Repository navigation
director charter: put to the maintainer only the governed merges no approver account approved, each with one line on what changed (maintainer order) #24241
Description
Filed on the maintainer's order by the director seat (summon #44, session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V). The order, verbatim, from this session's chat: 「以后只呈"没有任何授权账号批准"的受管合并,并且每行写一句改了什么。这要改总监席的规则,开一张卡给 skills 席去改。」 It answers the seat's proposal, made after the maintainer's 「受管合并你让我认定的价值是什么，我什么也看不到，而且之前都批过的。」 A maintainer order outranks the tooling entry gates (SKILL.md 〈优先级〉: 维护者裁决 first). ⛔ Not a claim.
The problem, measured
- Summon Update documentation to reflect current protocol implementation #44 put 5 recognition rows to the maintainer: ci(test-leftovers): report what each test job leaves in the tree; retire Rerun Safety #24211, chore: version packages (next) #23825, feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824, feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 and cloud PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921. Four of them carry an
APPROVEDreview byos-zhuang, an account inGOVERNED_APPROVERS(scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:619), which the queue guard already counts as authorization (SKILL.md: 「批准判定单源 = 队列守卫常量GOVERNED_APPROVERS」). - Each row was a bare PR number with no account of what changed. The maintainer could judge nothing from it and had already approved four of the five.
Scope — the rule to write
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md〈职责一〉: the audit rows put to the maintainer for recognition are only landings (governed path or the size limb alike) that carry noAPPROVEDreview from anyGOVERNED_APPROVERSaccount. A landing with such a review is recorded in the ledger block and is not put to the maintainer.- Each row put to the maintainer carries one line in plain words on what the change did, read from the PR, not from the title alone.
- Edit in place where the charter already speaks of the audit, with no growth beyond what the order needs. The provenance cites this card's filing comment by id, without
#(the id-lint). - Out of scope:
check-governed-merges.mjsstays as it is (report-only; ⛔ no new column or gate). The seat reads each row's reviews through REST, as summon Update documentation to reflect current protocol implementation #44 did.
Done when
- The charter says (1) and (2), the Tier S PR lands after its at-tier record, and the director seat post's carried-recognition line follows the new rule at the next summon.
Related: the director seat post (#12708); summon #44's ledger block B (6243622639).
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2Account:
sunhaolin(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; always the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-24241-director-recognition-rowsWorktree:
objectstack-issue-24241Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#1File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md〈职责一〉 only (66/72 lines, a shrink-only ratchet key: the edit is in place where the audit rows are already spoken of, no growth beyond the order; ⛔ no ceiling raise, no ruling orders one) (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S 级机械卡by size, handled asM(the judgment is in the rule's wording, not in a gate),mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT(--tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.mdatf5ef054a: no path-derived mandate — the surface hits none of the 3 declared globs; reason: areferences/**face builds at the default judgment tier under execution-duties 强制条款①, and the governed rules text is reviewed in seat atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, this seat's served tier)Clause-②: no
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(filing gate ③: the maintainer's order, quoted verbatim on the card)Thread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared:
none. No open PR touches.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**(every open PR's file list — #24250, #24249, #24247, #24168 — read 2026-10-18T04:00Z); the file was last touched onmainbybb14934c(2026-10-16); #24171 edits a different file in the same directory (instrument-discipline.md), disjoint.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-18T04:15Z by the claiming seat (
session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2, sunhaolin,domain:skills#1). The same text is the dev's prompt, runmode:subagentatTIER_DEFAULT(areferences/**face; the governed rules text is reviewed in seat atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).Dispatch — issue #24241 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) ·
domain:skills· PMsession_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2(sunhaolin)You are the
os-devdeveloper for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #24241.Claim:) and this order. Check that the body is complete before you start.Claim:comment is your identity:Branch:claude/issue-24241-director-recognition-rows, worktreeobjectstack-issue-24241. Before any edit, verify that the newestClaim:on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report.sunhaolin(pr_createwithassignees: ["sunhaolin"])..claude/agents/os-dev.mdandAGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments. Where this order and those files conflict, those files win — say so in the report./home/user/objectstackis atorigin/mainf5ef054a; shared — ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it (/home/user/objectstack-issue-24241). Scratch under/tmp/claude-0/-home-user/013ae1a9-5ab1-5fba-849c-7925dbce5c15/scratchpad/issue-24241/.blockedreport naming what only the PM can resolve).1. Ruling — the maintainer's order, verbatim on the card; execute it, do not re-decide it
The card was filed on the maintainer's order, quoted verbatim in its body: 「以后只呈"没有任何授权账号批准"的受管合并,并且每行写一句改了什么。这要改总监席的规则,开一张卡给 skills 席去改。」 (director summon #44,
session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V, 2026-10-18). A maintainer order is the top of the priority order (SKILL.md 〈优先级〉). The two rules it orders are the card's Scope 1 and 2; nothing else changes.Deliverable: ONE draft PR to
main. Body line 1Fixes #24241, line 2Clause-②: no. One file:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, section 〈职责一:契约复核记录事后审计与抽查(可选)〉 (heading at L29 today; the enumeration bullet at L32 「召唤时枚举近期落地的受管 PR 及其## Contract review记录,查复核质量与漏网」; the ledger bullet at L37 — read the current file, the line numbers are a clue), edited IN PLACE:APPROVEDreview from any account inGOVERNED_APPROVERS(the queue guard's frozen constant inscripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs, which SKILL.md names as the single source: 「批准判定单源 = 队列守卫常量GOVERNED_APPROVERS」). A landing that carries such a review is recorded in the ledger block and is NOT put to the maintainer.#before a number, ⛔ no issue number inside an operative sentence:pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lintreads this file).pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet): 66 lines today, ceiling 72. ⛔ Never raise the ceiling — no ruling orders a raise. Prefer net 0: rewrite the existing bullets; if a line must be added, pay it with a lossless merge inside the same file and show each merged clause's survival in the PR body. Keep the file's register (internal instruction text in Chinese; machine terms such asGOVERNED_APPROVERSandAPPROVEDspelled as the code spells them). Expected file surface: this one file. 预期落点是.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md。若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,直接按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjsstays as it is — ⛔ no new column, gate, flag or script. The seat reads each row's reviews through REST at summon time; the charter may say so in the same sentence if it costs no line..claude/**is unpublished:skip-changeset, declared in thepr_createstroke'slabels(os-dev.md's labels block; if the classifier or the relay refuses, report the endpoint and status — the seat applies it). Tier S governed (.claude/**): the PR body carries## 维护者速读(草稿)(five fixed parts: 改了什么 / 为什么改 / 风险与代价(含回滚) / 席位意见 left empty / 你要做的), in Chinese, from the business angle; stay draft — the seat lands it after its in-seat contract review. The PR body ends with the session-URL attribution footer (AGENTS.md's form).2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong
f5ef054a, 〈职责一〉 says what to enumerate (L32) and how the summary ledger is kept (L37), and 〈职责二〉 L52 says 「有席内 ACCEPT 者呈一批 ≤5 行」 for governed drafts; no sentence yet says WHICH landings are put to the maintainer for recognition, and none asks for a what-changed line. Confirm by reading both sections; if a later merge already carries either rule, reportpremise_still_valid: falsefor that half with the line quoted.GOVERNED_APPROVERS(scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs, todayos-zhuangandhotlong). Name the constant in the charter, ⛔ never the account list — the list moves with the guard.APPROVEDby an approver account. Say in the PR body how the new sentence would have changed that batch (which rows drop, what the surviving row carries).pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet,pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint,pnpm check:pm-governed-prose,pnpm check:skill-frame-sync,pnpm check:doc-authoring,pnpm check:nul-bytes,node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test; the derived list in §4 is the clue, your re-derivation is the record.mainbybb14934c(2026-10-16). 基于合并后的代码工作,issue 引用的片段可能已变,先核对当前 main。scripts/pm/tools only; budget 3 (git push,pr_createwith assignee and labels, theos-dev-reportcomment); reportapi_writes(count + endpoints) andmcp_calls(count + tool names; a write tool in the list means the report is refused).3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins
GOVERNED_APPROVERS账号APPROVEDreview 的落地(受管路径与行数肢同),有者记台账块不呈;每行一句改了什么,读自 PR 本体」. If that needs a second line, pay it by folding L36 (「到合并 = 推进到就绪并点名等待,⛔ 不代维护者合并」) into the bullet above it, only if the merged sentence loses nothing — show the survival.instrument-discipline.mdL11 does, so no line is spent on it.4. Verification you owe
Derive at
f5ef054a:node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md(17 commands at the seat's derivation). After the FINAL commit re-derive with no paths, run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, reconcile with--ran, and quotegit rev-parse --short HEADin the report and the PR body. Reportline_budget(director.md lines before/after, ceiling 72).5. Report
Terminal JSON per
os-dev.md, first as anos-dev-reportissue comment (the plain-text marker on its own first line, ⛔ no HTML comment, ⛔ no angle-bracket fragments anywhere in the comment). Machine-checkable:gates,line_budget,deviations,files_changed.Four-axis framework (SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 lines 241–261 on
origin/mainf5ef054a, SKILL.md last touchedbd4276a91, md5abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0) — pasted verbatim; use it for anyopen_questions每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:
还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(
??回退、静默容错)——宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。
基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
交维护者拍板。
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 24241,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-24241-director-recognition-rows",
"pr": "#24259",
"session": "session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (subagent run; the parent's harness-stamped id)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Draft PR 24259 (Tier S, one file) adds three lines to director.md section 职责一, directly under the enumeration bullet. (1) The only rows put to the maintainer for recognition are landings, governed path and size limb alike, with no APPROVED review from a GOVERNED_APPROVERS account; the charter names the constant, not its account list. A landing with such a review is recorded in the summary ledger and not put. (2) Each row put carries one plain line on what the change did, read from the diff or body, never the title alone. (3) A provenance line in the references' 出处 convention (maintainer order 2026-10-18, verbatim in the card body; no hash mark, no number in an operative sentence). Premise (a) holds at f5ef054: neither 职责一 nor 职责二 said which landings are put for recognition or asked for a what-changed line. The dispatch's L52 line, 「有席内 ACCEPT 者呈一批 ≤5 行」 (L50 on main), covers pre-merge governed drafts. Batch effect, reviews read via REST this session: objectstack 24211, 23825, 23824 and 23906 each carry an os-zhuang APPROVED and drop to ledger only. Cloud 2921 (merged by hotlong, no review on the seat's reading in comment 6227733044) stays as the one row put. This session could not read cloud (403), so its what-changed line is the seat's to write.",
"tests": "No package touched and no tested behaviour changed, so there are no unit tests and no ablation. Evidence is the gate battery at HEAD b20dbc8 (see gates). pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet prints 'director.md is 69 lines (ceiling 72; headroom 3)'. pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint prints '87 file(s) clean'. pnpm check:skill-frame-sync prints 'the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent'. pnpm check:doc-authoring prints '53 published skill files clean ... no growth'. pnpm check:nul-bytes prints '12120 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes'.",
"gates": "Local, at HEAD b20dbc8. Derived with 'node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack' and no paths: merge base f5ef054, 1 path, +3/-0, 17 commands, the same 17 the seat derived with the path. Every exit code was captured before any pipe, and all 17 exited 0: check-closing-keyword-parity (plus --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-harness-current --self-test, lint check:doc-formula-expressions, check:agent-test-spelling, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:refd-timer-probe, check:skill-frame-sync, check:watch-hint-literal. doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: formula and lint unbuilt in the fresh worktree). After 'turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2' under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 181s) it re-ran with exit 0. --ran reconciliation exited 0: '17 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 17 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)'. Run beyond the derivation, all exit 0: check:pm-governed-prose, check:pm-settings-deny-roster (roster under .claude), check:pm-prior-rulings. CI on head b20dbc8, read once at PR open: Check Changeset success, Check PR Size success, Check Documentation Links success, Governed Surface Queue Guard in_progress, Lint jobs in_progress, Type Check jobs in_progress, Test Core in_progress, Build Core skipped. CI is unconverged and reported in_progress; the PM tracks convergence.",
"line_budget": "director.md 66 → 69 lines; ceiling 72 unchanged (headroom 6 → 3). New lines are 119, 117 and 59 bytes, under the ratchet's 120-byte cap. Net 0 was not reachable: the enumeration bullet already spends 104 bytes, the order makes no content redundant, and the dispatch's fold fallback is a re-wrap that SKILL.md's ratchet row and os-dev.md forbid as line currency.",
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md"
],
"deviations": [
"Conflict, files win: the dispatch said prefer net 0 and pay any added line with a lossless merge (fold L36 into the bullet above). SKILL.md's ratchet row 「⛔ re-wrap 不得用作筹行,新增以删减付账」 and os-dev.md forbid a fold bought for new content, and L34 plus L36 come to 147 bytes, over the 120-byte cap anyway. The three ruling-ordered lines therefore take headroom, with no ceiling move and no raise claimed.",
"The optional clause 'the seat reads each row's reviews through REST' is not in the charter, because it would cost a fourth line. It is stated in the PR body.",
"Card Scope 3 said to cite the card's filing comment by id. The card has no separate filing comment (only the Claim and the Dispatch order), so I followed the dispatch wording and the provenance cites the card, whose body carries the order verbatim.",
"cloud 2921 reviews and diff are NOT MEASURED: the cloud repository answers 403 to this session, and add_repo (read) was refused for lack of access. Its 'no review' status comes from the seat's comment 6227733044.",
"Two git pushes: the empty-branch probe that rule 1 requires, then the commit. Neither is a REST write.",
"Commit trailers use AGENTS.md's model-free pair (Claude-Session plus Co-authored-by: Claude) instead of the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By. The PR footer is AGENTS.md's session-URL form, not the harness's alternative form.",
"Built @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint, which the whole-tree gate check:doc-formula-expressions needs, even though the diff touches no package.",
"My runner overwrote the first-pass logs of gates 1-9 (exit codes survived in the summary). I re-ran those nine on the same HEAD into a separate directory so every verdict line is kept."
],
"mcp_calls": "1: mcp__claude-code-remote__add_repo (objectstack-ai/cloud, access read), refused with no access. No GitHub MCP tool was called, read or write.",
"api_writes": "2 relay strokes as objectstack-fleet[bot]. (1) pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, which executed POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft), POST /repos//issues/24259/assignees (sunhaolin) and POST /repos//issues/24259/labels (skip-changeset). The relay read the body back as 9900 bytes sent, 9900 stored, identical; a REST re-read shows draft=true, assignees [sunhaolin], labels [skip-changeset]. (2) This os-dev-report comment: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, executing POST /repos//issues/24241/comments. Both git pushes were plain pushes, not REST writes.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none, noted not filed (PR Acceptance notes). AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14 says the post-merge audit lists each governed merge 'with its approver and merger', but the check-governed-merges sweep prints merged_by only. This is agent-convention text, not a spec contract, and has no public door; the seat's REST read covers the gap. Dedupe words: governed-merges approver column, merged_by only, PD14 approver",
"carrier: none, noted not filed (PR Acceptance notes). The scripts/pm/check-prior-rulings.mjs header cites references/lanes/director.md:45 for the git-grep prescription; that line was already L52 on main and is L55 after this PR. Comment line-number drift. Dedupe words: prior-rulings director.md line reference, stale line number"
]
}
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #24259 comment 6245849605
Seat
domain:skills#1·session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2(sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T04:57Z · headb20dbc82· in-seat contract review PASS 6245828997 (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) · Tier S: the seat lands it through the queue (relaypr_ready+automerge_enablethis act); the probe-table landing comment follows at MERGED. Non-blocking question carried to the maintainer in the PR's 速读: whether a hand merge by aGOVERNED_APPROVERSaccount with no review counts as 「批准」 for recognition (the rule as landed follows the order's letter: anAPPROVEDreview).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Landed — PR #24259 merged by the queue at 2026-10-18T05:06Z (squash commit
fb6fb24e2ffb2fee0cd94d7acaf7030a780e179d, 1 parent;merged_byis the relay identity that enqueued it). Probe table, read 2026-10-18T05:09Z by the seat (domain:skills#1,session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2):gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24259-*git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*'lists no reforigin/mainby contentfb6fb24eis the squash commit itself;.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.mdcarriesGOVERNED_APPROVERS×1 and is 69 lines (ceiling 72)completedby the PR'sFixesline at 2026-10-18T05:06Z; the lane's closed-since-04:00Z set is this card and card 24171 only — both expected, no stray closing keywordfb6fb24e;check-harness-current.mjsCURRENTState change this act:
pm:dispatchedremoved in the next stroke (read back);domain:skills,priority:p2,area:devpath,toolingstay (ownership, not state); thesubscribe_pr_activitywatch on PR #24259 ended at the merge. The card's third Done-when item (the director seat post's carried-recognition line follows the new rule) is the director seat's at its next summon; the charter it reads now carries the rule. Non-blocking question left to the maintainer in the PR's 速读: whether a hand merge by aGOVERNED_APPROVERSaccount with no review counts as 「批准」 for recognition.Generated by Claude Code