Repository navigation
[Decision] Is "governed" a lane or an approval tier? The lane table gives .github/workflows/** to skills and to spec, while devx carries the AGENTS.md and workflow cards in practice #26997
Description
Ruled: 6458715764 · letter B · 2026-10-28T02:08Z
Filing gate ②: a decision only the maintainer can make. The maintainer, in devx seat 2's session (session_01QSeKYmTYfaPbLQD4BJfomW), first asked, verbatim: 「AGENTS.md 不是应该归 skills 车道吗？」. Then, on the seat's answer: 「刚才的skills的问题立 决裁卡」. Filed by domain:devx seat 2 (#20163) · os-justin. ⛔ Not a claim. ⛔ No domain:*: the fix lands in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, and triage sets the lane.
Business reason: the lane label decides who may claim a card and which files run serial. The lane table now gives one path family to two or three lanes, so the same card can be claimed by two seats, or by none.
Reader who acts: the director seat presents the card. After the ruling, the domain:skills seat edits the SKILL.md lane table (.claude/**, Tier S) and the triage seat relabels the open cards the letter moves.
Dedupe: titles of domain:skills and tooling issues (open and closed, 5 pages of each label) grepped for lane table|domain table|车道表|governed.*(lane|domain)|AGENTS.md.*(lane|skills)|workflows.*(lane|domain). One hit: #19133 (closed). It narrowed the human-merge floor (Tier H vs Tier S), an approval axis, not lane ownership. New.
维护者速读
车道表（SKILL.md「域车道」）对同一批文件给了互相打架的归属：
- skills 行写「governed 面全量」归 skills，governed 面明确包括
AGENTS.md、CLAUDE.md、.github/workflows/**、docs/NORTH-STAR.md。 - devx 行又写
.github/workflows（接线）「按锚定规则归 domain:spec」。 - 实际上 devx 席一直在做这两类卡：AGENTS.md 三张（[Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073、docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088、[Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081），CI 工作流五张（ci: Turbo seeds vs the 10 GB Actions cache pool — measure the pool, then shrink or retire the per-sha seeds #25452、ci(test-shards): Test Core's two slowest shards set every core PR's wall clock at ~28 min (5.6 min dependency build + ~20 min tests) while the other six finish in 7–17 — re-derive the cli slicing and shard balance on post-merge readings #25870、ci(gates): after #26444 made ten baselines one-sided, two ledgers stay two-sided and two comments still describe the old two-sided ratchet #26586 第 2 项、e2e: the MSW test in console-rendering.spec passes when the worker is absent (it is absent), and 18 of 22 live specs run nowhere in CI — delete the vacuous test and make the four live specs count #25914、packages: 30 of 39 published packages declare no sideEffects, so consumers cannot tree-shake them; declare per package now, make registration explicit later so the 1,380-line array gate can go #25913）。ci: Turbo seeds vs the 10 GB Actions cache pool — measure the pool, then shrink or retire the per-sha seeds #25452 的工作流 PR 今天刚由 devx 落地。
你问「AGENTS.md 不是应该归 skills 吗」，按表面文字答案是「是」。但同一张表也让工作流归 skills 或 spec，与实践不符。
请裁：
- A governed 就是车道：凡 governed 路径（含工作流）都归 skills，devx 的 CI 卡全部移交。
- B governed 只是批准等级（Tier H/S），车道按主题分：规则文本（AGENTS.md、CLAUDE.md、
.claude/**、skills/**、docs/adr/**、NORTH-STAR）归 skills；.github/workflows/**的接线与 CI 性能归 devx，仍按 Tier H 人批。改表消除冲突。 - C 表不动，逐卡以分诊标签为准。
选 A / B / C？
Governing text
- SKILL.md 「域车道」
domain:skillsrow (L162 atorigin/main): "governed 面全量(含本文件;统一定义见「governed 面统一定义」行)". - SKILL.md
domain:devxrow (L161): "packages/lint、scripts(门禁类)、.github/workflows(接线)三者按锚定规则归domain:spec,门禁按 SUBJECT:governed 面归 skills". - SKILL.md 〈路径分叉〉 (L183–184): "governed 面统一定义:
docs/adr/**+.claude/**(全量)+skills/**+docs/NORTH-STAR.md+.github/workflows/**" · "governed 面同含AGENTS.md+CLAUDE.md;… 执行席恒随落地仓车道". - SKILL.md 「域车道」: "锚定规则:每个包恰属一个域;
domain:*= 修复落地包的域". - SKILL.md 「优先级」: "两条细则冲突 ⇒ 按更严的一条行动并立卡;⛔ 不当场改文本了结". That rule is why this card exists instead of an edit.
references/lanes/devx.md「常设承诺」: "受管面 PR 照 SKILL.md 〈路径分叉〉的路径分叉执行". The devx job description itself expects devx to produce governed PRs.
Premises (each with its re-check)
- P1, the conflict text.
git show origin/main:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md | grep -n -E 'domain:devx\x60|domain:skills\x60|governed 面统一定义'→ L161, L162, L183. Positive control: the same grep showsdomain:spec's row at L163. - P2, devx carries governed-path cards today (open cards this seat read today, fix paths from their claims and rulings):
AGENTS.md: [Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073 (+docs/NORTH-STAR.md, mixed withcontent/docs/**; PR docs: one North Star — docs/NORTH-STAR.md; the architecture page moves to concepts/architecture-overview #26970 approved), docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088 remainder (L40/138/173 only), [Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081 PR 1 (TOC +docs/agents/; its ruling 6417533492 already says "skills seat dispatches PR 1")..github/workflows/**: ci: Turbo seeds vs the 10 GB Actions cache pool — measure the pool, then shrink or retire the per-sha seeds #25452 (PR ci: restore the Next.js cache on every run, save it on push and schedule only #26984, landed through devx with an approver's review), ci(test-shards): Test Core's two slowest shards set every core PR's wall clock at ~28 min (5.6 min dependency build + ~20 min tests) while the other six finish in 7–17 — re-derive the cli slicing and shard balance on post-merge readings #25870 (ci.yml+packages/cli+scripts/), ci(gates): after #26444 made ten baselines one-sided, two ledgers stay two-sided and two comments still describe the old two-sided ratchet #26586 item 2 (lint.ymlcomment), e2e: the MSW test in console-rendering.spec passes when the worker is absent (it is absent), and 18 of 22 live specs run nowhere in CI — delete the vacuous test and make the four live specs count #25914 (a new required job), packages: 30 of 39 published packages declare no sideEffects, so consumers cannot tree-shake them; declare per package now, make registration explicit later so the 1,380-line array gate can go #25913 (ci.ymlwiring +ui/scripts).- Re-check: the cards' claim comments,
File surface:lines.
- P3, the label origin. These cards were graded
domain:docs(a retired lane, read as devx) ordomain:devxat triage. The director's ruling records name devx in the workload column ([Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073: "devx · 1 PR Tier H"). No seat applied the anchor rule to the governed paths. Re-check: the triage audit comments on [Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073 (6415525262), [Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081 (6415593935) and docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088 (6415687206).
One-sentence problem
The rule that says who owns a file names two or three owners for the same workflow and instruction files, so a card's lane depends on which line of the table a seat happens to read.
Options
| Option | What | Consequence | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Governed = lane. Every governed path (incl. .github/workflows/**, AGENTS.md, docs/NORTH-STAR.md) is domain:skills. Mixed cards split by lane, or triage designates one lane (the existing cross-domain path). Drop the devx row's workflows clause. |
One owner per path. The skills lane takes all CI workflow work; today that is 5 cards from devx plus the 3 AGENTS.md cards, and devx keeps docs/QA. CI performance work moves to the seat that writes rule text. | skills · 1 PR (SKILL.md table, Tier S) + triage relabels ~8 open cards · precedent: none read |
| B | Governed = approval tier, lane by subject. Rule text (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .claude/**, skills/**, docs/adr/**, docs/NORTH-STAR.md) is domain:skills. .github/workflows/** wiring and CI performance is domain:devx, still Tier H (approver review). Gates stay by SUBJECT as today. Rewrite the skills row from "governed 面全量" to the rule-text list, and the devx row's workflows clause to "归本域". |
One owner per path, matching what seats do today. The AGENTS.md cards go to skills (#26088 and #26081 are already marked pm:retriage). The workflow cards stay in devx. Approval stays exactly as strict, because Tier H is a property of the path, not of the lane. |
skills · 1 PR (SKILL.md table, Tier S) + triage relabels 2 cards (#26088, #26081) |
| C | No change. The triage label decides per card; any lane may land a governed edit under Tier H. | The contradiction stays. The next triage pass can label the same kind of card differently, and two seats can claim one file. | 0 |
Business meaning
- A: every governed file has one locksmith, and the locksmith also does the plumbing.
- B: the locksmith keeps the rulebook, and the plumber fixes the pipes; the building inspector (Tier H approval) signs off on both.
- C: whoever reaches the door first.
四维分析
- 实际业务需求：实测 devx 今天在做 8 张 governed 路径的卡（P2），其中 5 张是 CI 工作流，3 张是 AGENTS.md。工作流卡的内容是 CI 速度、缓存、分片，与 devx 的开发者体验职责一致；AGENTS.md 是规则文本，与 skills 的职责一致。A 会把 5 张 CI 卡推给写规则的座位，C 让每次分诊各凭理解。
- 项目长远合理性：车道（谁做、谁串行）和批准等级（谁签字）是两根独立的轴。B 把两轴分开：Tier H/S 仍按路径强制，车道按主题，冲突一次消除。A 把两轴绑死，CI 工作会挤进 skills 席。C 留着矛盾，等下一次误标。
- 防 AI 犯错：分诊和执行席都靠这张表机械地定车道。一条路径只对应一个车道，表才能被机械读对。B、A 都做到了，C 做不到，今天的误派就是 C 的现状造成的。批准不放松：B 下工作流 PR 仍要人批。
- 创业阶段不扩散：三者都不加门禁、不加文件。B、A 只改车道表几行。
Recommendation
B. Read on ① alone: B. Do ②③④ flip it? No. In two years the fleet should have two independent axes: a lane per path by subject (who works and serializes) and an approval tier per path (who signs). The mainstream analogue is CODEOWNERS versus branch protection: one says who maintains a path, the other says what a merge needs. B gives each path exactly one lane without loosening any approval. A would also give one lane per path, but it routes CI performance work to the rule-text seat.
Confidence gaps: whether scripts/ gate files under the devx row's "门禁类 → spec" clause also need restating under B. They are out of this card's question; the table PR names it if the wording touches them. The count of affected cards is from this seat's reads today, not a full-board scan.
After the ruling
- B: the skills seat opens one
.claude/**PR (Tier S, with a contract review) rewriting the skills and devx rows. Triage relabels docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088 and [Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081 todomain:skills(already markedpm:retriage). [Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073's PR docs: one North Star — docs/NORTH-STAR.md; the architecture page moves to concepts/architecture-overview #26970 lands as the declared cross-lane exception (cross-seat note on the card). - A: the same PR with the other wording; triage relabels the 8 cards in P2 and splits the mixed ones ([Decision] Two different documents are both called the "North Star" and four pointers disagree on which outranks AGENTS.md; the one that does is Chinese-only #26073, ci(test-shards): Test Core's two slowest shards set every core PR's wall clock at ~28 min (5.6 min dependency build + ~20 min tests) while the other six finish in 7–17 — re-derive the cli slicing and shard balance on post-merge readings #25870, packages: 30 of 39 published packages declare no sideEffects, so consumers cannot tree-shake them; declare per package now, make registration explicit later so the 1,380-line array gate can go #25913).
- C: no PR; this card closes with the ruling recorded, and the contradiction is accepted.
os-decision-facets
① 项目长远合理性：B 把车道（按主题）与批准等级（按路径）分成两根轴，一次消除表内三处冲突，不放松批准。
② 实际业务拉动：devx 今天在做 8 张 governed 路径卡，5 张 CI 工作流、3 张 AGENTS.md；今天已因此误派一次。
③ 防 AI 犯错：一条路径一个车道，分诊才能机械读表；C 保留今天误派的根因。
④ 创业阶段不扩散：零新门禁零新文件，只改车道表几行。
Prior rulings read: governed, lane, domain table, AGENTS.md skills → 1 hit; #19133 (closed: Tier H/S floor, approval axis only); ADR none; thread: devx seat 2 session (maintainer's question, quoted above)
Related
#26073 (PR #26970, cross-lane exception), #26088, #26081 (both pm:retriage → skills), #25452, #25870, #26586, #25914, #25913 (workflow cards in devx), #19133 (closed, approval tiers).
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Brief-claimed-by: session_01KrKXQVvgYk2AJ4VkqMobyb · batch #416 · 2026-10-28T00:52Z
Director seat, summon #51 continuation (ledger objectstack#12708). Presented to the maintainer in batch #416 as item 1 of 3 (family: devx/tooling cards born this shift). Seat increment (re-verified on
origin/maineae9a588e7):domain:devxrow (L161) sends.github/workflowswiring todomain:spec; thedomain:skillsrow (L162) claims "governed 面全量"; 〈路径分叉〉 (L183–184) lists.github/workflows/**andAGENTS.mdinside the governed set. Three lines, three owners for one path family. docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088 and [Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081 carrypm:retriagetoday, as the card says.needs-user-decisionwith nodomain:*, as filed; the ruling's stroke sets the lane on this card and on the cards the letter moves..claude/**, Tier S) + triage relabels docs: three contributor instructions contradict each other — dev port (AGENTS.md "must be 3000" vs getting-started auto-shift and OS_PORT), scaffold command (npm create vs npx create-objectstack), setup (pnpm run setup vs pnpm install && pnpm build) #26088 and [Decision] AGENTS.md is 82 KB with no table of contents and 28% fleet-operations narrative, CONTRIBUTING hands every rule to it, and there is no PR template: how a human contributor is meant to onboard #26081.Prior rulings read: skills(governed): narrow the human-merge floor to the law — Tier H stays human/approved (AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md · docs/adr/** · docs/NORTH-STAR.md · .claude/settings.json · .claude/hooks/**); Tier S (.claude/skills/** · .claude/agents/**) lands on the seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS + post-merge audit #19133 (closed, approval floor only); AGENTS PD 14 (Tier H by path); thread: card body (maintainer's question quoted there).
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Triage: lane
domain:skills· decision card stays with the maintainer · triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-28T01:03Z⛔ Not a claim.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(the lane table), which isdomain:skills. Lane set. The director seat presented it in batch Fix pnpm lockfile mismatch for react peerDependency specifier #416 (6457699606).AGENTS.mdsits indomain:skillsunder both A and B).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Ruling: batch #416 item 1 · letter B · maintainer 「同意」 2026-10-28T02:06Z
Recorded by the director seat (summon #51 continuation,
session_01KrKXQVvgYk2AJ4VkqMobyb, ledger objectstack#12708). The maintainer answered batch #416 with 「同意」 — every seat letter. Brief 6457699606. Letter B, governed is an approval tier, the lane follows the subject: rule text (AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md,.claude/**,skills/**,docs/adr/**,docs/NORTH-STAR.md) isdomain:skills;.github/workflows/**wiring and CI performance isdomain:devx, still Tier H (GOVERNED_APPROVERS review, AGENTS PD 14). Gates stay by SUBJECT as today. Not A (routes CI performance work to the rule-text seat) and not C (keeps the root cause of this shift's mis-dispatch).What lands (card column): skills · 1 PR on
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(Tier S, with a contract review) — thedomain:skillsrow (L162 atorigin/maineae9a588e7) goes from "governed 面全量" to the rule-text list above; thedomain:devxrow (L161) drops the ".github/workflows(接线)… 归domain:spec" clause and says the workflows are its own; 〈路径分叉〉 (L183–184) keeps the governed-set definition as the approval set and says so in one clause. The confidence gap stays as filed: whether the devx row's "scripts/(门禁类) → spec" clause needs restating is for the PR to name if the wording touches it; ⛔ it is not widened by this ruling.Who reads it next: the triage seat relabels #26088 and #26081 (both
pm:retriage) todomain:skills; #26073's PR #26970 lands as the declared cross-lane exception; the five workflow cards (#25452, #25870, #26586 item 2, #25914, #25913) stay in devx unchanged.Clause-②: no,Metadata-protocol: none.Execution:
needs-user-decision→pm:queuein this act withdomain:skillsset (the card asked triage to set the lane; the letter sets it);priority:p2→priority:p1as a protocol amendment (ruling #26368 A, 「协议新增定 p1」).Ruling-ref:names this comment.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 (takeover shift) · 2026-10-28T04:03Z
Session:
session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg(seat; implementation by anos-devsubagent of this session,mode:subagent— same session ID, identity by branch)Account:
os-justin(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-26997-lane-by-subject-governed-is-tierWorktree:
objectstack-issue-26997Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.mdonly — thedomain:devxrow (L161), thedomain:skillsrow (L162) and the two 〈路径分叉〉 governed-set lines (L183–184), edited IN PLACE (the file is at its line ceiling, 319 / 319: no new line, no re-wrap as currency); ⛔ no other file (the lane files underreferences/lanes/**point at this table and are not restated); Tier S (.claude/**) ⇒ one draft PR, contract review atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERbefore the seat readies it. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S(four lines, but a routing-semantics change, so judged as design not mechanics),mode:subagent,model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(reason:dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.mdat3230bdbfprintsModel tier — MANDATORY: claude-fable-5-1 … '.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md' — clause ① of the model-tiering ruling (narrowed to protocol semantics, 2026-08-20): the PM dispatch skill MAIN file is the lane's own operating protocol; the one-line mechanical exit is not taken — the edit changes which seat owns a path family),effort: xhighClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — a ruled decision card (director ruling 6458715764, letter B, the maintainer's 「同意」 2026-10-28T02:06Z; lane set
domain:skillsby triage 6457861906)Ruling-ref: 6458715764
Thread-read: 6458715764
Premise: holds — read on
origin/main3230bdbf(2026-10-28T03:58Z): L161 still sends ".github/workflows(接线)" todomain:spec, L162 still reads "governed 面全量(含本文件…)", L183–184 still define the governed set with.github/workflows/**andAGENTS.md+CLAUDE.mdinside it with no clause saying the set is the APPROVAL set — the three lines the ruling names; the cards the ruling moves (#26088, #26081) already carrydomain:skills(triage 6457775813, 6457763909); the five devx workflow cards stay as the ruling says.Serial constraints cleared: open PR #26749 (seat 1's, APPROVED by
os-zhuang, ready,mergeable_state: blocked) editsSKILL.mdL166 (thedomain:cloudrow) pluscross-repo-coordination.md,execution-duties.md,triage-duties.md— the same lane table, four lines below this card's rows: region-disjoint, so parallel authoring; the dev mergesorigin/mainbefore opening the PR and again if #26749 lands first; the queue arbitrates. Queued rule cards #27047 and #27062 also nameSKILL.md/references/**and are serialized BEHIND this PR in the seat's hot-file queue (they still await triage's first grade). Scan: 48 open PRs' file lists at 2026-10-28T03:58Z; control PR #26749's five files found.Resume-from: none
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 26997, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-26997-lane-by-subject-governed-is-tier", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27082", "head": "0b1ae9b848db4136c6848aa309c04aea34124e66 — merge of origin/main 5cba8fc2 onto the edit commit dd558521; the PR record read after the second push shows this head with 2 commits. The PR was first opened at dd558521 (the merge commit had been made after the first push); the merge commit was pushed right after the create, so the head the readings cite is the PR head.", "session": "session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Letter B applied in place to .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, three lines: the domain:skills row (L162) goes from 「governed 面全量(含本文件;统一定义见「governed 面统一定义」行)」 to the rule-text list 「规则文本:`AGENTS.md`+`CLAUDE.md`+`.claude/**`(含本文件)+`skills/**`+`docs/adr/**`+`docs/NORTH-STAR.md`」 with the rest of the row byte-identical; the domain:devx row (L161) drops the `.github/workflows`(接线) member from the anchor-rule clause and adds `.github/workflows/**`(接线、CI 性能) to its own surface list, gates-by-SUBJECT clause unchanged; 〈路径分叉〉 L183 keeps the five globs and now reads 「governed 面(定 Tier,非车道):…」, L184 untouched. Draft PR 27082 (Tier S, skip-changeset, assignee os-justin) awaits the seat's contract review; the seat lands it, not this dev. State on the PR not set by me: labels size/xs and documentation added by github-actions[bot] (Auto Label), left alone.", "files_changed": [".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md"], "line_budget": "319 / 319 before and after (ceiling 319, headroom 0); edited lines in bytes — L161 339 → 339 (table-row pin 341), L162 300 → 329 (pin 341), L183 120 → 120 (prose cap 120), L184 120 → 120 unchanged; widest table row stays L160 at 341 (pin 341, headroom 0). No new line, no re-wrap, nothing deleted elsewhere to buy a line.", "tests": "No package touched: no ① build closure and no ② package test/typecheck owed; `.claude/**` publishes nothing (skip-changeset on the create). No tested behaviour changed: no ablation. Byte measurement (python utf-8) on the final head: lines 319; L161=339 L162=329 L183=120 L184=120; widest row 341 at L160; control-character grep over the file: 0 hits. Ratchet verdict lines: 「SKILL.md: widest table row is 341 bytes (pin 341; headroom 0)」 and 「SKILL.md is 319 lines (ceiling 319; headroom 0)」. Governed-prose verdict: 「2 instruction surface(s) name all 13 registered governed surfaces that govern objectstack … and claim no others」. id-lint: 「104 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)」. frame-sync: 4 axes, binding sentence present, 107 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies. frame-freshness (local-only): 「the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main」.", "gates": "Local subset derived at head 0b1ae9b8 with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` (no paths; change set 1 file, +3/-3 vs merge base 5cba8fc2): 20 commands = 12 matched by path + 8 declared whole-tree. Every exit captured before any pipe (cmd to LOG; EXIT=$?): pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet 0 · pnpm check:pm-governed-prose 0 · pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint 0 · pnpm check:skill-frame-sync 0 · pnpm check:pm-governed-merges 0 · pnpm check:pm-expected-skips 0 · node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test 0 · node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test 0 · pnpm check:nul-bytes 0 · node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs 0 · node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test 0 · node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs 0 · pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions 0 (first run exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint not built, nothing measured; `pnpm exec turbo run build --concurrency=2 --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under os-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT command-exit 0, 4 tasks FULL TURBO; rerun exit 0, self-test 61 cases) · pnpm check:agent-test-spelling 0 · pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs 0 · pnpm check:doc-authoring 0 · pnpm check:driver-memory-census 0 · pnpm check:gitlink-declared 0 · pnpm check:refd-timer-probe 0 · pnpm check:watch-hint-literal 0. `--ran` reconciliation (coded form): 「20 derived, 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN … all 20 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3」; outside the derivation, run and read: pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness 0 (local-only family; SKILL.md is the four-axis frame file) · pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster 0 (roster under .claude, flagged by the derivation). CI-measured only (matched by path, no local invocation): node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs and its --toolchain-needed form (governed-surface-guard.yml). PR check-runs on head 0b1ae9b8 at report time: Governed Surface Queue Guard success · PR-body guards (claim · duplicate · Part-of · single-writer path) success · Check PR Size success · Test UI success · filter success · Auto Label in_progress · Test Core in_progress · Dogfood Regression Gate in_progress · Lint · CI, release & engine gates / Lint · ESLint / Lint · PM dispatch-gates / Lint · docs & code guards / Lint · repo & tooling gates / Lint · scoped (3) queued · Type Check · consumer gates / debt ledger / source gates / workspace queued · Check Changeset skipped (skip-changeset) · Build Core, Build Docs, Build & E2E UI, Lint UI, Type Check UI, Temporal Conformance skipped. Superseded head dd558521: Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check read failure with every lane cancelled — the cancellation my second push caused, NOT MEASURED there; the live head's runs are the ones to read. Reported before CI converges, as the contract says; in_progress is the honest value.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm (Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none).", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "2 — both through scripts/pm: (1) fleet-write relay pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (request fw-20261028T043721Z-c4c381, run 40633358913 success), executed by the relay as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft) plus its assignees leg (os-justin) and labels leg (skip-changeset); read-back: 14333 bytes sent, 14333 stored, identical; (2) post-stamped: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26997/comments (this report comment). git push ×3 (empty-branch probe, edit commit dd558521, merge commit 0b1ae9b8) are not REST writes. No PATCH, no label-write, no ready/arm/enqueue/approve.", "deviations": [ "Confidence gap touched, for a byte reason: the devx row's anchor-rule destination moved from the literal `domain:spec` to bare `spec` (the same bare form the cell already uses for 「归 skills」). Keeping the literal left the row at 348 bytes against the 341-byte table-row pin (L160 at 341, headroom 0) once `.github/workflows/**`(接线、CI 性能) joined; the only other way to fit was dropping 「CI 性能」, which the ruling names explicitly. The scripts(门禁类)→spec rule is not restated or changed in substance; named in one line of the PR body as the ruling requires.", "Hypothesis 3 falsified on placement: L184 is at 120/120 with no gloss to remove (the shortest clause puts it at 158, the PM's suggested spelling at 202), so the approval clause lands on L183 as 「(定 Tier,非车道)」 (120 bytes exactly) and two glosses leave L183 to pay for it: the word 统一定义 (its only referrer was L162, which this PR rewrites; no script or reference pins the phrase) and `(全量)` after `.claude/**` (the glob is the whole tree by construction; L204 keeps the whole-tree emphasis in words). Both halves of the ruling's clause — approval tier, not lane — are kept; the pointer 「车道按主题见域车道表」 did not fit.", "Hypothesis 2: the count word 三者 is dropped rather than rewritten as 两者 (no information with two members; 两者 would push the row to 345). 「(仍 Tier H)」 is not restated in the devx row (no bytes left); Tier H for workflows is carried by the 路径分叉 clause (path → Tier) and L186.", "Order of operations: the PR was created at dd558521 because the `git merge origin/main` (5cba8fc2) was made after the first push and before the create; the merge commit 0b1ae9b8 — the exact commit every gate reading was taken on — was pushed right after the create, so the PR head now equals the cited head. origin/main moved two more commits (cd609a49: an ADR status batch and a ui change, neither touching SKILL.md or a ratcheted file) between the merge and the create; not re-merged, stated in the PR body.", "The relay's pr_create read-back line lists assignees (os-justin) but no labels leg; the label's presence was verified by a direct REST read of the PR (labels: skip-changeset, plus size/xs and documentation added by github-actions[bot]). Recorded as a tooling observation below, not treated as a failed write.", "check:doc-formula-expressions exit 3 on first run (prerequisite: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint not built) — built under the verify lock (cache hit), rerun exit 0; the ran-list carries the final code.", "Commit trailer pair written model-free per AGENTS.md (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude) — the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By line was not used because the pre-push hook refuses a model identifier; the harness reminder yields to the repo rule by its own priority sentence. No card trailer in the commit; the card relation lives in the PR body only." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "observation (hypothesis 4) · SKILL.md L164, the domain:ui row: 「…协议恒归 `domain:spec`,受管面归 `domain:skills`;详见 `references/lanes/ui.md`」 — under letter B, `ui/.github/workflows/**` is workflow wiring inside ui's governed set and this row still routes every ui governed path to skills. Not edited (the ruling names only L161/L162/L183–L184). carrier: the seat · dedupe words: domain:ui row, 受管面归 domain:skills, ui workflows lane, lane table", "observation (hypothesis 4) · references/cross-repo-coordination.md L11: 「objectui 仓已并入本仓 `ui/`:UI 卡住本仓,`ui/**` 代码归 `domain:ui`,受管面归 `domain:skills`。」 — the same tie as the ui row, for the same path family. carrier: the seat · dedupe words: cross-repo-coordination, 受管面归 domain:skills, ui governed lane", "observation (hypothesis 4) · references/lanes/devx.md L7: 「边界:守护 skills 的门禁脚本在 `scripts/` 下时归本席,判据是被改文件的路径。」 — a by-PATH rule for gate scripts that guard skills, while SKILL.md L161 (unchanged clause 「门禁按 SUBJECT:governed 面归 skills」) and L162 route gates by SUBJECT; pre-existing tension outside this card's question, and the ruling keeps gates by SUBJECT as today. carrier: the seat · dedupe words: devx.md 边界, gate scripts by path, 门禁按 SUBJECT, lanes/devx", "observation (hypothesis 4, consistent with B, listed for completeness) · SKILL.md L184 「执行席恒随落地仓车道」 is the repo lane, not the domain lane; SKILL.md L204 「受管面两层:Tier S = `.claude/**` 全树,余皆 Tier H 等人批」 is the approval axis and now carries the whole-tree emphasis `(全量)` used to carry on L183; references/lanes/director.md L86 「改 skill、指令或治理文本归 skills 席」 says rule text → skills. carrier: none · noted, not filed", "observation (tooling) · scripts/pm/fleet-write pr_create read-back reports the assignees leg (「Assignees as the pull lists them: os-justin」, assignees_missing []) but prints no labels leg, while the os-dev rule reads the label leg from the relay's report line; the label did land (REST read: skip-changeset present). carrier: the seat · dedupe words: fleet-write read_back labels, pr_create labels leg, relay read-back" ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #27082 comment 6461040758 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-28T04:57Z — ⛔ not a claim. Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) PASS → PR comment 6461034569 on head0b1ae9b8. Tier S: the seat readies and arms through the relay once every check on that head is green; the card closes with the merge (Fixes #26997). One question born of the ruling's execution goes to the maintainer separately: which lane ownsui/.github/workflows/**under letter B (thedomain:uirow still says 受管面归 skills).objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Landing blocked by the seat's own permission classifier ·
domain:skills#2·session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg· 2026-10-28T05:07Z — ⛔ not a claim, nothing on the PR changed.0b1ae9b8, contract review PASS 6461034569 atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, seat ACCEPT 6461040758, all 38 check-runs terminal (22 success, 16 skipped),mergeable_state: clean,check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 27082→EXIT_TEST_GOVERNED(Tier S, every governed path under.claude/**).node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file land-27082.json(actionspr_ready+automerge_enable) was refused before it ran by this session's harness permission classifier, reason verbatim:[Merge Without Review]. Per landing-operations B (「落地遭分类器拒 ⇒ 停手、报维护者、卡上记命令与拒因;⛔ 不换拼法」) the seat stops here and reports to the maintainer in its session; the PR stays draft and unarmed. The previous seat-1 brief (6412572261) recorded the same platform fact: this classifier blocks a seat landing its own Tier S PR unless the ACCEPT cites the maintainer's authorising words.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Landing stroke sent on the maintainer's word — PR #27082 ready, auto-merge armed, enqueued
2026-10-28T12:19Z ·
domain:skills#2·session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg. The maintainer, in the seat's session: 「你应该按照 pm-dispatch 技能审核并落地pr」. On that word the seat re-sent the same relay stroke (no respelling) that the session's classifier had refused (note 6461164164):node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file land-27082.json --jsonwith[{"op":"pr_ready","pull":27082},{"op":"automerge_enable","pull":27082}]→ relay run 40686520190 success. Timeline read back:ready_for_review2026-10-28T12:17Z,auto_merge_enabled2026-10-28T12:17Z,added_to_merge_queue2026-10-28T12:18Z. Pre-landing readings unchanged from the ACCEPT (all checks green or expected-skip,mergeable_state: clean). The seat follows it to MERGED; the landing comment with the two probe readings comes then.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Landed — PR #27082 merged; card closed by
Fixes #26997domain:skills#2)git log -1 --grep='#27082)' origin/mainaftergit fetch origin maind3487071pm-dispatch: governed is an approval tier, the lane follows the subject — rule text to skills …— onorigin/main;GET pulls/27082→merged: true,merge_commit_sha d3487071, merged by the queue entry the seat made on the maintainer's word (2026-10-28T12:33Z);origin/main:SKILL.mdis 319 lines, the lane table rows L161–166 and the 路径分叉 lines L183–184 carry the letter-B textGET issues/26997state: closed,state_reason: completed(2026-10-28T12:33Z), closed by the PR body'sFixes #26997(the only closing keyword in the body — no other card was closed by it)State change:
pm:dispatchedremoved from this card in the same act (label-write, read back:tooling,priority:p1,domain:skills,area:devpathremain as ownership). The SKILL.md hot-file queue this PR headed is released: #27047 next, then #27061 / #27062 / #27117. Main's push CI ond3487071at this reading: 35 success · 33 skipped · 13 in progress · 0 failure.Generated by Claude Code