[objectstack-fleet]

Requested by Elon · project thread

Fixes #25344

Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none

维护者速读(草稿)

• 改了什么:把 pm-dispatch 技能里所有「Claude 可以自己裁」的通道全部撤掉——项目内裁决线程、「有把握自己决定」常设令、分诊代裁车道与置信门四条、auto-adjudicated 标记、总监席「一类自裁」免呈、PM 对 dev needs_decision 的直接答复。改后一句话:席位只分析与推荐,每个 needs_decision 都并入决裁批次,由您人工裁。
• 为什么改:您 2026-10-23 的原话:「我记得有一个skills 允许自主决裁，撤销这个决定。必须人工决裁。」
• 风险与代价(含回滚):决裁批次会多出以前「有把握就自裁」的那部分卡,批次变长;除此之外无行为面变化,纯文本改动,一次 revert 可回。
• 席位意见:(席位复核后填)
• 你要做的(一个动作):批 Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 您已「同意」,三项都已写入;席位复审 PASS 后,一句「可以落地」。

What changed

Every channel in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** that let a seat, a ruling thread or the director seat rule in the maintainer's place is removed, and the text that cited it is re-pointed. A seat analyses, recommends and files; the maintainer rules.

File	Before	After
references/lanes/director.md	项目内代裁通道: a card thread's needs_decision ⇒ the coordinator opens a ruling thread that rules for the director seat; the standing order 「对于自己有把握决定的问题，自己决定」; 「有把握」= the four-condition confidence gate; the needs_decision fork record form and the coordinator's 追认表	needs_decision ⇒ the seat writes the four-axis analysis and a recommendation and the card joins the ruling batch the maintainer rules by hand; the standing order is recorded as revoked; no ruling thread, no delegated ruling, no confidence gate
references/lanes/director.md 职责二	一类自裁按批过 / 全立者录裁转工作态、只入追认表,不呈批 / 消费面对齐协议 ⇒ 一类自裁 / 协议有误即裁改动	every card is presented; the seat records only the maintainer's word; protocol alignment and protocol errors are recommended and presented, never self-ruled
references/lanes/director.md L16	未回字 = 停,唯一例外是项目内代裁通道	no exception
references/triage-duties.md	代裁车道 (refactors and bug fixes), 代裁人工地板, 置信门四条, 代裁动作 + auto-adjudicated, 一类自裁门 (three criteria, summary table for 追认)	rulings belong to the maintainer; triage analyses, recommends and files into needs-user-decision; the 人工地板 list itself stays, re-homed as 「人工地板(恒呈维护者)」 so its six pointers and 例外一/例外二 keep their anchor (contract-review F1 at head 337ba76); the 机械边界测试 is kept only as the clause-② criterion (execution-duties.md points at it); the round report carries a 呈裁清单 instead of a 代裁清单; the 回翻条款 is kept
references/dispatch-runbook.md L146	终报 needs_decision ⇒ 席位交 coordinator 开 CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER 裁决线程	终报 needs_decision ⇒ 四维分析与推荐并入决裁批次呈维护者裁;⛔ 无裁决线程
SKILL.md 红线 L30 / state table L106	唯一例外是已裁的代裁通道 / 除代裁通道外永不代答	⛔ 无代裁通道;席位只分析与推荐 / 永不代答,只由人工裁
SKILL.md 升级与决策 L215, L219, L220, L234, L264, L267, L276	PM 裁量含「裁定」; dev's needs_decision in the non-escalation class answered by the PM; the premise-bound ruling tier is the PM's; 代裁 inputs/faces; 总监席是唯一裁决者	PM discretion is dispatch and ordering; every dev needs_decision goes to the human with the PM's analysis and recommendation (including "looks like a non-escalation class"); the premise-bound ruling is also the human's; the four facets are the input to the human ruling; the director seat is the only presenting seat
references/seat-lifecycle.md L69, references/contract-review.md L35, references/execution-duties.md L103	cite the 代裁清单 / 代裁 boundary test	cite the 呈裁清单 / the triage boundary test
scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs	ceilings director.md 72, triage-duties.md 120	director.md lowered to 70; triage-duties.md back at 120 after the batch-#3 text (landed counts, headroom 0); no other row moves

Already forbidding self-ruling and untouched: lanes/skills.md L21, lanes/hotcrm.md L51/L53, lanes/services.md L12. No script reads auto-adjudicated or the revoked vocabulary (git grep over scripts/, .github/), so the change is text-only.

批 #3 已裁 (maintainer 「同意」 = 1.1 A · 1.2 A · 2 A, 2026-10-23)

The two implementation-level self-choice lines first left for the maintainer's word, plus the report-only valve and the human floor, are now written as ruled (third commit):

1. 1.1 A — keep with a guard. A dev's implementation choices stay its own and are recorded in open_questions; touching product-visible behaviour or a contract is a fork, never a choice (dispatch-runbook.md L115). The PM's non-escalation classes carry the same guard (SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉).
2. 1.2 A — keep the valve, three hard conditions. A gate red twice in an hour on untouched packages may be flipped to report-only by any seat — only report-only (never a deleted gate or a skipped test), the item goes to the decision digest for the next batch in the same stroke with both red runs, and it flips back if the maintainer disagrees (triage-duties.md 例外二).
3. 2 A — the human floor, widened and judgeable. Beside the restored list: releases and anything public, external commitments, a card's fate (not planned, downgrade, withdrawal, halving), rules and process, defaults and factory shape, identity and tenancy model, cross-lane conflicts. Two criteria, any one of which presents the item: seven risk tests (security/permission/identity/tenancy boundary; irreversible stored data; contract or ADR change; outward-visible action; gate weakening or any exemption; contrary to a ruling or a new standing order; silent on a wrong pick) and four workload tests (a size/l option or ≥2 packages; chosen plan ≥2× the cheapest viable; a new permanent maintenance surface; ≥3 serial cards or a slot held over a working day). The never-presented list and its four-gate boundary (no product-visible change, no contract change, revertible, gate-backed) close it; every presented card names the criterion it hits. SKILL.md gains the one pointer line that binds every seat to it.

Line budget: triage-duties.md lands at 120, its ceiling on main (−13 revocation, +13 ruling); SKILL.md lands at its 319 ceiling (the pointer line spends the last line of headroom); no ceiling is raised.

Serial constraints

Open PRs on the same tree, checked before the first push: #25247 (SKILL.md 〈域车道〉 lane table + lane files), #25254 (platform-readings.md L403), #25255 (new coordinator.md, SKILL.md 入口与角色 row and the deletion of the 项目总监席 line at L274, dispatch-runbook.md cap line, ratchet rows beside seat-lifecycle.md). This PR touches none of those regions, but two hunks sit within three lines of #25255's (SKILL.md L276 and the ratchet's triage-duties.md row), so whichever lands second takes a trivial re-merge and re-measures check:pm-skill-ratchet. #25255's item 5 still points at the ruling thread this PR removes; its author re-points it after this lands.

Verification

• pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (SKILL.md 319/319; director.md 70/70; triage-duties.md 120/120; every changed line ≤120 bytes)
• pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓ · pnpm check:skill-frame-sync ✓ · pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness ✓
• node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the actual changed paths: 44 commands, run with exit codes recorded and reconciled with --ran — see the verification comment on this PR.
• git grep -n -E '代裁|自裁|auto-adjudicated|裁决线程|有把握' -- .claude/skills → only negations (⛔ 无代裁 …) and the three lane charters that already forbade it.

Governed surface .claude/** (Tier S): draft, awaiting the seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review and the maintainer's word; ⛔ not to be flipped ready, queued or armed by this thread. skip-changeset: no published package is touched.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJceC3xyxUtL12bEdf7QBC

[objectstack-fleet]

Verification record — head 337ba76

Gates derived for the actual changed paths (node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, tree at 337ba76, 8 paths, +38/−45 lines): 44 commands. Every one was run in the card thread's worktree with its exit code recorded, then reconciled:

dispatch-gates --ran: 44 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 44 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN

All 44 exited 0. pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs was interrupted once by the runner's wall clock (the whole batch was killed at its time limit, pnpm printed ELIFECYCLE on the signal); re-run on its own it passed (255 self-test cases, 31 packages declared, exit 0), and that clean exit is the one recorded.

Skill gates, read directly:

• check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ — SKILL.md 318/319 (headroom 1, unchanged); director.md 70/70 and triage-duties.md 107/107 (ceilings lowered to the landed counts); no changed line over 120 bytes.
• check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓ · check:skill-frame-sync ✓ · check:skill-frame-freshness ✓ (the four-axis frame block is untouched).

Residual vocabulary (git grep -n -E '代裁|自裁|auto-adjudicated|裁决线程|有把握' -- .claude/skills): 15 hits, every one a negation (⛔ 无代裁通道 / ⛔ 不自裁 / ⛔ 无裁决线程) or a lane charter that already forbade self-ruling (lanes/skills.md, lanes/hotcrm.md, lanes/services.md); the one non-negated hit is dispatch-runbook.md L115 (a dev's implementation-detail choice), left for the maintainer's word as the PR body says.

PR CI on this head: every required context green (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core, Governed Surface Queue Guard; Build Core skipped by the path filter), the claim/branch guards green, Check Changeset green under skip-changeset.

Landing: Tier S (.claude/** only, plus two ratchet rows) — awaits the domain:skills seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review record and the maintainer's word. This thread will not flip ready, queue or arm auto-merge.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 337ba767a4df794a48bc15aaa67eff843ccecca8
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the gate enforcing the ceilings these hunks lower), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/skills.md, lanes/hotcrm.md, lanes/services.md, references/decision-analysis.md, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, AGENTS.md (grepped for surviving readers of the revoked vocabulary), scripts/pm/*.mjs and .github/** (grepped for readers of auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表, needs_decision fork)

Inputs: card #25344 body and its one comment (the maintainer's word 2026-10-23, 「我记得有一个skills 允许自主决裁，撤销这个决定。必须人工决裁。」); PR #25348 body, file list (8 files, +38/−45), net diff origin/main...337ba767; check-runs on this head. Read-only: no worktree, no checkout, no gate re-run.

① Derived judgments

Every channel the card names, checked line by line on the head tree:

1. SKILL.md L30 red line — the only exception (已裁的代裁通道, 置信门) is gone; now 「⛔ 无代裁通道:席位只分析与推荐,裁决恒出自人工」. Correct.
2. SKILL.md L106 needs-user-decision row — 「除代裁通道外永不代答」 → 「永不代答 … 只由人工裁」. Correct.
3. SKILL.md L215 — PM discretion narrowed from 「裁定、派发」 to 「派发与排序」. Correct.
4. SKILL.md L219–L220 — a dev's needs_decision is always presented to the human with the PM's four-axis analysis and recommendation, including the 「疑属不升级类」 case; the premise-bound third-tier ruling is also the human's. Correct: no PM answer in the maintainer's place survives.
5. SKILL.md L234, L264, L267, L276 — 「答复/代裁到手」 → 「人工答复到手」; 「四棱同向置信门与代裁面不变」 → 「四棱同向 ⛔ 不构成代裁许可」; the four facets are the input to the human ruling; the director seat is the only PRESENTING seat (「唯一呈裁席」), 「⛔ 无代裁无自裁无子代理」. Correct and mutually consistent.
6. lanes/director.md L16 — 「唯一例外是项目内代裁通道」 → 「⛔ 无任何例外」. L21–L24 (the channel, the verbatim standing order, the 「有把握」 = confidence-gate line, the needs_decision fork record form with the coordinator 追认表) → two lines: needs_decision joins the ruling batch the maintainer rules by hand; the standing order is recorded as revoked. The ruling-record form at L11–L13 is intact and nothing left says 「同上形」 or cites a 追认表. 职责二 L48, L50, L57–L58 — 「一类自裁按批过」, 「全立者录裁转工作态、只入收班追认表」, 「消费面对齐协议 ⇒ 一类自裁」, 「有误即裁改动」 are all replaced by present/recommend wording; 「录裁只录维护者回字,⛔ 不自录、不自转工作态」. Correct.
7. triage-duties.md L5 — 「与代裁通道全仓照跑」 → 「⛔ 无代裁通道」. Main L101–L115 (代裁车道, 机械边界测试, 置信门四条, 代裁动作 + auto-adjudicated, 一类自裁门 three criteria, 追认 summary table, 二/三类, 回翻条款) → four lines. The mechanical boundary test survives as the Clause-② criterion (head L99) and execution-duties.md L103 is re-pointed at it (「triage 机械边界测试」) — the pointer resolves. The rollback clause survives at head L102 with 「⛔ 永不静默重裁」. 呈裁清单 (head L101) replaces 代裁清单 and is what seat-lifecycle.md L69 and contract-review.md L35 now cite — both pointers resolve. Correct for the channels.
8. triage-duties.md main L95–L97 — the human-floor list — was deleted with no new home. WRONG (FAIL item F1 below). The three lines carried the enumerated must-go-to-the-maintainer set: 功能新增; ADR; 协议/公开契约变化; 破坏性或难回滚动作; 安全/权限边界; 门禁削弱(降阈/删必查/抬上限/跳测); 新增运行时第三方依赖; 花费/配额/舰队形态/默认模型档位; 新增必需门禁/hook/棘轮(卡具名所守契约与预期捕获). At the head none of 降阈, 删必查, 跳测, 第三方依赖, 默认模型档位, 新增必需门禁 appears anywhere under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch or in AGENTS.md. Six lines still read 人工地板 as a defined term and now point at nothing: SKILL.md L263 and L266, execution-duties.md L104 and L136, lanes/services.md L12, and triage-duties.md head L107 (「人工地板项(发版、天花板、契约扩大)仍需明确字句」). The floor was a constraint, not a channel: it was 「恒交维护者」. Deleting it leaves the escalation test to SKILL.md L212–L215 alone, whose closing clause is 「其余归 PM 裁量:派发与排序」 — so a new runtime third-party dependency, a spend/quota/fleet-shape/default-model-tier change, or a new mandatory gate/hook/ratchet that trips none of the four L212–L215 criteria now falls to PM discretion. That widens seat autonomy, the opposite of 「必须人工决裁」, and it is not named as revoked in the card's 「What is revoked」 (the parenthetical for L93–L106 names only the lane, the four-condition gate and the marker).
9. triage-duties.md 例外一/例外二 (head L96–L97) were exceptions to the floor's 门禁削弱 item (raising a ceiling; flipping report-only). After the deletion they read as exceptions to 「裁决恒归维护者人工」. 例外一 cites a standing maintainer ruling (ruledRaises), so it is a human ruling applied. 例外二 (「任一席位先翻 report-only,裁定随后」) lets a seat weaken a gate BEFORE the ruling. Pre-existing and outside the card's named lines; see ③ item 3.
10. dispatch-runbook.md L60 (「代裁」 in the non-outsourceable reading list → 「呈裁分析」), L77 (「维护者裁与代裁同规」 → 「所记恒为维护者的裁」), L146 (needs_decision ⇒ CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER ruling thread → four-axis analysis and recommendation into the ruling batch, 「⛔ 无裁决线程」). Correct.
11. Residual vocabulary at the head (代裁|自裁|裁决线程|置信门|auto-adjudicated|有把握|一类自裁|追认 over .claude/ and AGENTS.md): 16 hits; 15 are negations or the three lane charters that already forbade self-ruling (lanes/skills.md L21, lanes/hotcrm.md L51/L53, lanes/services.md L12). The one non-negated hit is dispatch-runbook.md L115 (「开放选择按裁决与评估轴自裁,记入终报 open_questions」), left unchanged and flagged by the PR as C-group item 1. Note the card's own acceptance line (the grep 「returns only negations … or the lane charters」) is therefore not literally met at this head; the card's 「Wanted」 section excludes L115 unless the maintainer says so, and the PR follows that narrower reading and says so. Consistent with the card; the maintainer's one word settles it.
12. Dangling readers: scripts/pm/*.mjs and .github/** contain no reader of auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表 or needs_decision fork. The 呈裁清单 section is required by three rule lines and read by no script — consistent, no gate to update.
13. Completeness of judge item (1): at the head no surviving text lets a seat, a ruling thread, triage or the director seat decide a needs-user-decision card or a dev needs_decision itself. The only self-action channels left are the two C-group items the PR flags and 例外二 (item 9).
14. Ratchet: exactly two CEILINGS rows move, triage-duties.md 120 → 107 and lanes/director.md 72 → 70; both equal the landed wc -l at the head (107, 70). No other row changes. SKILL.md stays at 318 lines (ceiling 319). No re-wrap: every hunk outside the two ratchet rows is a one-for-one line replacement or a deletion; the longest added line is 120 bytes. The lowering comments follow the file's own 「Landed count, headroom 0, same convention (lowering is always legitimate)」 form.
15. Tier H: none of the 8 files is AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/NORTH-STAR.md, skills/**, .github/workflows/** or CODEOWNERS.
16. Check-runs on 337ba767: every run completed; no failure, no pending; Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core (and 6 shards), Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, Check Documentation Links, the three claim/branch guards and Dogfood Regression Gate all success; Build Core, Build Docs and the opt-in harnesses skipped by path filter. Gate verdicts are green on this head.

② Semver level

Clause-②: no on the PR body; Metadata-protocol: none; label skip-changeset. The diff touches no packages/**, no published schema and no exports map — only governed rule text under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** and two ceiling rows in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs. No changeset is owed; Check Changeset is green under skip-changeset. The declaration and the diff agree.

③ Boundary flags

1. C-group item 1 — dispatch-runbook.md L115 (a cloud dev resolves an open implementation choice by the ruling and the four axes itself and records it in open_questions): left unchanged and clearly flagged in the PR body 「留给您定的」 with a one-word (撤 / 留) resolution path on pm-dispatch: revoke every autonomous-adjudication channel — a seat analyses and recommends, every needs_decision goes to the maintainer's director ruling batch (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25344. Correctly escalated, not answered by the seat.
2. C-group item 2 — SKILL.md L216–L218 (the named non-escalation classes the PM acts on without a decision card): unchanged at the head (diff context confirms) and flagged the same way. Correctly escalated.
3. Added for the maintainer, not answered here: triage-duties.md head L97 例外二 lets any seat flip a twice-red gate to report-only before the ruling (「裁定随后」). Outside the card's named lines; whether 「必须人工决裁」 covers it is the maintainer's word, and it belongs in the same 撤 / 留 list as items 1–2.
4. No open_questions from a dev: this is a seat's own PR, not a dispatched dev PR.

FAIL items

• F1 — rule lost by accident: the human-floor list has readers but no home. Restore the enumerated floor (the content of main triage-duties.md L95–L97) under a non-代裁 heading, e.g. 「人工地板(恒呈维护者)」, in triage-duties.md or in SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉, so that SKILL.md L263/L266, execution-duties.md L104/L136, lanes/services.md L12 and triage-duties.md L107 resolve again and the items the four L212–L215 criteria do not catch (new runtime dependency; spend/quota/fleet shape/default model tier; new mandatory gate/hook/ratchet with its naming requirement; gate weakening by 降阈/删必查/抬上限/跳测) stay the maintainer's. Re-measure check:pm-skill-ratchet and raise the lowered ceiling to the new landed count. Everything else in the diff is correct; the verdict turns on this one item.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-g3n0k3
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM

VERDICT: FAIL

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 6a305ac996dec79e51f1d578acdebe428da30e6b
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the gate enforcing the ceilings these hunks lower), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/skills.md, lanes/hotcrm.md, lanes/services.md, references/decision-analysis.md, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, AGENTS.md (grepped for surviving readers of the revoked vocabulary), scripts/pm/*.mjs and .github/** (grepped for readers of auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表, needs_decision fork)

Inputs: card #25344 body and its one comment (the maintainer's word 2026-10-23, 「我记得有一个skills 允许自主决裁，撤销这个决定。必须人工决裁。」); PR #25348 body, file list (8 files, +38/−45), net diff origin/main...6a305ac9; check-runs on this head. Read-only: no worktree, no checkout, no gate re-run.

① Derived judgments

Every channel the card names, checked line by line on the head tree:

1. SKILL.md L30 red line — the only exception (已裁的代裁通道, 置信门) is gone; now 「⛔ 无代裁通道:席位只分析与推荐,裁决恒出自人工」. Correct.
2. SKILL.md L106 needs-user-decision row — 「除代裁通道外永不代答」 → 「永不代答 … 只由人工裁」. Correct.
3. SKILL.md L215 — PM discretion narrowed from 「裁定、派发」 to 「派发与排序」. Correct.
4. SKILL.md L219–L220 — a dev's needs_decision is always presented to the human with the PM's four-axis analysis and recommendation, including the 「疑属不升级类」 case; the premise-bound third-tier ruling is also the human's. Correct: no PM answer in the maintainer's place survives.
5. SKILL.md L234, L264, L267, L276 — 「答复/代裁到手」 → 「人工答复到手」; 「四棱同向置信门与代裁面不变」 → 「四棱同向 ⛔ 不构成代裁许可」; the four facets are the input to the human ruling; the director seat is the only PRESENTING seat (「唯一呈裁席」), 「⛔ 无代裁无自裁无子代理」. Correct and mutually consistent.
6. lanes/director.md L16 — 「唯一例外是项目内代裁通道」 → 「⛔ 无任何例外」. L21–L24 (the channel, the verbatim standing order, the 「有把握」 = confidence-gate line, the needs_decision fork record form with the coordinator 追认表) → two lines: needs_decision joins the ruling batch the maintainer rules by hand; the standing order is recorded as revoked. The ruling-record form at L11–L13 is intact and nothing left says 「同上形」 or cites a 追认表. 职责二 L48, L50, L57–L58 — 「一类自裁按批过」, 「全立者录裁转工作态、只入收班追认表」, 「消费面对齐协议 ⇒ 一类自裁」, 「有误即裁改动」 are all replaced by present/recommend wording; 「录裁只录维护者回字,⛔ 不自录、不自转工作态」. Correct.
7. triage-duties.md L5 — 「与代裁通道全仓照跑」 → 「⛔ 无代裁通道」. Main L101–L115 (代裁车道, 机械边界测试, 置信门四条, 代裁动作 + auto-adjudicated, 一类自裁门 three criteria, 追认 summary table, 二/三类, 回翻条款) → four lines. The mechanical boundary test survives as the Clause-② criterion (head L102) and execution-duties.md L103 is re-pointed at it (「triage 机械边界测试」) — the pointer resolves. The rollback clause survives at head L105 with 「⛔ 永不静默重裁」. 呈裁清单 (head L104) replaces 代裁清单 and is what seat-lifecycle.md L69 and contract-review.md L35 now cite — both pointers resolve. Correct for the channels.
8. triage-duties.md main L95–L97 — the human-floor list — is kept at head L96–L98 under 「人工地板(恒呈维护者)」, directly below the 「裁决恒归维护者人工」 line. Diffed against main L95–L97: byte-identical except the heading word (「代裁人工地板(恒交维护者)」 → 「人工地板(恒呈维护者)」); no 代裁 wording. All six readers of 人工地板 resolve again: SKILL.md L263 and L266, execution-duties.md L104 and L136, lanes/services.md L12, triage-duties.md head L110. The items the four SKILL.md L212–L215 criteria do not catch (new runtime dependency; spend/quota/fleet shape/default model tier; new mandatory gate/hook/ratchet with its naming requirement; gate weakening by 降阈/删必查/抬上限/跳测) stay the maintainer's. Correct — this was F1 of the record on 337ba767 (comment 6355713968) and it is closed on this head.
9. triage-duties.md 例外一/例外二 (head L99–L100) are exceptions to the floor's 门禁削弱 item (raising a ceiling; flipping report-only), and with the floor restored directly above them they anchor as before. 例外一 cites a standing maintainer ruling (ruledRaises), so it is a human ruling applied. 例外二 (「任一席位先翻 report-only,裁定随后」) lets a seat weaken a gate BEFORE the ruling. Pre-existing and outside the card's named lines; see ③ item 3.
10. dispatch-runbook.md L60 (「代裁」 in the non-outsourceable reading list → 「呈裁分析」), L77 (「维护者裁与代裁同规」 → 「所记恒为维护者的裁」), L146 (needs_decision ⇒ CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER ruling thread → four-axis analysis and recommendation into the ruling batch, 「⛔ 无裁决线程」). Correct.
11. Residual vocabulary at the head (代裁|自裁|裁决线程|置信门|auto-adjudicated|有把握|一类自裁|追认 over .claude/ and AGENTS.md): 16 hits; 15 are negations or the three lane charters that already forbade self-ruling (lanes/skills.md L21, lanes/hotcrm.md L51/L53, lanes/services.md L12). The one non-negated hit is dispatch-runbook.md L115 (「开放选择按裁决与评估轴自裁,记入终报 open_questions」), left unchanged and flagged by the PR as C-group item 1. Note the card's own acceptance line (the grep 「returns only negations … or the lane charters」) is therefore not literally met at this head; the card's 「Wanted」 section excludes L115 unless the maintainer says so, and the PR follows that narrower reading and says so. Consistent with the card; the maintainer's one word settles it.
12. Dangling readers: scripts/pm/*.mjs and .github/** contain no reader of auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表 or needs_decision fork. The 呈裁清单 section is required by three rule lines and read by no script — consistent, no gate to update.
13. Completeness of judge item (1): at the head no surviving text lets a seat, a ruling thread, triage or the director seat decide a needs-user-decision card or a dev needs_decision itself. The only self-action channels left are the two C-group items the PR flags and 例外二 (item 9).
14. Ratchet: exactly two CEILINGS rows move, triage-duties.md 120 → 110 and lanes/director.md 72 → 70; both equal the landed wc -l at the head (110, 70). The delta 337ba767..6a305ac9 touches only triage-duties.md (+3 lines) and that one ceiling row with its comment — no other new hunk. No other row changes. SKILL.md stays at 318 lines (ceiling 319). No re-wrap: every hunk outside the two ratchet rows is a one-for-one line replacement or a deletion; the longest added line is 120 bytes (the restored L97, as on main). The lowering comments follow the file's own 「Landed count, headroom 0, same convention (lowering is always legitimate)」 form.
15. Tier H: none of the 8 files is AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/NORTH-STAR.md, skills/**, .github/workflows/** or CODEOWNERS.
16. Check-runs on 6a305ac9 (re-read after the suites reported completed at 02:23Z): every run completed; no failure, no pending; Lint & Repo Gates (and its 8 scoped lint jobs), TypeScript Type Check (and its 4 jobs), Test Core (and 6 shards), Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate, Auto Label and the four claim/branch guards all success; Check Changeset skipped — the expected skip under skip-changeset; Build Core, Build Docs and the opt-in harnesses skipped by path filter. Gate verdicts are green on this head.

② Semver level

Clause-②: no on the PR body; Metadata-protocol: none; label skip-changeset. The diff touches no packages/**, no published schema and no exports map — only governed rule text under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** and two ceiling rows in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs. No changeset is owed; Check Changeset is an expected skip under skip-changeset on this head. The declaration and the diff agree.

③ Boundary flags

1. C-group item 1 — dispatch-runbook.md L115 (a cloud dev resolves an open implementation choice by the ruling and the four axes itself and records it in open_questions): left unchanged and clearly flagged in the PR body 「留给您定的」 with a one-word (撤 / 留) resolution path on pm-dispatch: revoke every autonomous-adjudication channel — a seat analyses and recommends, every needs_decision goes to the maintainer's director ruling batch (maintainer's word 2026-10-23) #25344. Correctly escalated, not answered by the seat.
2. C-group item 2 — SKILL.md L216–L218 (the named non-escalation classes the PM acts on without a decision card): unchanged at the head (diff context confirms) and flagged the same way. Correctly escalated.
3. Added for the maintainer, not answered here: triage-duties.md head L100 例外二 lets any seat flip a twice-red gate to report-only before the ruling (「裁定随后」). Outside the card's named lines; whether 「必须人工决裁」 covers it is the maintainer's word, and it belongs in the same 撤 / 留 list as items 1–2.
4. No open_questions from a dev: this is a seat's own PR, not a dispatched dev PR.

FAIL items

None. F1 of the record on 337ba767 (comment 6355713968) is closed by 6a305ac9: the human-floor list is back verbatim under a non-代裁 heading, every 人工地板 reader resolves, and the ratchet row is the landed count.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-g3n0k3
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

Verification record — head 6a305ac (after contract-review F1)

Change since 337ba76: the 人工地板 list returns to references/triage-duties.md under 「人工地板(恒呈维护者)」 (three lines, content byte-identical to main's L95–L97 minus the 代裁 heading word), so the six lines that cite it as a defined term and 例外一/例外二 resolve again; the triage-duties.md ceiling is set to the landed count 110.

• dispatch-gates.mjs --commands on this head: the same 44 commands; all 44 run in the card thread's worktree, all exit 0; --ran reconciliation: 44 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN.
• check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (SKILL.md 318/319; director.md 70/70; triage-duties.md 110/110; no changed line over 120 bytes) · check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓ · check:skill-frame-sync ✓ · check:skill-frame-freshness ✓.
• PR CI on 6a305ac: every required context green (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core, Governed Surface Queue Guard; Build Core skipped by path filter); claim/branch guards green.

Still untouched, as the PR body says: the two implementation-level self-choice lines (the maintainer's 撤 / 留) and the 例外二 report-only flip (a seat decision the review flagged for the maintainer).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 2bf011337d4a816726b252d759e26452b605fc3d
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the gate enforcing the ceilings these hunks touch), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/skills.md, lanes/hotcrm.md, lanes/services.md, references/decision-analysis.md, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, AGENTS.md (grepped for surviving readers of the revoked vocabulary and of 人工地板), scripts/pm/*.mjs and .github/** (grepped for readers of auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表, needs_decision fork)

Inputs: card #25344 body (now carrying Ruled: 6356061991 · batch #3 letters 1.1 A · 1.2 A · 2 A · 2026-10-23T02:37:14Z) and its comments, in particular the ruling record 6356061991 (Ruling: batch #3 items 1.1 / 1.2 / 2 · letters A / A / A · maintainer 「同意」 2026-10-23T02:37:14Z, which quotes the maintainer's 02:22 word 「有风险的事情让我决裁；可能大幅增加开发量的事情要我决裁」 and the original 「必须人工决裁」); PR #25348 body, file list (8 files, +52/−45 vs main), net diff origin/main...2bf01133 and the delta 6a305ac9..2bf01133 (4 files, +19/−8); check-runs on this head. The ruling was compared against the record ON THE CARD (the carrier lanes/director.md L9 names as the only ruling), not against the batch doc or the card thread's summary. Read-only: no worktree, no checkout, no gate re-run. This record supersedes the PASS on 6a305ac9 (comment 6355883270) and the FAIL on 337ba767 (comment 6355713968).

① Derived judgments

Carried from the two earlier records and re-checked unchanged at this head (items 1–7, 10–13 of comment 6355883270): every channel the card names is removed in SKILL.md L30/L106/L215/L219–L220/L235/L265/L268/L277, lanes/director.md L16/L21–L22/L48/L50/L57–L58, triage-duties.md L5/L95, dispatch-runbook.md L60/L77/L146; the pointers in seat-lifecycle.md L69, contract-review.md L35, execution-duties.md L103 resolve; the mechanical boundary test survives as the Clause-② criterion (triage-duties.md L112) and the rollback clause at L115; no script or workflow reads auto-adjudicated, 代裁清单, 追认表 or needs_decision fork; lanes/skills.md L21, lanes/hotcrm.md L51/L53, lanes/services.md L12 untouched. The human-floor list restored at 6a305ac9 stands at triage-duties.md L96–L98, byte-identical to main L95–L97 minus the 代裁 heading word, and every 人工地板 reader (SKILL.md L216 new, L264, L267; execution-duties.md L104, L136; lanes/services.md L12; triage-duties.md L120) resolves to it.

New at 2bf01133, each hunk compared with the ruling record 6356061991:

1. Item 1.1 A — dispatch-runbook.md L115. Ruled: keep the dev's own implementation choices recorded in open_questions, plus one guard — a choice may not change product-visible behaviour or a contract; if it would, the dev stops and reports a needs_decision fork. Written: 「实现取舍自定记入 open_questions;碰产品行为/契约报 fork」. Matches; the 「自裁」 word is gone, so the card's acceptance grep (代裁|自裁|auto-adjudicated|裁决线程|有把握 over .claude/skills) now returns only negations, the 「撤销」 line and the three lane charters — the one non-negated hit of the first two records is closed. The backstop the ruling names (「实施中发现契约终究要动 ⇒ dev 停手」) is still at triage-duties.md L115. Correct.
2. Item 1.1 A — SKILL.md L217. Ruled: the named non-escalation classes stay, with the same guard. Written: 「不升级类(碰产品行为或契约即报 fork):恢复不变量;任务顺序;验证策略;说明书脱节」. The guard is there and the four classes are there; to fit the 120-byte line the words 「具名」, 「(立即行动)」 and 「与依赖」 (from 「技术任务间顺序与依赖」) were dropped. The classes are the same classes and the bookkeeping lines L218–L219 are untouched, so no class is lost; the compression is noted under ③, not a FAIL. L220 (dev needs_decision 一律呈人工) still stands beside it, so the guard narrows and nothing reopens.
3. Item 1.2 A — triage-duties.md L110–L111 例外二. Ruled: keep the valve with three hard conditions — (a) report-only only, never delete a gate or skip a test; (b) at the flip, the item goes to 待决策汇总 for the next ruling batch with both red run links; (c) reverted if the maintainer disagrees. Written: 「任一席位可先翻 report-only,三条硬条件缺一不可:」 + 「①只翻 report-only,不删门不跳测;②同笔送待决策汇总入下批,附两红 run;③不同意即翻回」. All three conditions present, 「缺一不可」 makes them conjunctive, and the old 「裁定随后」 is replaced by ② (the ruling batch) rather than dropped. The valve stays a seat ACTION under a standing ruling, never a ruling — it adds no delegated path. Correct.
4. Item 2 A — extra floor classes, triage-duties.md L99–L101. Ruled: release and publication; card fate (close not planned, p1/p2 downgrade, withdraw, cut scope); rules and process (skills, AGENTS/CLAUDE, workflows, CODEOWNERS, ratchet-ceiling raise, standing orders, exceptions); defaults and factory shape (new-tenant defaults, isDefault permission sets, default OWD, default model tier, default concurrency); resources and spend; external promises; cross-lane conflicts; identity and tenancy model. Written: 发版与对外发布;对外承诺;卡的命运(关 not planned、降级、撤回、砍半);规则与流程(技能、AGENTS、工作流、CODEOWNERS、抬天花板、常设令、例外);跨车道冲突;默认值与出厂形态(租户默认、isDefault 权限集、OWD、模型档位、并发);身份与租户模型. Eight of eight classes present; 「resources and spend」 is already the restored L98 (花费/配额), not duplicated. The release sub-items (pin waiver, major bump, known-issues notes) are folded into 「发版与对外发布」 and risk ⑤ (例外豁免). Nothing beyond the ruled list was added. Correct.
5. Item 2 A — risk criteria, L102–L103. Ruled seven: ① security/permission/identity/tenancy boundary; ② irreversible data; ③ public-contract/accept-set or ADR change; ④ externally visible action; ⑤ gate weakening or any waiver/exception; ⑥ contradicts a prior ruling or sets a new standing order; ⑦ silent failure (no gate would catch a wrong choice). Written ①–⑦ in that order with 「任一即呈」. Seven of seven, same order, same trigger (any one). Correct.
6. Item 2 A — workload criteria, L104–L105. Ruled four: any option ≥ size/l or ≥ 2 packages; chosen ≥ 2× the cheapest viable; a new permanent maintenance surface (protocol key, metadata type, mandatory gate, runtime dependency, new service, new lane); ≥ 3 serial cards or more than one workday of a slot. Written: 「任一选项 ≥ size/l 或跨 ≥2 包;所选方案 ≥ 最便宜可行方案 2 倍;新增维护面(协议键、元数据类型、门禁、依赖、服务、车道);≥3 卡串行或占槽超一日」 with 「任一即呈」. Four of four. Correct.
7. Item 2 A — not-presented list and its four gates, L106–L107. Ruled: implementation detail; the named non-escalation classes; the four bookkeeping classes; p3 order and dispatch order; CI reruns; merged-branch cleanup; patch-level dependency bumps under lockfile + CI; mechanical steps under an existing ruling — and only when all four hold (no product-visible behaviour change, no contract change, reversible, gate-backed); every presented card names the test it hits. Written: 「不呈:实现细节、不升级类、记账类、p3 排序、CI 重跑、分支清理、patch 依赖、既裁执行」 and 「不呈四门同立:无产品可见行为变化、无契约变化、可回滚、有门禁兑底;呈裁卡注判据」. Eight of eight, four gates conjunctive (「同立」), and the 「呈裁卡注判据」 clause is the ruling's last sentence. This list is the ONLY text at the head that lets the PM act without presenting, it is gated four ways, and it is exactly what the maintainer agreed to — it reopens no delegated ruling path. Correct.
8. Item 2 A — SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 L216. Ruled: 〈升级与决策〉 「gains the maintainer's two tests」. Written as one binding pointer: 「人工地板与风险/工作量判据(triage-duties.md)任一命中即呈维护者,⛔ 不入 PM 裁量」, with the tests themselves living in triage-duties.md L96–L107. The tests bind through 〈升级与决策〉 (the pointer sits directly after L215's 「其余归 PM 裁量」 and overrides it), and SKILL.md is at its ceiling 319/319, where writing the ≈12 lines in place would need a ceiling raise — itself a floor item (「抬天花板」) that the ruling did not order. Judged as satisfying the ruling's intent; the placement is noted under ③ for the maintainer's eye.
9. Does any surviving text let a seat, triage, a ruling thread or the director seat decide a needs-user-decision card or a dev needs_decision itself? No. L215 keeps PM discretion at 派发与排序, L216 pulls every floor/risk/workload hit out of it, L220 sends every dev needs_decision to the human, the director seat is 「唯一呈裁席」, and 例外二 is a conditioned action with the ruling in the next batch.
10. Ratchet rows against main: only lanes/director.md 72 → 70 differs; triage-duties.md is 120 at main and 120 at the head (the row comment was rewritten to say 「Unchanged at 120 … (−13) … (+13)」, which is the true history across the three commits); SKILL.md stays 319. Landed wc -l: triage-duties.md 120, SKILL.md 319, director.md 70 — every row equals its count, headroom 0, no ceiling raised. The longest added line in the delta is 120 bytes; no re-wrap of untouched lines (the delta is +19/−8 across four files, every hunk a replacement or insertion at the named lines).
11. Tier H: the file list is unchanged (the same 8 paths); none is AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/NORTH-STAR.md, skills/**, .github/workflows/** or CODEOWNERS.
12. PR body at this head: the 「留给您定的」 section is replaced by 「批 Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 已裁 (maintainer 「同意」 = 1.1 A · 1.2 A · 2 A)」, verification says SKILL.md 319/319, director.md 70/70, triage-duties.md 120/120 — consistent with the tree.
13. Check-runs on 2bf01133: (re-read after the suites reported completed at 03:01Z; the PR head is still 2bf01133): every run completed; no failure, no pending; Lint & Repo Gates (and its 8 scoped lint jobs), TypeScript Type Check (and its 4 jobs), Test Core (and 6 shards), Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate, Auto Label and the four claim/branch guards all success; Check Changeset skipped — the expected skip under skip-changeset; Build Core, Build Docs and the opt-in harnesses skipped by path filter. Gate verdicts are green on this head.

② Semver level

Clause-②: no; Metadata-protocol: none; label skip-changeset. The diff still touches no packages/**, no published schema and no exports map — governed rule text under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** and ceiling rows in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs only. No changeset is owed; Check Changeset is the expected skip under skip-changeset. Declaration and diff agree.

③ Boundary flags

1. Former ③-1 (dispatch-runbook.md L115) and ③-2 (SKILL.md non-escalation classes): ruled 1.1 A on the card (6356061991) and implemented with the guard — closed.
2. Former ③-3 (例外二): ruled 1.2 A and implemented with the three conditions — closed.
3. For the maintainer's eye, not a FAIL: SKILL.md L217 compressed 「具名不升级类(立即行动)」 and 「技术任务间顺序与依赖」 to 「不升级类」 and 「任务顺序」 to stay under 120 bytes; the classes are intact, the words 「立即行动」 and 「与依赖」 are the only loss.
4. For the maintainer's eye, not a FAIL: the two tests are written in triage-duties.md and bound from SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 by one pointer line rather than written there in full (SKILL.md is at 319/319). If the maintainer wants the criteria in SKILL.md itself, that is a ceiling raise — a floor item — for a separate word.
5. No open_questions from a dev: this is a seat's own PR.

FAIL items

None.

Implemented-by: claude/project-thread-g3n0k3
Reviewed-by: session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

Verification record — head 2bf0113 (director batch #3 ruled 「同意」)

Change since 6a305ac: the maintainer's batch #3 ruling (1.1 A · 1.2 A · 2 A, recorded on the card) is written in — the dev's implementation choices stay with the guard 「碰产品行为/契约报 fork」 (dispatch-runbook.md L115, SKILL.md 不升级类 line); 例外二 stays report-only with its three hard conditions; the 人工地板 is widened and the risk tests ①–⑦ plus the workload tests are written into references/triage-duties.md, with one pointer line in SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉. 4 files, +19/−8.

• dispatch-gates.mjs --commands on this head: the same 44 commands; all 44 run in the card thread's worktree, all exit 0; --ran reconciliation: 44 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN.
• check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (SKILL.md 319/319; director.md 70/70; triage-duties.md 120/120 — back at main's ceiling, no raise; no changed line over 120 bytes) · check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓ · check:skill-frame-sync ✓ · check:skill-frame-freshness ✓ · check:ratchet-remedy-authority ✓.
• PR CI on 2bf0113: every required context green (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core 6/6, Governed Surface Queue Guard; Build Core skipped by path filter); claim / single-writer / part-of guards green; Check Documentation Links green.

Nothing is left open on this card from the seat's side: the review's F1 is closed (PASS on 6a305ac) and the three batch #3 items are landed. Landing is the maintainer's word; the PR stays draft.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对

ACCEPT · domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_01REMuzhz6MWRjg8uohedMnM · 2026-10-23T03:34Z · head 2bf011337d4a816726b252d759e26452b605fc3d · Tier S (check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 25348: .claude/** ×7, no Tier H path, 97 changed lines ≤ 3000)

Landing authority: the maintainer's own words in the Claude Code project "Objectstack" of the os-elon-musk account, 2026-10-23T03:33Z: 「可以落地」, naming this PR with #25247, #25254 and #25255.

1. Shape: draft, base main, Fixes #25344 the only closing keyword, Clause-②: no, skip-changeset (.claude/** and one scripts/pm ledger row; no package).
2. Premise measured: the card quotes the maintainer's 「我记得有一个skills 允许自主决裁，撤销这个决定。必须人工决裁。」; the third commit writes the director batch Implement ObjectStack protocol specification with Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces #3 ruling recorded on the card (6356061991: 1.1 A · 1.2 A · 2 A).
3. Gates (check-runs pinned to this head): every check-run completed, none failed; Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core 6/6, Governed Surface Queue Guard success; Check Changeset skipped (expected under skip-changeset). Card thread's 44 dispatch gates: 44 run, all exit 0 (6356353567).
4. Contract review: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS on this head, record 6356347814, compared against the ruling record on the card; it supersedes the FAIL on 337ba767 (6355713968, F1 human floor, fixed) and the PASS on 6a305ac9 (6355883270).
5. Accepted deviations: the risk and workload tests live in triage-duties.md and bind from SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 through one pointer line (SKILL.md is at 319/319; writing them in place would need a ceiling raise, itself a floor item); SKILL.md L217 compression dropped the words 「立即行动」 and 「与依赖」, classes intact.
6. Out of scope and landing: docs(pm-dispatch): a project-coordinator reference — the cross-lane scheduling rules a Claude Code project runs by, so its instructions name only its lanes #25255 item 5 still points at the ruling-thread channel this PR removes; it is re-pointed and re-reviewed before it lands. docs(pm-dispatch): fold the engine, services and cli lanes into domain:server #25247 lowers the SKILL.md ceiling to 317 on a tree where this PR's pointer line adds one, so whichever lands second merges main and re-measures check:pm-skill-ratchet at its landed count. This seat flips ready and arms auto-merge now.

---

Generated by Claude Code