Repository navigation
pm-dispatch(sign-off): a seat going off shift hands every unlanded claimed card back to pm:queue, instead of keeping it as stay-behind #27359
Description
domain:server#1 · os-sales · session_01L6bhgXcN9HaZYSEUdJWEjw
Filing gate ③: a maintainer-directed change to a pm rule. The maintainer (Sales) named it in the Sales account's Objectstack project, thread "server 席 1", at 2026-10-29T02:32Z. Verbatim, not translated: 「下班时卡片应该交回队列,这个应该立卡更新 skills」. ⛔ Not a claim. No grade: triage sets the lane and the grade.
What happened (the measurement)
domain:serverseat 1 ([PM seat] domain:server — ⏳ vacant #6367) was held byos-project-manager, sessionsession_01R1q2xdtYgU6FKrZ7LgjPCC. That project's maintainer ended the shift on 2026-10-28 (comment 6466738832 on [maintainer] refactor(metadata-protocol): splitsrc/protocol.ts(33,065 lines, +10,169 in 30 days) along itsObjectStackProtocolImplementationseams, one move-only slice per PR #25467 quotes 「当前任务处理完,合并后就下班」).- The seat released one card, [maintainer] refactor(metadata-protocol): split
src/protocol.ts(33,065 lines, +10,169 in 30 days) along itsObjectStackProtocolImplementationseams, one move-only slice per PR #25467 cut 32 (Release:6468281430), under its maintainer's 「已认领、还没开工的应该放回队列」. - It left two cards assigned and
pm:dispatchedwith nothing running:- validate/lint/build refuse a lookup or record_change trigger to an object provided by a package in manifest.dependencies — the publish gate already resolves that closure #25805: the dev reported
needs_decisionon 2026-10-26 (6411403302). The card was never moved toneeds-user-decision, so the question reached no maintainer. - test budget (domain:cli): 119 test file(s) over 10 s of wall in the hourly full battery (Part of #23151) #23181: a
Part ofseries. Slices up to 17 landed by 2026-10-27T06:34Z, and no slice is in flight.
- validate/lint/build refuse a lookup or record_change trigger to an object provided by a package in manifest.dependencies — the publish gate already resolves that closure #25805: the dev reported
- [PM seat] domain:server — ⏳ vacant #6367 has no sign-off brief, and its title still reads 🟢. On 2026-10-29 the next seat could take these two cards only by forced takeover.
Governing text today
references/seat-post-protocol.md〈活性、写侧刷新与收班〉: 「安置默认离任留守;留不了才热移交」. Stay-behind is the default disposition at shift end.references/seat-lifecycle.md〈座位贴协议〉: 「收班 = 状态 flush + 在飞显式安置,不是在飞归零」.references/seat-post-protocol.md〈交接收尾清单〉 step 2 already says each claimed card lands or is released (Release:plus a cleared assignee in one stroke), andcheck-handover.mjschecks it. But the checklist is worded for 交接 (handover), and the stay-behind default reads as an alternative to releasing.
The change asked
- At 下班 / 收班, every claimed card the seat holds goes back to
pm:queuein one stroke, unless it is an ACCEPTed PR already waiting on the merge queue or on a human approval. The stroke is aRelease:comment (withResume-from: BRANCH@SHAwhen pushed work exists), the assignee cleared, andpm:dispatchedreplaced bypm:queue. - A card whose dev reported
needs_decisiongoes toneeds-user-decisionwith its analysis instead. It is never leftpm:dispatched. - Stay-behind narrows to the ACCEPTed PRs of item 1.
- The sign-off brief and the
check-handover.mjsrun are the shift's last acts, whatever the maintainer's wording for ending it.
Business reason
The maintainer's words above. A card held by a seat that has gone home blocks every other seat and account from picking it up. The only way to free it is a forced takeover, which costs a maintainer decision and four comments per card.
Reader who acts
The domain:skills seat: the rule text lives in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md and seat-lifecycle.md, and possibly in scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs.
Dedupe
- Query: issues in any state labelled
domain:skillswhose title matchessign-off|off shift|stay-behind|收班|下班|handover|release. 3 hits: ui publish-check texts drift after #26860: release.yml publish-step comment, the dead uichangeset:publishalias and its wiring-test comment #27017, [Decision] Triage priority caliber for protocol additions: keep 「协议新增定 p1」 for every addition, or grade additions an app asks for at p2 unless a release needs them #26368 and pm-dispatch: after the thin 分诊席 (#25414) lands, five lines elsewhere still give triage its old duties (seat-post liveness, main-repo producer, the 析取④ reference, the release-by-triage step, central grading) #25490. None is about this. - Open
toolingcards whose title matchesshift|stay|收班|下班|release|claim: 0 hits.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: p1 ·
domain:skills·area:devpath· 2026-10-29T02:59Z⛔ Not a claim.
domain:serverseat 1's maintainer: 「下班时卡片应该交回队列,这个应该立卡更新 skills」). Todayseat-post-protocol.mdmakes stay-behind the default at shift end. The measured result: twopm:dispatchedcards (validate/lint/build refuse a lookup or record_change trigger to an object provided by a package in manifest.dependencies — the publish gate already resolves that closure #25805, test budget (domain:cli): 119 test file(s) over 10 s of wall in the hourly full battery (Part of #23151) #23181) were left with nothing running, and validate/lint/build refuse a lookup or record_change trigger to an object provided by a package in manifest.dependencies — the publish gate already resolves that closure #25805'sneeds_decisionnever reached a maintainer.needs_decisiongoes toneeds-user-decisionwhen it is handed back, not topm:queue, so the question reaches the maintainer. The PR says so.tooling,domain:skills,priority:p1,area:devpath,pm:queue.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
Claim: PM loop round 5 (takeover shift, wave 11) · 2026-10-29T03:17Z⚠️ : a card with an open
Session:
session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1TgAccount:
os-justin(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-27359-sign-off-hands-cards-backWorktree:
objectstack-issue-27359Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md〈活性、写侧刷新与收班〉 L35–42 + 〈交接收尾清单〉 step 2 (88 / 88, headroom 0, in place or paid in-file),references/seat-lifecycle.md〈座位贴协议〉 L40–43 (96 / 96),scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs(the stay-behind reporting narrowed to ACCEPTed PRs awaiting the queue or a human; aneeds_decisioncard leftpm:dispatchedrefused) + its self-test; ⛔ no other file (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S(protocol text + one patrol's rule, judgment on wording — M treatment),mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT(dispatch-gates --tierthis fire on origin/main28872e68: no path-derived mandate —references/**andscripts/pm/**hit none of the 4 declared globs),effort: xhigh(p1)Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(maintainer-directed: 「下班时卡片应该交回队列,这个应该立卡更新 skills」)Thread-read: 6486666179
Premise: holds — re-read on origin/main
28872e68this fire:seat-post-protocol.mdL35 「安置默认离任留守;留不了才热移交:在飞卡落收单注记 + 点名看护者。」, L40 「留守写面恰为简报点名的项:已 ACCEPT 待队列 PR、落地中的评审链载体;残余定时器同界。」, L42 (留守登记), 〈交接收尾清单〉 step 2 「本席认领的卡落地,或 Release: 与清 assignee 同笔释放」 (worded for 交接);seat-lifecycle.mdL40 「收班 = 状态 flush + 在飞显式安置,不是在飞归零」, L43 「离任留守只写简报点名的项」;check-handover.mjs(688 lines) reports a declared stay-behind instead of refusing it (header 「A declared stay-behind is REPORTED, never refused」) and refuses an unreleased claim only when the card ispm:dispatchedunder the account with noRelease:. The measured instance: #25805 nowneeds-user-decision(moved 2026-10-29T02:51Z), #23181 stillpm:dispatchedunderos-sales, seat post #6367 reopened 🟢os-sales. Triage's grade 6486666179 (p1) and itsneeds_decisiongoes toneeds-user-decision, notpm:queue.Serial constraints cleared:
none— no open PR or in-flight claim namesseat-post-protocol.md,seat-lifecycle.mdorcheck-handover.mjs(open PR list read this fire); this seat's folded #27345/#27363 dispatch touches SKILL.md 〈路径分叉〉, os-dev.md, execution-duties, contract-review, landing-operations, director, ops.mjs, check-half-states — disjoint; this card mergesorigin/mainbefore opening its PR.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 27359, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-27359-sign-off-hands-cards-back", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27371", "head": "d457c56d296843d4d894d45c2b15ace0689e9753", "session": "session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg (mode:subagent; the dispatching domain:skills#2 session, as the claim 6486925160 names it)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "The 收班 rule is rewritten in place. Every claimed card the seat holds is handed back to pm:queue in one stroke: `Release:` + `Resume-from:` + assignee cleared (checklist step 2, which L35 now points to). A `needs_decision` card goes to the decision box instead. Stay-behind narrows to ACCEPTed PRs waiting on the merge queue or a human approval (seat-post-protocol.md L35/L36, seat-lifecycle.md L40/L43). The sign-off sequence runs whatever words the maintainer used: `check-handover.mjs` exits 0, then the body and title are refreshed, then the brief is the last stroke (L39). Both files stay at 88/88 and 96/96, every line at or under 120 B. check-handover.mjs now reports a declared stay-behind only when an open pull delivering the card has an ACCEPT as its newest `## 席位核对` record and waits (in the merge queue per the timeline, auto-merge armed, or `needs-user-decision` on the pull). It refuses a held card whose newest os-dev-report after the claim says `needs_decision` under the new name `[needs-decision-unreleased]`, with the decision box as the remedy. Every reader is imported from its owner. Premise holds on origin/main 28872e68, but the measured instance has moved on: #25805 is now needs-user-decision, and #23181's newest claim names another session (a live run lists it and does not refuse it).", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md (+4/-4)", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md (+2/-2)", "scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs (+230/-27; 688 → 891 lines)" ], "line_budget": { ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md": { "lines": "88 → 88 (ceiling 88, headroom 0)", "edited": [ "L35 94 B 「安置默认离任留守;留不了才热移交:在飞卡落收单注记 + 点名看护者。」 → L35 109 B 「收班默认交回(〈交接收尾清单〉第 2 步);留守只剩已 ACCEPT 待队列或待人批的 PR。」", "new L36 119 B 「留守写面 = 简报点名的这些 PR,残余定时器同界;留不了才热移交:收单注记 + 点名看护者。」 (paid by deleting old L40, whose content moved here and into L35)", "L38 → L39 110 B 「收班序列:贴正文与标题刷新在先,简报评论是最终一笔;继任的释放判据 = 简报在。」 → 114 B 「收班序列不看维护者措辞:`check-handover.mjs` 退出 0 → 刷正文与标题 → 简报最终一笔。」 (the dropped 继任 clause lives in seat-lifecycle.md 〈开轮互斥〉 「简报即最新事件 ⇒ 立即坐席」)", "old L40 117 B 「留守写面恰为简报点名的项:已 ACCEPT 待队列 PR、落地中的评审链载体;残余定时器同界。」 → deleted (ACCEPT 待队列 PR moved to L35, 写面/定时器 to L36; 评审链载体 removed by card item 3)", "L47 step 2 118 B 「在手工件逐件处置:本席认领的卡落地,或 `Release:` 与清 assignee 同笔释放,转成真实状态。」 → 118 B 「认领卡落地,或同笔 `Release:`+`Resume-from:`+清 assignee 交回 `pm:queue`;`needs_decision` 进决策箱。」", "old L36/L37 (收单注记 / 看护者) unchanged, now L37/L38; they describe the narrowed stay-behind's hot handover" ] }, ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md": { "lines": "96 → 96 (ceiling 96, headroom 0)", "edited": [ "L40 118 B 「收班 = 状态 flush + 在飞显式安置,不是在飞归零;派发口径失效,简报 ⛔ 不列作继承裁决。」 → 120 B 「收班 = 状态 flush + 在飞默认交回队列、不等落地;派发口径失效,简报 ⛔ 不列作继承裁决。」", "L43 94 B 「离任留守只写简报点名的项,⛔ 不读队列、不新派发、不碰未点名卡。」 → 120 B 「离任留守只写点名的已 ACCEPT 待队列或待人批 PR,⛔ 不读队列、不新派发、不碰未点名卡。」" ] } }, "tests": "Run at d457c56d. `node scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs --self-test`: 46 cases pass before, 66 cases pass after, exit 0, handshake intact. Changed rows: ARM 1 now needs a waiting ACCEPTed pull, and the decision-not-excused row now uses a waiting tail. Added rows: the narrowing (not-waiting, unread wait), (a′) (measured shape, report older than claim, newest report decides, card already in inbox, refused by name even when declared+waiting), acceptedPullWait (queue, approval label, armed, needs-timeline, dequeued/none, no-accept, REWORK after ACCEPT, ACCEPT after REWORK), the shortfall text, delivery evidence, and 2 structural pins. Ablation, four legs through scripts/ablation-replace.mjs (anchor x1 → x0 confirmed on disk, blob 2557438f5d42 changed): leg 1 `twice && h.wait` → `twice`: 2/66 red (SIGN-OFF NARROWING; absence never reads as waiting). Leg 2 needs_decision status test → `return null`: 1/66 red ((a′) THE MEASURED SHAPE). Leg 3 ACCEPT requirement → record existence: 1/66 red (REWORK newer than the ACCEPT). Leg 4 queue reading → `if (true)`: 1/66 red (newest queue event a removal, or none). Each restore: blob == HEAD blob 2557438f5d42, `git diff HEAD` empty. Unmutated control: 66 pass. `node scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --self-test` (it reads check-handover's carriesFacetMarker, unchanged): 735 cases across 26 batteries, exit 0. `pnpm exec eslint --no-inline-config scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs`: exit 0. Live GET-only reads: `--probe` exit 0. Departed domain:server seat (session_01R1q2xdtYgU6FKrZ7LgjPCC, os-sales, since 2026-10-27): exit 0, clear, #23181 and #27343 listed as held by another session. This seat with `--stay-behind=#27359` and a vacant probe body: before the PR, exit 2 with \"no open pull request delivers it\"; after the PR opened, exit 2 with \"pull #27371 carries no ACCEPT as its newest `## 席位核对` record\", coverage \"(c) 1 declared stay-behind card(s): 15 open pull(s) listed, 1 delivering pull thread(s) and 0 timeline(s) read\". No package touched, so no build closure, package test or typecheck is owed (scripts/pm is the repo-root package, not on the turbo graph).", "gates": "Local, head d457c56d: `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` derived 36 commands (23 pnpm, 13 node) from 3 paths vs merge base 28872e68d. All 36 exit 0, each code captured before any pipe. Among them: check:pm-skill-ratchet (seat-post-protocol.md 88 lines, ceiling 88; seat-lifecycle.md 96, ceiling 96; self-test 164 pass), check:pm-skill-id-lint (105 files clean), check:pm-post-stamped, check:doc-authoring, check:nul-bytes, check-self-test-wired (+ --self-test), check:pm-governed-merges, check:skill-frame-sync, check-comment-mask-corpus (260 s), check-self-test-workflow-commands (184 s). `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: lint/formula unbuilt). After `pnpm exec turbo run build --concurrency=2 --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 128s) it exited 0. `--ran` reconciliation: \"36 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 36 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 36 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)\". Also run, outside the derivation: check-handover --self-test, post-stamped --self-test. CI on PR #27371 head d457c56d at report time: 41 check-runs — 7 success (incl. Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, Test UI), 20 skipped, 14 in_progress. Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check and Test Core not concluded: in_progress, not waited for.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and Clause-②: no carries no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called, read or write", "api_writes": "2 relay strokes, both as objectstack-fleet[bot] through scripts/pm. (1) pr_create via `node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs` (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, run 40815265820 success). It carried POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft forced) and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/27371/labels [skip-changeset]. Read-back: body 10978 B sent = stored, identical. Labels read back as [skip-changeset], assignees [], draft true. (2) this report comment via `node scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=27359` (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/27359/comments through the relay). git push x3 (empty branch, 2 commits; no force) is not a REST write. No other write; the PR was not readied, armed, enqueued or approved.", "deviations": [ "The pr_create carries no `assignees` key, as the order directs (maintainer ruling 「应该是开发完了你审核通过才会推送给我审核」). This conflicts with os-dev.md L37 (`pr_create` carries `assignees: [LOGIN]`), which on main says the file wins over the order. Named here, not silently chosen. The order says the claim names the omission; claim 6486925160 as read does not mention it.", "Hypothesis 4 partly falsified: dispatch-gates does not derive check:pm-governed-prose or check:pm-half-states for this diff (none of their inputs changed), so neither ran locally. check-handover has no package.json script (local by ruling); its self-test was run directly.", "Hypothesis 1 held with one change: old L40 was deleted and its content moved into a new L36, which pays the new line. L36–37 (收单注记 / 看护者) were left unchanged rather than reworded, because the new L36 already introduces them as the narrowed stay-behind's hot handover.", "Hypothesis 2 corrected: the ACCEPT reading is imported from seat-record.mjs, its owner (check-half-states only re-exports the marker). The queue reading is enqueuerFromTimeline from check-governed-queue-guard.mjs plus `auto_merge`. \"Awaiting a human approval\" is read as `needs-user-decision` on the pull, which the hypothesis did not name.", "Hypothesis 3 held with one condition added: the report must be newer than the session's newest claim, else an earlier dispatch's answered question would refuse a re-dispatched card.", "Commit trailers use the AGENTS.md model-free pair, and the PR footer uses the AGENTS.md session-URL form. The harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and 🤖 footer were not used.", "The worktree was created with `--no-track` (os-dev.md form); the order's command omits it.", "Built the @objectstack/spec, formula and lint closure under the verify lock to clear one whole-tree gate's prerequisite. The diff touches no package, so this was not owed.", "Cosmetic: check-handover's coverage line prints `(c)` between `(a)` and `(b)`." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: none · noted, not filed — scripts/pm/check-handover.mjs --self-test keeps its pre-existing shape: a verdict handshake but no battery floor (AGENTS.md 〈Writing a --self-test〉). The file is local-only and no CI job runs it. Recorded in the PR's Acceptance notes.", "carrier: #27363 · noted, not filed — os-dev.md L37 still tells a dev to send `assignees` on pr_create, against the maintainer's ruling this order applied. That card (this seat's own, in flight) already covers os-dev.md.", "carrier: none · noted, not filed — check-handover (a′) reads held claims only. A card already released to pm:queue while its dev's question is open is outside it; H52 (open questions unrouted) still reports such a card. Stated in the script header." ], "cleanup": "After this comment: `rm -rf /home/user/objectstack-issue-27359/node_modules && git worktree remove /home/user/objectstack-issue-27359` (no --force; tree clean, branch pushed at d457c56d). No server, watcher or monitor was started." }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
ACCEPT → PR #27371 comment 6487722461 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-29T04:13Z — ⛔ not a claim. Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) PASS → PR comment 6487643603 on headd457c56d(claim line 6487607811 first): at 收班 every unlanded claimed card is handed back topm:queuein one stroke (Release:+Resume-from:+ assignee cleared), aneeds_decisioncard goes to the decision box, stay-behind narrows to ACCEPTed PRs waiting on the merge queue or a human approval, and the sign-off sequence runs regardless of the maintainer's wording (check-handover.mjsexit 0 → body/title → brief);check-handover.mjsenforces the narrowed stay-behind and refuses an unreleasedneeds_decisioncard by name (self-test 46 → 66, four ablation legs red). Check-runs green or expected-skip, Tier S — the seat lands it through the relay in the next act on the maintainer's standing word. The PR opened without a seat assignee on the maintainer's new rule (#27363). After MERGED: strippm:dispatched.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
Landed — PR #27371 merged; card closed by
Fixes #27359domain:skills#2)git merge-base --is-ancestor d34533c1 origin/mainaftergit fetch origin maind34533c1pm-dispatch(sign-off): a seat going off shift hands every unlanded claimed card back to pm:queue in one stroke; …is onorigin/main;GET pulls/27371→merged: true,merge_commit_sha d34533c1, merged by the queue entry the seat made on the maintainer's standing word (2026-10-29T04:35Z) after contract review 6487643603 (PASS, headd457c56d, claim line 6487607811) and ACCEPT 6487722461;origin/mainreadsseat-post-protocol.md88 / 88 with L35 「收班默认交回(〈交接收尾清单〉第 2 步);留守只剩已 ACCEPT 待队列或待人批的 PR。」 andseat-lifecycle.md96 / 96;check-handover.mjscarries the narrowed stay-behind and the[needs-decision-unreleased]refusalGET issues/27359state: closed,state_reason: completed(2026-10-29T04:35Z), closed by the PR body'sFixes #27359(the only closing keyword in the body — no other card was closed by it)State change:
pm:dispatchedremoved from this card in the same act (label-write, read back:tooling,priority:p1,domain:skills,area:devpathremain as ownership). From this merge a seat's 收班 hands every unlanded claimed card back topm:queuein one stroke (Release:+Resume-from:+ assignee cleared), aneeds_decisioncard goes to the decision box, and only an ACCEPTed PR waiting on the queue or a human stays behind;check-handover.mjsenforces it at the shift's last act. This seat's own 收班, when the maintainer calls it, follows the new text. Theseat-post-protocol.md/seat-lifecycle.md/check-handover.mjshot files are FREE.