You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
pm-dispatch: a project seat creates its own patrol schedule in-session, hourly by default (lanes may relax it); drop the "maintainer creates it in the Routines UI" step (maintainer's word 2026-10-26) #25991
Filing gate: ③ maintainer-directed task (a pm rule change the maintainer named).
Maintainer's words (verbatim, 2026-10-26, ui-lane project)
你应该自己创建定时啊
为什么不是每小时
那需要立卡改 skills吗
立卡
Context: the domain:ui project seat (#25966) asked the maintainer to create its patrol routine in the Routines UI, every 2–4 h, as the skill says. The maintainer answered that the seat should create the schedule itself, asked why it is not hourly, and asked for this card.
What changes (two points, nothing else)
Interval. The project seat's patrol runs hourly by default; a lane may relax it when it has a reason, and states the interval on its seat post. This replaces the hard-coded "every 2–4 hours".
Who creates it. The project seat creates its own patrol schedule from inside its session, bound to that session (create_trigger with no create_new_session_on_fire, firing into the seat's own project thread). The "the maintainer creates it in the claude.ai Routines UI" requirement is removed for project seats.
Lines that say otherwise today (at origin/main)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md — 「项目席唤醒 = PR 订阅事件 + 每项目一个巡查 routine;⛔ 无自绑 cron、无 send_later 链。」 The "⛔ no self-bound cron" clause forbids exactly what point 2 asks for, so it needs a scoped rewording, not deletion of the send_later-chain ban.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md § 座位 Routine 创建 — 「由维护者在 claude.ai 的 Routines UI 创建…」 and 「会话内 create_trigger 的 Routine 拿不到 GitHub 工具、零产出」. The second line is about a fresh-session trigger; a trigger bound to a live project-seat session runs with that session's own tools and the fleet-write relay. Measured: trig_015KLmxJkto73scJDw4s14Sg (ui seat, hourly, fires into the seat's session). The editor should keep the zero-output warning for fresh-session triggers and scope it.
Routine (non-project) seats are out of scope: this card changes only the project-seat form.
Business reason
③ — the maintainer's words above stand in for it. Effect: a newly seated project lane has a patrol from the first minute, without a maintainer round-trip, and a patrol that is not event-driven (retriage answers, half-state sweep, slot refill) runs at most an hour late instead of up to four.
Who acts on it
The domain:skills seat, as one governed PR to the four files above (pm-dispatch root, contract-review tier per the lane's standing commitments).
Duplicate check
search_issues on objectstack-ai/objectstack, "pm-dispatch project seat patrol routine interval Routines UI create_trigger self-bind": 11 hits, none open. Nearest closed: #17728 (patrol timer armed once at seating as a self-bound Routine, Routine-seat form), #25379 / #25412 (project-seat forms that introduced the current wording).
Filed by seat domain:ui#1, session session_017iXjUm1rujwDk7f3KT1Pkk.
A rule change the maintainer already directed (「你应该自己创建定时啊」, 「为什么不是每小时」, 「立卡」), so it is not reopened here. Lane:domain:skills (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**). It is a governed surface, so it lands at the contract-review tier by the maintainer's hand.
Scope exactly as the card says: the project-seat form only. Keep the zero-output warning, scoped to fresh-session triggers, and keep the send_later-chain ban.
Claim: PM loop round 1 (second wave) · 2026-10-26T10:26Z
Session: session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn (seat; implementation by an in-session os-dev subagent)
Account: os-warren (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/project-thread-1r3slx (the seat thread's harness push branch — the measured platform exception to claude/issue-N-slug; recreated from origin/main0d83ee8f after PR #26016 merged and the remote branch was deleted)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-25991 in the seat's clone
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat post #19287)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (the 项目席唤醒 line only), references/seat-post-protocol.md (§ 座位 Routine 创建), references/seat-lifecycle.md (the 项目席巡查 routine line), references/project-forms.md (the 首次坐席 routine line). Line-neutral in every file: each sits at its ratchet ceiling with headroom 0 (319, 91, 96, 54), no ceiling raise. (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent (in-session), model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates --tier: MANDATORY, clause ① — the pm-dispatch main file), effort: xhigh. Same deviation from mode:thread as claim 6411570151 on #25791 (the coordinator channel caps at 2,000 characters; this container pushes only the seat thread's branch). Governed .claude/**: one independent CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review of record by an agent other than the drafter; the PR then stays draft for the maintainer's word (SKILL.md 红线 on governed PRs, read with the triage audit 6412135551 「lands … by the maintainer's hand」 — the stricter of the two rules).
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③, the maintainer's words quoted in the body)
Thread-read: 6412135551
Premise: holds — on origin/main0d83ee8f the four lines the card cites still read as quoted: SKILL.md line 71, seat-post-protocol.md lines 58–60, seat-lifecycle.md line 96, project-forms.md line 31
Serial constraints cleared: none — no open PR among the 41 open touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**; no open pm:dispatched card in the lane
{
"issue": 25991,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx",
"pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26067",
"session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn — this run's harness-stamped id (in-session os-dev subagent; the seat's id)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Implemented the card's two points for the project-seat form only, in the four named files, line-neutral in every file (all four stay at their ratchet ceiling with headroom 0) and every rewritten line within the ratchet's 120-byte line cap. SKILL.md:71 now reads: project-seat wake = PR subscription + one self-created, self-bound (自绑) patrol routine per project, hourly by default; the send_later-chain ban stays and the old 无自绑 cron clause is gone. seat-post-protocol.md § 座位 Routine 创建 splits the Routine-seat form (maintainer, Routines UI) from the project-seat form (self-created, self-bound), scopes the zero-output warning to the new-session create_trigger form, scopes the UI-tunable tier/cron line to Routine seats, and carries the interval rule (hourly default; relaxing needs a reason and goes on the seat post) folded into the existing seat-post-is-current-state rule. seat-lifecycle.md:96 and project-forms.md:31 move 每 2–4 小时 to 默认每小时 (project-forms also says 自建). Draft PR opened through the fleet-write relay with skip-changeset and assignee os-warren; it stays draft for the maintainer's word (governed .claude/**).",
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.md"
],
"line_budget": {
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": "319 → 319 (ceiling 319, headroom 0); line 71 rewritten, 120 bytes",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md": "91 → 91 (ceiling 91, headroom 0); lines 58/60/65/66 rewritten, 119/119/110/118 bytes",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md": "96 → 96 (ceiling 96, headroom 0); line 96 rewritten, 118 bytes",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.md": "54 → 54 (ceiling 54, headroom 0); line 31 rewritten, 117 bytes",
"method": "rewrite in place; no line joined, no re-wrap, no CEILINGS row moved; the one added rule (project-seat interval) was paid in place by tightening the wording of the line it joined (协议文本→协议, 其当前值→当前值, 才是现状→即现状), net 0 lines and under the byte cap"
},
"tests": "No test suite applies: the diff touches four pm-dispatch markdown files and no package, so there is no package build closure, no pnpm test and no typecheck to run (os-dev local-verification scope ①/② empty by construction). Verification = the derived gate union below on head c4503e6c, plus a control-character scan of the four files (grep -naP for C0/DEL bytes: none). Ablation: n/a — no tested behaviour changed (docs/protocol text).",
"gates": "LOCAL (head c4503e6c, derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, no paths; each exit code captured before any pipe; --ran reconciliation: 20 derived, 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN): check-closing-keyword-parity exit 0 (+ --self-test exit 0) · check-comment-mask-corpus exit 0 (18157 files, 0 disagree) · pm/check-governed-queue-guard --self-test exit 0 · pm/check-harness-current --self-test exit 0 · @objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions exit 0 (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET: unbuilt @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint; built both under os-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT command-exit 0, held 129 s, then clean: 23 record-scoped formula examples across 482 files) · check:agent-test-spelling 0 · check:cross-package-test-inputs 0 · check:doc-authoring 0 (428 files clean; 53 published skill files clean) · check:driver-memory-census 0 · check:gitlink-declared 0 · check:nul-bytes 0 · check:pm-expected-skips 0 · check:pm-governed-merges 0 · check:pm-governed-prose 0 (13 governed surfaces named, no others) · check:pm-skill-id-lint 0 (88 files clean) · check:pm-skill-ratchet 0 (SKILL.md is 319 lines, ceiling 319, headroom 0; seat-post-protocol.md 91/91; seat-lifecycle.md 96/96; project-forms.md 54/54; every line within 120 bytes) · check:refd-timer-probe 0 · check:skill-frame-sync 0 (the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent) · check:watch-hint-literal 0. Local-only reading (not a CI family): check:skill-frame-freshness exit 0 (frame current with origin/main). CI CHECK-RUNS on c4503e6c as read right after the PR opened (not waited on): Check Changeset success · Check PR Size success · The card this PR closes must claim this branch success · No other open PR may claim the same issue success · No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path success · Part-of PR must not also close its card success · Check Documentation Links success · filter success; in_progress: Lint · CI, release & engine gates; Lint · ESLint; Lint · PM dispatch-gates; Lint · docs & code guards; Lint · repo & tooling gates; Lint · scoped (query-options erasure, slot lookup & corpus, tooling self-tests); Type Check · consumer gates / debt ledger / source gates / workspace; Test Core; Dogfood Regression Gate; Governed Surface Queue Guard; Auto Label. Skipped by selector: Build Core, Build Docs, Build UI Deps, Build & E2E UI, Lint UI, Type Check UI, Test UI, Temporal Conformance, Dogfood Verify CLI, the opt-in harnesses.",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
"mcp_calls": "0 — no mcp__github__* call of any kind. The only MCP-adjacent act was loading the mcp__claude-code-remote__create_trigger tool schema through ToolSearch to read its parameter contract (default mode fires into the calling session; create_new_session_on_fire and persistent_session_id are mutually exclusive alternatives); the tool was never invoked.",
"api_writes": "3 — (1) git push -u origin claude/project-thread-1r3slx (git transport, a new remote branch, no force; not a REST write); (2) relay pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (HTTP 204, request fw-20261026T105222Z-0a44ad, run 40310765993 success) executed by objectstack-fleet[bot] as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (PR 26067, draft forced) + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26067/assignees (os-warren) + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26067/labels (skip-changeset); relay read-back: 8629 bytes sent, 8629 stored, identical; (3) this report comment via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs on the same relay (POST /dispatches → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/25991/comments). REST reads only, for the record: GET issues/25991, GET issues/25991/comments, GET pulls/26067, GET commits/c4503e6c/check-runs.",
"deviations": [
"Commit trailers are the model-free pair AGENTS.md and os-dev.md require (Claude-Session URL + Co-authored-by: Claude); the harness attribution reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By form was not used, per os-dev.md (the harness reminder yields to this file). Reported, not a deviation under AGENTS.md's own exemption text.",
"SKILL.md:71 drops the word 事件 from PR 订阅事件 to land at exactly 120 bytes while keeping 每项目一个 (the one-per-project guard matters more now that seats create the routine themselves). If the maintainer prefers the fuller wake-source wording, the alternative that fits is dropping 每项目 instead (117 bytes).",
"The relax-with-a-reason-on-the-seat-post rule lives in seat-post-protocol.md:66 only; project-forms.md:31 had no bytes for it under the 120-byte cap and carries 自建 + 默认每小时 alone.",
"No empty-branch probe push: the branch is the platform-designated seat-thread branch (os-dev.md rule 1 exempts it); the first push carried the commit.",
"pnpm install finished in 40 s (warm store), not the 22 min the order budgeted; run detached as ordered.",
"Worktree cleanup (rm -rf node_modules; git worktree remove) performed after this comment, per os-dev.md resource rule 4; the local branch claude/project-thread-1r3slx remains in the seat's clone, tracking the new remote branch."
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: the skills seat (this card's seat) · noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed — references/project-forms.md:32 lets the director and triage seats share one routine in a project; a session-bound patrol trigger wakes only the session that created it, so a shared routine now wakes one seat thread and the other needs its own trigger or a poke. Outside the card's four lines; not a class a/b/c finding (protocol text, no runtime).",
"carrier: the skills seat · noted, not filed — references/seat-post-protocol.md:61 (model pinned in the UI; a Routine inherits the environment default model) is Routine-seat text after line 58's split; a self-bound trigger keeps the bound session's tier (platform-readings.md 自绑 facts). Not a contradiction; left as is.",
"carrier: none · measured, nothing to route — the dispatch's unverified candidates references/execution-duties.md:158 and references/dispatch-runbook.md:122 contradict neither point (158: the project seat is woken by events and the patrol routine; 122: the poke-trigger spelling with persistent_session_id for message delivery, a different mechanism). references/lanes/director.md:7 (direct-connect director seat: no Routine or cron) is about the director seat and out of scope. platform-readings.md:445–452 already record both halves of the mechanism (new-session Routines carry no GitHub tools; self-bound triggers wake an existing session with tools loaded, orphaned if that session dies, delete and recreate) and needed no edit.",
"carrier: none · noted, not filed — the card's evidence of a working session-bound trigger (the ui seat's hourly trigger id) is a fleet colleague's statement; the wording rests on platform-readings.md and the create_trigger tool contract, not on that id."
]
}
ACCEPT → PR #26067 comment 6414537678 · domain:skills#2 · 2026-10-26T11:09Z
Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on c4503e6c) → PR #26067 comment 6414505625. Tier S: the seat readies and arms the PR through the relay on this record.
merged: true at 2026-10-26T13:34:05Z, merge commit edba9d23
origin/main
git log origin/main --grep=26067 answers edba9d23; SKILL.md:71 on origin/main now reads 「每项目一个自建自绑的巡查 routine,默认每小时」
merge queue
no gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-26067-* ref remains
Landing path: Tier S on the independent ## Contract review (PR comment 6414505625, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on c4503e6c) and the seat's ACCEPT (6414537678); readied and enqueued through the relay at 2026-10-26T13:05Z on the maintainer's word in the seat thread.
State: the card closed as completed through Fixes #25991; pm:dispatched removed in this act (the domain, area, type and priority labels stay). The body of #26067 closes no other card.
Follow-ups the record raised, not filed (pm-rule cards wait for the maintainer's naming): one platform-readings.md line for the create_trigger default-mode spelling once measured; project-forms.md:32 (director and triage sharing one routine) is latent under a self-bound trigger.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Triage: first grade —
tooling·priority:p2·domain:skills·area:devpath·pm:queue· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T08:59Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
domain:skills(.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**). It is a governed surface, so it lands at the contract-review tier by the maintainer's hand.send_later-chain ban.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 (second wave) · 2026-10-26T10:26Z
Session:
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn(seat; implementation by an in-session os-dev subagent)Account:
os-warren(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-1r3slx(the seat thread's harness push branch — the measured platform exception toclaude/issue-N-slug; recreated fromorigin/main0d83ee8fafter PR #26016 merged and the remote branch was deleted)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-25991in the seat's cloneDomain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(the 项目席唤醒 line only),references/seat-post-protocol.md(§ 座位 Routine 创建),references/seat-lifecycle.md(the 项目席巡查 routine line),references/project-forms.md(the 首次坐席 routine line). Line-neutral in every file: each sits at its ratchet ceiling with headroom 0 (319, 91, 96, 54), no ceiling raise. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
M,mode:subagent(in-session),model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(dispatch-gates --tier: MANDATORY, clause ① — the pm-dispatch main file),effort: xhigh. Same deviation frommode:threadas claim 6411570151 on #25791 (the coordinator channel caps at 2,000 characters; this container pushes only the seat thread's branch). Governed.claude/**: one independentCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERreview of record by an agent other than the drafter; the PR then stays draft for the maintainer's word (SKILL.md 红线 on governed PRs, read with the triage audit 6412135551 「lands … by the maintainer's hand」 — the stricter of the two rules).Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③, the maintainer's words quoted in the body)
Thread-read: 6412135551
Premise: holds — on
origin/main0d83ee8fthe four lines the card cites still read as quoted:SKILL.mdline 71,seat-post-protocol.mdlines 58–60,seat-lifecycle.mdline 96,project-forms.mdline 31Serial constraints cleared: none — no open PR among the 41 open touches
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**; no openpm:dispatchedcard in the laneGenerated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 25991, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26067", "session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn — this run's harness-stamped id (in-session os-dev subagent; the seat's id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Implemented the card's two points for the project-seat form only, in the four named files, line-neutral in every file (all four stay at their ratchet ceiling with headroom 0) and every rewritten line within the ratchet's 120-byte line cap. SKILL.md:71 now reads: project-seat wake = PR subscription + one self-created, self-bound (自绑) patrol routine per project, hourly by default; the send_later-chain ban stays and the old 无自绑 cron clause is gone. seat-post-protocol.md § 座位 Routine 创建 splits the Routine-seat form (maintainer, Routines UI) from the project-seat form (self-created, self-bound), scopes the zero-output warning to the new-session create_trigger form, scopes the UI-tunable tier/cron line to Routine seats, and carries the interval rule (hourly default; relaxing needs a reason and goes on the seat post) folded into the existing seat-post-is-current-state rule. seat-lifecycle.md:96 and project-forms.md:31 move 每 2–4 小时 to 默认每小时 (project-forms also says 自建). Draft PR opened through the fleet-write relay with skip-changeset and assignee os-warren; it stays draft for the maintainer's word (governed .claude/**).", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.md" ], "line_budget": { ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": "319 → 319 (ceiling 319, headroom 0); line 71 rewritten, 120 bytes", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md": "91 → 91 (ceiling 91, headroom 0); lines 58/60/65/66 rewritten, 119/119/110/118 bytes", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md": "96 → 96 (ceiling 96, headroom 0); line 96 rewritten, 118 bytes", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.md": "54 → 54 (ceiling 54, headroom 0); line 31 rewritten, 117 bytes", "method": "rewrite in place; no line joined, no re-wrap, no CEILINGS row moved; the one added rule (project-seat interval) was paid in place by tightening the wording of the line it joined (协议文本→协议, 其当前值→当前值, 才是现状→即现状), net 0 lines and under the byte cap" }, "tests": "No test suite applies: the diff touches four pm-dispatch markdown files and no package, so there is no package build closure, no pnpm test and no typecheck to run (os-dev local-verification scope ①/② empty by construction). Verification = the derived gate union below on head c4503e6c, plus a control-character scan of the four files (grep -naP for C0/DEL bytes: none). Ablation: n/a — no tested behaviour changed (docs/protocol text).", "gates": "LOCAL (head c4503e6c, derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, no paths; each exit code captured before any pipe; --ran reconciliation: 20 derived, 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN): check-closing-keyword-parity exit 0 (+ --self-test exit 0) · check-comment-mask-corpus exit 0 (18157 files, 0 disagree) · pm/check-governed-queue-guard --self-test exit 0 · pm/check-harness-current --self-test exit 0 · @objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions exit 0 (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET: unbuilt @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint; built both under os-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT command-exit 0, held 129 s, then clean: 23 record-scoped formula examples across 482 files) · check:agent-test-spelling 0 · check:cross-package-test-inputs 0 · check:doc-authoring 0 (428 files clean; 53 published skill files clean) · check:driver-memory-census 0 · check:gitlink-declared 0 · check:nul-bytes 0 · check:pm-expected-skips 0 · check:pm-governed-merges 0 · check:pm-governed-prose 0 (13 governed surfaces named, no others) · check:pm-skill-id-lint 0 (88 files clean) · check:pm-skill-ratchet 0 (SKILL.md is 319 lines, ceiling 319, headroom 0; seat-post-protocol.md 91/91; seat-lifecycle.md 96/96; project-forms.md 54/54; every line within 120 bytes) · check:refd-timer-probe 0 · check:skill-frame-sync 0 (the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent) · check:watch-hint-literal 0. Local-only reading (not a CI family): check:skill-frame-freshness exit 0 (frame current with origin/main). CI CHECK-RUNS on c4503e6c as read right after the PR opened (not waited on): Check Changeset success · Check PR Size success · The card this PR closes must claim this branch success · No other open PR may claim the same issue success · No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path success · Part-of PR must not also close its card success · Check Documentation Links success · filter success; in_progress: Lint · CI, release & engine gates; Lint · ESLint; Lint · PM dispatch-gates; Lint · docs & code guards; Lint · repo & tooling gates; Lint · scoped (query-options erasure, slot lookup & corpus, tooling self-tests); Type Check · consumer gates / debt ledger / source gates / workspace; Test Core; Dogfood Regression Gate; Governed Surface Queue Guard; Auto Label. Skipped by selector: Build Core, Build Docs, Build UI Deps, Build & E2E UI, Lint UI, Type Check UI, Test UI, Temporal Conformance, Dogfood Verify CLI, the opt-in harnesses.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — no mcp__github__* call of any kind. The only MCP-adjacent act was loading the mcp__claude-code-remote__create_trigger tool schema through ToolSearch to read its parameter contract (default mode fires into the calling session; create_new_session_on_fire and persistent_session_id are mutually exclusive alternatives); the tool was never invoked.", "api_writes": "3 — (1) git push -u origin claude/project-thread-1r3slx (git transport, a new remote branch, no force; not a REST write); (2) relay pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (HTTP 204, request fw-20261026T105222Z-0a44ad, run 40310765993 success) executed by objectstack-fleet[bot] as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (PR 26067, draft forced) + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26067/assignees (os-warren) + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26067/labels (skip-changeset); relay read-back: 8629 bytes sent, 8629 stored, identical; (3) this report comment via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs on the same relay (POST /dispatches → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/25991/comments). REST reads only, for the record: GET issues/25991, GET issues/25991/comments, GET pulls/26067, GET commits/c4503e6c/check-runs.", "deviations": [ "Commit trailers are the model-free pair AGENTS.md and os-dev.md require (Claude-Session URL + Co-authored-by: Claude); the harness attribution reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By form was not used, per os-dev.md (the harness reminder yields to this file). Reported, not a deviation under AGENTS.md's own exemption text.", "SKILL.md:71 drops the word 事件 from PR 订阅事件 to land at exactly 120 bytes while keeping 每项目一个 (the one-per-project guard matters more now that seats create the routine themselves). If the maintainer prefers the fuller wake-source wording, the alternative that fits is dropping 每项目 instead (117 bytes).", "The relax-with-a-reason-on-the-seat-post rule lives in seat-post-protocol.md:66 only; project-forms.md:31 had no bytes for it under the 120-byte cap and carries 自建 + 默认每小时 alone.", "No empty-branch probe push: the branch is the platform-designated seat-thread branch (os-dev.md rule 1 exempts it); the first push carried the commit.", "pnpm install finished in 40 s (warm store), not the 22 min the order budgeted; run detached as ordered.", "Worktree cleanup (rm -rf node_modules; git worktree remove) performed after this comment, per os-dev.md resource rule 4; the local branch claude/project-thread-1r3slx remains in the seat's clone, tracking the new remote branch." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: the skills seat (this card's seat) · noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed — references/project-forms.md:32 lets the director and triage seats share one routine in a project; a session-bound patrol trigger wakes only the session that created it, so a shared routine now wakes one seat thread and the other needs its own trigger or a poke. Outside the card's four lines; not a class a/b/c finding (protocol text, no runtime).", "carrier: the skills seat · noted, not filed — references/seat-post-protocol.md:61 (model pinned in the UI; a Routine inherits the environment default model) is Routine-seat text after line 58's split; a self-bound trigger keeps the bound session's tier (platform-readings.md 自绑 facts). Not a contradiction; left as is.", "carrier: none · measured, nothing to route — the dispatch's unverified candidates references/execution-duties.md:158 and references/dispatch-runbook.md:122 contradict neither point (158: the project seat is woken by events and the patrol routine; 122: the poke-trigger spelling with persistent_session_id for message delivery, a different mechanism). references/lanes/director.md:7 (direct-connect director seat: no Routine or cron) is about the director seat and out of scope. platform-readings.md:445–452 already record both halves of the mechanism (new-session Routines carry no GitHub tools; self-bound triggers wake an existing session with tools loaded, orphaned if that session dies, delete and recreate) and needed no edit.", "carrier: none · noted, not filed — the card's evidence of a working session-bound trigger (the ui seat's hourly trigger id) is a fleet colleague's statement; the wording rests on platform-readings.md and the create_trigger tool contract, not on that id." ] }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #26067 comment 6414537678 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-26T11:09ZContract review (
CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS onc4503e6c) → PR #26067 comment 6414505625. Tier S: the seat readies and arms the PR through the relay on this record.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Landed ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-26T13:37Zmerged: trueat 2026-10-26T13:34:05Z, merge commitedba9d23origin/maingit log origin/main --grep=26067answersedba9d23;SKILL.md:71onorigin/mainnow reads 「每项目一个自建自绑的巡查 routine,默认每小时」gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-26067-*ref remainsLanding path: Tier S on the independent
## Contract review(PR comment 6414505625,CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS onc4503e6c) and the seat's ACCEPT (6414537678); readied and enqueued through the relay at 2026-10-26T13:05Z on the maintainer's word in the seat thread.State: the card closed as
completedthroughFixes #25991;pm:dispatchedremoved in this act (the domain, area, type and priority labels stay). The body of #26067 closes no other card.Follow-ups the record raised, not filed (pm-rule cards wait for the maintainer's naming): one
platform-readings.mdline for thecreate_triggerdefault-mode spelling once measured;project-forms.md:32(director and triage sharing one routine) is latent under a self-bound trigger.Generated by Claude Code