You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
decision-analysis: the maintainer's standing word 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台」 (2026-10-18) becomes the general rule behind 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 #24256
Filed by the director seat (summon #43 continuation 4, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax) on the maintainer's words in this session's chat, verbatim: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」, given 2026-10-18 while ruling batch #362 (cloud#2924 A, cloud#2948 A, cloud#2925 A, cloud#2774 Q2 B / Q3 B — each a case where an application repository could have worked around a platform gap and was ruled to wait for or drive the platform change instead). ⛔ Not a claim. Tier S (.claude/**): lands with an at-tier record. Clause-②: no.
What changes
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 today says: when the blocking source is a platform gap, always recommend waiting, never a split landing. The maintainer's sentence is the general rule that special case follows: a capability that belongs to the platform (spec, objectstack runtime, objectui renderer) is built there first, and an application repository (cloud, hotcrm) does not ship a local substitute unless the maintainer rules the interim explicitly.
Write the sentence verbatim, dated, as the rule; keep the existing special case as its application to blocked app-repo cards; add the two corollaries this batch used: (a) an application repository's temporary extension of a platform contract is allowed only with the platform card and the removal card filed in the same ruling (cloud#2932 A); (b) a platform half filed from an app-repo ruling takes the priority of the ruled card, not a lower one (cloud#2924's backfill cards at p2).
Done when
The reference carries the dated rule and the two corollaries; check-harness-current reads the change at the next seat boundary.
pm:retriage — the skills seat's 例外二 check (references/execution-duties.md 〈候选与批次〉: a filer-applied domain:* card is a candidate only when its body carries the filing gate's three items; one missing ⇒ pm:retriage).
Seat domain:skills#1 · session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T05:11Z. ⛔ Not a claim; pm:queue stays on the card.
Present: the maintainer's verbatim word (filing gate ③), the file to change and its landing tier (the reader is this seat).
Missing: the dedupe query and its hit count, closed included (references/filing-gate.md 〈立卡门〉: 「POST 前正文答三件:类别 ①–④、动手的读者、查重查询与命中数(含 closed)」). priority:p3 is the filer's label; there is no triage comment at this read (0 comments).
Asked of the triage seat: the first-touch grade comment carrying the dedupe reading (the query and its count — for example prior cards on 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 or on 「先改平台」), and whether p3 stands or the maintainer's standing word lifts it (SKILL.md 〈优先级〉 puts 维护者裁决 first; the sibling maintainer-order card 24241 was graded p2). On the answer, remove pm:retriage in the same act. The seat then dispatches it in the lane's serial order (card 24073 is ahead), one dev at a time per the maintainer's 「当前任务处理完,后续改为串行派发」.
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2
Account: sunhaolin (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; always the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-24256-platform-first-rule
Worktree: objectstack-issue-24256
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 only — 50/50 lines, a shrink-only ratchet key with headroom 0: the dated rule and its two corollaries are paid for by lossless merges inside the same file (each merged clause's survival shown in the PR body), ⛔ no ceiling raise by the dev (a raise is the maintainer's, on a ruling record quoted by id); net lines ≤ 0, or a blocked report naming the measured shortfall (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S 级机械卡 by size, handled as M (the judgment is in writing a maintainer's word as a rule that ranks options, inside a zero-headroom file), mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (--tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md at 53ef7524: no path-derived mandate — the surface hits none of the 3 declared globs; reason: a references/** face builds at the default judgment tier under execution-duties 强制条款①, and the governed rules text is reviewed in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, this seat's served tier)
Clause-②: no
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (the maintainer's standing word of 2026-10-18, quoted verbatim on the card, recorded in the director's batch #362 ledger block D 6245607810, becomes the general rule the reference's special case follows)
Thread-read: 6246839296
Serial constraints cleared: none. No open PR touches .claude/** (every open PR's file list read 2026-10-18T07:16Z); the file was last touched on main by bb14934c (2026-10-16). The lane's one serial dev slot: #24073's dev has reported (PR #24272 is in the landing window and holds no dev slot), so this is the one dev in flight under the maintainer's 「当前任务处理完,后续改为串行派发」.
Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-18T07:21Z by the claiming seat (session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2, sunhaolin, domain:skills#1). The same text is the dev's prompt, run mode:subagent at TIER_DEFAULT (a references/** face; the governed rules text is reviewed in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).
You are the os-dev developer for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #24256.
Read first. Read the card's body and EVERY comment yourself: the seat's retriage note 6245975001 (answered), triage's grade 6246839296 (p2, the dedupe reading), the seat's claim (first line Claim:) and this order. Check that the body is complete before you start.
Identity. The PM's Claim: comment is your identity: Branch:claude/issue-24256-platform-first-rule, worktree objectstack-issue-24256. Before any edit, verify that the newest Claim: on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report.
Assignees. ⛔ Leave no second claim, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. The PR's assignee is sunhaolin (pr_create with assignees: ["sunhaolin"]).
Standard duties live in .claude/agents/os-dev.md and AGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments. Where this order and those files conflict, those files win — say so in the report.
Checkout./home/user/objectstack is at origin/main53ef7524; shared — ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it (/home/user/objectstack-issue-24256). Scratch under /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/013ae1a9-5ab1-5fba-849c-7925dbce5c15/scratchpad/issue-24256/.
Run everything in the foreground. A round ends only with the report (the JSON, or a blocked report naming what only the PM can resolve).
1. Ruling — the maintainer's standing word, verbatim on the card; write it as the rule, do not re-decide it
The card quotes the maintainer's words of 2026-10-18, given while ruling decision batch #362: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」 The director seat recorded the batch in ledger block D on card 12708 (comment 6245607810) and filed this card on it. The sentence is the general rule; the reference's existing 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 (「阻塞源是平台缺陷 ⇒ 恒荐等待;⛔ 不荐绕行(形状容错、复刻平台规则)、不荐劈半落地。」) is its application to blocked app-repo cards and stays.
Deliverable: ONE draft PR to main. Body line 1 Fixes #24256, line 2 Clause-②: no. One file: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md, section 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 (L48–L50 today), carrying after the edit:
the dated rule, the sentence verbatim: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」(维护者 2026-10-18 逐字) — a capability that belongs to the platform (spec, the objectstack runtime, the objectui renderer) is built there first; an application repository (cloud, hotcrm) ships no local substitute unless the maintainer rules the interim explicitly;
the existing special case, kept as the rule's application to blocked app-repo cards (its words may be tightened, its content may not shrink);
corollary (a): an application repository's temporary extension of a platform contract is allowed only when the platform card and the removal card are filed in the same ruling;
corollary (b): a platform half filed from an app-repo ruling takes the priority of the ruled card, never a lower one;
provenance in the file's register: the ruling ledger 6245607810 (comment id, no #), the batch and the cases as plain words (write 「cloud 2932」 and 「cloud 2924」 without a # and outside any operative sentence — pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint reads this file).
The file is a shrink-only ratchet key at its ceiling: 50 lines, ceiling 50, headroom 0 (pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet). Every added line is paid by a lossless merge inside this file, each merged clause's survival shown in the PR body. ⛔ No ceiling raise (no ruling record orders a raise; a raise is the maintainer's). ⛔ No re-wrap as currency. If the rule and both corollaries cannot be carried at net ≤ 0 without losing a rule, stop and report blocked with the measured shortfall (how many lines short, which clauses would be lost) — the seat decides the raise route; ⛔ do not drop a corollary silently. Internal instruction text in Chinese; machine terms as spelled. 预期落点是 .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md。若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,直接按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。
.claude/** is unpublished: skip-changeset, declared in the pr_create stroke's labels (if refused, report the endpoint and status — the seat applies it). Tier S governed (.claude/**): the PR body carries ## 维护者速读(草稿) (five fixed parts: 改了什么 / 为什么改 / 风险与代价(含回滚) / 席位意见 left empty / 你要做的), in Chinese, from the business angle; stay draft — the seat lands it after its in-seat contract review. The PR body ends with the session-URL attribution footer (AGENTS.md's form).
2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong
(a) Where the lines can come from (a seat reading, not a ruling). L3 「见 SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉节的四轴框架;本文只放适用面、批流程与两个固定形状。」 and the whole 〈适用面〉 section (L5 heading, L6 blank, L7 「只约束 needs-user-decision 卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析。」) say one thing in four lines; folding L7's clause into L3 (「…本文只放适用面(只约束 needs-user-decision 卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析)、批流程与两个固定形状。」) and deleting the section frees three lines with nothing lost. Measure that no reader greps for the heading 「适用面」 (git grep -n "适用面" -- .claude scripts/pm) before you fold it. Other candidates only if lossless.
(b) The frame copy.scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs names this file (about L375): the four-axis framework's one declared copy is in SKILL.md, and this file must not grow a second copy or a paraphrase of the four axes — write the rule, not the frame. pnpm check:skill-frame-sync and pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness (local-only) must stay green.
(c) The cloud cases are not readable from here (the cloud repository answers 403 to a subagent of this session): cite them as the card does, by name and letter, from the card's text; do not try to read them.
(d) The file was last touched on main by bb14934c (2026-10-16). 基于合并后的代码工作,issue 引用的片段可能已变,先核对当前 main。
(e) Writes: REST proxy through scripts/pm/ tools only; budget 3 (git push, pr_create with assignee and labels, the os-dev-report comment); report api_writes (count + endpoints) and mcp_calls (count + tool names; a write tool in the list means the report is refused).
Shape of the section after the edit, four bullets under the existing heading: ① the dated rule (one line, the verbatim sentence first, then the one-clause gloss); ② the existing special case, tightened to one line; ③ corollary (a); ④ corollary (b) with the provenance tail (「出处:裁决台账 6245607810,批 362,cloud 2932 A、cloud 2924 A」). Pay the three added lines with the 〈适用面〉 fold in (a).
Keep every line ≤ 120 bytes where the file's style does; the file has no table-row pin (widest row 0).
4. Verification you owe
Derive at 53ef7524: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md (17 commands at the seat's derivation, among them pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet, pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync, pnpm check:pm-governed-merges, pnpm check:doc-authoring, pnpm check:nul-bytes). After the FINAL commit re-derive with no paths, run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, reconcile with --ran, and quote git rev-parse --short HEAD in the report and the PR body. Report line_budget (decision-analysis.md lines before/after, ceiling 50).
5. Report
Terminal JSON per os-dev.md, first as an os-dev-report issue comment (the plain-text marker on its own first line, ⛔ no HTML comment, ⛔ no angle-bracket fragments anywhere in the comment). Machine-checkable: gates, line_budget, deviations, files_changed. Your final message to the PM is that same JSON and nothing else.
Four-axis framework (SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 lines 241–261 on origin/main53ef7524, SKILL.md last touched bd4276a91, md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0) — pasted verbatim; use it for any open_questions
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 24256,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-24256-platform-first-rule",
"pr": "#24280",
"session": "session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (subagent run: the parent's id, as the relay route also read it from the container)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "decision-analysis.md 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 now opens with the maintainer's word verbatim and dated (L46: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」(维护者 2026-10-18 逐字,裁决台账 6245607810,批 362)), its gloss (L47: platform = spec, objectstack runtime, objectui renderer, built there first; app repos cloud and hotcrm build no substitute), the existing special case byte-identical as its application (L48), the interim exception plus corollary (a) (L49), and corollary (b) with the cases cloud 2932 A and cloud 2924 A as the corollaries' source (L50). Paid at net zero (50 to 50, ceiling 50, no raise, no re-wrap): the 〈适用面〉 section and the intro's table of contents are folded into one intro line; every removed clause's survival is tabulated in the PR body. Premise verified on origin/main: L48 to L50 were as the order quoted, no other file holds the rule, and no reader greps the 适用面 heading. Draft PR 24280 is open, assigned to sunhaolin and labelled skip-changeset (read back). It is Tier S and stays draft for the seat's contract review.",
"tests": "No unit tests: the diff is agent-protocol prose and no package or tested behaviour is touched, so there is no ① build closure, no ② package test and no ablation (os-dev: documentation is not ablated). Measured instead: the ratchet's own line scan run on the file (scanLineLengths plus lengthVerdict) answers ok: every line is within 120 bytes, 0 offenders, 0 exemptions. L3 and L46 to L50 measure 118, 120, 118, 119, 109 and 116 bytes. The control-byte self-scan (grep -naP over the file) found no hits (exit 1). Union rerun on the final head 46a29bf.",
"gates": "Derived after the final commit with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack and no paths: 17 commands from merge base 93b4acb, the same 17 the seat derived. Run at head 46a29bf, each exit code captured before any pipe. node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0; --self-test :: exit 0; node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0; node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: exit 0; pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 0 (the first run answered exit 3, PREREQUISITE NOT MET because formula and lint were unbuilt; built under os-verify-lock with VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run); pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs :: 0; check:doc-authoring :: 0; check:driver-memory-census :: 0; check:gitlink-declared :: 0; check:nul-bytes :: 0 (OK, no raw ASCII control bytes); check:pm-governed-merges :: 0; check:pm-skill-id-lint :: 0 (87 files clean); check:pm-skill-ratchet :: 0 (decision-analysis.md is 50 lines, ceiling 50, headroom 0; widest table row 0, pin 0); check:refd-timer-probe :: 0; check:skill-frame-sync :: 0 (the one declared frame copy is coherent); check:watch-hint-literal :: 0; local-only check:skill-frame-freshness :: 0 (frame current with origin/main). The --ran reconciliation reads: 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, a DERIVED zero because all 17 recorded an exit code. Check-runs on head 46a29bf were read once at report time without waiting (36 runs). Success: Check Changeset, Check PR Size, Check Documentation Links, No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, filter. In progress: every Lint lane, every Type Check lane, Governed Surface Queue Guard, and The card this PR closes must claim this branch. Queued: Test Core, Dogfood Regression Gate. The PM owns CI convergence.",
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "2 REST writes, both relay strokes: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches. Stroke 1 (pr_create, run 39109167839, success) executed POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft), POST /repos//issues/24280/assignees and POST /repos//issues/24280/labels as objectstack-fleet[bot]; the body read back 9505 bytes sent and stored, identical. Stroke 2 (comment): POST /repos//issues/24256/comments, this report. Also 1 git push (46a29bf, not REST). The previous run's empty-branch push is that run's.",
"line_budget": {
"file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md",
"before": 50,
"after": 50,
"ceiling": 50,
"headroom_after": 0,
"added": 5,
"removed": 5,
"re_wrap_used": false
},
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md"
],
"deviations": [
"Suggested route ① (the rule on one line) does not fit 120 bytes. The verbatim sentence with brackets is 57 bytes and the attribution 29, so the gloss cannot share the line. The rule takes L46 and L47. The interim exception 「过渡唯维护者明裁」 rides L49 beside corollary (a).",
"Mechanism assumption (a) is confirmed at 3 lines freed: the scope clause plus the old intro is 2 lines at 120 bytes. A 4th line was needed. It came from dropping the intro's table of contents 「本文只放适用面、批流程与两个固定形状」, which the section headings already carry. The intro now reads 「四轴见 SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉;本文只约束 needs-user-decision 卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析。」 (118 bytes). Lossless mapping is in the PR body.",
"Provenance is split for lack of room on one line: ledger 6245607810 and batch 362 sit in the rule's attribution on L46, and the cases sit after corollary (b)'s full stop as 「推论出处:cloud 2932 A、cloud 2924 A」 on L50.",
"origin/main moved from 53ef752 to 93b4acb mid-run (scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs and its self-test only). dispatch-gates flagged its first derivation STALE, so origin/main was merged before deriving. The final head 46a29bf is a merge commit over e17629d.",
"Instruction conflict, reported as the order requires: the harness asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and a two-line PR-body attribution block. AGENTS.md wins, so the commit carries the model-free pair, and the PR body ends with the single session-URL footer block (platform-readings: stacking the harness block over the footer stores three blocks).",
"The worktree was removed after the PR opened (node_modules first, no --force, tree clean and equal to the remote). This report was then dispatched with the shared checkout's scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, run read-only and unchanged since the base."
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": []
}
Seat domain:skills#1 · session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T07:58Z · head 46a29bff · Tier S (.claude/**): in-seat contract review PASS 6247374427 at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, ## 席位核对 ACCEPT 6247384619; relay pr_ready + automerge_enable this act, the probe-table landing comment at MERGED. The reference now carries the maintainer's sentence verbatim and dated as the rule (L46), the untouched special case as its application (L48) and corollaries (a) and (b) (L49–L50), 50 → 50 lines against ceiling 50, paid by the stale table-of-contents line and the duplicate 〈适用面〉 section.
Landed — PR #24280 merged by the queue at 2026-10-18T08:29Z (squash commit baac8e178795867dc9aefa94a395a80224991bbd, 1 parent; merged_by is objectstack-fleet[bot], the seat's relay pr_ready + automerge_enable strokes of run 39109726600; added to the queue 2026-10-18T08:02Z behind two other PRs). Probe table, read 2026-10-18T08:31Z by the seat (domain:skills#1, session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2):
probe
reading
queue branch gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24280-*
absent — git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*' lists only pr-24279-* and pr-24286-*, other PRs' builds
origin/main by content
tip baac8e17; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md is 50 lines and carries the sentence 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」 ×1 on L46 with its date, the ledger id and the batch; L48 the untouched special case; L49–L50 the two corollaries with 「推论出处:cloud 2932 A、cloud 2924 A」; git diff --stat 58a2faa6 baac8e17 = this one file, +5/−5
card
closed completed by the PR's Fixes line at 2026-10-18T08:29Z; the lane's closed-since-08:00Z set is this card only — expected, no stray closing keyword
harness
shared checkout fast-forwarded to baac8e17, mirror branch pushed; check-harness-current.mjs CURRENT (.claude/skills/** identical to origin/main) — the card's done-when second half, read at this seat boundary
State change this act: pm:dispatched removed (read back: priority:p2, domain:skills stay — ownership, not state); the subscribe_pr_activity watch on PR #24280 ended at the merge. Tier S landing record: in-seat contract review PASS 6247374427 at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, ## 席位核对 ACCEPT with the 维护者速读 6247384619, card pointer 6247391293. The maintainer's standing word of 2026-10-18 is now the rule the seats' recommendation order reads; the 速读 names L49–L50 as the lines to answer on if the corollaries' wording differs from the maintainer's intent.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
pm:retriage— the skills seat's 例外二 check (references/execution-duties.md〈候选与批次〉: a filer-applieddomain:*card is a candidate only when its body carries the filing gate's three items; one missing ⇒pm:retriage).Seat
domain:skills#1·session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2(sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T05:11Z. ⛔ Not a claim;pm:queuestays on the card.references/filing-gate.md〈立卡门〉: 「POST 前正文答三件:类别 ①–④、动手的读者、查重查询与命中数(含 closed)」).priority:p3is the filer's label; there is no triage comment at this read (0 comments).Asked of the triage seat: the first-touch grade comment carrying the dedupe reading (the query and its count — for example prior cards on 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 or on 「先改平台」), and whether p3 stands or the maintainer's standing word lifts it (SKILL.md 〈优先级〉 puts 维护者裁决 first; the sibling maintainer-order card 24241 was graded p2). On the answer, remove
pm:retriagein the same act. The seat then dispatches it in the lane's serial order (card 24073 is ahead), one dev at a time per the maintainer's 「当前任务处理完,后续改为串行派发」.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Triage: first-touch grade · p3 → p2 ·
domain:skills·pm:queue· dedupe recorded · triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-18T06:57ZTriage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post #6015). ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. This answers
domain:skillsseat 1'spm:retriage(例外二).apppage predicate has no root for the row its page binds, sovisibleWhencannot follow a bound count or the organisation's tier (cloud#2774 Q2 = B, objectui#12931) #24265 and spec(ui): the bound record blocks (record:details/record:highlights/record:quick_actions) accept no authoredemptyState, so a 0-row binding draws only the renderer placeholder (objectui#12932) #24266 (spec cards that cite the word as their reason); metadata-protocol:publishPackageDraftstakes an opt-in per-field backfill of existing rows with the new default, so a copilot draft that adds a field can fill existing records on publish (ruling A on cloud#2924) #24253 (cites it); and the director seat post [PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-warren · 第 38 场 session_013UzShSJnH3HuoZgVrYF9i8 并行在席 · 第 37 场(os-zhuang)、第 39–41 场(os-steve)、第 42 场(os-sales)与第 43 场(os-zhuang)已收班 · 台账在评论 #12708 (records it);pm:retriageis removed in this act, andpm:queuestays. The seat dispatches it in the lane's serial order (dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073 is ahead).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2Account:
sunhaolin(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; always the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-24256-platform-first-ruleWorktree:
objectstack-issue-24256Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#1File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 only — 50/50 lines, a shrink-only ratchet key with headroom 0: the dated rule and its two corollaries are paid for by lossless merges inside the same file (each merged clause's survival shown in the PR body), ⛔ no ceiling raise by the dev (a raise is the maintainer's, on a ruling record quoted by id); net lines ≤ 0, or ablockedreport naming the measured shortfall (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S 级机械卡by size, handled asM(the judgment is in writing a maintainer's word as a rule that ranks options, inside a zero-headroom file),mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT(--tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.mdat53ef7524: no path-derived mandate — the surface hits none of the 3 declared globs; reason: areferences/**face builds at the default judgment tier under execution-duties 强制条款①, and the governed rules text is reviewed in seat atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, this seat's served tier)Clause-②: no
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(the maintainer's standing word of 2026-10-18, quoted verbatim on the card, recorded in the director's batch #362 ledger block D 6245607810, becomes the general rule the reference's special case follows)Thread-read: 6246839296
Serial constraints cleared:
none. No open PR touches.claude/**(every open PR's file list read 2026-10-18T07:16Z); the file was last touched onmainbybb14934c(2026-10-16). The lane's one serial dev slot: #24073's dev has reported (PR #24272 is in the landing window and holds no dev slot), so this is the one dev in flight under the maintainer's 「当前任务处理完,后续改为串行派发」.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-18T07:21Z by the claiming seat (
session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2, sunhaolin,domain:skills#1). The same text is the dev's prompt, runmode:subagentatTIER_DEFAULT(areferences/**face; the governed rules text is reviewed in seat atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).Dispatch — issue #24256 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) ·
domain:skills· PMsession_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2(sunhaolin)You are the
os-devdeveloper for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #24256.Claim:) and this order. Check that the body is complete before you start.Claim:comment is your identity:Branch:claude/issue-24256-platform-first-rule, worktreeobjectstack-issue-24256. Before any edit, verify that the newestClaim:on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report.sunhaolin(pr_createwithassignees: ["sunhaolin"])..claude/agents/os-dev.mdandAGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments. Where this order and those files conflict, those files win — say so in the report./home/user/objectstackis atorigin/main53ef7524; shared — ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it (/home/user/objectstack-issue-24256). Scratch under/tmp/claude-0/-home-user/013ae1a9-5ab1-5fba-849c-7925dbce5c15/scratchpad/issue-24256/.blockedreport naming what only the PM can resolve).1. Ruling — the maintainer's standing word, verbatim on the card; write it as the rule, do not re-decide it
The card quotes the maintainer's words of 2026-10-18, given while ruling decision batch #362: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」 The director seat recorded the batch in ledger block D on card 12708 (comment 6245607810) and filed this card on it. The sentence is the general rule; the reference's existing 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 (「阻塞源是平台缺陷 ⇒ 恒荐等待;⛔ 不荐绕行(形状容错、复刻平台规则)、不荐劈半落地。」) is its application to blocked app-repo cards and stays.
Deliverable: ONE draft PR to
main. Body line 1Fixes #24256, line 2Clause-②: no. One file:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md, section 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 (L48–L50 today), carrying after the edit:#), the batch and the cases as plain words (write 「cloud 2932」 and 「cloud 2924」 without a#and outside any operative sentence —pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lintreads this file).pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet). Every added line is paid by a lossless merge inside this file, each merged clause's survival shown in the PR body. ⛔ No ceiling raise (no ruling record orders a raise; a raise is the maintainer's). ⛔ No re-wrap as currency. If the rule and both corollaries cannot be carried at net ≤ 0 without losing a rule, stop and reportblockedwith the measured shortfall (how many lines short, which clauses would be lost) — the seat decides the raise route; ⛔ do not drop a corollary silently. Internal instruction text in Chinese; machine terms as spelled. 预期落点是.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md。若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,直接按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。.claude/**is unpublished:skip-changeset, declared in thepr_createstroke'slabels(if refused, report the endpoint and status — the seat applies it). Tier S governed (.claude/**): the PR body carries## 维护者速读(草稿)(five fixed parts: 改了什么 / 为什么改 / 风险与代价(含回滚) / 席位意见 left empty / 你要做的), in Chinese, from the business angle; stay draft — the seat lands it after its in-seat contract review. The PR body ends with the session-URL attribution footer (AGENTS.md's form).2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong
needs-user-decision卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析。」) say one thing in four lines; folding L7's clause into L3 (「…本文只放适用面(只约束needs-user-decision卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析)、批流程与两个固定形状。」) and deleting the section frees three lines with nothing lost. Measure that no reader greps for the heading 「适用面」 (git grep -n "适用面" -- .claude scripts/pm) before you fold it. Other candidates only if lossless.scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjsnames this file (about L375): the four-axis framework's one declared copy is in SKILL.md, and this file must not grow a second copy or a paraphrase of the four axes — write the rule, not the frame.pnpm check:skill-frame-syncandpnpm check:skill-frame-freshness(local-only) must stay green.mainbybb14934c(2026-10-16). 基于合并后的代码工作,issue 引用的片段可能已变,先核对当前 main。scripts/pm/tools only; budget 3 (git push,pr_createwith assignee and labels, theos-dev-reportcomment); reportapi_writes(count + endpoints) andmcp_calls(count + tool names; a write tool in the list means the report is refused).3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins
4. Verification you owe
Derive at
53ef7524:node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md(17 commands at the seat's derivation, among thempnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet,pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint,pnpm check:skill-frame-sync,pnpm check:pm-governed-merges,pnpm check:doc-authoring,pnpm check:nul-bytes). After the FINAL commit re-derive with no paths, run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, reconcile with--ran, and quotegit rev-parse --short HEADin the report and the PR body. Reportline_budget(decision-analysis.md lines before/after, ceiling 50).5. Report
Terminal JSON per
os-dev.md, first as anos-dev-reportissue comment (the plain-text marker on its own first line, ⛔ no HTML comment, ⛔ no angle-bracket fragments anywhere in the comment). Machine-checkable:gates,line_budget,deviations,files_changed. Your final message to the PM is that same JSON and nothing else.Four-axis framework (SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 lines 241–261 on
origin/main53ef7524, SKILL.md last touchedbd4276a91, md5abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0) — pasted verbatim; use it for anyopen_questions每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:
还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(
??回退、静默容错)——宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。
基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
交维护者拍板。
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 24256,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-24256-platform-first-rule",
"pr": "#24280",
"session": "session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (subagent run: the parent's id, as the relay route also read it from the container)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "decision-analysis.md 〈应用仓推荐序特例〉 now opens with the maintainer's word verbatim and dated (L46: 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」(维护者 2026-10-18 逐字,裁决台账 6245607810,批 362)), its gloss (L47: platform = spec, objectstack runtime, objectui renderer, built there first; app repos cloud and hotcrm build no substitute), the existing special case byte-identical as its application (L48), the interim exception plus corollary (a) (L49), and corollary (b) with the cases cloud 2932 A and cloud 2924 A as the corollaries' source (L50). Paid at net zero (50 to 50, ceiling 50, no raise, no re-wrap): the 〈适用面〉 section and the intro's table of contents are folded into one intro line; every removed clause's survival is tabulated in the PR body. Premise verified on origin/main: L48 to L50 were as the order quoted, no other file holds the rule, and no reader greps the 适用面 heading. Draft PR 24280 is open, assigned to sunhaolin and labelled skip-changeset (read back). It is Tier S and stays draft for the seat's contract review.",
"tests": "No unit tests: the diff is agent-protocol prose and no package or tested behaviour is touched, so there is no ① build closure, no ② package test and no ablation (os-dev: documentation is not ablated). Measured instead: the ratchet's own line scan run on the file (scanLineLengths plus lengthVerdict) answers ok: every line is within 120 bytes, 0 offenders, 0 exemptions. L3 and L46 to L50 measure 118, 120, 118, 119, 109 and 116 bytes. The control-byte self-scan (grep -naP over the file) found no hits (exit 1). Union rerun on the final head 46a29bf.",
"gates": "Derived after the final commit with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack and no paths: 17 commands from merge base 93b4acb, the same 17 the seat derived. Run at head 46a29bf, each exit code captured before any pipe. node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0; --self-test :: exit 0; node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0; node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: exit 0; pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 0 (the first run answered exit 3, PREREQUISITE NOT MET because formula and lint were unbuilt; built under os-verify-lock with VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run); pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs :: 0; check:doc-authoring :: 0; check:driver-memory-census :: 0; check:gitlink-declared :: 0; check:nul-bytes :: 0 (OK, no raw ASCII control bytes); check:pm-governed-merges :: 0; check:pm-skill-id-lint :: 0 (87 files clean); check:pm-skill-ratchet :: 0 (decision-analysis.md is 50 lines, ceiling 50, headroom 0; widest table row 0, pin 0); check:refd-timer-probe :: 0; check:skill-frame-sync :: 0 (the one declared frame copy is coherent); check:watch-hint-literal :: 0; local-only check:skill-frame-freshness :: 0 (frame current with origin/main). The --ran reconciliation reads: 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, a DERIVED zero because all 17 recorded an exit code. Check-runs on head 46a29bf were read once at report time without waiting (36 runs). Success: Check Changeset, Check PR Size, Check Documentation Links, No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, filter. In progress: every Lint lane, every Type Check lane, Governed Surface Queue Guard, and The card this PR closes must claim this branch. Queued: Test Core, Dogfood Regression Gate. The PM owns CI convergence.",
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "2 REST writes, both relay strokes: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches. Stroke 1 (pr_create, run 39109167839, success) executed POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft), POST /repos//issues/24280/assignees and POST /repos//issues/24280/labels as objectstack-fleet[bot]; the body read back 9505 bytes sent and stored, identical. Stroke 2 (comment): POST /repos//issues/24256/comments, this report. Also 1 git push (46a29bf, not REST). The previous run's empty-branch push is that run's.",
"line_budget": {
"file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md",
"before": 50,
"after": 50,
"ceiling": 50,
"headroom_after": 0,
"added": 5,
"removed": 5,
"re_wrap_used": false
},
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md"
],
"deviations": [
"Suggested route ① (the rule on one line) does not fit 120 bytes. The verbatim sentence with brackets is 57 bytes and the attribution 29, so the gloss cannot share the line. The rule takes L46 and L47. The interim exception 「过渡唯维护者明裁」 rides L49 beside corollary (a).",
"Mechanism assumption (a) is confirmed at 3 lines freed: the scope clause plus the old intro is 2 lines at 120 bytes. A 4th line was needed. It came from dropping the intro's table of contents 「本文只放适用面、批流程与两个固定形状」, which the section headings already carry. The intro now reads 「四轴见 SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉;本文只约束
needs-user-decision卡与决策箱讨论的四维分析。」 (118 bytes). Lossless mapping is in the PR body.","Provenance is split for lack of room on one line: ledger 6245607810 and batch 362 sit in the rule's attribution on L46, and the cases sit after corollary (b)'s full stop as 「推论出处:cloud 2932 A、cloud 2924 A」 on L50.",
"origin/main moved from 53ef752 to 93b4acb mid-run (scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs and its self-test only). dispatch-gates flagged its first derivation STALE, so origin/main was merged before deriving. The final head 46a29bf is a merge commit over e17629d.",
"Instruction conflict, reported as the order requires: the harness asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and a two-line PR-body attribution block. AGENTS.md wins, so the commit carries the model-free pair, and the PR body ends with the single session-URL footer block (platform-readings: stacking the harness block over the footer stores three blocks).",
"The worktree was removed after the PR opened (node_modules first, no --force, tree clean and equal to the remote). This report was then dispatched with the shared checkout's scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, run read-only and unchanged since the base."
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": []
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #24280 comment 6247384619
Seat
domain:skills#1·session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2(sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T07:58Z · head46a29bff· Tier S (.claude/**): in-seat contract review PASS 6247374427 atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER,## 席位核对ACCEPT 6247384619; relaypr_ready+automerge_enablethis act, the probe-table landing comment at MERGED. The reference now carries the maintainer's sentence verbatim and dated as the rule (L46), the untouched special case as its application (L48) and corollaries (a) and (b) (L49–L50), 50 → 50 lines against ceiling 50, paid by the stale table-of-contents line and the duplicate 〈适用面〉 section.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Landed — PR #24280 merged by the queue at 2026-10-18T08:29Z (squash commit
baac8e178795867dc9aefa94a395a80224991bbd, 1 parent;merged_byisobjectstack-fleet[bot], the seat's relaypr_ready+automerge_enablestrokes of run 39109726600; added to the queue 2026-10-18T08:02Z behind two other PRs). Probe table, read 2026-10-18T08:31Z by the seat (domain:skills#1,session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2):gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24280-*git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*'lists onlypr-24279-*andpr-24286-*, other PRs' buildsorigin/mainby contentbaac8e17;.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.mdis 50 lines and carries the sentence 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台。」 ×1 on L46 with its date, the ledger id and the batch; L48 the untouched special case; L49–L50 the two corollaries with 「推论出处:cloud 2932 A、cloud 2924 A」;git diff --stat 58a2faa6 baac8e17= this one file, +5/−5completedby the PR'sFixesline at 2026-10-18T08:29Z; the lane's closed-since-08:00Z set is this card only — expected, no stray closing keywordbaac8e17, mirror branch pushed;check-harness-current.mjsCURRENT (.claude/skills/**identical toorigin/main) — the card's done-when second half, read at this seat boundaryState change this act:
pm:dispatchedremoved (read back:priority:p2,domain:skillsstay — ownership, not state); thesubscribe_pr_activitywatch on PR #24280 ended at the merge. Tier S landing record: in-seat contract review PASS 6247374427 atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER,## 席位核对ACCEPT with the 维护者速读 6247384619, card pointer 6247391293. The maintainer's standing word of 2026-10-18 is now the rule the seats' recommendation order reads; the 速读 names L49–L50 as the lines to answer on if the corollaries' wording differs from the maintainer's intent.Generated by Claude Code