[objectstack-fleet]

Requested by Elon · project thread

Fixes #25457

Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none

维护者速读(草稿)

• 改了什么:把您 2026-10-23 14:43Z 的话「在每张卡的派发令里写明『PR 只经中继 pr_create 开,禁用 MCP』」写进 pm-dispatch 四个细则文件。① 派发令的 Writes: 行现在点名:PR 只经中继 pr_create,评论/标签/正文只经中继写工具;⛔ GitHub MCP 写工具逐个点名(create_pull_request、update_pull_request、issue_write、add_issue_comment 等);多仓项目线程不加载仓库 settings.json 的 deny,这一行就是唯一防线。② 卡线程开场消息里的派发令必须逐字带这条 Writes: 行。③ 契约复核记录多一笔:PR 作者不是 objectstack-fleet[bot] 时,③ 注点名该登录名(脱中继写),席位落地前先读到。④ 顺带把 coordinator.md 车道归属那两行改成和 docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 写的无条件接管一致:座位贴 🟢 写着别的账号就是车道已有主,⛔ 不坐别席,但维护者改写项目指令行即按 project-forms.md 接管(含在飞卡)。
• 为什么改:实测 docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 由卡线程经 GitHub MCP create_pull_request 开出,作者变成个人登录名而不是车队 bot;原因是以多个检出为根的项目线程不加载 objectstack/.claude/settings.json,仓库里的 MCP 写禁令与 PreToolUse 守卫在那里失效,技能文本是唯一防线。原 Writes: 行只说「只走 REST 代理」,没点名 pr_create,也没按名禁 MCP 写工具。
• 风险与代价(含回滚):纯规则文本,不碰代码与门禁逻辑;execution-duties.md 188/188(+3 −2,两行合一行付账)、contract-review.md 54→55/60(+1)、dispatch-runbook.md 与 coordinator.md 就地改行、行数不变;无上限抬高;一次 revert 可回。要您知道的一处:coordinator.md L12–13 原文「另一项目在飞卡由其席跟完,其收班简报在即可坐」与 docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 的「接管不等撞墙账号」相抵触,本 PR 按席位复核记录 6368204690 ③-1 的建议改写:默认仍由原席跟完在飞卡,只有您改写指令行时才无条件接管。
• 席位意见:(席位复核后填)
• 你要做的(一个动作):无。您 14:14Z 已在席位线程授权「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」;本 PR 在 docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 合入、合 main 后由席位复核 PASS、CI 全绿即落地。环境级设置(禁 MCP 写、放行中继命令)仍是您亲手改,不在本 PR。

What changed

Four files under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**, rule text only, every edited line at or under 120 bytes, no ceiling row moved.

File	Before	After
execution-duties.md 派发 (187 → 188, ceiling 188)	L130 「派发令恒带 Writes: 行:只走 REST 代理、写预算(端点清单)、mcp_calls 计数,dev 两数都报」	Three lines in its place: the Writes: line names the relay's pr_create as the only PR path and the relay write tools as the only path for comments, labels and body edits, and still asks for both counts; a ⛔ line names the GitHub MCP write tools (create_pull_request, update_pull_request, issue_write, add_issue_comment, …); a third line says a multi-repo project thread does not load the repo's settings.json deny, so the Writes: line is the only guard, and defines the two counts (write budget, mcp_calls). Paid in the same file: the two 派发词 lines at L121–L122 merged into one (116 bytes) keeping increments only, ⛔ no whole-body paste, the dev reading the full card and every comment, the dev's own completeness check, and the runbook pointer
dispatch-runbook.md 〈卡线程〉 (241, net 0)	「派发令由 coordinator 写进卡线程开场消息,⛔ 不落共享目录;卡上派发评论留一行指针」	「…写进线程开场消息,Writes: 行逐字在内,⛔ 不落共享目录;卡上留指针」 (in place, 119 bytes)
contract-review.md 复核归属与资格 (54 → 55 on the merged head, ceiling 60)	①②③ items	+1 after ③: a PR whose user.login is not objectstack-fleet[bot] gets a ③ note naming that login (an off-relay write), read by the seat before landing. Placed in contract-review.md rather than review-checklist.md (77/77, no headroom)
coordinator.md 一、车道归属 (49 lines, net 0; the file carries no CEILINGS row)	L12 「一条车道恒归一个项目:车道任一座位贴 🟢 标着另一项目 ⇒ 车道已有主,⛔ 不坐别席」; L13 「仲裁者是座位贴,⛔ 不是项目记忆;另一项目在飞卡由其席跟完,其收班简报在即可坐」	L12 「一车道归一项目:座位贴 🟢 写他账号 ⇒ 车道已有主;仲裁者是座位贴,⛔ 不是项目记忆」; L13 「⛔ 不坐别席,另一项目在飞卡由其席跟完;维护者指令行改写 ⇒ 按 project-forms.md 接管」 (both in place; the seat's review record 6368204690 ③-1 on #25427 asked for this alignment, and the claim on the card names it)

Acceptance reads on this head: git grep -n 'create_pull_request' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch → one hit, execution-duties.md L130, the ⛔ line. git grep -n 'os-bill\|hotlong\|os-elon-musk' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/ → no hit.

Line budget

File	Lines	Ceiling	Net
references/execution-duties.md	188	188	+1 (+3 −2)
references/dispatch-runbook.md	241	241	0 (1 edited in place)
references/contract-review.md	55	60	+1
references/coordinator.md	49	(no ceiling row)	0 (2 edited in place)

SKILL.md untouched (318/318). Widest edited line 119 bytes (coordinator.md L12, dispatch-runbook.md L140). scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs untouched: no file shrinks and none passes its ceiling.

Gates

Head 684b081c = content commit 5ea4c1c + merges of origin/main after #25427 (c246fb07) and #25422 (a7da5b92) + the ③-1 line (684b081c). The head's check-runs are the record: on a7da5b92 all 35 check-runs completed, 25 success and 10 skipped, none failed (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Governed Surface Queue Guard all success); the contract review record on that head is comment 6370282626 (PASS). Locally on 684b081c, each exit code captured before any pipe: pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (execution-duties.md 188/188, dispatch-runbook.md 241/241, contract-review.md 55/60; no line over 120 bytes), pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync ✓, pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness ✓, pnpm check:pm-governed-prose ✓, node scripts/check-commit-card-trailers.mjs --range origin/main..HEAD ✓. On the content commit, dispatch-gates.mjs --commands derived 17 commands, 17 run, 17 × exit 0 after pnpm install --frozen-lockfile and a build of @objectstack/formula + @objectstack/lint, reconciled with --ran. No published package moves (.claude/** only), so skip-changeset.

Ordering and open PRs

• Lands after docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 (card pm-dispatch: Tier S PR landed from a project needs a contract-review record by another account; triage shrinks to bare cards in the director project; decision cards stay in their repo, the director scans every repo (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25414), which edits dispatch-runbook.md 〈巡查常设项〉/〈分诊两级盘点〉 (L39–L50, L64–L71) and contract-review.md 独立性对/落地前检 (L35–L41). This PR's hunks are dispatch-runbook.md L140 and contract-review.md L29, outside those; main is merged in here once docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 lands, before the seat's review.
• docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 (card pm-dispatch: project forms — lane project and director project, lanes read from the seat post's 🟢 line, the maintainer's one-sentence assignment, takeover of a walled account, mailbox PRs, generated roster board (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25412) was in the merge queue at this push; its project-forms.md is what coordinator.md L13 now points to, and main is merged in once it lands too.
• Tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates.mjs --tier on .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**: "MANDATORY", as the claim records; governed rule text under contract-review.md 档随面定).

Acceptance notes

• The body's first line is the HTML-comment attribution block the project session requires; os-dev.md 〈干净收尾〉 forbids HTML comments in GitHub text. Reported as a deviation, not hidden.
• execution-duties.md L121's merge keeps every clause of the two old lines (the completeness check was restored at the reviewer's ③-1 spelling in 684b081c).
• The commit carries the model-free trailer pair the pre-push hook requires and no card trailer; the card relation is this body's Fixes line only.
• Opened through the fleet-write relay pr_create (the rule this PR writes), so the author is objectstack-fleet[bot]; every later write to this PR goes through the relay too.
• Governed surface .claude/** (Tier S): draft, awaiting the seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review after the main merge; landing by the seat under the maintainer's 14:14Z standing word in the seat thread; ⛔ not to be flipped ready, queued or armed by this thread.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01REirBR5H4pfZ96C61mK6Uj

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: a7da5b921b3b7f8909440d0547bd4b10436ca0f6
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/coordinator.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md + references/seat-lifecycle.md L30, references/project-forms.md L27 and L35–L38, references/rest-channel.md L10 and L47–L49, references/review-checklist.md (77/77), references/triage-duties.md (byte-identical to main), SKILL.md L45 and L198, scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (CEILINGS rows L409, L538, L1287; MAX_LINE_BYTES L2358; MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES rows), .claude/agents/os-dev.md L62–L65 and L322–L323, .github/workflows/lint.yml (gate-to-job mapping), and the merge-tree readings against origin/main 4c8f40a1961f75b84d5f2222554c471e035a3744

Record written 2026-10-23T17:00Z by an isolated reviewer of the domain:skills seat 2 session, on head a7da5b92 (the third commit of PR #25474: content commit 5ea4c1cc83, then two merges of origin/main). Inputs: card #25457 (its body quotes the maintainer's words of 2026-10-23T14:43Z), the seat claim (comment 6368326080), PR #25474 (body, file list, net diff against origin/main at 4c8f40a196), the head's check-runs; also the prior record 6368204690 ③-1 on #25427 (the coordinator.md wording it suggested) and the ruling 6363872862 on #25379 (item 1A, which fixed dispatch-runbook.md L141–L142). The PR body's self-assessment was not trusted; every reading below was re-derived with read-only git on the committed tree, no checkout, no gate re-run. Angle brackets are written as 〈 〉 so the sanitizer keeps them.

① Derived judgments

Surface. git diff --name-only origin/main..a7da5b92: exactly the four files above, +8 −6, all under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/. No Tier H path (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/**, skills/**, .github/workflows/**, CODEOWNERS), no scripts/**, no .claude/settings.json, SKILL.md untouched (318 lines). references/triage-duties.md is byte-identical to main (git diff empty), so the human floor is untouched. The merge-base with origin/main is origin/main itself: the branch already contains #25422 (5497d4ad43) and #25427 (ea33919f56), the two serial constraints the card and claim name, and the check-runs ran on the merged tree. Correct.

1. Wanted 1 — execution-duties.md L129–L131 (old L130 → three lines, 117 / 111 / 112 bytes). Old: 「派发令恒带 Writes: 行:只走 REST 代理、写预算(端点清单)、mcp_calls 计数,dev 两数都报。」 New: 「派发令恒带 Writes: 行:PR 只经中继 pr_create;评论/标签/正文只经中继写工具;两数都报。」 / 「⛔ GitHub MCP 写:create_pull_request、update_pull_request、issue_write、add_issue_comment 等。」 / 「多仓项目线程不加载仓 settings.json deny,此行即唯一防线;两数 = 写预算与 mcp_calls。」 Against the card's Wanted 1: PR only through the relay's pr_create — carried; comments, labels, body edits only through the relay write tools — carried as the class 「中继写工具」 rather than the card's three script names (post-stamped.mjs, label-write.mjs, fleet-write/dispatch.mjs); those names already stand where the dev is sent for the spelling (rest-channel.md L47–L49, landing-operations.md L52, seat-post-protocol.md L30, lanes/ui.md L23), and pr_create resolves through SKILL.md L198 and execution-duties.md L59, so the rule is operative without them; ⛔ GitHub MCP writes by name — the card's four names carried, its 「…」 carried as 「等」; the one clause on the multi-repo project not loading the repo settings.json deny, so this line is the guard — carried verbatim in meaning. Both counts kept and now defined (「两数 = 写预算与 mcp_calls」). Dropped from the old line: 「只走 REST 代理」 (subsumed: the relay is that proxy, rest-channel.md L10) and the parenthetical 「(端点清单)」, whose detail still stands at the dev's own rule, os-dev.md L65 「报告记 api_writes(次数 + 端点清单)与 mcp_calls」. Correct.

2. The payment — execution-duties.md old L121–L122 merged into new L121 (120 bytes, the widest line of the diff). Old: 「派发词 ⛔ 默认不整段粘贴 issue 正文:让 dev 自己读全文与全部评论并自查正文完整性。」 and 「派发词只带增量,构造细则与条款原文见 references/dispatch-runbook.md。」 New: 「派发词只带增量,⛔ 不整段粘贴卡正文(dev 自读全文与评论);构造细则见 dispatch-runbook.md。」 Kept: increments only; ⛔ no whole-body paste; the dev reads the full text and every comment; the pointer to the runbook (whose own L3 says it holds 「参数、模板、步骤与原文」, so 「条款原文见」→「构造细则见」 still resolves). 「默认」 is gone, which makes the no-paste rule absolute; the verbatim-quotation allowance it covered survives on the very next line, L122 「派发词引卡片的精确断言(schema 臂、判据、原文)一律逐字」, so no exception is lost. Lost: 「并自查正文完整性」 — the dev's own check that the body it read is whole. The PR body reports it; it is a clause, not a tail, and a 116-byte spelling keeps it (③-1). Judged: the merge pays the line without losing either of the two rules the card asks to keep; one sub-clause is dropped and flagged, non-blocking.

3. Wanted 2 — dispatch-runbook.md L140 in place (119 bytes). Old: 「派发令由 coordinator 写进卡线程开场消息,⛔ 不落共享目录;卡上派发评论留一行指针。」 New: 「派发令由 coordinator 写进线程开场消息,Writes: 行逐字在内,⛔ 不落共享目录;卡上留指针。」 The card's 「carries that Writes: line verbatim」 is carried as 「Writes: 行逐字在内」. 「卡线程开场消息」→「线程开场消息」 keeps its referent (the line sits in 〈卡线程(mode:thread)〉); 「卡上派发评论留一行指针」→「卡上留指针」 keeps the pointer comment. Ruling 1A on #25379 fixed the shape of L141–L142 (coordinator reads the branch, the seat claims, the thread verifies): both lines are byte-identical to main on this head. Correct.

4. Wanted 3 — contract-review.md L29 (+1, 116 bytes), placed right after the ①②③ item line in 〈复核归属与资格〉. 「另记作者:PR user.login 非 objectstack-fleet[bot] ⇒ ③ 注点名该 login(脱中继写),落地前读。」 Names the ③ note, the login to record, the reason (an off-relay write) and the reading moment (before landing) — the card's Wanted 3 whole. Placed in contract-review.md (54 → 55 of 60 on this head) rather than review-checklist.md (77/77, no headroom) — the card allowed either. objectstack-fleet[bot] is the bot login the card itself names and rest-channel.md L10 already carries; no personal login enters rule text: git grep -n 'os-bill\|hotlong\|os-elon-musk' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/ on the head → no hit. No #NNN citation in any of the eight new lines (id-lint). Correct. The new line is applied to this very PR at ③-4.

5. Scope addition — coordinator.md L12–L13 in place (119 and 117 bytes). Old: 「一条车道恒归一个项目:车道任一座位贴 🟢 标着另一项目 ⇒ 车道已有主,⛔ 不坐别席。」 / 「仲裁者是座位贴,⛔ 不是项目记忆;另一项目在飞卡由其席跟完,其收班简报在即可坐。」 New: 「一车道归一项目:座位贴 🟢 写他账号 ⇒ 车道已有主;仲裁者是座位贴,⛔ 不是项目记忆。」 / 「⛔ 不坐别席,另一项目在飞卡由其席跟完;维护者指令行改写 ⇒ 按 project-forms.md 接管。」 Agreement on main: seat-lifecycle.md L30 「维护者强制接管令取席位、队列、在飞卡、未起工卡与待落地 PR;⛔ 不等原认领者注记」 and project-forms.md L37–L38 「🟢 行写着别的账号 ⇒ 指令行即维护者强制接管令,含在飞卡」 / 「撞墙账号写不出任何东西,接管永不等它的注记或简报」. The clause that contradicted them, 「其收班简报在即可坐」 (sit once the closing brief is in), is gone; 「标着另一项目」→「写他账号」 reads the 🟢 line the way project-forms.md L37 does now that #25427 removed the project types; the no-order default (the other project's seat finishes its in-flight cards) is kept; the maintainer's rewrite of the instruction line is routed to project-forms.md, so the takeover mechanics live in one place. The claim's suggested L13 began with 「仲裁者是座位贴,⛔ 不是项目记忆;」; the PR moved that clause to L12 to fit the byte cap — same content, same two lines. git diff origin/main..a7da5b92 -- references/coordinator.md is −2 +2 on L12–L13; the other 47 lines are byte-identical. Correct; one residual wording note at ③-2.

6. Acceptance reads on the head. git grep -n 'create_pull_request' -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch → one hit, execution-duties.md L130, the ⛔ line: named only as forbidden. Budgets against the CEILINGS map (the PR does not touch the ratchet script): execution-duties.md 188/188 (row L1287), dispatch-runbook.md 241/241 (row L409), contract-review.md 55/60 (row L538), coordinator.md 49 lines net 0 — that file carries no CEILINGS row on main or on this head (grep -n coordinator scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs → no hit; see ③-3). Every added or edited line measured 111–120 bytes against MAX_LINE_BYTES = 120; MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES for the four files is 0 and no table row is touched; no ceiling row moved or needed. No angle bracket in the new text.

7. Merge. a7da5b92 has parents c246fb07b1 and 4c8f40a196 (= origin/main at this review); git merge-tree --write-tree on those parents yields 0815ab01c9a7745e546668f69f173bcb486cf96c, byte-identical to the merge commit's tree. c246fb07b1 (parents 5ea4c1cc83 and ea33919f56, the #25427 merge) likewise reproduces its tree 5e83d1c4995b8de33fa54baed0a7ee580e26057c. No hand-resolved conflict, nothing from main altered or dropped; git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main a7da5b92 is clean.

8. Gates — the head's check-runs are the record. 35 check-runs on a7da5b92, all completed: 25 success, 10 skipped, none failed, none pending at the time of this write. The required floor Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check are both success; Governed Surface Queue Guard is success. The four gates the card names run inside Lint · repo & tooling gates (pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet, pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint; lint.yml L1035, L1045) and Lint · PM dispatch-gates (pnpm check:skill-frame-sync, check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs --self-test + scan; L5516, L5554) — both success. Nothing was built, run or re-run locally.

② Semver level

.claude/** only; no package files[] content moves, so nothing is published. The PR carries skip-changeset, the right form for this repo for a rules-only change; Clause-②: no and Metadata-protocol: none on the body match the diff. Correct.

③ Boundary flags

1. Dropped sub-clause 「并自查正文完整性」 at execution-duties.md L121 (self-reported in the PR body). A line-neutral 116-byte spelling keeps it: 「- 派发词只带增量,⛔ 不整段贴卡正文;dev 自读全文与评论、自查完整(dispatch-runbook.md)。」 Non-blocking; the seat's ACCEPT names whether it lands on this PR or as a one-line follow-up.
2. coordinator.md L13 says 「维护者指令行改写 ⇒ …接管」; project-forms.md L27 says 「维护者在项目里写下或改写这一行,是唯一的指派动作」, so a freshly written line (a new project) is also an order there. The pointer 「按 project-forms.md 接管」 resolves it in practice, and the claim's suggested text used the same word; 「写下或」 does not fit the cap (126 bytes). Recorded, no change demanded.
3. PR body against the tree: (a) 「contract-review.md 48 → 49, 49/60」 is the pre-docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 count; on this head the file is 54 → 55 of 60. (b) 「coordinator.md 49/49 (ceiling 49)」 names a ceiling row that does not exist — the file is unmetered by the ratchet (a card for the seat if it is to be metered; not this PR's defect, the file is net 0). (c) The body says dispatch-gates.mjs --tier derives no path mandate while the claim says 「MANDATORY」; not re-run here. The served tier is CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER either way under contract-review.md 「档随面定:…governed 规则文本 ⇒ CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER」. (d) The Gates paragraph was measured on 5ea4c1c, two merges before this head; the head's check-runs above are the record, as the body itself says.
4. Author line applied to this PR. user.login on PR docs(pm-dispatch): the Writes: line names the relay as the only GitHub write path and bans GitHub MCP writes by name; the card thread's opening message carries it verbatim; contract review notes a PR not authored by the fleet bot #25474 is objectstack-fleet[bot], so no off-relay write and no login note is owed under the new L29. The authoring account is read from the body's attribution block (github_login = os-elon-musk), per contract-review.md 「作者账户 = PR 正文 attribution 的 github_login」. That block is an HTML comment on the body's first line (os-dev.md L322 forbids HTML comments in GitHub text; the body reports it as a deviation) and puts Fixes #25457 on the third line rather than the first (review-checklist.md 「正文首行引用卡片」) — the same shape docs(pm-dispatch): Tier S landed from a project needs a review of record by another account; the 分诊席 shrinks to bare cards; decision cards stay in their repo and the 总监席 scans every repo #25422 and docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 landed with; recorded, not a FAIL. The check 「The card this PR closes must claim this branch」 is success.
5. Same-account review. The implementing card thread (claude/project-thread-4obil9, session session_01REirBR5H4pfZ96C61mK6Uj), this isolated reviewer and the adopting seat session all run under os-elon-musk, the PR's attribution login. Under contract-review.md 「项目席落地的 Tier S:Reviewed-by: 须属 PR 作者外的账户;同账户子代理只算复核」 this record is the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review and not the cross-account record; under the interim line 「过渡:无另一账户在席时,① 的替代 = 维护者本人在执行线程的话:逐个点名 PR 编号,或对该席位的 Tier S 长期授权(一句可撤)」 the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread of 2026-10-23T14:14Z 「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」 is the ① substitute. The queue guard reads the same.
6. Check-runs completed before posting. Four Lint · … jobs were still in_progress when the tree reading was taken; re-read until none pending: 35/35 completed, conclusions success or skipped only.
7. Commit trailers. The content commit 5ea4c1cc83 carries the model-free trailer pair and no card trailer; the card relation is the body's Fixes line only. The two merge commits are plain merges.

Independence: the diff was produced by the card thread on branch claude/project-thread-4obil9; this record is rendered by an isolated subagent and adopted by the domain:skills seat 2 session named below.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-4obil9
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM
Reviewed-by-account: os-elon-musk

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 684b081ca82692002029b3106e91687722487e5a
Local-runs: probe — node scripts/check-commit-card-trailers.mjs --range a7da5b92..684b081c, a read of the new commit's message only, to confirm its trailer pair carries no card relation and no model identifier (exit 0); no gate re-run, no checkout
Scope: delta a7da5b92..684b081c (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md L121 only) + the PR body as it stands, scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (CEILINGS row L1317, MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES row L2168), and the merge-tree reading against origin/main 915e9404992234a7cd0d2dd4701dfbadbe9cb2c7

Delta record written 2026-10-23T17:08Z by an isolated reviewer of the domain:skills seat 2 session, on head 684b081c (the fourth commit of PR #25474, a single-parent commit on a7da5b92). The prior record 6370282626 (2026-10-23T17:00Z, PASS on a7da5b92) is carried forward by reference: nothing it read has changed except the one line below and the PR body, and this record re-derives only those. Read-only git on the committed tree, no checkout, no gate re-run.

① Derived judgments

1. The delta is exactly the ③-1 spelling. git diff --stat a7da5b92..684b081c → one file, +1 −1: execution-duties.md L121. Old: 「- 派发词只带增量,⛔ 不整段粘贴卡正文(dev 自读全文与评论);构造细则见 dispatch-runbook.md。」 New: 「- 派发词只带增量,⛔ 不整段贴卡正文;dev 自读全文与评论、自查完整(dispatch-runbook.md)。」 — byte-for-byte the line the prior record's ③-1 offered, 116 bytes measured on the head. The dropped sub-clause 「并自查正文完整性」 is back as 「自查完整」; increments only, ⛔ no whole-body paste, the dev reading the full card and every comment, and the runbook pointer all remain. L122 「派发词引卡片的精确断言(schema 臂、判据、原文)一律逐字,⛔ 不释义转述。」 is untouched, so the verbatim-quotation allowance still sits beside it. No #NNN and no angle bracket on the new line. Correct.

2. Budgets unchanged. execution-duties.md is 188 lines on the head against the CEILINGS row ['.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md', 188] (ratchet L1317; the row moved in line number since the prior record because main grew, the value did not); widest line in the file 120 bytes, none over MAX_LINE_BYTES; MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES row for the file is 0 and no table row is touched. contract-review.md 55 lines on the head. git diff --stat 4c8f40a196..684b081c is still the same four files, +8 −6; no new path entered the PR.

3. Merge. 684b081c has the single parent a7da5b92 (tree 3b3607b2d4), so there is no merge to reproduce. origin/main has moved by one commit since the prior record, 4c8f40a196 → 915e9404 (#25489, packages/plugins/plugin-security/**, packages/types/**, content/docs/**, one changeset; nothing under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** or scripts/pm/**). The merge-base is still 4c8f40a196; git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main 684b081c → dd150817cfec7c98ff25202cb1eaac078df802ff, exit 0, no conflict.

4. PR body against the tree (closes the prior ③-3). (a) 「contract-review.md 54 → 55 on the merged head, ceiling 60」 and the Line budget row 「55 / 60」 now match the head. (b) coordinator.md is written 「(no ceiling row)」 / 「the file carries no CEILINGS row」 — the phantom 49/49 ceiling claim is gone and the file is still net 0 in place. (c) Tier: 「CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates.mjs --tier … "MANDATORY", as the claim records)」 — matches the claim; not re-run here, the served tier is the same either way under 「档随面定」. (d) The Gates paragraph now names the head 684b081c and its ancestry, cites the a7da5b92 check-runs and record 6370282626 as the record for that head, and lists the body's own local runs on 684b081c as the author's runs; this record ran nothing locally and treats the head's check-runs as the record (⑤). The Acceptance note on L121 now says the completeness check 「was restored at the reviewer's ③-1 spelling in 684b081c」 — true on the tree. Correct.

5. Gates — the head's check-runs are the record. 42 check-runs on 684b081c, all completed at this write: 29 success, 13 skipped, none failed, none pending (eight Lint · … / Type Check · … jobs were still in_progress when the tree reading was taken; re-read every two minutes until none pending). The required floor Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check are both success; Governed Surface Queue Guard is success; Lint · repo & tooling gates (ratchet, id-lint) and Lint · PM dispatch-gates (frame-sync, frame-freshness) are both success; the four card-relation checks (claim, single-writer path, same-issue, part-of) are success on both of the head's runs. Nothing was built or run locally beyond the trailer check named in Local-runs.

② Semver level

Unchanged from the prior record: .claude/** only, skip-changeset, Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none. Correct.

③ Boundary flags

1. Closed. The dropped sub-clause 「并自查正文完整性」 is restored at L121 in the 116-byte spelling the prior record offered (①-1); it landed on this PR, not as a follow-up.
2. Stands. coordinator.md L13 「维护者指令行改写」 against project-forms.md L27 「写下或改写」 — untouched by this delta; recorded, no change demanded.
3. Closed. The four body-vs-tree discrepancies (contract-review count, phantom coordinator.md ceiling row, tier wording, stale Gates paragraph) are corrected on the body as read at this write (①-4).
4. Stands. user.login on the PR is still objectstack-fleet[bot]; no login note is owed under the new contract-review.md L29. The body's attribution block (github_login = os-elon-musk) remains an HTML comment on the first line with Fixes #25457 on the third — the same shape as before; recorded, not a FAIL. 「The card this PR closes must claim this branch」 is success on this head.
5. Stands. Same-account review: card thread, this isolated reviewer and the adopting seat all run under os-elon-musk; this record is the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review, and the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread of 2026-10-23T14:14Z 「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」 is the ① substitute under the interim line.
6. Commit trailers. 684b081c carries the same model-free trailer pair as the content commit and no card trailer (check-commit-card-trailers.mjs over a7da5b92..684b081c → ✓, the one local run above); the card relation is the body's Fixes line only.

Independence: the diff was produced by the card thread on branch claude/project-thread-4obil9; this record is rendered by an isolated subagent and adopted by the domain:skills seat 2 session named below.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-4obil9
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM
Reviewed-by-account: os-elon-musk

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对

ACCEPT · domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM · 2026-10-23T17:09Z · head 684b081ca82692002029b3106e91687722487e5a · Tier S (.claude/** only, four reference files, +8 / −6, no Tier H path)

Landing authority: the maintainer's standing Tier S word in this seat's thread of the Claude Code project "Objectstack" (os-elon-musk account), 2026-10-23T14:14Z: 「后续按 pm-dispatch 规则审核通过的都可以落地」 — the ① substitute under contract-review.md's interim line (ruling A, #25414 comment 6369035432).

1. Shape: draft, base main, Fixes #25457 the only closing keyword, skip-changeset; author objectstack-fleet[bot] (opened through the relay, as this PR's own rule asks).
2. Premise measured: the card quotes the maintainer's word of 2026-10-23T14:43Z; PR docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427 was opened through GitHub MCP and carries the personal login as author, the case this rule closes.
3. Gates (check-runs pinned to this head): 42 check-runs, all completed, none failed.
4. Contract review: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS on a7da5b92 (6370282626) and delta PASS on this head (6370438380); the one dropped sub-clause (③-1) is restored here and the PR body corrected (③-3).
5. Accepted deviations: scope includes references/coordinator.md L12–L13, aligned with the unconditional takeover from docs(pm-dispatch): the project layer — one project form, 「pm-dispatch <席位…>」 as the summon, seats read from the seat posts' 🟢 line, takeover that never waits for a walled account, mailbox PRs, a generated roster board #25427, as the claim recorded.
6. Landing: merges cleanly onto main a285ff29a1 (git merge-tree, no conflict). This seat flips ready and arms auto-merge now.

---

Generated by Claude Code