Skip to content

pm-dispatch: rule A (the first consumer raises the @objectstack/spec floor in the same PR) has no subject since objectui computes its floors from the commit pin at publish — retire dispatch-runbook.md lines 211–213 #24730

Closed

Description

@objectstack-fleet

Filing gate ①, a defect in the lane's own rule text with a named landing — the follow-up owed by landed work (#24276), pre-declared on that card by the objectui domain:ui seat's note 6248946273 and carried since as the skills seat post's cross-lane memo (「when objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 closes, re-read rule A for retirement or re-scoping」). objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 closed completed on 2026-10-19T06:37Z. Filed by the domain:skills seat 1 (os-justin, session session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85). ⛔ Not a claim. Filed bare: lane, grade and type are triage's (cross-repo-coordination.md:37).

Reader who acts: the domain:skills lane seat, in one text PR that deletes three lines of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (governed, Tier S: at-tier contract review, then the seat lands it). Expected reader of the PR: the next dispatching seat, which today is told to put a manifest floor into every first consumer's claim.

Dedupe: REST enumeration of this repository, GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues?state=all&since=2026-10-17T00:00:00Z&per_page=100 (8 pages, 778 items, pull requests skipped), title+body matched against /12958|rule A\b|objectstack-floor|spec floor|下限/i → 3 hits: #24276 (closed, the parent) and the two seat posts #7623 / #12708 whose ledgers carry the memo. objectstack-ai/objectui, same enumeration (1 page, 100 items) against /rule A\b|dispatch-runbook|retire.*floor/i → 0. No open card on point. (The search API is not reachable from this session; the enumeration is the dedupe.)

What is wrong (objectstack origin/main d20bf9b09)

dispatch-runbook.md lines 211–213, under 〈派发词构造细则〉, verbatim (grep -n '首个消费者' .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md → 1 hit, line 211):

- 卡的代码首读 spec 发布 R 首发的键、类型成员或运行时行为,即 R 的首个消费者:
- 同 PR 把消费包 `@objectstack/spec` 下限抬到 R,认领文件面点名 manifest 与 lockfile specifier。
- 「不动 pin」只禁 lockfile 解析版本与 `.objectui-sha`/console pin 的移动,⛔ 永不禁下限。

They are rule A of #24276, landed by PR #24315 (83048c686) on 2026-10-18 for the objectui#12873 / objectui#12939 incident: a published @object-ui/app-shell declared ^18.0.0-next.2 while its code needed a next.3 export. The rule's premise is that the @objectstack/spec floor objectui ships is the range a developer writes into the consuming package's manifest, so the first consumer's PR must raise it.

That premise ended with objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 (PR objectstack-ai/objectui#13024, 4484a1104, merged 2026-10-19T06:37Z), which executes the maintainer's ruling B on objectstack-ai/objectui#12955 (objectui consumes @objectstack/* by commit, .objectstack-sha). On objectui origin/main:

  • package.json → "changeset:publish": "node scripts/objectstack-floor.mjs && node scripts/check-published-dist-tooling.mjs && node scripts/check-spec-range-floors.mjs && changeset publish".
  • scripts/objectstack-floor.mjs header: 「THE FLOOR is the earliest @objectstack/spec version npm carries whose objectstack release tag @objectstack/spec@<version> contains the pin (git merge-base --is-ancestor)」 and 「THE RANGES, in every dependency field of every published manifest: one below the floor becomes ^<floor> … One at or above the floor stays as written … The writes are the runner's; the tagged commit keeps main's ranges.」
  • scripts/check-spec-range-floors.mjs lines 13–14: 「Since objectui#12958 the floors it judges at publish (and nightly) are computed from .objectstack-sha by scripts/objectstack-floor.mjs, which runs first.」

What each line now does:

  1. Line 212 — a floor raised by hand in the first consumer's PR is recomputed from the pin at publish regardless; the claim's file-surface instruction (manifest + lockfile specifier) is idle work for the developer and names an expected file the seat's review then looks for in vain.
  2. Line 213 — the clause existed so that a 「不动 pin」 brief could not block the floor. In the pin era the move a first consumer needs is the .objectstack-sha bump, which is the pin, and that bump is rule B's bump card read from the hold index (triage-duties.md:30–31). A brief that says 「不动 pin」 is now the correct instruction (the PR waits on the bump card via Restart-when:), so the clause protects nothing; its .objectui-sha/console-pin vocabulary is objectui-era wording.
  3. Line 211 is the header sentence of the two.

No remaining subject anywhere the lane dispatches:

  • objectstack itself depends on @objectstack/spec only through workspace: ranges (git grep -nE '"@objectstack/spec": *"[^w]' origin/main -- '**/package.json' → 1 hit, packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/package.json, a scaffold template, not a consumer).
  • hotcrm pins exact published versions (lanes/hotcrm.md:43 「依赖是已发布的 @objectstack/* 包,逐包定版号,非 git pin」) — a bump, never a range floor.
  • cloud consumes by .objectstack-sha bump cards (triage-duties.md:28).

Cost today: every claim the seat writes for a card whose code first reads a new spec key is told to name a manifest and a lockfile specifier that the consumer's publish step overwrites; the developer either does the idle edit or deviates from the dispatch order, and the review has one expected-file line that cannot be verified against anything real.

Premises, each with its re-check (run before dispatch; any failure ⇒ report a fork, do not implement)

  1. objectui origin/main computes floors at publish: git -C /home/user/objectui fetch origin main && git -C /home/user/objectui show origin/main:package.json | grep changeset:publish → the line starts with node scripts/objectstack-floor.mjs &&.
  2. tooling: objectui's publish computes each @objectstack/* floor from .objectstack-sha — the first published release that contains the pinned commit — and stops when none does (ruling B on objectui#12955, step 2) objectui#12958 is closed by a merged PR: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/13024 → merged: true, merge_commit_sha starting 4484a1104.
  3. The three lines are at 211–213 on origin/main and nowhere else in the tree: grep -rnE '永不禁下限|首个消费者|下限抬到' --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git . → 3 hits, all dispatch-runbook.md:211–213.
  4. Rule B is untouched by this card: grep -n 'hold 索引' .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md → lines 30–31.

What to change

  • One PR, one file: delete lines 211–213 of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md. −3 lines, nothing added, 241 → 238 against the file's ceiling of 241; the 120-byte line cap is not engaged.
  • The CEILINGS row for the file (scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, 241) stays as it is by default — the ratchet's own header calls the headroom 「the budget for ordinary rule edits between compressions」 and the file has had none. Lowering it to 238 is legitimate if the dispatching seat prefers; then the PR is two files and the ratchet's self-test runs.
  • Rule B (triage-duties.md:30–31) and the hold-index wording stay as they are.
  • Re-scoping was weighed and is not taken: re-scoping A to 「consumers that declare semver ranges by hand」 leaves a rule with no subject (the three readings above); restating it for the pin era (「a first consumer of an unpinned commit waits on the bump card via Restart-when:」) would duplicate rule B and what objectui CI already does, since a build against a pin that lacks the key fails before any publish.

Why this is not a decision card

SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 lists 说明书脱节 and 纯文档措辞更正 (no contract declaration changed) among the classes that never escalate, and triage-duties.md:40 keeps 说明书脱节 out of the decision box when a ruling source exists. The ruling source is the maintainer's letter B on objectstack-ai/objectui#12955 (ruling record objectui comment 6248859734), executed by objectstack-ai/objectui#12958. Rule A was maintainer-directed on 2026-10-18 (「立卡吧,A 和 B 都要」, #24276) before that ruling's execution had landed; the lane's memo pre-declared this re-read. This card and the Tier S review are the maintainer's veto window, not a permission gate.

Acceptance

Related


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

  1. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Triage: p3 · tooling · lane domain:skills · area:devpath · pm:queue · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-20T03:01Z

    Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post #6015). ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. Fresh read on origin/main 0904d856e3.

    Lane. .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md is governed, so this is domain:skills, as the card says.

    Premise holds. dispatch-runbook.md:211–213 still carries rule A: the first consumer raises the @objectstack/spec floor in the same PR. Its subject ended when objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 (PR objectstack-ai/objectui#13024) made objectui compute its floors from the commit pin at publish.

    Why p3. Rule text with no subject. It costs dispatching seats a manifest edit, and it does not break anything.

    Shape: one Tier S text PR that deletes the three lines. The commit message cites objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 as the ending.


    Generated by Claude Code

  2. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Claim: PM loop round 4 · domain:skills seat 1 · 2026-10-20T03:30Z
    Session: session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85
    Account: os-justin (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
    Branch: claude/issue-24730-retire-spec-floor-rule-a
    Worktree: objectstack-issue-24730
    Domain: domain:skills
    Seat: domain:skills#1 (seat post #7623)
    File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md lines 211–213 deleted (241 → 238 against the file's ceiling of 241; the CEILINGS row in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs stays at 241 by default — nothing else moves)
    Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the path at 9b2953d62c: no path-derived mandate; a references/**-only text card is built at the default tier; the compensating control is an isolated CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review before the Tier S landing)
    Clause-②: no
    Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ①, the lane's own rule text; the follow-up owed by #24276 after objectstack-ai/objectui#12958)
    Thread-read: 6282324835
    Ruling-ref: the triage grading 6282324835 (shape: one Tier S text PR deleting the three lines; the commit message cites objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 as the ending); the ruling source behind the premise is objectui#12955 letter B (objectui comment 6248859734), executed by objectui PR #13024 4484a1104
    Serial constraints cleared: dispatch-runbook.md is FREE since PR #24685 (c66324564, 2026-10-20T00:09Z); the batch sibling #24729 touches platform-readings.md and rest-channel.md only (disjoint); of the 14 open PRs none touches .claude/**, skills/** or scripts/pm/** (file lists read at this fire; the four new ones #24731–#24734 included); seat 2 (#19287) is vacant since 2026-10-19T16:53Z.

  3. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-20T03:38Z by the claiming seat (session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85, os-justin, domain:skills#1; claim 6282676166). The same text is the dev's prompt, run mode:subagent at TIER_DEFAULT (a references/** face; the governed rules text is reviewed in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).

    你是 os-dev,本令派你恰好一张卡:#24730(p3,domain:skills,Tier S 文本卡;分诊定形:删三行)。

    • 认领评论 6282676166。
    • 分支 claude/issue-24730-retire-spec-floor-rule-a,worktree ../objectstack-issue-24730,基点 origin/main(派发时 9b2953d62)。
    • 预期落点是 .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md 第 211–213 行(整行删除);⛔ 不动其他行、其他文件。
    • 若实测表明真正的生产者在别处,直接按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。

    一、裁决(不可重裁)

    二、PM 机制假设(须实测,鼓励证伪)

    1. 文件 241 行、上限 241;第 211–213 行字节(不含换行)106/113/110;第 211 行以冒号引出 212–213,三行是〈派发词构造细则〉内一个自足小块。删后 238 行;棘轮以「超上限才红」判(脚本自测项 over the ceiling -> red),238 ≤ 241 绿。
    2. 全树只此三行含 永不禁下限|首个消费者|下限抬到(PM 于派发时 grep -rnE … --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git .,3 命中);check:skill-frame-sync、check:pm-skill-id-lint、check:pm-skill-ratchet 对删行不敏感 —— 你重跑验证。
    3. 删后第 210 行「跨包常等于跨车道,PM 事后补跨座位声明。」与原第 214 行「模型标识只禁内容工件…」相邻,语义互不依赖;核读一遍,⛔ 不为分隔增行。
    4. 没有测试语料 pin 这三行文字(PM 未发现);若有,按生产者侧修并在报告 deviations 点名。

    三、PM 建议路线(可选,实测优先)

    本令门禁清单(PM 于 9b2953d62 以 dispatch-gates --commands 对本单文件取得,17 条)

    • node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs · node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test · node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs · node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test
    • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions · pnpm check:agent-test-spelling · pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs · pnpm check:doc-authoring · pnpm check:driver-memory-census
    • pnpm check:gitlink-declared · pnpm check:nul-bytes · pnpm check:pm-governed-merges · pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint · pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet · pnpm check:refd-timer-probe · pnpm check:skill-frame-sync · pnpm check:watch-hint-literal

    通用

    • 仓 objectstack-ai/objectstack,共享检出 /home/user/objectstack(⛔ 不编辑;它游离钉在 origin/main);PM 会话 session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85,席位 domain:skills#1,卡 assignee os-justin(⛔ 你不写卡 assignee)。
    • PM 的认领评论即你的身份;⛔ 不另留认领。动手前读卡全文与全部评论,核对最新一条 Claim: 点名的 Branch: 就是本令的分支,不符即停手回报。
    • 档位:TIER_DEFAULT 施工(dispatch-gates --tier 在 9b2953d62 读「no path-derived mandate」);席位在落地前另起隔离的 CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER 复核。
    • 受管面分层:改动全在 .claude/** ⇒ Tier S。PR 保持 draft,翻 ready 与入队归席位;PR 正文带 ## 维护者速读(草稿)(中文、业务角度,席位意见留空)。
    • 不发布面(.claude/** 快速通道)⇒ 不写 changeset,skip-changeset 随 pr_create 的 labels 同笔申报。
    • PR 正文行首照抄认领的 Clause-②: no;首行 Fixes #N。PR 正文一次写成(os-dev 定义:正文后续改动归席位)。
    • 棘轮实况(PM 于 origin/main 9b2953d62 实测,仍须你重测):scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs 的 MAX_LINE_BYTES = 120(按字节,中文每字 3 字节),目标文件已顶满行数上限、余量 0;上限只减不增(over the ceiling -> red),低于上限为绿。
      • ⛔ 不拿 re-wrap 筹行;新增以删减付账;⛔ 不动 CEILINGS 行(除非本令另有明文)。
    • 门禁清单由 PM 于派发时以 node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack <本单文件> 取得(见本令专属段),逐条跑,退出码先落盘再看,--ran 对账;对实际改动重取一次补跑。
    • 操作文本 ⛔ 不引 issue 编号(id-lint 机械强制);裁决出处只进 PR 正文与 commit message。
    • Writes: 只走 REST 代理 / scripts/pm/ 写工具(云容器经 fleet-write 中继);写预算三笔:git push、pr_create(draft,assignees: ["os-justin"],labels: ["skip-changeset"])、卡上一条 os-dev-report 评论;⛔ 无 MCP 写。终报 mcp_calls 与 api_writes 两数都报。
    • 终报 JSON 照 os-dev 定义;另只收机器可核字段:gates(逐条命令 + 退出码)、line_budget(文件行数 before/after 对上限,改动行逐行字节数)、deviations、files_changed。
    • 前台执行姿态:全部步骤同步跑完,⛔ 不把检查挂后台等唤醒;一轮只以终报或 blocked 结束。

    每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:

    • 实际业务需求 — 它服务的是真实存在的业务场景,
      还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
      示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
    • 项目长远合理性 — 哪个方案符合北极星方向与可持续架构(no workarounds、
      contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
    • 防 AI 写代码犯错,尤其是防 AI 写元数据 app 犯错 — 哪个方案让 AI 在结构上更难写错:
      契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(?? 回退、静默容错)——
      宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
    • 创业阶段不扩散需求 — 创业阶段聚焦原则:创业项目先专注核心能力,能力扩张默认
      从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
      过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
      窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
      不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。

    基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
    ⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
    运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
    推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
    交维护者拍板。


    Generated by Claude Code

  4. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    os-dev-report

    {
      "issue": 24730,
      "status": "done",
      "branch": "claude/issue-24730-retire-spec-floor-rule-a",
      "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/24742",
      "session": "session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 (mode:subagent, the parent's session id)",
      "premise_still_valid": true,
      "summary": "Deleted rule A, lines 211-213 of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (the first consumer raises the @objectstack/spec floor in the same PR). Nothing was added: the file goes 241 -> 238 against its ceiling of 241, the CEILINGS row is unchanged, and rule B in triage-duties.md 30-31 is untouched. All four card premises were re-run before the edit and hold. objectui origin/main 4b6774649 changeset:publish starts with `node scripts/objectstack-floor.mjs &&`. objectui PR 13024 is merged with merge commit 4484a11041f3 (ancestor of objectui origin/main, exit 0) and objectui 12958 is state_reason completed. The tree grep finds 3 hits, all at dispatch-runbook.md:211-213, on base 7e7e605de. The hold-index grep hits triage-duties.md 30 and 31. Draft PR 24742 was opened through the fleet-write relay with assignee os-justin and label skip-changeset. Its body was read back byte-identical (8708/8708). It quotes the deleted lines verbatim and carries the four premise readings, the ruling chain and a 维护者速读(草稿) section with 席位意见 left blank. Ready-flip and queue are left to the seat.",
      "tests": "No package code is touched, so there is no unit/type test to run and no ablation (a text deletion; no tested behaviour changes). Acceptance probes at HEAD 3969b2c3c: grep -cE on the file for the three phrases answers 0 (exit 1); control grep -c on the section heading answers 1; wc -l answers 238. The ratchet prints: dispatch-runbook.md is 238 lines (ceiling 241; headroom 3). Mechanism assumptions measured: 1) 241/241 lines, bytes 106/113/110, 238 after: confirmed. 2) Tree grep 3 hits; skill-frame-sync, pm-skill-id-lint and pm-skill-ratchet are green after the deletion: confirmed. 3) New line 210 ends the file-surface block and new line 211 starts the model-identifier pair; neither depends on the other and no separator was added: confirmed. 4) No test corpus pins the text, and no line-number citation into the file exists (git grep for dispatch-runbook followed by a 3-digit line number: 0 hits): confirmed.",
      "gates": "Local subset: all 17 commands derived by dispatch-gates --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack at the final head 3969b2c3c, identical to the dispatch's list. Exit codes were captured before any pipe: node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0 ; node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 ; node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0 ; node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 ; pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:doc-authoring :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:gitlink-declared :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0 ; pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: exit 0. check:doc-formula-expressions first answered exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: formula/lint dist not built). After building them under os-verify-lock (turbo build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2, VERDICT command-exit 0), the re-run answered exit 0. The --ran reconciliation answered: 17 derived famil(ies) accounted for, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero, all 17 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3). Not owed locally: check:dev-prereqs and check:skill-frame-freshness (the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the four-axis frame file), test:repo, and the platform-checklist (no export renamed). CI check-runs on 3969b2c3c at report time: Check Changeset success, filter success, three PR guards (single-writer path, same-issue claim, card-claims-branch) success. Governed Surface Queue Guard, the Lint lanes, the Type Check lanes, Check PR Size and Check Documentation Links are in_progress. Test Core and Dogfood Regression Gate are queued. Build Core and the matrix/opt-in jobs are skipped. Not waited on, per the dispatch contract.",
      "mcp_calls": "0 - no MCP GitHub tool was called",
      "api_writes": "2 relay strokes (each one POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches): (1) pr_create, which the runner executed as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft) + POST /issues/24742/assignees + POST /issues/24742/labels; (2) this report, through post-stamped, executed as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24730/comments. Plus 2 git pushes (the empty-branch write probe and the commit), which are not REST.",
      "line_budget": {
        "file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md",
        "before": 241,
        "after": 238,
        "ceiling": 241,
        "ceiling_row_changed": false,
        "deleted_line_bytes": [
          106,
          113,
          110
        ],
        "added_lines": 0
      },
      "files_changed": [
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (-3 lines, +0)"
      ],
      "deviations": [
        "Base moved: origin/main went from 9b2953d62 (the dispatch's read) to 7e7e605de before the worktree was cut, and the branch is based on 7e7e605de. The target file, its line numbers, its byte counts and the tree grep are identical on both.",
        "Two git pushes instead of one: the os-dev rule-1 empty-branch probe push, then the commit push.",
        "check:doc-formula-expressions needed a prerequisite build of formula+lint (turbo also built spec as their dependency) under the verify lock. That is outside the no-package-touched default.",
        "The commit trailer pair is model-free (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude) and the PR footer uses the session-URL form, both per AGENTS.md. The harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and its alternative PR footer were not used.",
        "The relay's pr_create read-back line names the assignees only and prints no label list. The label was confirmed by the run's success (the executor judges the labelled leg) and by an independent REST read of the pull: labels = [skip-changeset], draft = true, assignees = [os-justin].",
        "The worktree was removed after the PR opened. This report comment was posted with post-stamped.mjs run from the shared checkout (read-only use, no edit; post-stamped.mjs there is byte-identical to origin/main's)."
      ],
      "open_questions": [],
      "out_of_scope_findings": [
        "carrier: none (承接者:无) - noted, not filed: the fleet-write relay's pr_create read-back line lists assignees but not labels, while os-dev requires that line to list every label sent. The write itself was verified (run success, labelled leg judged by the executor, REST read-back shows the label). Not a/b/c class. The PR body is write-once for the dev, so the seat may carry this note into Acceptance notes."
      ]
    }
  5. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Seat pointer · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T04:06Z

    • PR docs(pm-dispatch): retire rule A — the spec floor follows the commit pin since objectstack-ai/objectui#12958 #24742 (head 3969b2c3c): isolated CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review PASS 6283093805; 席位核对 ACCEPT 6283117694 (维护者速读 终稿 on the PR).
    • Readied and armed (pr_ready + automerge_enable) by relay run 39367737295 at 2026-10-20T04:05Z; CI on the head was 24 success / 10 expected skips at that moment. The queue merges it; Fixes #24730 closes this card and the seat then removes pm:dispatched.
    • Two notes carried from the review, not findings against the diff: the PR body's 「No out-of-scope findings」 line is stale against the report's one carrier-none note, and that note (the relay's pr_create read-back not listing labels) is a misread of which relay row prints the labels. Both are recorded in the ACCEPT; the seat post's platform reading on the relay read-back is corrected at its next refresh.

    Generated by Claude Code

  6. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Landing · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T04:35Z

    Reading Value
    PR #24742 merged yes, by the queue at 2026-10-20T04:30Z, merge commit 9bc4ddeb8
    9bc4ddeb8 is an ancestor of origin/main (580fd4ed3c) yes
    queue branch gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24742-… still present 0
    remote branch claude/issue-24730-retire-spec-floor-rule-a still present 0

    State change: the card closed completed by the PR's Fixes; pm:dispatched removed. Rule A is gone from dispatch-runbook.md (238 lines on main, ceiling 241).


    Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions