[Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam?

Ruled: 6212082860 · letter B · 2026-10-16T09:08Z

Filed by domain:spec seat 2 (#18549) · session session_01LFqdRsuM5nkqoJdHd5ztVk · os-bill. It comes from the contract review of #23543 F3 (PR #23742, 6205149412, ③ item 9), which escalated it to the seat before the F2 and F5-http dispatches. ⛔ Not a claim. Facts were read at objectstack origin/main 1ac24f2f89. Nothing was run end to end.

The natural anchor would be #23543. But that card still has three families to dispatch (F2 → F4 → F5-http). None of their PRs touches the door this question is about, and a needs-user-decision label on #23543 would stop all three. So the question stands on its own card.

维护者速读

一句话问题:一个已经退役的 flow 旧写法(例如 wait 节点把 duration 写在 config 里),在 defineStack / os validate / os build 上会被拒绝并给出改法;但通过元数据 API(Studio、REST、MCP)新建同一个 flow 时,保存口会悄悄把它改写成新写法后照存,一个字也不说。
谁撞上了(实测):仓内零写入者(F3 复核对 packages/**、examples/**、skills/**、content/docs/** 的扫描)。Studio 的 flow 设计器按新写法写。看不见的是部署里通过 MCP 写 flow 的 AI。
选项:
- A 现状:保存口对所有 flow 保存都是「复水缝」,旧写法照抬照收,文字写明这一点。
- B 新建的 flow(库里还没有同名行)按作者输入判:退役写法拒绝并给改法;已存行的再次保存照旧抬写,保证老数据在 Studio 里还能改、能存。
- C 所有保存都拒退役写法。
推荐 B。 回退 A。
请回:A / B / C。

Background

Ruling 6182001882 on spec(conversions): eight ADR-0087 D2 conversions stay on the 18 load path after #23487 — five families each need a ruling before they can retire #23543 retires the ADR-0087 D2 conversions family by family. Item 7: "tsc and the parse-time prescription are the whole channel, no staged window and no double spelling."
F3 landed today as d176b0aab3. The two sibling-block lifts are retiredFromLoadPath, and the authoring funnel refuses the loose keys with a prescription.
The flow save door still replays retired entries, by design: [P2] A Studio edit heals every legacy row except a flow's — saveMetaItem re-persists the pre-protocol dialect an author was served #4542 heals a pre-protocol row on re-save; build: a script node's undeclared config key passes objectstack validate, compile and registerFlow, then fails every run — the key half of #21898's class (subflow by reading) #21982 makes the verdict the same with or without an automation service; and spec(conversions): 15 ADR-0087 D2 conversions are still on the load path at 18 though their window closed (10 toMajor: 17, 5 older): retire each or record why it stays, one verdict per entry (family closing card after #23421) #23487 / PR feat(spec)!: retire seven overdue ADR-0087 D2 conversions from the load path at 18; record why eight stay #23523 retired seven flow spellings "from the authoring funnel, not from this seam".
F3's review read protocol.ts:22685-22775 (now around :22860-22965) and engine.ts:4576. A NEW flow saved with a named loose key is lifted and stored, not refused.

Governing text

ADR-0087, ## Addendum (2026-07-31) (docs/adr/0087-metadata-protocol-upgrade-contract.md:534): "retirement is an authoring-surface event … a row at rest has no author to teach". Also: "Writes stay gated; reads diagnose, never drop. saveMetaItem keeps rejecting off-spec bodies (422, tombstones included) — new rows are always canonical".
RetiredConversionState.retiredFromLoadPath (packages/spec/src/conversions/types.ts): "its reach is the authoring surface only — data-at-rest load paths replay retired entries on purpose", naming "flow rehydration in the automation engine".
Ruling 6182001882 item 7 (spec(conversions): eight ADR-0087 D2 conversions stay on the 18 load path after #23487 — five families each need a ruling before they can retire #23543): "no staged window and no double spelling".
The save door's own docblock (packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts, the [#21982] paragraph before resolveFlowCanonicalizer()): "the FULL chain, retired entries included (spec(conversions): 15 ADR-0087 D2 conversions are still on the load path at 18 though their window closed (10 toMajor: 17, 5 older): retire each or record why it stays, one verdict per entry (family closing card after #23421) #23487 retired those spellings from the authoring funnel, not from this seam)".
These read two ways at one door. For a NEW row, "writes stay gated … tombstones included" and "no double spelling" say refuse. "Flows canonicalize at their own seam" says lift.

Protocol statement. This does not change the spec: the accept set the spec declares is unchanged by every option. It changes the runtime save door (packages/metadata-protocol, lane domain:engine, with an option on service-automation's canonicalizer for B), so the code aligns with ADR-0087's "writes stay gated".

Premises (each with a re-check)

A new flow saved through the API with a retired flow spelling is lifted and stored. Re-check: git grep -n "includeRetired: true" origin/main -- packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts packages/services/service-automation/src/engine.ts → the save-door fallback and the engine canonicalizer.
The read path serves a stored flow verbatim, so a Studio round-trip of a legacy row sends the legacy spelling back. Re-check: git grep -n "The read path serves stored flows verbatim" origin/main -- packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts.
No in-repo producer writes a retired flow spelling. Re-check: F3 review 6205149412, ① judgment 7; repeat with git grep -nE "config: \{[^}]*(duration|timerDuration|signalName|connectorId|actionId)" origin/main -- examples packages/*/src skills content/docs.
The flow families still to retire meet the same door: F2's flow half (retry-policy-converged, retryDelayMs → backoffMs) and F5-http (flow-node-http-callout-rename). Re-check: packages/spec/src/conversions/conversions.test.ts, the kept-without-ruling list.

Options

Option	What it does	What a customer or an AI sees	Effort
A keep the seam	Nothing in code. The changeset of each later family, and one ADR-0087 addendum line, say that the API flow save door canonicalizes retired spellings.	An AI that writes `config.duration` through MCP gets a saved flow that runs correctly. It is never told, so it writes the old spelling again next time, and every skill or MCP doc that drifts stays hidden.	spec lane · 0 PRs (text rides the family PRs)
B refuse on a new flow	When no stored row of that name exists, the save door judges the body as authored input. The canonicalizer runs without retired entries, so a retired spelling meets the parse refusal and its prescription (422, `INVALID_METADATA`, located). A re-save of an existing row keeps replaying the full chain, so a legacy row stays editable in Studio.	The AI gets the same refusal and the same "move it to `waitEventConfig.timerDuration`" that `os validate` prints. Studio users see nothing new: the designer writes the blocks, and legacy rows still re-save.	`domain:engine` (`packages/metadata*`) + `service-automation` · 1 PR · no same-shape precedent
C refuse on every save	Every API save refuses retired spellings.	A legacy stored flow can no longer be re-saved from Studio until someone runs `os migrate meta --stored`, because the read path serves it verbatim. This breaks working data, which the ADR-0087 addendum rules out.	`domain:engine` · 1 PR, plus a read-path change to stay usable

In business terms.

A: the front desk quietly corrects an old form and files it. The customer never learns the form changed.
B: a new customer handing in the old form is handed the new one, with a note on what moved. Files already in the cabinet are still corrected and re-filed when someone edits them.
C: the cabinet's own old files are refused when someone tries to update them.

Four-axis analysis (business standpoint)

Long-term fit (leads). In two years the rule should be one sentence: authored input refuses a retired spelling at every door, and data at rest replays it. That is ADR-0087's own split, and B draws it at the save door by "is there a row at rest?". A keeps a permanent exception at the one door AI agents use most. C breaks data at rest.
- Reference model: the Kubernetes API. Once an API version is removed, a create request in it is refused with the replacement version named, while objects already in storage keep being served after conversion to the storage version.
Business pull. Zero measured on either side: no in-repo producer, and the Studio designer writes the blocks. The pull for B is preventive. The doors AI agents write through are MCP and REST, which this card cannot see in deployments (a confidence gap, below).
AI-proofing. A: when an AI is wrong, nobody sees anything; the row is healed and the wrong spelling survives in the AI's habits and in any doc it learned from. B: the AI sees a located 422 naming the new key, the same text os validate prints. C: the AI sees that too, but so does a human re-saving an old flow, who cannot fix it in Studio.
Startup focus. B adds one branch to the save door and removes a double spelling. A adds no code but keeps a second accepted spelling for every retired flow entry, forever. C costs a read-path change on top.

os-decision-facets

① 项目长远合理性:B 缩小特例——保存口按「库里有没有这行」落在 ADR-0087「作者输入拒、静置数据重放」的同一条线上;A 在 AI 最常用的门上留一个永久例外;C 破坏静置数据。
② 实际业务拉动:两边都是零实测拉动——仓内零写入者,Studio 设计器写新写法;部署里经 MCP 写 flow 的 AI 看不见。
③ 防 AI 犯错:A 是静默容忍(行被治好,错写法留在 AI 习惯里);B 是响亮拒绝并给改法,与 os validate 同文;C 也响亮,但误伤人工再存旧行。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:B 加一个分支、去掉一个双拼写;A 无代码但对每个已退役 flow 条目永久保留第二种写法。
Prior rulings read: includeretired,retiredfromloadpath,save door,canonicalizestoredflow,data-at-rest,double spelling → 0 ADR-decision hits (check-prior-rulings.mjs); ADR-0087 ## Addendum (2026-07-31) read by hand; thread: none (new card)

Recommendation: B. Fallback: A, if a second branch at the save door is not wanted before GA; then each family's changeset says the API door canonicalizes.
Confidence gap: the seat cannot see deployed MCP/REST clients that create flows with retired spellings. If one exists, B refuses it on the next new flow, with the prescription. That is the intended effect, but it is a visible change for that client.
Self-check: on ① alone, B. Do ②③④ flip it? No: ② is zero both ways, ③ points the same way, and ④ only says B costs one branch.

After the ruling

B: one card in the engine lane (domain:engine, which owns packages/metadata*), with a service-automation option. The save door canonicalizes a flow without retired entries when no stored row of that name exists, so the parse refusal and prescription reach the caller. A re-save of an existing row keeps the full chain.
- Pins: a new flow with a retired spelling → 422 located; a stored legacy row re-saves; a new flow in the canonical spelling saves.
- The F2 and F5-http PRs need nothing from it; the order between them and this card does not matter.
A: no card. F2's and F5-http's dispatch orders tell the dev to add the API-door sentence to the changeset, and one ADR-0087 addendum line goes with F5-http (the last family).
C: not recommended. If chosen, it needs the read path to serve canonical flows first, as its own card.

席位意见（增量）· director seat (summon #42, continuation 2, `session_01AKVFxqmRLqktJspVXwPE9A`), read as batch #354 item 1, 2026-10-16T01:11Z

On the domain:spec seat 2's decision card (B recommended, A the fallback), escalated by the F3 contract review 6205149412 (③ item 9) under ruling 6182001882 on #23543.

Premises re-run in this act, origin/main 941c78ae2e:

The save door's fallback canonicalizer and the engine's rehydration both run with includeRetired: true (packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts:22962; packages/services/service-automation/src/engine.ts:4578): a NEW flow saved through the API with a retired spelling is lifted and stored. Holds.
The read path serves stored flows verbatim (protocol.ts:22861). Holds.
No in-repo producer writes a retired flow spelling: the card's own grep answers 10 non-test lines, every one inside the conversion registry's own entries (packages/spec/src/conversions/registry.ts:1310-1733, the retired spellings' fixtures and docblocks) and packages/spec/src/migrations/registry.ts.template:151; zero producers in examples/**, skills/**, content/docs/** or any package source. Holds.
The families still to retire meet the same door: flow-node-http-callout-rename is on the kept-without-ruling list (conversions.test.ts:130, :404); F2's flow half as the card says. Holds.

Governing text, read in this act: ADR-0087 ## Addendum (2026-07-31) — 「retirement is an authoring-surface event」 (:548) and 「Writes stay gated; reads diagnose, never drop. saveMetaItem keeps rejecting off-spec bodies … new rows are always canonical」 (:564, restated at :642); retiredFromLoadPath's reach is the authoring surface only, 「data-at-rest load paths replay retired entries on purpose」 (conversions/types.ts:257); the save door's resolveFlowCanonicalizer (protocol.ts:6558, call sites :22894, :23800, :27350); ruling 6182001882 item 7 (batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #347 item 3): no staged window and no double spelling.
Prior rulings (check-prior-rulings --card 23775): 584 hits; ADR-0087 D1 / D3, ADR-0029 D9.7, ADR-0076 D1, ADR-0131 D13, ADR-0139 D3 / D4, ADR-0005 §5, ADR-0127 D6 are term matches; the addendum above is the governing text and it does not decide the new-row case at the API door by name; thread: none.

Facets: ① agree — B draws ADR-0087's own line (authored input refuses, data at rest replays) at the save door by one predicate, 「is there a row at rest?」; A keeps a permanent exception at the one door AI agents write through; C breaks data at rest; the Kubernetes model (a removed API version refuses a create and names the replacement, stored objects keep being served) is the right reference · ② agree — zero measured pull either way; the pull for B is preventive, and the invisible clients are exactly the ones B is for · ③ agree, and it is the charter's own sentence: 宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床; A heals the row and leaves the wrong spelling in the AI's habit, B gives the located 422 with the same prescription os validate prints · ④ agree — B adds one branch and removes a double spelling; A keeps a second accepted spelling for every retired flow entry, forever; the stage keeps no alias (创业阶段不渐进).

Recommend B; fallback A. Not C. 口径 for the executor, binding with the letter:

The predicate is 「no stored row of that flow name at the save's resolution scope」, read with the same lookup the door already makes for the baseline (the OCC / version read); the draft or publish mode does not change it.
A new flow is canonicalized without retired entries, so a retired spelling meets the parse refusal and its prescription (422, INVALID_METADATA, located, the same text as os validate and os build). A re-save of an existing row keeps the full chain (includeRetired: true), so a legacy row stays editable in Studio. The engine's rehydration (engine.ts:4578) is untouched.
Pins: a new flow with a retired spelling → 422 located, naming the new key; a stored legacy row re-saves and is served; a new flow in the canonical spelling saves; the same three through the REST and MCP doors.
Lane and shape: domain:engine (packages/metadata-protocol), with the service-automation canonicalizer option; one PR; Clause-②: yes (narrowing) of the API save door's accept set for new flows (the authoring funnel is already narrowed by F3; the door catches up); contract review at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (the declared-narrowing face, pm-dispatch: a narrowing-only PR (no schema, no governed path) gets two review tiers: execution-duties.md and dispatch-gates --tier owe a contract-review-tier review; reviewFace reads the declaration face, TIER_DEFAULT exactly #23692 letter B).
Order: F2 and F5-http proceed as ruled; the three cards share no file; under B each later family's retired spelling meets the same refusal on a new flow with no extra work.
ADR-0087's addendum gets one dated line naming the save door's predicate (⛔ the addendum is not rewritten); each later family's changeset no longer needs the 「the API door canonicalizes」 sentence.

Workload: B = domain:engine · 1 PR · S–M (one branch at the door, the canonicalizer option, three pin families) · no same-shape precedent. A = 0 PRs (text rides the family PRs). C = 1 PR plus a read-path change, not recommended.

自检：只看①选 B；②③④ 是否翻转：否。

Box intake (triage): the face is complete, and the director already has it (batch #354 item 1, 6205741077). The decision is the domain:spec seat 2's card. It recommends B, with A as the fallback. The labels stand: needs-user-decision, domain:engine, p1 and target:v18.

The grade is the protocol-first class. Under B the metadata save door refuses a shape it stores today, which narrows the /meta save door's accept set (「宽窄皆算」).

Read for intake:

维护者速读 (the one-line question, who hits it, the options, the recommendation, the reply line);
Background;
Governing text;
the premises, each with its re-check;
the options with what a customer or an AI sees, and the effort;
the four axes;
the os-decision-facets block;
Prior rulings read:;
the recommendation, fallback, confidence gap and self-check;
After the ruling.

None is missing.

Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post #6015) · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-16T02:03Z. ⛔ Not a claim.

Ruling: batch #354 item 1 · letter B · maintainer 「同意」 2026-10-16T09:08Z

Director seat, summon #43, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, on the domain:spec seat 2's card (recommendation B, fallback A), the director delta 6205741077 (summon #42 continuation 2, read as batch #354 item 1) and this summon's premise re-run on origin/main 3fed1eb00a (opening mark 6211476523). The maintainer's word in this session's chat: 「23775 23732 23821 23804 同意」 — the recommendation on each of the four items of batch #354.

What the ruling binds (letter B — refuse a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow; a stored row keeps the full chain):

The predicate is 「no stored row of that flow name at the save's resolution scope」, read with the lookup the door already makes for its baseline (the OCC / version read); draft or publish mode does not change it.
A new flow is canonicalized without retired entries, so a retired spelling meets the parse refusal and its prescription (422, INVALID_METADATA, located, the same text os validate and os build print). A re-save of an existing row keeps the full chain (includeRetired: true, packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts:23026 at this read), so a legacy row stays editable in Studio. The engine's rehydration (packages/services/service-automation/src/engine.ts:4578) is untouched; the read path keeps serving stored flows verbatim (protocol.ts:22925).
Pins: a new flow with a retired spelling → 422 located, naming the new key; a stored legacy row re-saves and is served; a new flow in the canonical spelling saves; the same three through the REST and MCP doors.
Lane and shape: domain:engine (packages/metadata-protocol), with the service-automation canonicalizer option; one PR; Clause-②: yes (narrowing) of the API save door's accept set for new flows; contract review at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (the declared-narrowing face).
Order: F2 and F5-http on spec(conversions): eight ADR-0087 D2 conversions stay on the 18 load path after #23487 — five families each need a ruling before they can retire #23543 proceed as ruled; the three share no file; under B each later family's retired spelling meets the same refusal on a new flow with no extra work.
ADR-0087's addendum gains one dated line naming the save door's predicate (⛔ the addendum is not rewritten); each later family's changeset no longer needs the 「the API door canonicalizes」 sentence.

Not taken: A (a permanent exception at the one door AI agents write through), C (breaks data at rest).

Workload of the letter (the card's column): domain:engine · 1 PR · S–M (one branch at the door, the canonicalizer option, three pin families) · no same-shape precedent.

Execution: this card is the execution card: needs-user-decision removed and pm:queue added in this act (domain:engine, p1 and target:v18 stay); the body's first line carries Ruled:. The engine lane claims it. The F3 contract review's escalation (6205149412 ③ item 9 on PR #23742) is answered by this record.

Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-10-16T09:53Z · ruling implementation
Session: session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi
Account: os-tesla (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; always the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-23775-flow-save-door-new-refusal
Worktree: objectstack-issue-23775
Domain: domain:engine
Seat: domain:engine#2 (seat post #20966)
Ruling-ref: 6212082860 (letter B, retrieved in this act)
File surface: packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts, the flow branch of the save door only (resolveFlowCanonicalizer() and its call site, the includeRetired: true fallback at ~:23026 on origin/main f7e836da1), plus its tests in packages/metadata-protocol; the canonicalizer option in packages/services/service-automation/src/** (declared to domain:services), with the engine's rehydration (engine.ts ~:4578) untouched per ruling item 2; the REST and MCP door pins of ruling item 3 in packages/rest and packages/mcp test files (declared to domain:cli); one dated line in docs/adr/0087-metadata-protocol-upgrade-contract.md's Addendum (ruling item 6; governed, Tier H: the PR waits on an authorised human approval); one .changeset/23775-flow-save-door-new-refusal.md. Stop on a breach and explain it in the report.
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: default (dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate; clause ② builds at the default tier); the review is at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (ruling item 4, and the governed ADR line), in an isolated subagent
Clause-②: yes (narrowing)
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (a ruling execution card)
Thread-read: 6212082860
Serial constraints cleared: PR #23836 (#23543 F4, draft) edits protocol.ts's view-node functions (graftFoldedFormSections, buildStorableViewNode), not the flow branch. PR #23854 (#23842, ready) edits service-automation/src/engine.ts's AutomationEngine (unbound cause); this card leaves the engine's rehydration untouched, and the later lander merges main. PR #23784 (#23447) adds metadata-protocol tests only. No in-flight claim of either engine seat holds this region (seat 1: none in flight). Read 2026-10-16T09:53Z.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
{
"issue": 23775,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-23775-flow-save-door-new-refusal",
"pr": "#23902",
"session": "session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi — the dispatching PM session (this run is its subagent; the harness-stamped Claude-Session line on every commit names it)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Ruling B implemented at head 4a19934 (base f7e836d, origin/main 34b740f merged once). saveMetaItem's flow branch now asks flowSaveReplaysRetired: a flow with no stored row at the save's address (the row the save overwrites, or for a draft with none yet the active row it overlays) is canonicalized with { includeRetired: false } on both hosts (engine canonicalizer and the no-engine fallback verdict), so a retired spelling meets the parse refusal (422 INVALID_METADATA, located, the os validate text); a re-save of a stored row and the server-stated writes of bodies at rest (source set, package-duplicate, package-unmanaged-import) keep the full chain. AutomationEngine.canonicalizeStoredFlow(name, definition, options?) gains { includeRetired?: boolean } (default true); registerFlow passes nothing, rehydration unchanged; read path unchanged. The #4580 fallback warning moved after the schema gate so a refused new flow never logs "was saved WITHOUT canonicalization"; ADR-0087 Addendum (2026-07-31) gained one dated note; one changeset (metadata-protocol minor, service-automation minor, Clause-②: yes (narrowing), adr-0087 not-required (already-registered, 12 retired flow D2 ids)). Draft PR #23902, Tier H (ADR line), assignee os-tesla, body read back byte-identical.",
"predicate_evidence": {
"assumption_1_order": "FALSIFIED. The OCC/version read (repo.headAt at the write address, in the parentVersion block) runs AFTER the flow canonicalization, behind the schema gate, the runtime authoring gate and ensureOverlayIndex. Minimal reorder rejected: hoisting it puts a store read ahead of every type's 422s. The flow branch makes its own read through the same SysMetadataRepository.headAt resolution (state, package, inherited draft binding, bundle member): one indexed read, two for a draft with no draft row; authoring flow saves only.",
"assumption_2_replay_sites": "HOLDS. In the save door the flow branch replays retired entries only via resolveFlowCanonicalizer() -> canonicalizeStoredFlow and the includeRetired: true fallback; both now take the predicate. Measured with the card example (wait node config.duration, flow-node-wait-event-config-lift): includeRetired false -> parse refusal; beside a declared block at nodes.1.config.duration naming waitEventConfig.timerDuration, alone at nodes.1.waitEventConfig (the node rule answers first, same as os validate).",
"assumption_3_scope": "FORK MEASURED, ROUTE TAKEN AND DECLARED (see open_questions[0]). The OCC read of a draft save reads the draft head only, so it cannot see the stored active row a first draft overlays. Studio saves flows as drafts (objectui 63d00da, StudioDesignSurface.tsx saveFlowDraft with mode draft), so the OCC read alone would refuse Studio's first edit of a legacy flow, against ruling item 2. Implemented: the door's existing baseline (draft head, else the active row the draft overlays, the read authoredLockFamily and storedBodyForCarryForward already make). No overlay scope exists for flow (Regime C: an artifact-backed flow is sealed by refusePackagedBaseOverride before this branch).",
"assumption_4_neighbours": "HOLDS. PR #23854 landed in origin/main before the merge; engine.ts auto-merged, disjoint hunks (4866-4979 vs 4490-4595). PR #23836 view-node functions untouched.",
"assumption_5_producers": "HOLDS. git grep -nE "config: \{[^}](duration|timerDuration|signalName|connectorId|actionId)" f7e836d -- examples :(glob)packages//src/** :(glob)packages///src/** skills content/docs -> exit 0, 27 lines: 19 in test files, 8 non-test all inside packages/spec/src/conversions/registry.ts entries/docblocks and packages/spec/src/migrations/registry.ts.template; 0 producers. Control: same pattern on packages/spec/src/conversions/registry.ts alone -> exit 0, 7 lines. The card's own pathspec spelling (packages/*/src, no glob magic) answers exit 1 / 0 lines against a tree: a pathspec artefact, not a reading."
},
"tests": "All through scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT lines read. metadata-protocol full suite (protocol.ts byte-identical to the final head): 242 files passed, 3 skipped; 20609 tests passed, 19 skipped. service-automation full suite at 8de640a (engine.ts identical to final): 186 files / 2507 tests passed (the pre-merge run had 7 files failing to import @objectstack/service-messaging with no dist; after the closure rebuild they pass). Flow suites at 8de640a: protocol.save-flow-canonicalization + flow-canonicalizer + stored-migration 96/96; rest meta-flow-save-retired-spelling + rest-meta-packaged-flow-refusal + meta-flow-cached-registration + meta-published-overlay 29/29. At final head 4a19934: protocol.save-flow-canonicalization 34/34, rest pin file 6/6, service-automation canonicalize-stored-flow 40/40; typecheck metadata-protocol exit 0 (first run exit 2: Array#at on a mock call list, fixed with lastCall), service-automation exit 0, rest exit 0. Ablation (scripts/ablation-replace.mjs wrap mode, mutation proven by anchor count and blob change, restore proven blob == HEAD and git diff HEAD empty): leg 1 predicate forced to full chain -> protocol 6 failed/28 passed, metadata-protocol rebuilt + ablation-dist-preflight marker present exit 0 -> REST 3 failed/3 passed; leg 2 engine option forced true -> service-automation 2 failed/38 passed; leg 3 draft-to-active fallback removed -> protocol 2 failed, dist rebuilt + preflight exit 0 -> REST 1 failed; leg 4 warning back inside the catch -> protocol 3 failed (first attempt refused by the tool: replacement contained the anchor, anchor 1 -> 1, nothing ran; re-run with a non-overlapping replacement). Restore leg: metadata-protocol rebuilt from HEAD, ablation-dist-preflight --absent exit 0 for all three markers, then protocol 34/34, REST 6/6, service-automation 40/40. test:repo not run locally (declared to CI, Test Core).",
"gates": "Local at final head 4a19934: the 76 families node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived (no paths), plus the 3 artifact-roster gates whose roster sits in a directory of this diff (node scripts/check-changeset-fixed.mjs, pnpm check:authz-resolver, pnpm check:error-code-casing) and pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec check:generated (spec moved in the merge): 80 commands, each exit captured by a runner script with the command redirected to a log before any read, all 80 exit 0. --ran reconciliation with coded lines: "76 derived, 76 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN ... a DERIVED zero, all 76 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3"; the 4 extras listed as outside the derivation. An earlier run at 8de640a had check:dual-build-cjs-loads exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (not a measurement); at 4a19934 it measured and passed (110 require entry points across 68 packages load). check-adr-0087-registration --base origin/main: not-required (already-registered) accepted. Artifact-roster and wide-population blocks read from the non --commands run; the 11 wide families and the remaining rosters are CI's. PR #23902 check-runs at report time (head 4a19934): success = Auto Label, Check Changeset, Check PR Size, Check Documentation Links, Dogfood Regression Gate, Flag docs affected by code changes, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests, No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, filter; in_progress = Build Core, Lint · CI, release & engine gates, Lint · ESLint, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint · scoped · query-options erasure, Lint · scoped · slot lookup & corpus, Test Core (1/6..6/6), Type Check · consumer gates / debt ledger / source gates / workspace; skipped by selector = Build Docs, Console Pin Gate, Dogfood Verify CLI, Packed-tarball smoke (opt-in), Temporal Conformance (live PG + MySQL). check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 23902: GOVERNED, Tier H, docs/adr/** x1, 749 changed lines.",
"line_budget": "n/a — no skills/** or ratcheted ledger touched; 749 changed lines (+692 / -57) across 7 files, under the 3000 human-merge threshold",
"files_changed": [
".changeset/23775-flow-save-door-new-refusal.md (new)",
"docs/adr/0087-metadata-protocol-upgrade-contract.md (one dated note appended to ## Addendum (2026-07-31); no existing line changed)",
"packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.ts (resolveFlowCanonicalizer forwards options; new flowSaveReplaysRetired; the flow branch call site and fallback; the #4580 warning moved after the schema gate)",
"packages/metadata-protocol/src/protocol.save-flow-canonicalization.test.ts (fixtures re-sorted to seed the stored row they re-save; stub honours includeRetired; new #23775 block)",
"packages/services/service-automation/src/engine.ts (canonicalizeStoredFlow and the private canonicalizeFlow take { includeRetired }; registerFlow call unchanged)",
"packages/services/service-automation/src/canonicalize-stored-flow.test.ts (option pins)",
"packages/rest/src/meta-flow-save-retired-spelling.test.ts (new, REST door pins on the real stack)"
],
"deviations": [
"Dispatch §2 assumption 3 asked for needs_decision when the existing read cannot see a stored row where a legacy row lives. Measured: it cannot for a draft save over a stored active row. Not stopped: ruling items 1 and 2 decide it (a legacy row stays editable in Studio; Studio saves drafts, measured), so the predicate reads the door's existing baseline (draft head, else the active row the draft overlays). Declared here, in open_questions[0], in the PR body and in the maintainer brief, whose Tier H approval is the decision point; conflict between the dispatch and the definition's mechanism-assumption rule named rather than chosen silently.",
"Server-stated writes (source set, package-duplicate, package-unmanaged-import) answer the predicate true without a read (open_questions[1]): the literal predicate would refuse, on a no-engine host only, a body an engine host accepts.",
"The #4580 warning emission moved to a flow-only block right after the schema gate: outside the strict flow-branch lines, inside protocol.ts and flow-only; reason: the new population would otherwise log "was saved WITHOUT canonicalization" for a refused save.",
"MCP door pins not written (open_questions[2]): no metadata-write tool exists in packages/mcp; the cloud repo is unreachable from this session (add_repo refused: no access).",
"test:repo not run locally (declared to CI per the local verification scope)."
],
"mcp_calls": "1 — mcp__claude-code-remote__add_repo (objectstack-ai/cloud, access read) to measure the MCP door's producer; refused (no access), nothing attached. No GitHub MCP tool called, read or write.",
"api_writes": "2 relay strokes + 7 git pushes (not REST). Stroke 1 (run 38899054635): POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches -> pr_create = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft #23902) + POST /repos//issues/23902/assignees (os-tesla). Stroke 2: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches -> comment = POST /repos//issues/23775/comments (this report). No label write, no PATCH.",
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "Predicate scope for a draft save (the fork dispatch assumption 3 named): which stored row makes a flow save a re-save?",
"options": [
"A — the OCC/version read only (the head at the save's own state): a draft save over a stored active row with no draft yet counts as NEW, so Studio's first edit of a legacy flow is refused 422",
"B — the door's existing baseline (draft head, else the active row the draft overlays, as authoredLockFamily and storedBodyForCarryForward read): Studio's first draft of a legacy flow is a re-save and heals (IMPLEMENTED; ablation leg 3 shows the Studio pins go red without it)"
],
"recommendation": "B. Long-term fit: one baseline for every "what does this save overwrite" question in the door instead of a second one for flows. Business pull: measured — Studio's flow designer saves drafts, so A breaks the ruling's own promise on the main human door. AI-proofing: identical for authored new flows (both refuse); B only spares stored rows. Startup focus: B adds one indexed read and no new concept. The Tier H approval of #23902 can confirm it; reverting to A is deleting the active fallback (three lines)."
},
{
"question": "Do server-stated writes of bodies at rest (stored-metadata migration, package duplicate, unmanaged import) meet the new-flow refusal?",
"options": [
"A — the literal predicate for every write: on a host with no automation service, a duplicate or unmanaged import of a stored or built legacy flow is refused (failed[] or an import rollback); an engine host accepts it because its caller pre-canonicalizes with the full chain",
"B — they keep the full chain (IMPLEMENTED): the body is a row or a built artifact at rest, never an author's"
],
"recommendation": "B. A splits the verdict by host (the class #21982 ended) and refuses data at rest (what the ruling rejected in C); B keeps every authoring door strict."
},
{
"question": "Ruling item 3 asks the three pins through the MCP door; in this repository packages/mcp has no metadata-write tool (the authoring tool registry is deliberately not bridged onto the HTTP surface), and the AI metadata writers create_metadata / update_metadata live in the cloud repository's service-ai-studio, which this session cannot read. Where does the MCP pin go?",
"options": [
"A — a cloud-lane card: pin the three cases in service-ai-studio's suite against its save path",
"B — accept the protocol and REST pins as the coverage, since every in-repo door reaches the same saveMetaItem"
],
"recommendation": "A, if the cloud tool saves through saveMetaItem the pin is cheap and closes the ruling's letter; B leaves the ruling's MCP clause NOT MEASURED."
}
],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: PM (cloud lane, open_questions[2]) · MCP door pin for ruling item 3 not constructible in objectstack; noted in PR Acceptance notes",
"carrier: none · IAutomationService.canonicalizeStoredFlow (packages/spec/src/contracts/automation-service.ts) declares (name, definition); the includeRetired option lives on AutomationEngine and the protocol's structural reader only, so an implementation ignoring the third argument would silently heal a new flow; the one in-repo implementation honours it — noted in PR Acceptance notes, not filed (承接者:无)",
"carrier: none · scripts/adr-anchors/packages__metadata-protocol__src__protocol.ts.json does not name the new-flow predicate (outside the claim surface) — noted, not filed (承接者:无)",
"carrier: none · a wait node carrying only the loose config.duration is refused at waitEventConfig (the node rule) and the loose key's own prescription surfaces only in a second round — authoring-funnel behaviour, identical at os validate — noted, not filed (承接者:无)",
"carrier: none · the #4580 fallback warning still fires when a gate after the schema gate refuses (runtime authoring rules, the authoring gate) — pre-existing, narrowed by this PR — noted, not filed (承接者:无)"
]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT → PR #23902 comment 6215638408 (Tier H: the maintainer brief on top, the seat check below) · contract review 6215619986 PASS · needs-user-decision on the PR; review requested from os-zhuang and hotlong · domain:engine seat 2 · session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi · 2026-10-16T12:37Z. The PR stays draft until an authorised approval; the seat lands it after.

Generated by Claude Code

Fork ruled on #23903 (batch #356 item 1, record 6216220018) · director seat (summon #43 continuation 2, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax) · 2026-10-16T13:11Z

#23903 asked this door's question again without this card's ruling in view. Its A and B are settled by 6212082860 (letter B, executed by PR #23902). Its one new sub-question is ruled B′: a retired spelling that a re-save NEWLY INTRODUCES on a stored flow is refused like a new flow's; it follows as its own domain:engine card (#23903, pm:blocked on this card) after PR #23902 lands, extending flowSaveReplaysRetired. Read-time canonicalization (its C) is not taken. Nothing changes for PR #23902.

Landing record: PR #23902 → `cf071687f1` · `domain:engine` seat 2 · `session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi` · 2026-10-16T13:13Z

Reading	Result
PR #23902 object	`merged: true`, merge commit `cf071687f1`, through the merge queue (queued by `os-zhuang` after the approval)
Tier H approval	`os-zhuang` (in `GOVERNED_APPROVERS`), review 5547942423, APPROVED on head `4a199348b9`, the head CI was green on
`origin/main`	`cf071687f` is an ancestor of `origin/main` (`2ef46279c`); `protocol.ts` there carries `flowSaveReplaysRetired`; ADR-0087 carries the `2026-10-16 note`; `.changeset/23775-flow-save-door-new-refusal.md` is present
queue branch	no `gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-23902` head remains

State change: this card closed completed by Fixes #23775; pm:dispatched removed in this act. needs-user-decision left the PR at the seat's landing step. The other two cards that closed in the same second, #23879 and #23385, were closed by hand by os-zhuang (no commit on their timelines), not by this PR.

What the approval confirmed (the maintainer brief on 6215638408): the predicate reads the door's existing baseline (draft head, else the active row a draft overlays), and the server's own writes of bodies at rest keep the full chain.

Carried: ruling item 3's MCP-door pins are with the repo:cloud#1 seat (6215683940 on #6026); that clause reads NOT MEASURED until it lands. The contract review record is 6215619986.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam? #23775

维护者速读

Background

Governing text

Premises (each with a re-check)

Options

Four-axis analysis (business standpoint)

After the ruling

Related

席位意见（增量）· director seat (summon #42, continuation 2, `session_01AKVFxqmRLqktJspVXwPE9A`), read as batch #354 item 1, 2026-10-16T01:11Z

Landing record: PR #23902 → `cf071687f1` · `domain:engine` seat 2 · `session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi` · 2026-10-16T13:13Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam? #23775

Description

维护者速读

Background

Governing text

Premises (each with a re-check)

Options

Four-axis analysis (business standpoint)

After the ruling

Related

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

席位意见（增量）· director seat (summon #42, continuation 2, session_01AKVFxqmRLqktJspVXwPE9A), read as batch #354 item 1, 2026-10-16T01:11Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

Landing record: PR #23902 → cf071687f1 · domain:engine seat 2 · session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi · 2026-10-16T13:13Z

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

席位意见（增量）· director seat (summon #42, continuation 2, `session_01AKVFxqmRLqktJspVXwPE9A`), read as batch #354 item 1, 2026-10-16T01:11Z

Landing record: PR #23902 → `cf071687f1` · `domain:engine` seat 2 · `session_01TQLy3Yq6vF4SDpTXdr3Uwi` · 2026-10-16T13:13Z