Repository navigation
Flow screens: a flat screen has no file field type, so a multi-step wizard must create the record before its last step to collect a file — and closing the screen dialog leaves the run paused and the half-written record behind #25801
Description
Blocked-by: #25692
Filing class: ③ capability gap, filed at destination by the hotclm director seat under the maintainer's ruling on objectstack-ai/hotclm#99 item 4 (batch 5, letter B, 2026-10-25). Unlabelled, no assignee; the objectstack seat triages.
Symptom (hotclm, @objectstack/* 18.1.0 and 17.7.0)
hotclm's intake wizard (F1, contract-intake.flow.ts) asks three screens of questions and then needs the first version file for a contract type that carries no template. A flat screen node cannot collect a file, so the flow creates the clm_contract at create_contract and then opens an object-form screen on clm_contract_version (whose required contract lookup must point at an existing row) to upload it. A requester who closes the dialog at that point leaves a version-less draft behind (NDA-2026-0021 in the browser pass) that they cannot delete (DELETE → 403; the app grants requesters RCU). Reordering the flow cannot fix it: the write has to precede the only widget that can take the file.
What the platform does today (read on main, 2026-10-25)
ScreenFieldConfigSchema.typeis an open string (packages/spec/src/automation/builtin-node-config.zod.ts:897), but the console's flat-screen renderer (objectui packages/app-shell/src/views/ScreenView.tsx:356-421) handleslookup(withreference),boolean/checkbox,textarea/markdown, and mapsnumber/currency/email/dateto an<input>; everything else falls to a text input. There is no file control, andresumehas no file-bag contract.- Closing the screen dialog sends no request:
FlowRunner.tsx:624onOpenChangecallsonCloseonly;cancelRunis never called, so the run stayspausedand whatever the flow wrote before the screen stays written.
Seat analysis with the measurement: objectstack-ai/hotclm#99 (comment).
Expected capability
- A
type: 'file'screen field on a flat screen: the console renders the platform file widget, the file is stored through the normal file service, andresumereceives a file reference the next node can write into afilefield (hotclm would write it intoclm_contract_version.file). - Closing a paused run's screen dialog cancels the run (or offers to), so a wizard that is authored "ask everything, write at the end" leaves nothing behind when abandoned.
With (1) the app can move every write after the last screen, per its design; (2) closes the remaining abandonment path for flows that must write mid-way.
Dedupe
Searched objectstack issues for flow screen file upload field / flat screen cannot collect a file / cancel run on dialog close: no card asks for a file-typed screen field or for cancel-on-close.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 25, 2026
Triage: first grade —
enhancement·priority:p1·domain:spec·area:workflow·pm:queue· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-25T13:55Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
filefield type on a flatscreen, so a wizard collects the file before the record exists./storage/uploadanswers 404 to the guest principal, so a required attachment field is impossible on a public form #25572).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Blocked-by: #25692
Parked by domain:spec seat 2 at the round-1 dispatch: a
filefield on a flow screen needs the upload-then-claim lifecycle in service-storage, which is being reworked under #25692 (PR #25951, open, accepted on the server lane). Building against the old lifecycle would collide with that rework. The card goes back topm:queuewhen #25692 closes; nothing else about the card changes.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Unlock scan: unlocked →
pm:queue· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T07:55Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
completed, with its fix PR fix(storage)!: a record write claims or copies only a file its caller may read #25951 merged at 06:40Z (3761710927). The 07:04Z parking comment read the PR as still open, so the card was parked about 25 min after its blocker had already landed. The upload-then-claim lifecycle this card builds on is the reworked one onmain. Grade unchanged (p1 ·domain:spec).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-10-26T12:12Z
Session:
session_01HbmCEPMBmMLU3VZCEzfec7(seat 4; the card thread issession_0121LS2jqNju6opaDpdcn7ht, which writes no claim of its own)Account:
zhuangjianguoBranch:
claude/project-thread-h2ifka(the platform assigns the card thread's branch, and the thread can push only that branch. Written as measured, instead ofclaude/issue-25801-<slug>.)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-25801Domain:
domain:specSeat:
domain:spec#4(seat post #18917; 由 zhuangjianguo 账户的项目负责)File surface:
packages/spec/src/automation/builtin-node-config.zod.ts(ScreenFieldConfigSchema: afilescreen-field type), the flowresumecontract and its runtime reader,ui/packages/app-shell/src/views/ScreenView.tsx(the file widget),ui/packages/app-shell/src/views/FlowRunner.tsx(closing a paused run's dialog cancels it, or offers to), the storage unattached-then-claimed path it needs, liveness rows and generated references, tests, and one changeset. If measurement puts the producer elsewhere, fix it there and say so. Stop on a breach and explain it in the report.Container & model:
M/L,mode:thread,model: TIER_DEFAULT — dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate,effort: xhigh (p1)Clause-②: yes
Metadata-protocol: added
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6411014103
Premise: holds (at
main0a694821:ScreenFieldConfigSchemaatbuiltin-node-config.zod.ts:841;ScreenView.tsxhas no file branch;FlowRunner.tsx:624onOpenChangecallsonCloseonly. The blocker #25692 is closed, with PR #25951 merged at 06:40Z.)Ruling-ref: hotclm#99 item 4, batch 5, letter B (maintainer, 2026-10-25); triage shape check 6398525499 (unattached-then-claimed upload under ADR-0104; the anonymous door stays file-free, ruling C on #25572)
Serial constraints cleared:
seat 2 PR #26011 (#25800) edits ui/packages/app-shell/src/utils/flowResponse.ts — merge main after it lands if the same files are touched; sibling #25779 (seat 4) shares the service-storage claim lifecycle — the first PR to open owns a shared file.Resume-from: none
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 25801, "status": "needs_decision", "branch": "claude/project-thread-h2ifka", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26134", "head": "1e9a122b723516590bdb895a23913d6ef296596c", "session": "session_0121LS2jqNju6opaDpdcn7ht", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Part (1) is done in draft PR #26134 (Part of #25801): a flat screen field declared type 'file' renders the platform FileField in the console dialog, uploads through the console UploadProvider (an unowned sys_file), holds Submit labelled 'Uploading…' until the upload settles, and resumes with the bare file id (screenResumeValues reduces an expanded value with fileIdOf). The engine reads 'file' as the second closed value domain beside 'number': a non-id value (URL, expanded read form, list, number) is refused 400 INVALID_SCREEN_INPUT / invalid_type with nothing written and the pause kept; the id is judged by the spec's isFileIdToken, the claim path's own predicate. A create_record after the screen writes the id into the record's file field, and that write claims the file (proven end to end in a new dogfood test driven by a plain member). Part (2), closing a paused run's dialog, is a real product fork and is returned as needs_decision without code: the only cancel verb is operator-only (#13953) and a cancel undoes no earlier writes.", "tests": "service-automation: screen-input-file-field.test.ts (6 tests) and builtin/screen-file-field-resume.test.ts (3 tests); with screen-input-contract.test.ts at the head: Test Files 3 passed (3), Tests 19 passed (19); ablation deleting the 'file' row of SCREEN_FIELD_VALUE_DOMAINS turned 4 red, restored to HEAD blob 753e36a8. app-shell: FlowRunner.fileField-25801.test.tsx Tests 7 passed (7); with FlowRunner.bounds-9248 and ActionParamDialog.uploading Test Files 3 passed (3), Tests 16 passed (16). Ablations via scripts/ablation-replace.mjs, each restored with git diff HEAD empty: disabled gate removed to 1 failed | 6 passed (toBeDisabled); resumeWith(values) to 1 failed (prefilled expanded value); if (kind === 'file') to if (false) to 4 failed | 3 passed. A first attempt at the disabled mutation split its anchor on '||' and left a file that did not parse ('no tests'); that reading is void and was re-run. Dogfood: flow-screen-file-intake.dogfood.test.ts Test Files 1 passed (1), Tests 4 passed (4). Type-check: @object-ui/app-shell type-check, @objectstack/service-automation typecheck, @objectstack/dogfood typecheck, exit 0 each.", "gates": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack at 1e9a122b: 117 commands, each run with its exit code captured before any pipe; --ran: '117 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 116 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)'. 116 exited 0, including check-adr-0087-registration, check-changeset-no-major, check:api-surface, check:authorable-surface, check:generated, check:docs, check:liveness, check:nul-bytes and check:type-check-debt (under the verify lock: '26 raw tsc error(s) total, none above its recorded number'). NOT MEASURED: check:dual-build-cjs-loads (exit 3, needs a full workspace pnpm build), left to CI. PR #26134 check runs at the time of this report: every completed run is success (Check Changeset, Lint & Repo Gates, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Type Check · debt ledger / consumer gates / source gates, Spec property liveness, Build Core, Build UI Deps, Lint UI, Build & E2E UI, Test Core 1, 2, 6, 8, Test UI 6, 7, 10, 15, 16, the Part-of and single-writer guards); Test Core 3, 4, 5, 7, the remaining Test UI shards, Type Check UI and Type Check · workspace were still in progress.", "dogfood_battery": "1e9a122b · os-verify-lock: VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 988s · Test Files 297 passed | 3 skipped (300) · Tests 2527 passed | 18 skipped (2545) · no failures. Run although the claim's lines carry no (narrowing) arm, because of the deviation below.", "line_budget": "968 changed lines (+920 / -48, 13 files, generated docs included) against the 3000-line human-merge threshold: under. Source: spec 2 files, service-automation 1, app-shell 2; the rest is tests, the dogfood fixture, regenerated docs and the changeset.", "files_changed": [ ".changeset/25801-flow-screen-file-field.md", "content/docs/references/automation/builtin-node-config.mdx", "packages/spec/src/automation/builtin-node-config.zod.ts", "packages/spec/src/contracts/automation-service.ts", "packages/services/service-automation/src/screen-input-contract.ts", "packages/services/service-automation/src/screen-input-contract.test.ts", "packages/services/service-automation/src/screen-input-file-field.test.ts", "packages/services/service-automation/src/builtin/screen-file-field-resume.test.ts", "ui/packages/app-shell/src/views/ScreenView.tsx", "ui/packages/app-shell/src/views/FlowRunner.tsx", "ui/packages/app-shell/src/views/__tests__/FlowRunner.fileField-25801.test.tsx", "packages/qa/dogfood/test/fixtures/flow-screen-file-fixture.ts", "packages/qa/dogfood/test/flow-screen-file-intake.dogfood.test.ts" ], "deviations": [ "Declaration lines: copied verbatim from the claim (Clause-②: yes, Metadata-protocol: added) as os-dev requires. Measured, the change reads as Clause-②: yes (narrowing) and Metadata-protocol: semantic: the resume now refuses values it used to accept for a field declared type 'file', and an already-accepted type value changes meaning from a text input to an upload. Zero producers of a type 'file' screen field in examples or packages at main 0a694821 (the type 'file' hits are action params). If the seat amends the claim, the PR title takes '!', the changeset's two lines change and it takes an ADR-0087 marker (likely not-required (no-migration-prescription)); the full dogfood above already covers this head. The PR body states this in its Acceptance notes.", "File surface: the claim named the storage unattached-then-claimed path; no service-storage change was needed, since the claim lifecycle #25951 landed is used unchanged. Sibling #25779 shares that file family; this PR does not touch it. FlowRunner.tsx is edited for part (1) (the uploading scope and the id reduction), not for part (2). ui/packages/app-shell/src/utils/flowResponse.ts (PR #26011) is not touched.", "PR closing keyword: Part of #25801, because part (2) is left to the decision below.", "A first push was refused by the pre-push check:commit-card-trailers hook (a 'Part of' line in a commit message); the unpublished commit was reworded and pushed, no override used.", "CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review is owed before the queue (order); not requested by this thread." ], "mcp_calls": "7 — all reads: mcp__github__issue_read get_comments x3, issue_read get x2, pull_request_read get x1 (PR #26011 body as a format reference), pull_request_read get_check_runs x1. No MCP write tool.", "api_writes": "2 — (1) fleet-write relay pr_create, request fw-20261026T132703Z-61aa43, run 40330674697 success: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft #26134) and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26134/assignees (zhuangjianguo), body read back byte-identical (10067 bytes); (2) this os-dev-report comment via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs on issue 25801. git push is not counted.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "Part (2): when a user closes a paused run's screen dialog, should the console cancel the run, offer to, or leave it paused?", "context": "Part (2): closing a paused run's screen dialog cancels the run, or offers to.\n\nMeasured facts at main 0a694821 and this head:\n- The console dialog's close calls onClose only (FlowRunner onOpenChange). The run stays paused in sys_automation_run.\n- The only cancel verb is POST /automation/:name/runs/:runId/cancel, an operator verb (#13953, runtime automation.ts isRunLifecycleWrite): \"a run belongs to the environment rather than to a user\". A requester gets 403 PERMISSION_DENIED and is pointed at resume.\n- A cancel ends the run; it does not undo writes made by nodes before the screen.\n- The end-user console has no list of the user's paused runs to re-enter (FlowRunsPanel is the Studio author's history), so a closed wizard is not resumable from the console today.\n- In-repo producers: the one multi-screen wizard (examples/app-crm convert-lead) writes only after its last screen (update_lead), so closing it mid-way writes nothing. With part (1), a file-collecting wizard can take the same shape.\n\nOptions:\nA. Cancel silently on close. Needs a new starter-scoped \"abandon\" verb for screen pauses (or the cancel gate widened to the run's starter), and the console calls it on close.\nB. Offer on close: the same starter-scoped verb, and the console shows a confirm (Discard this run / Keep it paused).\nC. No change now. Close leaves the run paused, as today; part (1) lets wizards write after their last screen, so a closed dialog leaves no half-written record.\nD. Expire abandoned screen pauses server-side after a TTL.\n\nFour axes:\n- Real business need: the measured harm of a closed dialog was a half-written record, and A/B do not cure it (cancel undoes nothing); part (1) does, by letting the write move after the last screen. What remains is a paused row the user never sees again. No measured producer or deployment reads or suffers from that row today.\n- Long-term soundness: run-lifecycle authority is deliberately operator-only (#13953). A and B add a second authority rule (the starter may end their own screen pause), which is a contract change in its own right and wants its own ruling. D adds a sweeper subsystem. C adds nothing and closes no door.\n- AI-error resistance: none of the options changes what an author writes, so the metadata contract is unaffected. A turns an accidental Esc or outside-click into an irreversible end of the run, behind no confirmation, which is the shape most likely to surprise; B makes it explicit; C has no new surface.\n- Startup focus: C costs nothing; A and B cost a new server verb, its authority rule, tests and console UI; D costs a lifecycle sweeper. Expansion defaults to no.\n\nRecommendation: C now. If the maintainer wants abandonment, B over A, built on a starter-scoped abandon verb ruled separately, never by widening the operator cancel gate in passing.\n", "options": [ "A: cancel silently on close, on a new starter-scoped abandon verb", "B: offer on close (Discard this run / Keep it paused), on the same verb", "C: no change now; closing leaves the run paused, and part (1) lets wizards write after their last screen", "D: expire abandoned screen pauses server-side after a TTL" ], "recommendation": "C now: the measured harm (a half-written record) is cured by part (1) and not by a cancel, run lifecycle stays operator-only per #13953, nothing new is built. If the maintainer wants abandonment, B over A, on a starter-scoped verb ruled separately, never by widening the operator cancel gate in passing." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: none · noted, not filed — the console lowercases a screen field's type before choosing a widget while the engine matches the value domain exactly, so type 'File' gets the upload widget and no server check; pre-existing for 'number'. Dedupe words: screen field type case, value domain, validateScreenInputs, ScreenFieldInput.", "carrier: none · noted, not filed — a screen field has no multiple, accept or maxSize key, so one file per field and no widget-side limits; the target file field's constraints still refuse at the claiming write. Adding them is a widening. Dedupe words: screen file multiple, screen field accept maxSize.", "carrier: none · noted, not filed — a runAs 'system' screen flow writes a user-supplied file id without a read check (the #25951 posture for system writes); not new, a type 'text' screen value could already be written into a file field. Stated in the spec docblock and changeset." ] }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Claim amendment — PM loop round 1, seat
domain:spec#4, sessionsession_01HbmCEPMBmMLU3VZCEzfec7, 2026-10-26T13:50Z.The dev's measurement on PR #26134 corrects this seat's claim 6415695572, and the seat takes the correction:
Clause-②: yes (narrowing)
Metadata-protocol: semantic
Why: the resume door now refuses values it accepted for a screen field declared
type: 'file'(a URL, the expanded read form, any non-id string), so an accept set narrows. What an author can write does not change (typestays an open string), but the meaning of the already-accepted value'file'does, from a text input to an upload whose resume admits a file id only. AGENTS.md Post-Task Checklist step 3 reads that assemantic, and(narrowing)makes the change BREAKING.Consequences for PR #26134: the title takes
!; the changeset and the PR body carry the two lines above and exactly one ADR-0087 disposition marker; the fulldogfood_batteryis reported pinned to the PR head before the queue; and aCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERcontract review is owed before landing (published schema face and a declared narrowing).The card's second half (closing a paused run's dialog) is a product decision and now lives on #26149 with
needs-user-decision. PR #26134 staysPart of #25801.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Duplicate of 6417676103, posted twice by this seat's own retry. Read that comment; this one carries nothing.
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 25801, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-h2ifka", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26134", "head": "9c17572c2da999a01edf567e4a95bab87b771d1d", "session": "session_0121LS2jqNju6opaDpdcn7ht", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Rework after the seat's review (declaration lines only), on the same branch. The changeset now carries Clause-②: yes (narrowing) and Metadata-protocol: semantic as line-initial declarations (claim amended in comment 6417676103), a BREAKING note with an explicit FROM/TO fix for a caller that resumes the run itself, and exactly one ADR-0087 marker, not-required (no-migration-prescription); the level stays minor on all three packages. One more commit since the first report: the CI docs-drift check flagged content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (it names validateScreenInputs), so the flows guide gained a short 'A file field' section. No code moved since 1e9a122b. Part (2) is the maintainer's decision card #26149 and is no longer this thread's.", "tests": "No code moved since the first report (git diff --stat 1e9a122b..9c17572c: .changeset/25801-flow-screen-file-field.md and content/docs/automation/flows.mdx only), so the unit, console, dogfood and ablation readings in comment 6417535261 stand at this head.", "gates": "check-adr-0087-registration --base origin/main: exit 0, '.changeset/25801-flow-screen-file-field.md [BREAKING+clause-②-narrowing] not-required (no-migration-prescription)'. check-changeset-no-major --base origin/main: exit 0. Dispatch-gates union re-derived at 9c17572c (117 commands) after rebuilding the dogfood, app-shell and client-react closures in a fresh worktree; each run with its exit code captured before any pipe; --ran: '117 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 116 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)'. NOT MEASURED: check:dual-build-cjs-loads (exit 3, needs a full workspace pnpm build), left to CI. check:type-check-debt under the lock: '26 raw tsc error(s) total, none above its recorded number'. Before the changeset commit, the 28 docs families on the flows.mdx edit also ran green. PR check runs at report time: all 63 listed are success or skipped, none failed or pending.", "dogfood_battery": "Not re-run: the diff from 1e9a122b to 9c17572c is a changeset and a docs page, no code. The battery at 1e9a122b stands: os-verify-lock VERDICT command-exit 0, held 988s, Test Files 297 passed | 3 skipped (300), Tests 2527 passed | 18 skipped (2545).", "adr_0087_disposition": "not-required (no-migration-prescription). Why: no spec key, authorable spelling, object definition, stored row or stored shape is added, removed, renamed or re-shaped; ScreenFieldConfigSchema.type stays an open string, so every flow that parsed before still parses. What narrows is the resume door's acceptance for a field already declared type 'file', and the remedy is a change in what a caller posts (the minted sys_file id), never a rewrite of package source or a stored row, so objectstack migrate meta has nothing to rewrite. The other categories are closed on facts: the three packages publish (not unpublished); no ADR-0087 id is touched (not registered / already-registered); no runtime interface, type or export is removed or narrowed (not runtime-interface-only / type-surface-only / runtime-export-retired).", "pr_title_and_body": "Not written by this thread: os-dev.md rule 2 says the dev writes the PR body once, at pr_create, and a later change is named in the report for the seat to write. Ready to apply through issue_patch on #26134: title 'feat(spec,automation,app-shell)!: a flow screen field typed `file` collects an upload, and the run resumes with the uploaded file's id'; body in the project folder at issue-25801/pr-26134-body-9c17572c.md. It changes the two line-initial declarations to yes (narrowing) / semantic, replaces the declaration-lines acceptance note with the BREAKING note and the ADR-0087 disposition, names the flows guide section, states the battery result, and moves the gate head to 9c17572c. The 'Part of #25801' line is kept.", "line_budget": "1007 changed lines vs merge base (+959 / -48, 14 files, generated docs included) against the 3000-line human-merge threshold: under.", "files_changed_since_last_report": [ ".changeset/25801-flow-screen-file-field.md", "content/docs/automation/flows.mdx" ], "deviations": [ "PR title and body are handed to the seat rather than patched here (os-dev.md rule 2); the seat's message asked for both.", "The flows guide section is outside the claim's named file surface; it answers the CI docs-drift comment on #26134 and is docs only." ], "mcp_calls": "8 in total, all reads: issue_read get_comments x3, issue_read get x2, pull_request_read get x1, pull_request_read get_check_runs x2. No MCP write tool.", "api_writes": "3 in total: the pr_create relay write and the first os-dev-report comment (both listed in 6417535261), and this comment via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs. git push is not counted.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "Unchanged from comment 6417535261: type-case asymmetry, one file per screen field, the runAs 'system' claim posture; each noted, not filed." ] }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Blocked-by: #26149
Landing — seat
domain:spec#4, sessionsession_01HbmCEPMBmMLU3VZCEzfec7, 2026-10-26T15:16Z.merged: true, merged at 15:16:10Z, merge commit6d9d3ef8origin/main6d9d3ef8 feat(spec,automation,app-shell)!: … (#26134)is presentThe card's first half has landed: a flow screen field typed
filecollects an upload. The second half, closing a paused run's dialog, waits on the maintainer's ruling on #26149. The card moves frompm:dispatchedtopm:blockedand stays open until that ruling. When #26149 is decided, this card is re-queued for the chosen option, or it is closed if the ruling is C.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Note from the director seat · 2026-10-26T17:35Z · ruling on #26149 (batch #401 item 1, maintainer 「同意」 on letter B, staged)
The second half of this card (closing a paused run's screen dialog abandons the run, or offers to) is ruled on #26149: direction B — the starter may abandon after a confirm — but not built now, since PR #26134 (merged) removes the measured pull; #26149 is closed
not_plannedas the record and reopens when a screen flow that must write mid-run exists. This card closes on #26134 asPart of→ the first half, with that pointer; the spec seat's act.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Half-state closed:
completedon #26134 · triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T17:52Z⛔ Not a claim.
filecollects an upload, and the run resumes with the uploaded file's id #26134 (6d9d3ef8): a flow screen field typedfilecollects an upload.not_plannedas the record. It reopens when a screen flow that must write mid-run exists (director note, 17:35Z: "this card closes on feat(spec,automation,app-shell)!: a flow screen field typedfilecollects an upload, and the run resumes with the uploaded file's id #26134").Blocked-by: #26149no longer waits on anything, and the card closescompletedwithpm:blockedremoved.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Release:
session_01HbmCEPMBmMLU3VZCEzfec7/ card threadsession_0121LS2jqNju6opaDpdcn7ht(zhuangjianguo,domain:spec#4, claim6415695572), seat clock-out 2026-10-27.Resume-from: none
Correction note from seat 4: this card was already closed
completedby the triage seat in 6423394187, following the #26149 ruling (B, staged, closednot_plannedas the record). This release closes seat 4's claim and clears the assignee. Nothing stays blocked: the second half reopens through #26149 when a real mid-run-writing screen flow appears.