 5h59m is silent and 6h01m fires; a missing stamp reports; a fresh re-ruling silences an old one, and two old ones report the newer id; the Prior rulings on this card: line naming this id (inline or as a list) is clean, naming another id fires, and an id after a blank line is not that line's; closed card, PR row, unreadable labels, missing row and null body are silent.
• Ablations on a copy of the committed file (scripts/pm/zz-ablate-h73.mjs, deleted afterwards; git status clean): fence stripping removed → 3 cases red; label gate removed → 2 red; id requirement removed → 2 red; re-entry exception removed → 2 red; threshold removed → 3 red; the sweep push removed → 21 red, the band/coverage case among them.

Live sweep

• node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs against the live board (objectstack-ai/objectstack, main 86d36e9 plus this commit), exit 0: two H73 rows, [Decision] spec: the relatedList describe still names the retired "Related" and "Details" tabs of the old record page — fix now, after record page v2 settles, or leave it #28888 (domain:spec, ruling 6568787922, ~13h) and objectql: a plain lookup write accepts a target the writer cannot read — the reference check probes it elevated, and only master_detail asks the caller's read door #29029 (domain:server, ruling 6573561091, ~8h). [Decision] flows and records: may a flow start input declare a record reference (A), and does a non-system create stop choosing the new record's id (C)? #29425 (ruled 14:56Z, ~2h) is under the threshold and silent. That matches the premise re-measured at 16:52Z: three open needs-user-decision cards with a line-leading Ruled:.

Gates

• node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands (no paths, from the merge base) derives 54 commands for the two paths. All 54 exited 0, each exit captured before any pipe. pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions first answered exit 3 (prerequisite: no built @objectstack/formula / @objectstack/lint); after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint it exited 0 on the same head.
• dispatch-gates --ran: 54 derived, 54 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN.
• Among them: pnpm check:pm-half-states 0, pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet 0 (lanes/director.md 86 against ceiling 86), pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint 0, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync 0, pnpm check:doc-authoring 0, pnpm check:commit-card-trailers 0, pnpm check:nul-bytes 0.
• pnpm exec eslint --no-inline-config scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs: exit 0.

• No changeset: only .claude/** and scripts/pm/** change, which publish nothing, so the PR carries skip-changeset.

Acceptance notes

• The runbook still says the wiring is another card's. dispatch-runbook.md 「机械两旗 report-only,归半状态巡查;接线是另一张卡的事」 is now half-true for 旗一: its body-record half is H73. The runbook is outside this card's surface and at its own ceiling (245), so it is left for the seat.
• 旗一's title half stays where it was. A [Decision] title is read from the queue side by H54; this row reads only the body record, as the card scopes it.
• Out of scope as filed: option B and the reverse direction (a card moved out of the box with no retrievable ruling id), which the runbook assigns to the dispatch-time 决策复读.
• A live shape this row does not read: a scoped record such as Ruled (plugin-ai): ID · letter A · UTC (one open card carries one, outside the box) is not a line-leading Ruled: and is not read. The card specifies Ruled:; widening the key is a seat call.

Human Minimum

• 1. Schemas start as Zod; packages/spec holds no runtime logic. (Not touched.)
• 2. Every name I added uses the casing for its kind.
• 3. No formatter ran; eslint over the changed script passes.
• 4. One issue, one branch off an up-to-date main, one pull request.
• 5. Nothing publishes, so no changeset; both declaration lines are filled in.
• 6. packages/spec not touched.
• 7. No hand edits to content/docs/references/, packages/*/CHANGELOG.md or content/docs/releases/.
• 8. Title, body and comments are in English, except the 维护者速读 section, which the lane asks for in Chinese.
• The Before Submitting list in CONTRIBUTING.md is done. (Left unchecked: the workspace-wide pnpm lint and pnpm test were not run; the changed script has no package tests, and eslint over it was run.)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01J8VVAm7suYn3TrFHkbu4N3

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

domain:skills#1 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J

Contract-review-claim: session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J · head 4bf6e86 · 2026-11-02T17:21Z

The seat review runs at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER in an isolated subagent (the seat session is not at that tier).

[objectstack-fleet]

domain:skills#1 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 4bf6e86b7606b09457e3ca4f1f7d04d2ee02d3d2
Local-runs: probe — on a detached worktree of the head (merge-base with origin/main 86d36e9; neither touched file moved on main since; origin/main at a922779 when fetched): node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs --self-test (5213 cases, exit 0, battery H73 ruled card in the decision box 28/25), node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (default and --self-test, 164 cases, exit 0), node scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs (108 files clean) and its --self-test (23 cases), node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands over the two paths (54 commands derived), of which 38 distinct commands were run in their node form (listed in ①.9), one live read-only sweep node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs against the board with the seat's own token (exit 0), and ten reviewer-authored ablations applied to the committed file, measured, and restored with git checkout HEAD -- to the head blob (git hash-object cf1ab28b65 equal to the PR's blob after every ablation, git status --porcelain empty); the worktree was removed after the runs and the main checkout was not touched
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs (the PR's two files; the row and its self-test live in the second) + read, not reviewed: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.md (line 44, the Notify: ruling route the new rule points at, and the 不敲 line), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md lines 78 to 86 (旗一, 旗二, 决策复读), node scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs --mailbox-keys (the bell shape the row's remedy cites), scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the director.md 86 row), card #29386 body with comments 6578786428 (triage), 6580080463 (claim) and 6583566307 (dev report, read as input), PR #29515 body and its one comment 6583599083 (the seat's review claim on this head)

Reviewer: an isolated contract reviewer at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, read-only on GitHub (REST reads only; nothing written, pushed or commented), fed the card body and comments, the PR body, the net diff against the merge-base, the head's check-runs, contract-review.md and review-checklist.md. The dev report was read as input, not as conclusions; every count below is this review's own measurement. No environment variable value is printed anywhere in this record; the live sweep's token was passed by substitution and never echoed.

① Derived judgments

The card's letter A, its two deliverables and the PR's claims, one at a time:

1. File surface. One commit (4bf6e86, author Claude, PR author objectstack-fleet[bot], head repo = base repo, draft, base main); git diff 86d36e99 4bf6e86b --stat, the REST file listing and the PR body agree on exactly .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md (+2/−2, blob 42d5814566) and scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs (+215/−0, blob cf1ab28b65). The claim's file surface (6580080463) was these two files, the row's self-test included; nothing else is touched, and neither file moved on origin/main since the merge-base. Correct, and on surface.
2. director.md, the new rule (line 13): 「同笔向卡的车道席敲 Notify: ruling,形状见 ../project-forms.md;漏敲即录裁者欠的半状态。」 Placed directly under the recording line 12 (「录裁同笔改正文 … ⛔ 不新增标签与状态」), so the act is now: the Ruling: comment, the Ruled: body line and the bell to the card's lane seat, in one stroke, with line 12's no-label clause untouched. Consistent with the rest of the skill: project-forms.md line 44 routes exactly this bell (「记裁决席→被改席 Notify: ruling」) and --mailbox-keys prints the shape (Notify: ruling · #n · LETTER · record ID, sender the seat that recorded the ruling, receiver the seat whose card it changes); director.md line 21 (the director holds no domain:* lane) and line 17 (no patrol when not summoned) are untouched and the rule asks the director for a mailbox write it already makes elsewhere, not a label. The card's own words (Change 1) are met term for term: same stroke, knock to the card's lane seat, shape unchanged, a missing knock is the recorder's half state, no new label or state. The line is 112 bytes; no line in the file exceeds 120; check-skill-id-lint clean (no tracker number). Unambiguous: 「卡的车道席」 is the domain:* seat of the card, which is the seat the row's remedy names and project-forms' 「被改席」 for a card ruling. Correct.
3. director.md, the paid line (职责一). Before: 「处理三分支之一,收尾 PASS 且工已完 ⇒ 跟到合并为止。」 and, two lines later, 「到合并 = 推进到就绪并点名等待,⛔ 不代维护者合并。」 After, one line 39: 「处理三分支之一,收尾 PASS 且工已完 ⇒ 推进到就绪并点名等待合并,⛔ 不代维护者合并。」 The second line was the definition of the first line's 「到合并」; the merge substitutes the definition into the rule and keeps every term: the trigger (branch one, PASS, work done), the two acts (advance to ready, name the waiting), the prohibition (never merge in the maintainer's stead). The only word not carried is 「跟」 (follow), which under the deleted definition meant exactly the two acts kept, and which line 8 (「只出裁决不持在飞状态」) would in any case forbid reading as a standing watch. No obligation lost; one line in, one line out; wc -l 86 before and after, ceiling row 86 in check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs unchanged, ratchet green. Correct.
4. The row's population and reading (h73SpeaksAbout, ruledRecords). Issues only (pull_request rows out), open only, labels must be an array (an unreadable label set is never read as unlabelled), and the card must carry GOVERNED_PR_DECISION_LABEL, which is the constant 'needs-user-decision' (line 11543). The record is a line-leading Ruled: read through the file's shared directiveValues (bullet, bold and backtick decoration tolerated, blockquotes and mid-sentence mentions not), after stripMarkdownCode(body, { inline: false }) blanks backtick and tilde fences while keeping inline spans, and only when the value opens with a six-plus-digit comment id (RULED_RECORD_ID); so Ruled: the repository variable… is prose, and a scoped Ruled (plugin-ai): is not this key (see ③). The card asked for 「a line-leading Ruled: <comment id> while it still carries needs-user-decision」. Correct, and exactly the card's reading.
5. Age, threshold and the governing record. The age is read from the newest readable UTC stamp among the card's Ruled: lines (RULED_RECORD_STAMP, minutes or seconds precision, both live shapes pinned); a record with no readable stamp reports with its age unreadable rather than reading as fresh. RULED_IN_BOX_STALE_HOURS = 6 equals PATROL_CADENCE_HOURS (line 21622) and a self-test case pins the equality; the comparison is <=, so exactly 6 h is silent and the first minute past it fires (pinned at 5h59m / 6h01m). Judgment on the band: one standing patrol cycle is the right floor for a row whose remedy is a lane seat's exit, since a lane seat patrols more often than that and a ruled card that outlived a full cycle has missed at least one exit pass; a lower threshold would alarm on cards the lane is about to move. Sensible.
6. The one exception. A card whose governing ruling id is named on its Prior rulings on this card: line, or on the list lines directly under it (stopping at the first blank line), is clean: that is the lawful re-entry director.md lines 54 to 55 describe (「线程有 Ruling:/RULED 的卡再入箱,该行逐 id 各一句变化;缺行 ⇒ 拒入」). The regex that looks for the id is built from digits only, so no injection. Once the re-entered card is ruled again, the newer stamp governs, its id is not on the prior-rulings line, and the row fires after 6 h. Correct, and the controls hold (named id clean, other id fires, id after a blank line not that line's).
7. Report-only, never fails a gate. The row returns a string or null and sweepInto only pushes [issue, 'H73', text] onto findings, beside H62 on the unscoped open listing already in hand (no new request). The script's header says it never writes a label and never fails a build over findings; a grep for a POST, PATCH, PUT or DELETE request finds none; the live sweep below exited 0 with 364 half-states found; in lint.yml check:pm-half-states is --self-test only. The row text uses the label constant, carries no ASCII angle bracket and no tracker number (the 〈〉 around 信箱 PR are CJK brackets, and a self-test case pins /[<>]/ and /#[0-9]/ absent), names the lane seat for the exit and the recorder for the bell, and says in words that no label is written from the script. Band stall, registered in HALF_STATE_FAMILY_BAND with its reasons, and isLoudFinding is false for it. Correct.
8. Self-test and ablations, measured here. Head: 5213 cases pass, exit 0, H73 ruled card in the decision box 28/25. Ten ablations on the committed file, each restored to the head blob: A1 fence stripping removed (ruledRecords reads the raw body) → 3 red, the backtick-fence and tilde-fence cases among them; A2 label gate removed → 2 red (the same body without the label fires); A3 id requirement removed → 2 red (the prose Ruled: fires); A4 re-entry exception removed → 2 red (the inline and the list-form prior-rulings cases); A5 threshold removed → 3 red (the 5h59m boundary case); A6 sweep push removed, the row still computed → 7 red (H62's and H73's band-coverage cases); A7 governing stamp inverted (oldest governs) → 2 red (the newest-stamp case); A8 unreadable stamp silenced → 2 red (the no-stamp case); A9 band row deleted → 8 red; A10 closed-card gate removed → 2 red (the population case). Every piece the card's done-when names (label, fence, positive control) has a control that reds when the piece is reverted, and so do the threshold, the stamp choice, the re-entry line and the registration. The dev's five ablation counts (3, 2, 2, 2, 3) reproduce; the dev's sixth (sweep push removed, 21 red) was a different cut from A6's 7, both red.
9. Gates. dispatch-gates --commands from the merge-base derives 54 commands for the two paths (measured 54). Run here in their node form (no node_modules in the throwaway worktree): check-half-states --self-test, skill-line-ratchet (both forms), skill-id-lint (both forms), declaration-mirrors (both), issue-citations (both; 0 citations added against 86d36e9), self-test-wired (both), whole-set-label-write (both), platform-checklist, commit-card-trailers, nul-bytes (24214 files, none), entry-guard, parse-guard, skill-frame-sync, agent-test-spelling, scripts-symbol-anchors (4154 resolve), closing-target-claim, partof-closing-keyword, post-stamped (753/26), watch-hint-literal, bash32-floor, ratchet-remedy-authority, gitlink-declared, single-claim-paths, refd-timer-probe, pnpm-flag-spellings, pnpm-filter-targets, cross-package-test-inputs, sweep-closed-cards, board-snapshot, bare-root-worklist, check-harness-current: all exit 0. Nine answered PREREQUISITE NOT MET (exit 3) for the missing yaml or typescript dependency or absent node_modules (closing-keyword-parity, comment-mask-corpus, platform-checklist-watchdog, doc-authoring, governed-merges self-test, cli-command-ids, ci-filter-parity, driver-memory-census) and check-self-test-workflow-commands exited 1 on release-pending-publish.mjs missing @changesets/cli, a finding about this container, not the diff. CI covers those: Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · CI, release & engine gates, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · ESLint and Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests are all success on the head (see the check-runs line).
10. Live read-only run. node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs against objectstack-ai/objectstack with the seat's token: exit 0; 257 open issues in the unscoped pass; two H73 rows, [Decision] spec: the relatedList describe still names the retired "Related" and "Details" tabs of the old record page — fix now, after record page v2 settles, or leave it #28888 (domain:spec, ruling 6568787922, ~13h) and objectql: a plain lookup write accepts a target the writer cannot read — the reference check probes it elevated, and only master_detail asks the caller's read door #29029 (domain:server, ruling 6573561091, ~8h). A REST listing of open needs-user-decision issues taken alongside shows five with a line-leading Ruled: (28888 04:06Z, 29029 09:25Z, 29425 14:56Z, 29465 and 29469 17:17Z) and five without; at the run (≈17:41Z) the three under 6 h were silent, which is the threshold working, and no card without a record fired. The two rows match the PR body's live reading. The head's own Live half-state sweep check-run is also success.
11. PR body against the head. 86 → 86 lines (measured); 5213 cases and 28/25 (measured); 54 derived commands (measured); two live H73 rows (measured); Clause-②: no and Metadata-protocol: none are right (no published schema, no authorable surface); skip-changeset is right (.claude/** and scripts/pm/** publish nothing; Check Changeset success); Fixes #29386 is right because both done-when lines are met (the charter states the one-act rule; the patrol prints one row per ruled card past the threshold, with the three named controls in the self-test), and option B and the reverse direction were out of scope by the card's own Change 3, not deferred work. One body slip: the 维护者速读 points the reader at 「lanes/director.md 第 13 行与第 38 行」; the merged 职责一 line is line 39 (line 38 is the CI-red line). Cosmetic, S3.
12. Nothing new on any surface: no gate, no label, no workflow, no CODEOWNERS, no governed-register row, no package. The card, the PR body, the dev report and this record carry no finding and no mechanism.

② Semver level

None. No published package, no packages/spec/src/**, no TypeScript; governed rules text and scripts/pm tooling only. skip-changeset is the right declaration and Check Changeset is success on the head.

③ Boundary flags

• Dev open_questions: none.
• Dev out-of-scope note (a): dispatch-runbook.md line 83 「机械两旗 report-only,归半状态巡查;接线是另一张卡的事,⛔ 不随协议文本改脚本」 is now half-true for 旗一, whose body-record half is H73 while its title half and its thread half (a Ruling: comment with no Ruled: body line) stay unwired. Judgment: follow-up, not a blocker. The sentence describes routing, not behaviour; no seat acts on 「另一张卡的事」 by writing anything, the card's surface and the claim (stop on breach) held the runbook out, and it sits at its 245 ceiling, so the correction is one line paid in place under a new card. S1.
• Dev out-of-scope note (b): a scoped record Ruled (plugin-ai): ID · letter A · UTC exists on one open card outside the box and is not read. Judgment: follow-up, not a blocker. director.md line 12 spells the record as Ruled: <评论 id> · letter <X> · <UTC> and the card specifies Ruled:; the row reads the charter's spelling exactly, and the scoped form is the off-charter one. Whether to normalise that card's line or widen the key is a ruling, carried on the same follow-up card as S1.
• Dev out-of-scope note (c): the PR carries no assignee or reviewer; os-dev.md's rule, no flag.
• Independence: PR author objectstack-fleet[bot], commit author Claude; no off-relay author note is owed. The PR thread carries the seat's Contract-review-claim: for this head (6583599083) and no other record.

④ Design judgment

Per hits file, against the card's scenario (a director records a ruling on a card in the decision box; the lane seat must learn of it and make the exit; nothing else may write the label):

• lanes/director.md: putting the bell into the recording stroke is the right place for it, since the recorder is the one actor who knows a ruling exists at the moment it exists, the mailbox is the one channel the lane's patrol and the sweep already read, and the alternative (option B, the director relabels) was listed and not chosen by the maintainer. Naming the missing bell as the recorder's half state gives the patrol row below its remedy's second half without inventing a state. The pay-in-place merge keeps the file at its ceiling without a ruled raise, and the merged line reads as one rule. Holds.
• scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs: reading the body record rather than the thread is the right cut for a report-only row on the unscoped listing (no comment page bought, the Ruled: line is the charter's own record of the thread ruling); the fence strip, the leading-anchor and the numeric-id requirement together make the predicate hard to fire by citation or prose; the newest-stamp rule and the unreadable-stamp branch are the two choices that keep the row honest on re-rulings and on malformed records; the prior-rulings exception reads the exact line the box duty already writes, so no new author convention is introduced. Threshold tied to the patrol cadence by a pinned case. Band stall is argued against the other three. Holds.

Must-fix: none.

Should-fix:

• S1 (follow-up card, skills seat; no new head on this PR): one line in dispatch-runbook.md (paid in place at 245) so 「接线是另一张卡的事」 names what is wired (旗一's body-record half, H73) and what is not (旗一's title and thread halves, 旗二), carrying the dev's note (a) and the Ruled (scope): spelling question from (b) for the maintainer's word.
• S2 (same card, or the seat's own stroke): the live board shows two ruled cards past the threshold today ([Decision] spec: the relatedList describe still names the retired "Related" and "Details" tabs of the old record page — fix now, after record page v2 settles, or leave it #28888 domain:spec, objectql: a plain lookup write accepts a target the writer cannot read — the reference check probes it elevated, and only master_detail asks the caller's read door #29029 domain:server); the row names the exits owed, and the daily summary (director duty four) is where the card says they are listed.
• S3 (PR body, cosmetic): 「第 38 行」 → 「第 39 行」 in the 维护者速读.

Check-runs at record time (2026-11-02T17:45Z): 51 check-runs on 4bf6e86, all completed, 31 success, 20 skipped, 0 failure, 0 in progress. Success: Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core (and shards 1/8, 2/8), Governed Surface Queue Guard, Test UI, Lint · ESLint, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests, Lint · scoped · slot lookup & corpus, Lint · scoped · query-options erasure, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · CI, release & engine gates, Type Check · workspace / source gates / debt ledger / consumer gates, PR-body guards, Check Changeset, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate, Plan Test Core shards, Auto Label, filter, Live half-state sweep, Live required-set sweep, Platform checklist gate sweep, Release section-coverage sweep, Snapshot the board to the archive branch. Skipped by path filter: Build Core, Build Docs, Build UI Deps, Lint UI, Type Check UI, Build & E2E UI, Live E2E UI, UI Published Artifacts, Temporal Conformance, Dogfood Verify CLI and the opt-in lanes. Combined status pending (statuses API, 0 statuses; no check-run is pending). mergeable_state clean; the PR is a draft with skip-changeset, documentation, size/m, Tier S (.claude/**), landing by the owning seat once this record is on the thread.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-zjdjqh
Reviewed-by: session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J

VERDICT: PASS with should-fixes (S1 runbook line and the Ruled (scope): question on a follow-up card; S2 the two live exits owed; S3 PR-body line number)

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

domain:skills#1 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAnMUWA9rufXzFaEh4J

维护者速读

• 改了什么: 裁决落地改为"一笔完成"。lanes/director.md 加一行：记录裁决的同一笔里要敲对应车道席位的信箱，缺了这一敲算记录方的半态;为腾出这一行，把职责一里两行"跟到合并"合成一行，义务不变，仍是 86 行上限。check-half-states.mjs 新增只报告的 H73 行：卡上已有 Ruled: 记录、却仍挂着 needs-user-decision 超过 6 小时(巡检周期),就报出来。
• 为什么改: 实测有已裁决的卡在决策箱里躺了 10 小时以上，巡检脚本没有任何一行会看它们。
• 风险与回滚: 新行只报告、不写 GitHub,不卡任何门禁;可整 PR revert。
• 两分钟验证: node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs --self-test,预期 5213 例全过。
• 需要你做的: 无。受治理面 Tier S,本席达档复核后落地。
• 席位意见: ACCEPT。复核 PASS(6584117457),复核方十个消融全部变红;现场只读扫描报出两张卡([Decision] spec: the relatedList describe still names the retired "Related" and "Details" tabs of the old record page — fix now, after record page v2 settles, or leave it #28888 spec 车道约 13 小时、objectql: a plain lookup write accepts a target the writer cannot read — the reference check probes it elevated, and only master_detail asks the caller's read door #29029 server 车道约 8 小时),由那两条车道的席位收尾。

席位核对 — ACCEPT · domain:skills#1 · head 4bf6e86b7606b09457e3ca4f1f7d04d2ee02d3d2

1. 形态: draft → main,Fixes #29386;skip-changeset;作者 objectstack-fleet[bot];改动正好是认领时的 2 个文件(6580080463),director.md 86 → 86 行。
2. 前提与自测: origin/main 上 check-half-states 没有任何读 Ruled: 的行(唯一一处是测试夹具)。head 上 --self-test 5213 例全过(H73 电池 28/25);棘轮 exit 0,id-lint 108 个文件干净;dispatch-gates 推出 54 条命令。合并基 86d36e99 之后 main 没动过这两个文件。
3. check-runs(钉 head 4bf6e86b): success 31 / skipped 23 / 改正文后重跑的 PR-body guards 落地前再读;check-governed-merges --pr 29515:受治理面 Tier S(席内达档复核落地),+217/−2,低于 3000 行人合线。
4. 接受的偏差: S1,dispatch-runbook.md 仍写着"旗一的接线是另一张卡的事",它在 245 行上限且不在本卡面内;Ruled (plugin-ai): 这种带范围的写法本行不读(卡和 director.md 第 12 行都只规定 Ruled:)。两者都留待维护者点名再立卡(pm 规则卡只按维护者点名立)。S3 正文行号已由本席改正(第 38 → 39 行)。
5. 落地条款: 受治理 Tier S。本复核即达档记录;CI 全绿后本席 pr_ready + automerge_enable。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[github-actions]

⛔ merge queue 构建失败 — 先分诊，再决定要不要重排

队列构建 41495019103 红了。队列跑的是全量套件（PR 侧 CI 只跑 affected 子集），
所以失败的测试可能在本 PR 没碰过的包里 —— 那不是重排能修的。每次盲目重排都会让排在后面的所有 PR 重建一轮。

分类：failure —— 按下面的日志分诊。

失败的 job（日志抽取，best effort）：

• Test Core (1/8) — 失败步骤: Run this shard's tests

  @objectstack/spec:test:      ✓ inverts the card's measured control: the three bogus keys now FAIL parse instead of adding zero warnings  362ms
    ↳ 失败原因: (这条 FAIL 之后 12 行内没有可识别的原因行 —— 点进 job 看)
  @objectstack/spec:test:  FAIL   local  scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts > the committed ledger > names at least one site per entry, and its header totals match its body
    ↳ 失败原因: @objectstack/spec:test: AssertionError: expected 993 to be 998 // Object.is equality
  @objectstack/spec:test:repo:  FAIL   repo  scripts/strictness-ledger-doc.test.ts > the ledger and the generated counts agree > is checked in current — every shard on disk equals a fresh render, and no
    ↳ 失败原因: @objectstack/spec:test:repo: AssertionError: expected Map{ …(14) } to deeply equal Map{ …(14) }
  @objectstack/spec:test:repo:  FAIL   repo  scripts/strictness-ledger-doc.test.ts > the ledger and the generated counts agree > the read-time totals equal the sums of the shards' own rows
    ↳ 失败原因: @objectstack/spec:test:repo: AssertionError: expected 'untriaged: 1297 object site(s) across…' to be 'untriaged: 1296 object site(s) across…' // Object.is equality
  

↳ 失败原因 是判读的关键：超时（Test timed out in … / Hook timed out in …）多半是负载/时序，不是本 PR 的回归；
断言（AssertionError: …）才指向真实的行为改变。两者的 FAIL 行长得一模一样，只有这一行能区分。

⚠️ 断言这一侧有一类例外，判据是断言在测什么，不是它是不是 AssertionError。 断言的对象是产品行为（一个值、一个形状、一次拒收）⇒ 照上面读：真实的行为改变，去查，⛔ 不要重排掉；
断言的对象是这次实验自身的有效性前提（跑完的耗时、负载下的先后、任何只在时间预算内才成立的条件）⇒ 它跟超时是同一类，同样对负载敏感，重排一次是合法的判别手段。
识别是机械的：断言的消息或它比较的值本身点名了一段时长、一个时间戳、一个耗时计数。实测过的一对 —— AssertionError: SecurityPlugin.init() ran: expected false to be true 测的是产品行为（真回归）；
AssertionError: this run took over a second, so second-precision stamps could have differed too: expected 1006 to be less than 1000 测的是实验前提：它守护的那条不变式当时是绿的，同一个 head 原样重排一次即成功。
穿着 AssertionError 外衣的时间测量，仍然是时间测量。（⛔ 这只改「怎么读一次红」，不改「哪些测试可以重排」——后者由别处管。）

跨 PR 相同签名（24h，按失败测试文件聚合）：

• scripts/strictness-ledger-doc.test.ts — 24h 内已弹出 11 个 PR（feat(spec): declare the whole-deployment export, every installed package as installable packages in one read (PackageExportBundleSchema) #29100、feat(spec): push channel protocol face — device registration widening, stored device shape, device contract members, push route, APNs/FCM config by credentialRef #29218、fix(spec)!: refuse a dashboard globalFilters entry keyed dateRange beside a declared dateRange #29370、fix(spec)!: a datasource named drivers is refused at every door that parses a datasource #29423、feat(spec): a record page can name the apps whose routes open it (PageSchema.apps) #29437、feat(spec): declare features.sso on the auth config response #29455、build(turbo): hash the Service Worker generator into the Console's build and type-check only #29504、fix(pm): the relay reads no runner 403 as the egress proxy's, and a refused advisory row names its cause #29505、fix(cli): os migrate organization-ownership --apply carries a public-form withdrawal onto a read-only package view into its .custom pair, declared #29508、docs(spec): the disabledActions description names Setup › Packaged Actions, not the retired Packaged automation page #29511、feat(pm): a ruled decision card still in the box is a patrol row, and the director's ruling lands with its knock #29515），但它们同属 1 条投机栈 ⇒ 1 次独立命中。汇总 issue：Queue-flake anchor: scripts/strictness-ledger-doc.test.ts #29524（已刷新）
• scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts — 24h 内已弹出 4 个 PR（feat(spec): a record page can name the apps whose routes open it (PageSchema.apps) #29437、fix(pm): the relay reads no runner 403 as the egress proxy's, and a refused advisory row names its cause #29505、docs(spec): the disabledActions description names Setup › Packaged Actions, not the retired Packaged automation page #29511、feat(pm): a ruled decision card still in the box is a patrol row, and the director's ruling lands with its knock #29515），但它们同属 1 条投机栈 ⇒ 1 次独立命中。汇总 issue：Queue-flake anchor: scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts #29530（已刷新）
• ⚠️ 24h 评论账本没读完（超过 5 页仍未读到窗口尽头），所以上面的「不同 PR 数」是下界，不是全量。

历史信号：

• 本 PR 过去 24h 无队列失败记录（首次）。
• 过去 24h 队列共有 18 个失败构建（不含本次）。

分诊清单：

1. 失败测试在本 PR 改动的包里 → 真回归，修 PR。
2. 失败测试与本 PR 无关 → 看上面的「跨 PR 相同签名」；已有汇总 issue ⇒ flaky/环境问题实锤，去那张 issue 上谈，修好前重排只会再烧一轮全队列。
3. 两者都不是 → 可能与同组 PR 语义冲突；等前面的 PR 落地或失败出队后再重排一次即可，不要连续重排。

---

Generated by Claude Code · merge-queue-triage workflow (#4859)

[github-actions]

⛔ merge queue 构建失败 — 先分诊，再决定要不要重排

队列构建 41498313013 红了。队列跑的是全量套件（PR 侧 CI 只跑 affected 子集），
所以失败的测试可能在本 PR 没碰过的包里 —— 那不是重排能修的。每次盲目重排都会让排在后面的所有 PR 重建一轮。

分类：failure —— 按下面的日志分诊。

失败的 job（日志抽取，best effort）：

• Test Core (1/8) — 失败步骤: Run this shard's tests

  @objectstack/spec:test:      ✓ inverts the card's measured control: the three bogus keys now FAIL parse instead of adding zero warnings  412ms
    ↳ 失败原因: (这条 FAIL 之后 12 行内没有可识别的原因行 —— 点进 job 看)
  @objectstack/spec:test:  FAIL   local  scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts > the committed ledger > names at least one site per entry, and its header totals match its body
    ↳ 失败原因: @objectstack/spec:test: AssertionError: expected 993 to be 998 // Object.is equality
  

↳ 失败原因 是判读的关键：超时（Test timed out in … / Hook timed out in …）多半是负载/时序，不是本 PR 的回归；
断言（AssertionError: …）才指向真实的行为改变。两者的 FAIL 行长得一模一样，只有这一行能区分。

⚠️ 断言这一侧有一类例外，判据是断言在测什么，不是它是不是 AssertionError。 断言的对象是产品行为（一个值、一个形状、一次拒收）⇒ 照上面读：真实的行为改变，去查，⛔ 不要重排掉；
断言的对象是这次实验自身的有效性前提（跑完的耗时、负载下的先后、任何只在时间预算内才成立的条件）⇒ 它跟超时是同一类，同样对负载敏感，重排一次是合法的判别手段。
识别是机械的：断言的消息或它比较的值本身点名了一段时长、一个时间戳、一个耗时计数。实测过的一对 —— AssertionError: SecurityPlugin.init() ran: expected false to be true 测的是产品行为（真回归）；
AssertionError: this run took over a second, so second-precision stamps could have differed too: expected 1006 to be less than 1000 测的是实验前提：它守护的那条不变式当时是绿的，同一个 head 原样重排一次即成功。
穿着 AssertionError 外衣的时间测量，仍然是时间测量。（⛔ 这只改「怎么读一次红」，不改「哪些测试可以重排」——后者由别处管。）

跨 PR 相同签名（24h，按失败测试文件聚合）：

• scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts — 24h 内已弹出 7 个 PR（feat(spec): a record page can name the apps whose routes open it (PageSchema.apps) #29437、docs(spec): tenancy-posture prose says which side of the open/commercial split gates activation #29454、feat(lint)!: os lint refuses a flow region the engine refuses to register (flow-region-shape-invalid) #29495、fix(pm): the relay reads no runner 403 as the egress proxy's, and a refused advisory row names its cause #29505、docs(spec): the disabledActions description names Setup › Packaged Actions, not the retired Packaged automation page #29511、docs(spec): TOP_LEVEL_COLLECTIONS_NEVER_RESIDUAL names the readers of top-level datasets the tree has #29514、feat(pm): a ruled decision card still in the box is a patrol row, and the director's ruling lands with its knock #29515），但它们同属 1 条投机栈 ⇒ 1 次独立命中。汇总 issue：Queue-flake anchor: scripts/dropped-refinements.test.ts #29530（已刷新）
• ⚠️ 24h 评论账本没读完（超过 5 页仍未读到窗口尽头），所以上面的「不同 PR 数」是下界，不是全量。

历史信号：

• ⚠️ 本 PR 过去 24h 已在队列失败 1 次（不含本次）。 内容未变而反复失败 ⇒ 高度怀疑 flaky 测试或与同组 PR 的语义冲突，重排不解决。
• 过去 24h 队列共有 27 个失败构建（不含本次）。

分诊清单：

1. 失败测试在本 PR 改动的包里 → 真回归，修 PR。
2. 失败测试与本 PR 无关 → 看上面的「跨 PR 相同签名」；已有汇总 issue ⇒ flaky/环境问题实锤，去那张 issue 上谈，修好前重排只会再烧一轮全队列。
3. 两者都不是 → 可能与同组 PR 语义冲突；等前面的 PR 落地或失败出队后再重排一次即可，不要连续重排。

---

Generated by Claude Code · merge-queue-triage workflow (#4859)