[Decision] the >5000-line SIZE limb counts a pure deletion the maintainer already ruled (ruling 208), and the Tier H wait for an authorized APPROVED has no clock — PR #22002 idles green #22051

Filing gate: ② a decision only the maintainer can make — whether the over-5,000-line SIZE limb of the human-merge predicate keeps counting a pure deletion the maintainer already ruled (ruling 208, 「同意」), and whether a Tier H terminal that waits on an authorized APPROVED gets a clock. Filed by domain:skills seat 2 (seat post #19287, session_0181E4ZeZmWyknawnauxD2CE) on the maintainer's instruction in this session, verbatim: 「创建卡片,暂时不派发。」 ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
Reader: the maintainer (the needs-user-decision inbox); after the ruling, the domain:skills seat executes per 「裁后执行」 below.
Dedupe: REST listings, closed included (labels=tooling since 2026-09-07: 417; labels=needs-user-decision since 2026-09-07: 2; every issue updated since 2026-10-01: 625; domain:skills since 2026-09-23: 109; union 1,030) grepped for 5000|human-merge|size limb|deletion → 6 hits, 2 relevant and both closed: #19344 (the limb prescribed a human merge the ruleset made unreachable) and #20153 (an authorized APPROVED lifts the limb). Neither asks what this card asks. approval SLA|Tier H wait|escalation → 0 relevant.

维护者速读

问题:一张按裁决执行的纯删除 PR(#22002:删 6,528 行的只报告仪器,外加 17 行改注释)因超过 5,000 行阈值进入 Tier H 终局,全绿之后空等授权 APPROVED 约 12 小时;这个终局本身没有时钟。要裁两件事:阈值要不要给「已裁的纯删除」开口;等待要不要有升级点。

推荐:D(两样都不改)。阈值不开口,因为「删除不算行」正是 AI 顺手删门禁的温床;不加时钟,因为 needs-user-decision 收件箱已经是你消化的节奏,今天只是第一次撞上(n=1)。

你要做的:回一个字母 A / B / C / D。选 D 本卡即关、规则文本不动;选别的,席位按「裁后执行」段派发。

Governing text

• AGENTS.md:510-512: "(c) a PR whose changed lines exceed 5,000 (additions + deletions, …) … the owning seat, or a human merge. Read the PR's file list (get_files), its author and its size before …".
• scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs:187, maintainer verbatim (2026-09-18): 「还有应该完善skills,修改代码量超过某个行数(比如5000)就应该人工审核。」; :255 (2026-09-27, governed guard: an authorized APPROVED review lifts the >5000-line SIZE limb, as it already lifts Tier H paths #20153): 「所以阈值写死成 5000 行 , 维护者已经批准了就是可以合并。」; :1105 HUMAN_MERGE_LINE_THRESHOLD = 5000; header: "generated files INCLUDED — no exemption for regen artefacts, docs builds or reverts".
• .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md:60: 「Tier H(其余受管面)者:四件套留 draft 等人批,⛔ 不翻正式不入队;获授权批准后认领席落地。」
• .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:269: 「卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡;收件箱由维护者定期消化,⛔ 不 assign 推送。」; SKILL.md:275: 「每场召唤把带席内 ACCEPT 的受管草稿呈为一批 ≤5 行决裁;批准与合并仍是维护者的点击。」
• .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md:7-8 (ruling 208: report-only instruments get no dev; their only in-flight work is deletion).
• Protocol statement: options A–C change the protocol (the SIZE predicate and/or the Tier H wait); D changes nothing.

前提(每条带 re-check 命令)

1. PR chore(pm): delete report-only check-widening-tells.mjs and its wiring (ruling 208) #22002 is 6,580 changed lines (+17 / −6,563), 6,528 of them one deleted file. — gh api repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/22002 --jq '"\(.additions)/\(.deletions)/\(.changed_files)"'
2. The deletion was ruled before the PR existed (card pm tooling: delete scripts/pm/check-widening-tells.mjs (report-only, judges no PR; ruling 208's only in-flight work is deletion — ruled by the maintainer) #21959 provenance: decision batch 2 item 2, verbatim 「同意」; ruling 208). — gh api repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/21959 --jq .body | grep -c '「同意」'
3. The PR is ACCEPTed (6019427107), every check on fab444b4 is green, and it has 0 reviews. — gh api repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/22002/reviews --jq length
4. No rule gives the Tier H wait a clock or an escalation; the director batch runs only when the maintainer convenes it. — grep -n -E "小时|hours|SLA|clock|超时" .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md | wc -l → 0
5. Frequency of ruled pure deletions over 5,000 lines: 1 in the window read (this PR). — gh api 'repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls?state=all&per_page=100' --jq '[.[] | select(.deletions > 5000 and .additions < 100)] | length'

一句话问题

一个人已经点头删掉的文件,删掉它的 PR 还要不要等这个人第二次点头;等的时候要不要有人被叫号。

选项 × 真实代价

业务含义直译

A = 「删东西不用复核」;B = 「排队有叫号」;C = 两者都要;D = 「维护者消化收件箱的节奏就是 SLA」。

四轴论证(从业务立场)

• 实际业务需求:实测拉动 n=1(chore(pm): delete report-only check-widening-tells.mjs and its wiring (ruling 208) #22002),代价是一张 PR 的等待时间,零产品影响;ruling 208 类删除是普查表里的有限集合,不会成规模。零拉动 ⇒ 默认 defer。
• 项目长远合理性:SIZE 判据今天是一个数、一个运算(additions + deletions > 5000,生成物不豁免、revert 不豁免)。A 给它开第一个口子,「revert 为什么不豁免」必然跟来——扩大特例与契约增生。B / D 不碰判据。
• 防 AI 犯错:删除是 AI 最容易「顺手做大」的动作,而删门禁、删测试在 CI 上不响亮(门禁只减不增正是靠人眼守)。A 让这类错误静默通过;B / D 让它停在 draft 等人,是响亮拒绝。
• 创业阶段不扩散:新增时钟或升级机制是新的协议零件;维护者收件箱是既有机制。D 不增零件;B 增一行协议;A 增一个例外分支。

推荐 + 回退 + 置信缺口

推荐 D(两样都不改)。回退 B:若维护者认为等待不可见才是真问题,只加「收件箱卡上写 idle 小时数 + 呈进下一场决裁批」一行,不加自动升级,不加门禁。置信缺口:只测了本车道这一张 Tier H 等待,看不见其他车道的等待分布;看不见维护者消化收件箱的实际周期。
自检行:只看①选 D;②③④ 是否翻转:否。
终态句:两年后这个判据仍是一个数、一个运算,人工审核的边界由人决定而不是由例外表决定;参照 GitHub 自身的 required reviews,也不按删除行豁免。

os-decision-facets
① 项目长远合理性:D 保持单一判据零特例;A 开第一个口子,revert 与生成物的豁免会跟着来。
② 实际业务拉动:n=1(#22002,等约 12 小时),零产品影响;零拉动默认 defer。
③ 防 AI 犯错:大删除停在 draft 等人是响亮拒绝;删除免审会让删门禁静默通过。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:D 零新零件;B 一行协议;A 一个新例外分支。
Prior rulings read: human-merge,5000,size,deletion,approval,draft,governed → 51 ADR / 31 AGENTS.md / 334 spec term hits, 10 ADR candidates, none on this limb; ADR none; thread: #20153, #19344
推荐 D;选项 A / B / C / D;自检「只看①选 D;②③④ 是否翻转:否」。置信缺口:仅本车道一例;收件箱周期未测。

裁后执行

• D:本卡以 completed 关闭,规则文本不动;PR chore(pm): delete report-only check-widening-tells.mjs and its wiring (ruling 208) #22002 继续等 APPROVED。
• B:一张 domain:skills 卡改 landing-operations.md 的 Tier H 段与座位贴模板(idle 小时行、呈批动作),无工具改动;N 由维护者在回批里定(建议默认 24 小时)。
• A / C:一张卡改 check-governed-merges.mjs 的 SIZE 判据与自测、check-governed-queue-guard.mjs 的同源导入([finding] skills/*/references/_index.md is generator-owned (gen:skill-refs) yet sits inside the skills/** governed-merge fence — every spec PR touching an indexed headline is forced to carry a governed-surface file #11705 单一推导)、AGENTS.md:510 与 SKILL.md 对应行;维护者须在回批里写出豁免的精确判据(例如 deletions-only && additions ≤ 100),席位不代拟。

Related: PR #22002 · #21959 · #20153 · #19344 · ruling 208 (instrument-discipline.md:7-8).

Generated by Claude Code